振动水翼低阶振型的阻尼特性试验研究

doi:10.3901/JME.2022.05.108

机械工程学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (5): 108-118.doi: 10.3901/JME.2022.05.108

扫码分享

振动水翼低阶振型的阻尼特性试验研究

曾永顺¹, 齐鑫¹, 姚志峰^1,2, 王静竹³, 王一伟³, 王福军^1,2

1. 中国农业大学水利与土木工程学院北京 100083;
2. 北京市供水管网系统安全与节能工程技术研究中心北京 100083;
3. 中国科学院力学研究所流固耦合系统力学重点实验室北京 100190

收稿日期:2020-08-10 修回日期:2021-12-05 出版日期:2022-03-05 发布日期:2022-04-28
通讯作者: 姚志峰(通信作者),男,1984年出生,博士,副教授,博士研究生导师。主要研究方向为水力机械流动理论、泵站水动力学。E-mail:yzf@cau.edu.cn E-mail:yzf@cau.edu.cn
作者简介:曾永顺,男,1993年出生,博士研究生。主要研究方向为水力机械流固耦合。E-mail:yongshunzeng@cau.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(51879266,51839001);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2020TC116);中国农业大学研究生自主创新研究基金(2020XYZC03A)资助项目。

Experimental Investigation on Damping Characteristics of a Vibrating Hydrofoil in Low-Order Modes

CENG Yong-shun¹, QI Xin¹, YAO Zhi-feng^1,2, WANG Jing-zhu³, WANG Yi-wei³, WANG Fu-jun^1,2

1. College of Water Resources & Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083;
2. Beijing Engineering Research Center of Safety and Energy Saving Technology for Water Supply Network System, Beijing 100083;
3. Key Laboratory for Mechanics in Fluid Solid Coupling Systems, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190

Received:2020-08-10 Revised:2021-12-05 Online:2022-03-05 Published:2022-04-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 水力机械过流部件与环境流体相互作用产生的附加质量和阻尼效应，对其动力响应特性有显著影响。本研究重点测量了空气和水中振动水翼前四阶振型的阻尼特性参数。通过在水翼前缘嵌入一个压电片施加激励，采用激光测振仪和水翼尾缘的压电片同时获取振动响应信号并相互校准，构建了叶片式结构模态参数测试系统。将压电片信号作为基准信号，同步激光测振仪的多点响应信号，提出了一种单振型测量方法。重点分析了对数衰减法、希尔伯特变换法、共振放大法、半功率带宽法和圆圈拟合法五种常用的阻尼比识别方法。结果表明：五种阻尼比识别方法的精度和不确定度在同一量级，综合比较后认为，对于自由振动响应信号推荐采用对数衰减法，强迫振动响应信号则推荐采用半功率带宽法；空气和水中在同一振型条件下，水翼不同位置点的阻尼比基本保持不变，最大偏差为5.8%；相比空气环境，水中水翼各阶固有频率下降率在6.49%～26.73%之间，各阶模态对应的振型未见明显差异；水中振动水翼阻尼比变化趋势依赖于具体振型，其中，1阶弯曲、1阶扭转和1阶弯扭振型对应的阻尼比分别增大13.09%、8.61%和14.34%，但2阶弯曲振型对应的阻尼比则减小16.25%。

关键词: 水力机械, 水翼, 阻尼识别方法, 阻尼比, 振型

Abstract: Added mass and damping effects are induced by the fluid structure interaction（FSI） between submerged structure of hydraulic machines and the environmental fluid, which have significant influences on the vibration characteristics of submerged structures. The damping characteristic parameters of the first four-order modes of a vibrating hydrofoil in air and water are measured,based on experimental tests. By inserting a piezoelectric patch（PZTp） on the leading edge of the hydrofoil to apply excitation, a laser Doppler vibrometer（LDV） and another PZTp（on the trailing edge） are used to simultaneously obtain vibration response signals and calibrate each other, and then a modal parameter testing system is constructed. A single mode shape measurement method is proposed by taking the signal obtained by the PZTp as the reference signal and synchronizing the multi-point response signals obtained by the LDV. Five kinds of commonly used damping ratio identification methods including logarithmic decay method, Hilbert transform method, resonance amplification method, half power bandwidth method and circle fitting method are analyzed. The results show that the accuracies and uncertainties of the five damping ratio identification methods are at the same level. After comprehensive comparisons, the logarithmic decay method is recommended for the free vibration response signal, and the half power bandwidth method is recommended for the forced vibration response signal. At the same vibration mode in air and water, the damping ratios of different measurement positions of the hydrofoil are nearly the same with the maximum deviation of 5.8%. The natural frequency reduction rates of hydrofoil in water range from 6.49%-26.73% as compare to air condition, and no difference in the mode shapes of test modes is observed. The damping characteristics of the vibrating hydrofoil in water are depended on the specific modes.Specifically, the damping ratios of the first bending, first torsional and first bending-torsion combined modes in water are all higher（13.09%, 8.61% and 14.34%, respectively） than those in air. However, the damping ratio of the second bending mode in water is 16.25% lower than that in air.

Key words: hydraulic machinery, hydrofoil, damping identification method, damping ratio, mode shape

中图分类号:

TV136

曾永顺, 齐鑫, 姚志峰, 王静竹, 王一伟, 王福军. 振动水翼低阶振型的阻尼特性试验研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(5): 108-118.

CENG Yong-shun, QI Xin, YAO Zhi-feng, WANG Jing-zhu, WANG Yi-wei, WANG Fu-jun. Experimental Investigation on Damping Characteristics of a Vibrating Hydrofoil in Low-Order Modes[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2022, 58(5): 108-118.

参考文献

[1] 姚志峰,王福军,杨敏,等.叶轮形式对双吸离心泵压力脉动特性影响试验研究[J].机械工程学报,2011,47(12):133-137. YAO Zhifeng,WANG Fujun,YANG min,et al. Effect of impeller type on pressure fluctuation in double-suction centrifugal pump[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2011,47(12):133-137.
[2] 周佩剑,王福军,姚志峰.离心泵叶轮旋转失速团特性分析[J].水利学报,2015(9):124-130. ZHOU Peijian,WANG Fujun,YAO Zhifeng. Analysis of rotating stall cells in an impeller of a centrifugal impeller[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,2015(9):124-130.
[3] 庞立军,吕桂萍,钟苏,等.水轮机固定导叶的涡街模拟与振动分析[J].机械工程学报,2011,47(22):163-170. PANG Lijun,LÜ Guiping,ZHONG Su,et al. Vortex shedding simulation and vibration analysis of stay vanes of hydraulic turbine[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2011,47(22):163-170.
[4] TRIVEDI C. A review on fluid structure interaction in hydraulic turbines:A focus on hydrodynamic damping[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis,2017,77:1-22.
[5] SOLTANI D,AIDANPAA J,ENGSTROM F,et al. A review of available methods for the assessment of fluid added mass,damping,and stiffness with an emphasis on hydraulic turbines[J]. Applied Mechanics Review,2018,70(5):050801
[6] ROTH S,CALMON M,FARHAT M,et al. Hydrodynamic damping identification from an impulse response of a vibration blade[C]//3rd IAHR International Meeting of the Workgroup on Cavitation and Dynamic Problems in Hydraulic Machinery and Systems,October 14-16,2009,Brno,Czech Republic.
[7] XIU H,DAVIS R,ROMEO R. Edge clearance effects on the added mass damping of beams submerged in viscous fluids[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures,2018,83:194-217.
[8] PRESAS A,VALENTIN D,EGUSQUIZA E,et al. Accurate determination of the frequency response function of submerged and confined structures by using PZT-patches[J]. Sensors,2017,17(3):660.
[9] PRESAS A,VALERO C,HUANG X,et al. Analysis of the dynamic response of pump-turbine runners-Part I:experiment[C]//IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing,2012,15(5):052015.
[10] YAO Z,WANG F,DREYER M,et al. Effect of trailing edge shape on hydrodynamic damping for a hydrofoil[J]. Journal of Fluids&Structures,2014,51:189-198.
[11] SEELEY C,COUTU A,MONETTE C,et al. Characterization of hydrofoil damping due to fluid-structure interaction using piezocomposite actuators[J]. Smart Materials&Structures,2012,21(3):35027-35035.
[12] COUTU A,SEELEY C,MONETTE C,et al. Damping measurements in flowing water[C]//IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science,2012,15(6):062060.
[13] TORRE O,ESCALER X,EGUSQUIZA E,et al. Experimental investigation of added mass effects on a hydrofoil under cavitation conditions[J]. Journal of Fluids&Structures,2013,39(5):173-187.
[14] LIU X,ZHOU L,ESCALER X,et al. Numerical simulation of added mass effects on a hydrofoil in cavitating flow using acoustic fluid-structure interaction[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering,2017,139(4):1-8.
[15] PRESAS A,VALENTIN D,VALERO C,et al. Experimental measurements of the natural frequencies and mode shapes of rotating disk-blades-disk assemblies from the stationary frame[J]. Applied Sciences,2019,9(18):3864.
[16] BERGAN C,SOLEMSLIE B,ØSTBY P,et al. Hydrodynamic damping of a fluttering hydrofoil in high-speed flows[J] International Journal of Fluid Machinery and Systems,2018, 11(2):146-153.
[17] HOSOYA N,KAJIWARA I,UMENAI K,et al. Dynamic characterizations of submerged structures using noncontact vibration tests based on nanosecond laser ablation in water:evaluation of passive vibration suppression with damping materials[J]. Journal of Vibration and Control,2018,24(16):3714-3725.
[18] 曾永顺,姚志峰,杨正军,等.非对称尾部形状水翼水力阻尼识别方法研究[J].水利学报,2019,50(7):864-873. ZENG Yongshun,YAO Zhifeng,YANG Zhengjun,et al. Study on hydrodynamic damping identification for an asymmetrical trailing edge shape hydrofoil[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,2019,50(7):864-873.
[19] JACOBSON K,KIVIAHO J,KENNEDY G,et al. Evaluation of time-domain damping identification methods for flutter-constrained optimization[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures,2019, 87:174-188.
[20] TORRE O,ESCALER X,EGUSQUIZA E,et al. Numerical and experimental study of a nearby solid boundary and partial submergence effects on hydrofoil added mass[J]. Computers&Fluids,2014,91:1-9.
[21] LIANG Q,RODRIGUEZ C,EGUSQUIZA E,et al. Numerical simulation of fluid added mass effect on a Francis turbine runner[J]. Computers&Fluids,2007,36(6):1106-1118.
[22] KANG H,LEE K,KIM J,et al. Damping measurement for a steam generator tube with gap support in air and in water[C]//Transactions,SMiRT-23,August 10-14,2015,Manchester,United Kingdom.
[23] 韩巧丽,邢为特,李汪灏,等.不同介质中海流机叶片的模态试验分析[J].太阳能学报,2019,4(1):285-290. HAN Qiaoli,XING Weite,LI Wanghao,et al. Experimental modal analysis of blade in different media[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica,2019,4(1):285-290.
[24] RICARDO M. Free surface effects on the free vibration of full immersed cantilevered composite plates[R]. Lausanne:Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne,2013.
[25] SILVA D. Vibration:fundamentals and practice[M]. Boca Raton:CRC Press,2000.
[26] ZENG Y,YAO Z,GAO J,et al. Numerical investigation of added mass and hydrodynamic damping on a blunt trailing edge hydrofoil[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering,2019,141(8):081105.
[27] 丁建明,林建辉,赵洁,等.机车车辆运动稳定性动态检测的时变阻尼比方法[J].机械工程学报,2015,51(6):109-117. DING Jianming,LIN Jianhui,ZHAO Jie,et al. Dynamic detection of vehicle motion stability based on time-varying damping ratio[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2015,51(6):109-117.
[28] FABIEN Q,Free surface effects on the free vibration of partially immersed cantilevered composite plates[R]. Lausanne:Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne,2013.
[29] LEVY S,Fluid-structure interactions:mechanical response of a partially immersed hydrofoil[R]. Lausanne:Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne,2013.

振动水翼低阶振型的阻尼特性试验研究

Experimental Investigation on Damping Characteristics of a Vibrating Hydrofoil in Low-Order Modes

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	胡峰, 赵文涛, 黄琰, 俞建成, 赵宝德, 崔健. 三维被动摆动水翼对波浪滑翔机推进动力的性能研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(8): 243-249.
[2]	杨晟, 李凡松, 石怀龙, 邬平波. 车体垂弯振型节点位置对其弹性振动的影响[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(22): 210-218.
[3]	姜世杰, 史银芳, SIYAJEU Yannick, 赵春雨. 路径宽度对FDM薄板固有特性的影响机理研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(15): 226-232.
[4]	郝加封, 张敏弟, 付细能. 涂层对绕水翼云状空化的运动特性及动力特性影响的试验研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(18): 170-179.
[5]	周锋, 顾临怡, 陈宗恒. 比例减压阀控桨系统的模型线性化及稳定性分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2017, 53(14): 187-194.
[6]	张贤彪, 王东, 苏振中. 大型分体式磁轴承电动机系统定子模态分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(8): 1-7.
[7]	丁建明, 林建辉, 赵洁, 尹燕利. 机车车辆运动稳定性动态检测的时变阻尼比方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2015, 51(6): 109-117.
[8]	欧阳小平, 李磊, 方旭, 杨华勇. 共振型液压脉动衰减器研究现状及展望[J]. 机械工程学报, 2015, 51(22): 168-175.
[9]	方建士, 黎亮, 章定国, 徐振钦. 基于刚柔耦合动力学的旋转悬臂梁的频率转向与振型转换特性[J]. 机械工程学报, 2015, 51(17): 59-65.
[10]	王超新, 孙靖雅, 张志谊, 华宏星. 最优阻尼三参数隔振器设计和试验[J]. 机械工程学报, 2015, 51(15): 90-96.
[11]	徐宁;任尊松;马尚. 带集中质量及转动惯量的弹性车轴模型及振动分析[J]. , 2014, 50(2): 125-131.
[12]	杨帆;刘超;汤方平;周济人. 斜轴伸泵装置水动力数值计算与模型试验[J]. , 2012, 48(18): 152-159.
[13]	尹必行;康灿. 绕水翼空化流场的数值模拟与试验研究[J]. , 2012, 48(16): 146-151.
[14]	高书娜;邓兆祥. 车身低噪声设计新方法[J]. , 2012, 48(12): 96-102.
[15]	臧献国;于德介;姚凌云;郭建文. 基于模态振型形状优化的结构声辐射控制[J]. , 2010, 46(9): 73-78.