复杂轮轨摩擦条件下驱动方式对地铁轮轨动态相互作用影响研究

doi:10.3901/JME.2024.14.215

机械工程学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (14): 215-226.doi: 10.3901/JME.2024.14.215

扫码分享

复杂轮轨摩擦条件下驱动方式对地铁轮轨动态相互作用影响研究

李牧皛¹, 刘鹏飞^2,3

1. 成都飞机工业(集团)有限责任公司成都 610073;
2. 石家庄铁道大学省部共建交通工程结构力学行为与系统安全国家重点实验室石家庄 050043;
3. 河北省交通工程结构力学行为演变与控制重点实验室石家庄 050043

收稿日期:2023-08-21 修回日期:2024-03-11 出版日期:2024-07-20 发布日期:2024-08-29
作者简介:李牧皛,男,1988年出生,博士,工程师。主要研究方向为振动噪声和车辆系统动力学。E-mail:309805634@qq.com;刘鹏飞(通信作者),男,1986年出生,博士,副教授。主要研究方向为轮轨服役性能演化和机车车辆动力学。E-mail:pfliu@stdu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(52072249)。

Effect of Driven Modes on Metro Wheel/rail Interactions under Complex Wheel/rail Friction Conditions

LI Muxiao¹, LIU Pengfei^2,3

1. Chengdu Aircraft Industrial (Group) Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610073;
2. State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and System Safety of Traffic Engineering Structures, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043;
3. Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior Evolution and Control of Traffic Engineering Structures in Hebei, Shijiazhuang 050043

Received:2023-08-21 Revised:2024-03-11 Online:2024-07-20 Published:2024-08-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 旋转电机驱动和直线电机驱动是地铁列车最常采用的两种驱动方式。基于车辆-轨道耦合动力学理论，建立考虑旋转电机和直线电机两种驱动方式的地铁车辆-轨道三维耦合动力学模型；同时为精确反映轮轨系统动力学相互作用，在这两种模型中建立考虑轮轨空间运动的轮轨非赫兹滚动接触模型。利用所建立的动力学数值模型，系统地对比分析牵引工况下复杂轮轨界面摩擦条件对这两种地铁车辆轮轨系统动态相互作用的影响。结果表明：牵引载荷对旋转电机地铁车辆切向相互作用影响显著，但对直线电机地铁车辆切向相互作用影响很小；在低黏着接触条件下，旋转电机地铁车辆防滑控制器会被触发，此时轮轨接触表现为全滑动状态，而直线电机地铁车辆的轮轨接触则表现为局部滑动状态；在复杂轮轨摩擦条件和牵引工况下，旋转电机地铁车轮踏面磨耗量明显高于直线电机地铁的车轮踏面磨耗量。

关键词: 地铁车辆, 驱动方式, 车辆-轨道耦合动力学, 复杂轮轨摩擦条件, 轮轨非赫兹滚动接触, 磨耗

Abstract: Metro trains are commonly driven by the linear induction motors(LIM) or rotary motors(RM). The LIM and RM metro vehicle-track coupled dynamic models are respectively established, in which the wheel/rail non-Hertzian rolling contact is performed with consideration of spatial vibrations of wheelsets and rails. The wheel/rail frictional contact under changeable friction conditions with respect to the metro vehicles with different driving modes is systematically compared. The numerical investigations suggested that the traction loadings have a significant effect on wheel/rail tangential interactions of the RM vehicle, which however, contribute little to the wheel/rail tangential interactions of the LIM vehicle. The anti-slip controllers of the RM vehicles will be triggered when the powered wheelset enters into the low-adhesion zones, and the wheel/rail contact is full-slip under this case. On the other hand, the wheel/rail contact of the LIM vehicles is prone to be locally slipping with low-friction adhesion conditions. Moreover, the wheel/rail frictional wear of the RM vehicles is clearly higher than that of the LIM vehicles under complex friction conditions due to the lower level of frictional contact.

Key words: metro, driven modes, vehicle-track coupled dynamics, complex wheel/rail friction conditions, wheel/rail non-Hertzian contact, wear

中图分类号:

TG156

李牧皛, 刘鹏飞. 复杂轮轨摩擦条件下驱动方式对地铁轮轨动态相互作用影响研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(14): 215-226.

LI Muxiao, LIU Pengfei. Effect of Driven Modes on Metro Wheel/rail Interactions under Complex Wheel/rail Friction Conditions[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 60(14): 215-226.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: http://www.cjmenet.com.cn/CN/10.3901/JME.2024.14.215

http://www.cjmenet.com.cn/CN/Y2024/V60/I14/215

参考文献

[1] 周建乐，韩志卫，张雄飞. 直线电机车辆技术现状与应用发展[J]. 都市快轨交通，2012，25(1)：7-13. ZHOU Jianle，HAN Zhiwei，ZHANG Xiongfei. Development and application of technology of linear motor-driven vehicles[J]. Urban Rapid Rail Transit，2012，25(1)：7-13.
[2] 宗凌潇，马卫华，罗世辉. 直线电机地铁车辆电机的隔振优化分析[J]. 机械工程学报，2015，51(18)：119-125. ZONG Lingxiao，MA Weihua，LUO Shihui. Optimization analysis of vibration isolation of linear motor of metro vehicles[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering，2015，51(18)：119-125.
[3] FATEMI M J，GREEN M F，CAMPBELL T I. Dynamic analysis of resilient crosstie track for transit system[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering，1996，122(2)：173-180.
[4] 杨云帆，陶功权，吴磊，等. 两种驱动电机地铁车辆轮轨动态相互作用对比分析[J]. 机械工程学报，2020，55(14)：112-121. YANG Yunfan，TAO Gongquan，WU Lei，et al. Comparison of wheel/rail dynamic interaction of two kinds of metro vehicles with different driving mode[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering，2020，55(14)：112-121.
[5] WANG W J，SHEN P，SONG J H，et al. Experimental study on adhesion behavior of wheel/rail under dry and water conditions[J]. Wear，2011，271(9-10)：2699-2705.
[6] WANG W J，WANG H，WANG H Y，et al. Sub-scale simulation and measurement of railroad wheel/rail adhesion under dry and wet conditions[J]. Wear，2013，302(1-2)：1461-1467.
[7] POLACH O. Creep forces in simulations of traction vehicles running on adhesion limit[J]. Wear，2005，258(7)：992-1000.
[8] SPIRYAGIN M，POLACH O，COLE C. Creep force modelling for rail traction vehicles based on the fastsim algorithm[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics，2013，51：1765-1783.
[9] ZHAO X，WEN Z F，ZHU M H，et al. A study on high-speed rolling contact between a wheel and a contaminated rail[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics，2014，52(10)：1270-1287.
[10] VO K D，TIEU A K，ZHU H T，et al. A 3D dynamic model to investigate wheel-rail contact under high and low adhesion[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences，2014，85：63-75.
[11] SPIRYAGIN M，WOLFS P，SZANTO F，et al. Simplified and advanced modelling of traction control systems of heavy-haul locomotives[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics，2015，53(5)：672-691.
[12] TIAN Y，LIU S，DANIEL W J T，et al. Investigation of the impact of locomotive creep control on wear under changing contact conditions[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics，2015，53(5)：692-709.
[13] YANG Y F，GUO X R，SUN Y，et al. Non-Hertzian contact analysis of heavy-haul locomotive wheel/rail dynamic interactions under changeable friction conditions[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics，2022，60(6)：2167-2189.
[14] YANG Y F，GUO X R，LING L，et al. Effect of gauge corner lubrication on wheel/rail non-Hertzian contact and rail surface damage on the curves[J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica，2022，38：521522.
[15] TAO G Q，WEN Z F，GUAN Q H，et al. Locomotive wheel wear simulation in complex environment of wheel/rail surface[J]. Wear，2019，430-431：214-221.
[16] YANG Y F，XU M K，LING L，et al. Polygonal wear evolution of locomotive wheels subjected to anti-slip control[J]. Wear，2022，500-502：204348.
[17] ZHAI W M. Vehicle-track coupled dynamics：Theory and applications[M]. Singapore：Springer，2020.
[18] SHRESTHA S，WU Q，SPIRYAGIN M. Review of adhesion estimation approaches for rail vehicles[J]. International Journal of Rail Transportation，2019，7(2)：79-102.
[19] SUN Y，ZHAI W M，YE Y G，et al. A simplified model for solving wheel-rail non-Hertzian normal contact problem under the influence of yaw angle[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences，2020，174：105554.
[20] SICHANI M S，ENBLOM R，BERG M. An alternative to FASTSIM for tangential solution of the wheel/rail contact[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics，2016，54：748-764.
[21] MEYMAND S Z，KEYLIN A，AHMADIAN M. A survey of wheel-rail contact models for rail vehicles[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics，2016，54(3)：386-428.
[22] SICHANI M S，ENBLOM R，BERG M. Comparison of non-elliptic contact models：Towards fast and accurate modelling of wheel-rail contact[J]. Wear，2014，314(1-2)：111-117.
[23] KALKER J J. Three-dimensional elastic bodies in rolling contact[M]. Dordrecht：Kluwer Academic Publishers，1990.
[24] LIU B B，BRUNI S. Comparison of wheel-rail contact models in the context of multibody system simulation：Hertzian versus non-Hertzian[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics，2022，60(3)：1076-1096.
[25] YE Y G，SUN Y，SHI D C，et al. A wheel wear prediction model of non-Hertzian wheel-rail contact considering wheelset yaw：Comparison between simulated and field test results[J]. Wear，2021，474-475：203715.
[26] SUN Y，ZHAI W M，GUO Y. A robust non-Hertzian contact method for wheel-rail normal contact analysis[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics，2018，56：1899-1921.
[27] ENBLOM R，BERG M. Simulation of railway wheel profile development due to wear—Influence of disc braking and contact environment[J]. Wear，2005，258(7-8)：1055-1063.
[28] LEWIS R，DEYER-JOYCE R S. Wear mechanisms and transitions in railway wheel steels[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers，Part J：Journal of Engineering Tribology，2004，218(6)：467-478.
[29] WANG W J，LEWIS R，YANG B，et al. Wear and damage transitions of wheel and rail materials under various contact conditions[J]. Wear，2016，362-363：146-152.

复杂轮轨摩擦条件下驱动方式对地铁轮轨动态相互作用影响研究

Effect of Driven Modes on Metro Wheel/rail Interactions under Complex Wheel/rail Friction Conditions

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	柴非凡, 杨云帆, 凌亮, 王开云, 翟婉明. 蛇行运动状态下高速列车轮轨动态接触特性分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2026, 62(2): 329-343.
[2]	黄勉, 杨冰, 廖贞, 吕培锦, 肖守讷, 阳光武, 朱涛. 受电弓滑板磨耗研究综述[J]. 机械工程学报, 2025, 61(8): 193-213.
[3]	付昊宁, 关庆华, 王鹏, 温泽峰. 地铁弹性车轮对钢轨波磨段扣件弹条的减振作用[J]. 机械工程学报, 2025, 61(8): 240-249.
[4]	陈玉洪, 黎嘉欣, 张更娥, 温泽峰, 陶功权. 基于多目标优化的地铁车轮低轮缘磨耗型面设计[J]. 机械工程学报, 2025, 61(8): 261-271.
[5]	段世文, 刘增华, 陶功权, 谢晨希, 王鹏, 温泽峰. 地铁车轮非圆化磨耗特征分析及车轮粗糙度谱构建[J]. 机械工程学报, 2025, 61(24): 213-222.
[6]	肖乾, 崔正淳, 徐中旭, 申悦. 高速列车车轮磨耗对踏面等效锥度的影响研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2025, 61(24): 339-350.
[7]	苗堉淏, 凌亮, 张恒, 翟婉明. 电磁作动器辅助的高速列车防滑控制策略研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2025, 61(22): 143-154.
[8]	龙辉, 陶功权, 梁红琴, 卢纯, 温泽峰, 张楷, 刘奇锋, 肖乾. 地铁扁疤车轮通过钢轨焊缝区的轮轨垂向力特性分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2025, 61(20): 263-273.
[9]	杨逸凡, 陈是扦, 王开云, 肖绯雄, 马呈祥. 基于模态共振原理的重载机车一系钢弹簧结构优化研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2025, 61(2): 247-256.
[10]	文永蓬, 程瑞平, 钟硕乔, 宗志祥, 周慧. 温湿变工况下地铁车辆横向异常晃动机理分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2025, 61(18): 278-287.
[11]	支兴帅, 程尧, 周宁, 李智威, 姜杭艳, 张卫华, 陈光雄. 弓网接触副磨耗演变规律及其对动力学性能影响研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2025, 61(18): 288-298.
[12]	苗堉淏, 凌亮, 杨云帆, 王开云, 翟婉明. 基于轨面状态模糊辨识的高速列车最优黏着控制策略研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2025, 61(16): 273-282.
[13]	杨云帆, 王瑞晨, 常宇健, 陈美, 刘鹏飞. 车轮镟修对重载机车车轮非圆化磨耗消除及演化发展影响研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2025, 61(14): 184-196.
[14]	李新一, 刘金安, 肖新标, 黄振鑫, 刘晓龙, 金学松. 基于轴箱振动加速度小波包分解的高速列车车轮多边形特征识别[J]. 机械工程学报, 2025, 61(14): 223-232.
[15]	肖乾, 石小牒, 陈道云, 刘新龙, 杨文斌, 昌超. 基于损伤函数及典型线路工况组合的动车组车轮损伤预测方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2025, 61(10): 376-385.