涂层对绕水翼云状空化的运动特性及动力特性影响的试验研究

doi:10.3901/JME.2018.18.170

机械工程学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (18): 170-179.doi: 10.3901/JME.2018.18.170

• 可再生能源与工程热物理 • 上一篇下一篇

扫码分享

涂层对绕水翼云状空化的运动特性及动力特性影响的试验研究

郝加封¹, 张敏弟¹, 付细能²

1. 北京理工大学机械与车辆工程学院北京 100081;
2. 洪都航空工业集团南昌 330024

收稿日期:2017-03-02 修回日期:2017-12-26 出版日期:2018-09-20 发布日期:2018-09-20
通讯作者: 张敏弟(通信作者),女,1971年出生,博士,副教授,博士研究生导师。主要研究方向为空化,水下航行器减阻。E-mail:zmd1971@bit.edu.cn
作者简介:郝加封,男,1992年出生。主要研究方向为绕水翼空化流动。E-mail:2580657296@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（51106009）。

Experimental Study of Coatings' Effect on Kinetics and Dynamics in Cloud Cavitating Flows

HAO Jiafeng¹, ZHANG Mindi¹, FU Xineng²

1. School of Mechanical and Vehicular Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081;
2. Hongdu Aviation Industry Group, Nanchang 330024

Received:2017-03-02 Revised:2017-12-26 Online:2018-09-20 Published:2018-09-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用多种试验技术方法讨论了不同涂层水翼云状空化的空穴形态、运动特性和动力特性。三种涂层分别为光滑环氧涂层（模型A）、光滑氟碳涂层（模型B）和表面粗糙氟碳涂层（模型C）。研究表明：①涂层的粗糙度和材质共同影响绕水翼云状空化流动特性；②不同涂层水翼的空穴形态不同：附着在模型A的空穴厚度更小，空穴长度随时间变化更快，空穴脱落周期更短。且模型A透明空穴区透明性更好，变化范围最小，模型B其次，模型C最大。③涂层影响云状空化运动特性：绕不同涂层水翼的局部低速区和涡量区位置的各不相同导致透明空泡堆积位置也不同，局部正涡量区位置的不同导致出现旋涡水汽混合区位置的差异，模型A的旋涡水汽混合区位置距离水翼头部最近，B其次，C最远；④与粗糙度相比，涂层材质对绕水翼云状空化的动力特性影响更为明显。不同涂层水翼升力系数急剧下降区不同，升力的主导频率也不同，但与云空化流动结构中空化的变化周期相一致，此外绕模型B空穴转变为云状空化的空化数比模型A、C的要小，因此模型B涂层能够抑制云状空化发生。

关键词: 空化, 流动特性, 水翼, 涂层

Abstract: Different experimental techniques are combined to carry out the flow patterns, kinetic and dynamic characteristics of cloud cavitation around three different coating hydrofoils and discuss the influence of different coatings. Three different coatings are smooth epoxy coating(Hydrofoil A), smooth fluorocarbon coating(Hydrofoil B) and rough fluorocarbon coating(Hydrofoil C). The results show four main phenomena. Firstly, coatings' roughness and material both effect the flow characteristics of cloud cavitation. Secondly, different coatings have different flow patterns. The comparison among cavities over hydrofoils with three different coatings verifies that Hydrofoil A has thinner thickness of attached cavity, more transparent cavity region, larger growth rate of cloud cavity and shorter period. Thirdly, coating effects the kinetic characteristics of cloud cavitation. For different coatings, positions of local low-speed region are different, resulting in positions of accumulation of transparent bubble are different, the same to the local positive vorticity region for the reason of the vortex vapor mixing region. In terms of variation range of transparent cavity, Hydrofoil A has smaller range than Hydrofoil B and C. In terms of positions of vortex vapor mixing region, Hydrofoil A has the shortest distance to the leading edge. Fourthly, compared with roughness, material of coating has more obvious effect on the dynamic characteristics of cloud cavitation. The dominant frequency of lifts of hydrofoils with different coating is different in cloud cavitation, which consistent with changes of cavitation flow structure. When develops into cloud cavitation, Hydrofoil B has the lowest cavitation number among three hydrofoils. So restriction on cloud cavitation generated by Hydrofoil B is stranger than Hydrofoil A and C.

Key words: cavitation, coating, flow characteristics, hydrofoils

中图分类号:

TK72

郝加封, 张敏弟, 付细能. 涂层对绕水翼云状空化的运动特性及动力特性影响的试验研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(18): 170-179.

HAO Jiafeng, ZHANG Mindi, FU Xineng. Experimental Study of Coatings' Effect on Kinetics and Dynamics in Cloud Cavitating Flows[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 54(18): 170-179.

参考文献

[1] WANG G, SENOCAK I, SHYY W, et al. Dynamics of attached turbulent cavitating flows[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2001, 37(6):551-581.
[2] FURNESS R A, HUTTON S P. Experimental and theoretical studies of two-dimensional fixed-type cavities[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1975, 97(4):515-521.
[3] KUBOTA A, KATO H, YAMAGUCHI H, et al. Unsteady structure measurement of cloud cavitation on a foil section using conditional sampling tech[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1989, 111(2):204-210.
[4] FARHAT M, AVELLAN F. On the detachment of a leading edge cavitation[J]. Cerâmica, 2001, 49(309):40-43.
[5] 刘诗汉, 陈大融. 粗糙表面的空蚀机制研究[J]. 润滑与密封, 2009, 34(3):6-8. LIU Shihan, CHEN Darong. On Mechanism of cavitation erosion of rough surface[J]. Lubrication Engineering, 2009, 34(3):6-8.
[6] ROOD E P. Review-mechanisms of cavitation inception[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1991, 113(2):163-175.
[7] 王维夫, 陈军, 徐贤统. 铝合金电火花沉积层的组织和抗空蚀性能[J]. 材料热处理学报, 2013, 34(6):120-124. WANG Weifu, CHEN Jun, XU Xiantong. Microstructure and cavitation erosion resistance of aluminum alloy coating fabricated by electrospark deposition[J]. Transactions of Materials and Treatment, 2013, 34(6):120-124.
[8] 黄旭, 张敏弟, 付细能. 表面涂层对绕水翼空化流动影响的实验研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2015, 36(3):522-525. HUANG Xu, ZHANG Mindi, FU Xineng. The experimental study of surface coatings' effect on cavitating flow around hydrofoil[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2015, 36(3):522-525.
[9] 张敏弟, 王国玉, 鲁君瑞. 绕水翼初生空化涡的实验观测[J]. 力学学报, 2006, 38(4):547-552. ZHANG Mindi, WANG Guoyu, LU Junrui. Experimental observation of incipient cavitation vortices around a hydrofoil[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2006, 38(4):54-552.
[10] 胡常莉, 王国玉, 陈广豪. 绕不同头型回转体初生空化的实验研究[J]. 实验流体力学, 2013, 27(2):35-40. HU Changli, WANG Guoyu, CHEN Guanghao. Experimental study of inception cavitation around axisymmetric bodies with different headforms[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 27(2):35-40.
[11] 黄彪, 王国玉, 权晓波, 等. 绕平头回转体非定常空化流体动力特性研究[J]. 实验流体力学, 2011, 25(2):22-28. HUANG Biao, WANG Guoyu, QUAN Xiaobo, et al. Study on the unsteady cavitating flow dynamic characteristics around a 0-caliber ogive revolution body[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2011, 25(2):22-28.

[1]	王艳, 何顺, 陈奕璋, 姜晨, 钱兆峰, 陈浩毅. 超声空化辅助金刚石线锯切割单晶硅机理分析与试验验证[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(9): 114-126.
[2]	郑杰, 权伟, 刘洋, 卢学民, 刘晓红, 岳雅楠, 周腾, 蔡振兵. Cr/Zr涂层环向压缩表面裂纹识别研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(8): 1-10.
[3]	梁玉, 陆国权, 梅云辉. 非线性电导调制SiC/环氧树脂绝缘涂层热氧/湿热老化研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(6): 207-217.
[4]	蔡腾飞, 潘岩, 王啸林, 马飞, 祝启恒, 韩健. 自振空化射流冲蚀模式与机制研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(6): 378-385.
[5]	王星星, 吴港, 何鹏, 杨晓红. 基于第一性原理的镍/碳化钨复合钎涂层界面分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(4): 296-304.
[6]	陈泰然, 樊亚丁, 项乐, 穆振东, 黄彪, 陈晖. 诱导轮快速启动过程的瞬态水力特性研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(18): 195-207.
[7]	刘银水, 丁爽爽, 马玉山, 吴新宇, 韩明兴, 崔岩. 蚁穴式节流元件控压机理和空化特性研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(16): 348-356.
[8]	袁晓明, 王宁, 王卫东, 张立杰, 朱勇. 自激振荡脉冲空化射流喷嘴谐振机理及协同优化研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(16): 377-389.
[9]	王琳婷, 朱丽娜, 李润杰, 康嘉杰, 卢晓亮. 冷喷涂和超音速火焰喷涂FeCoCrNiMn高熵合金涂层的耐腐蚀性能对比研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(14): 117-125.
[10]	童哲铭, 马廷良, 刘浩. 基于高速图像特征提取的滑动轴承空化特性试验研究及其数值仿真分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(13): 48-55.
[11]	林亮行, 马国政, 孙建芳, 韩翠红, 雍青松, 苏峰华, 王海斗. 基于VMD-EEMD-LSTM的涂层型关节轴承剩余使用寿命预测方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(9): 125-136.
[12]	胡琼, 肖洋, 卢迪, 曹志康, 王晓雷, 王衍, 武扬, 何一鸣. 微流道界面剪切对液膜密封空化流场特性的影响研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(9): 171-185.
[13]	林莉, 马志远, 孙珞茗, 罗忠兵, 雷明凯. 航空功能涂层表界面完整性参数超声检测反演原理及其应用[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(8): 1-8.
[14]	徐亚飞, 王星雨, 钟舜聪, 张留洋, 陈雪峰. 基于稀疏表示的叶片热障涂层太赫兹检测回波信号定位分离方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(8): 9-19.
[15]	王伟志, 马国政, 韩珩, 李洋, 周雳, 赵海朝, 许建峰, 郭伟玲, 王海斗. 激光熔覆陶瓷涂层研究现状与展望[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(7): 92-109.

涂层对绕水翼云状空化的运动特性及动力特性影响的试验研究

Experimental Study of Coatings' Effect on Kinetics and Dynamics in Cloud Cavitating Flows

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价