复杂轮轨摩擦条件下驱动方式对地铁轮轨动态相互作用影响研究

doi:10.3901/JME.2024.14.215

机械工程学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (14): 215-226.doi: 10.3901/JME.2024.14.215

扫码分享

复杂轮轨摩擦条件下驱动方式对地铁轮轨动态相互作用影响研究

李牧皛¹, 刘鹏飞^2,3

1. 成都飞机工业(集团)有限责任公司成都 610073;
2. 石家庄铁道大学省部共建交通工程结构力学行为与系统安全国家重点实验室石家庄 050043;
3. 河北省交通工程结构力学行为演变与控制重点实验室石家庄 050043

收稿日期:2023-08-21 修回日期:2024-03-11 出版日期:2024-07-20 发布日期:2024-08-29
作者简介:李牧皛,男,1988年出生,博士,工程师。主要研究方向为振动噪声和车辆系统动力学。E-mail:309805634@qq.com;刘鹏飞(通信作者),男,1986年出生,博士,副教授。主要研究方向为轮轨服役性能演化和机车车辆动力学。E-mail:pfliu@stdu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(52072249)。

Effect of Driven Modes on Metro Wheel/rail Interactions under Complex Wheel/rail Friction Conditions

LI Muxiao¹, LIU Pengfei^2,3

1. Chengdu Aircraft Industrial (Group) Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610073;
2. State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and System Safety of Traffic Engineering Structures, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043;
3. Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior Evolution and Control of Traffic Engineering Structures in Hebei, Shijiazhuang 050043

Received:2023-08-21 Revised:2024-03-11 Online:2024-07-20 Published:2024-08-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 旋转电机驱动和直线电机驱动是地铁列车最常采用的两种驱动方式。基于车辆-轨道耦合动力学理论，建立考虑旋转电机和直线电机两种驱动方式的地铁车辆-轨道三维耦合动力学模型；同时为精确反映轮轨系统动力学相互作用，在这两种模型中建立考虑轮轨空间运动的轮轨非赫兹滚动接触模型。利用所建立的动力学数值模型，系统地对比分析牵引工况下复杂轮轨界面摩擦条件对这两种地铁车辆轮轨系统动态相互作用的影响。结果表明：牵引载荷对旋转电机地铁车辆切向相互作用影响显著，但对直线电机地铁车辆切向相互作用影响很小；在低黏着接触条件下，旋转电机地铁车辆防滑控制器会被触发，此时轮轨接触表现为全滑动状态，而直线电机地铁车辆的轮轨接触则表现为局部滑动状态；在复杂轮轨摩擦条件和牵引工况下，旋转电机地铁车轮踏面磨耗量明显高于直线电机地铁的车轮踏面磨耗量。

关键词: 地铁车辆, 驱动方式, 车辆-轨道耦合动力学, 复杂轮轨摩擦条件, 轮轨非赫兹滚动接触, 磨耗

Abstract: Metro trains are commonly driven by the linear induction motors(LIM) or rotary motors(RM). The LIM and RM metro vehicle-track coupled dynamic models are respectively established, in which the wheel/rail non-Hertzian rolling contact is performed with consideration of spatial vibrations of wheelsets and rails. The wheel/rail frictional contact under changeable friction conditions with respect to the metro vehicles with different driving modes is systematically compared. The numerical investigations suggested that the traction loadings have a significant effect on wheel/rail tangential interactions of the RM vehicle, which however, contribute little to the wheel/rail tangential interactions of the LIM vehicle. The anti-slip controllers of the RM vehicles will be triggered when the powered wheelset enters into the low-adhesion zones, and the wheel/rail contact is full-slip under this case. On the other hand, the wheel/rail contact of the LIM vehicles is prone to be locally slipping with low-friction adhesion conditions. Moreover, the wheel/rail frictional wear of the RM vehicles is clearly higher than that of the LIM vehicles under complex friction conditions due to the lower level of frictional contact.

Key words: metro, driven modes, vehicle-track coupled dynamics, complex wheel/rail friction conditions, wheel/rail non-Hertzian contact, wear

中图分类号:

TG156

李牧皛, 刘鹏飞. 复杂轮轨摩擦条件下驱动方式对地铁轮轨动态相互作用影响研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(14): 215-226.

LI Muxiao, LIU Pengfei. Effect of Driven Modes on Metro Wheel/rail Interactions under Complex Wheel/rail Friction Conditions[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 60(14): 215-226.

参考文献

[1] 周建乐，韩志卫，张雄飞. 直线电机车辆技术现状与应用发展[J]. 都市快轨交通，2012，25(1)：7-13. ZHOU Jianle，HAN Zhiwei，ZHANG Xiongfei. Development and application of technology of linear motor-driven vehicles[J]. Urban Rapid Rail Transit，2012，25(1)：7-13.
[2] 宗凌潇，马卫华，罗世辉. 直线电机地铁车辆电机的隔振优化分析[J]. 机械工程学报，2015，51(18)：119-125. ZONG Lingxiao，MA Weihua，LUO Shihui. Optimization analysis of vibration isolation of linear motor of metro vehicles[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering，2015，51(18)：119-125.
[3] FATEMI M J，GREEN M F，CAMPBELL T I. Dynamic analysis of resilient crosstie track for transit system[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering，1996，122(2)：173-180.
[4] 杨云帆，陶功权，吴磊，等. 两种驱动电机地铁车辆轮轨动态相互作用对比分析[J]. 机械工程学报，2020，55(14)：112-121. YANG Yunfan，TAO Gongquan，WU Lei，et al. Comparison of wheel/rail dynamic interaction of two kinds of metro vehicles with different driving mode[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering，2020，55(14)：112-121.
[5] WANG W J，SHEN P，SONG J H，et al. Experimental study on adhesion behavior of wheel/rail under dry and water conditions[J]. Wear，2011，271(9-10)：2699-2705.
[6] WANG W J，WANG H，WANG H Y，et al. Sub-scale simulation and measurement of railroad wheel/rail adhesion under dry and wet conditions[J]. Wear，2013，302(1-2)：1461-1467.
[7] POLACH O. Creep forces in simulations of traction vehicles running on adhesion limit[J]. Wear，2005，258(7)：992-1000.
[8] SPIRYAGIN M，POLACH O，COLE C. Creep force modelling for rail traction vehicles based on the fastsim algorithm[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics，2013，51：1765-1783.
[9] ZHAO X，WEN Z F，ZHU M H，et al. A study on high-speed rolling contact between a wheel and a contaminated rail[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics，2014，52(10)：1270-1287.
[10] VO K D，TIEU A K，ZHU H T，et al. A 3D dynamic model to investigate wheel-rail contact under high and low adhesion[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences，2014，85：63-75.
[11] SPIRYAGIN M，WOLFS P，SZANTO F，et al. Simplified and advanced modelling of traction control systems of heavy-haul locomotives[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics，2015，53(5)：672-691.
[12] TIAN Y，LIU S，DANIEL W J T，et al. Investigation of the impact of locomotive creep control on wear under changing contact conditions[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics，2015，53(5)：692-709.
[13] YANG Y F，GUO X R，SUN Y，et al. Non-Hertzian contact analysis of heavy-haul locomotive wheel/rail dynamic interactions under changeable friction conditions[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics，2022，60(6)：2167-2189.
[14] YANG Y F，GUO X R，LING L，et al. Effect of gauge corner lubrication on wheel/rail non-Hertzian contact and rail surface damage on the curves[J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica，2022，38：521522.
[15] TAO G Q，WEN Z F，GUAN Q H，et al. Locomotive wheel wear simulation in complex environment of wheel/rail surface[J]. Wear，2019，430-431：214-221.
[16] YANG Y F，XU M K，LING L，et al. Polygonal wear evolution of locomotive wheels subjected to anti-slip control[J]. Wear，2022，500-502：204348.
[17] ZHAI W M. Vehicle-track coupled dynamics：Theory and applications[M]. Singapore：Springer，2020.
[18] SHRESTHA S，WU Q，SPIRYAGIN M. Review of adhesion estimation approaches for rail vehicles[J]. International Journal of Rail Transportation，2019，7(2)：79-102.
[19] SUN Y，ZHAI W M，YE Y G，et al. A simplified model for solving wheel-rail non-Hertzian normal contact problem under the influence of yaw angle[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences，2020，174：105554.
[20] SICHANI M S，ENBLOM R，BERG M. An alternative to FASTSIM for tangential solution of the wheel/rail contact[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics，2016，54：748-764.
[21] MEYMAND S Z，KEYLIN A，AHMADIAN M. A survey of wheel-rail contact models for rail vehicles[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics，2016，54(3)：386-428.
[22] SICHANI M S，ENBLOM R，BERG M. Comparison of non-elliptic contact models：Towards fast and accurate modelling of wheel-rail contact[J]. Wear，2014，314(1-2)：111-117.
[23] KALKER J J. Three-dimensional elastic bodies in rolling contact[M]. Dordrecht：Kluwer Academic Publishers，1990.
[24] LIU B B，BRUNI S. Comparison of wheel-rail contact models in the context of multibody system simulation：Hertzian versus non-Hertzian[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics，2022，60(3)：1076-1096.
[25] YE Y G，SUN Y，SHI D C，et al. A wheel wear prediction model of non-Hertzian wheel-rail contact considering wheelset yaw：Comparison between simulated and field test results[J]. Wear，2021，474-475：203715.
[26] SUN Y，ZHAI W M，GUO Y. A robust non-Hertzian contact method for wheel-rail normal contact analysis[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics，2018，56：1899-1921.
[27] ENBLOM R，BERG M. Simulation of railway wheel profile development due to wear—Influence of disc braking and contact environment[J]. Wear，2005，258(7-8)：1055-1063.
[28] LEWIS R，DEYER-JOYCE R S. Wear mechanisms and transitions in railway wheel steels[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers，Part J：Journal of Engineering Tribology，2004，218(6)：467-478.
[29] WANG W J，LEWIS R，YANG B，et al. Wear and damage transitions of wheel and rail materials under various contact conditions[J]. Wear，2016，362-363：146-152.

复杂轮轨摩擦条件下驱动方式对地铁轮轨动态相互作用影响研究

Effect of Driven Modes on Metro Wheel/rail Interactions under Complex Wheel/rail Friction Conditions

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈清华, 杨云帆, 閤鑫, 凌亮, 王开云. 基于电磁力作用的地铁列车防滑控制研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(6): 334-341.
[2]	吴越, 胡晓依, 王佳诺, 金学松, 成棣, 肖新标, 侯茂锐. 基于全尺寸轮轨滚动试验台的高速车轮多边形磨耗再现试验研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(20): 229-239.
[3]	郭欣茹, 杨云帆, 王超, 凌亮, 王开云, 翟婉明. 制动工况下多边形车轮对轮轨动态相互作用影响研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(8): 196-203.
[4]	王佳诺, 王奇, 韩健, 肖新标, 金学松. 考虑弹性轮对的车辆-轨道耦合动力学建模及减振特性研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(8): 235-244.
[5]	李霞, 吴磊, 温泽峰, 金学松, 王安斌. 钢弹簧浮置板轨道焊接接头处钢轨波磨研究Ⅰ：初始演化[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(8): 245-252.
[6]	陈帅, 吴磊, 陶功权, 温泽峰, 王衡禹. 基于摩擦温升效应的地铁车轮磨耗特性研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(4): 213-220.
[7]	郭欣茹, 杨云帆, 凌亮, 陈哲, 王开云, 翟婉明. 防滑控制策略对机车车轮的损伤影响研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(22): 369-379.
[8]	范伟, 赵鑫, 罗易飞, 温泽峰, 金学松. 机车牵引齿轮瞬态啮合接触模拟研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(22): 401-410.
[9]	张峻瑞, 张军, 马贺, 窦蕴平. 轮对通过磨耗后固定辙叉的试验研究及接触分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(18): 304-311.
[10]	肖乾, 周前哲, 程玉琦, 王一凡, 姜雄峰, 张培东. 高速列车车轮磨耗型面特征提取及参数化描述方法研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(14): 245-253.
[11]	杨云帆, 凌亮, 张涛, 王开云, 翟婉明. 牵引/制动载荷和复杂黏着条件对地铁轮轨动态相互作用影响研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(12): 284-296.
[12]	邹栋, 钟舜聪, 耿妍, 程尧, 莫志刚, 徐可佳, 宋兵, 程斌, 张士宇, 王志城, 华路捷, 张亚楠. 城轨交通弓网系统异常磨损现状分析与防治技术研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(10): 152-178.
[13]	陈清华, 杨云帆, 凌亮, 张涛, 王开云. 复杂轮轨摩擦条件下的重载机车防滑控制研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(10): 179-186.
[14]	张恒, 凌亮, 昌超, 翟婉明, 王开云. 基于线性轨道涡流制动器的高速列车风致安全主动控制研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(8): 195-203.
[15]	侯茂锐, 陈秉智, 成棣, 胡晓依, 孙丽霞. 两种典型动车组车轮磨耗演变规律及其动力学影响研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(4): 191-201.