航空齿轮钢滚动接触疲劳性能预测与表面完整性优化

doi:10.3901/JME.2024.08.081

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 齿轮滚动接触疲劳是限制航空、航天、新能源汽车、舰艇等高端装备的重要瓶颈。高表面完整性是决定齿轮服役性能的重要保障，表面完整性与齿轮接触疲劳性能的定量关联规律成为工程及学术界的研究重点。该系列研究讨论了常规喷丸、二次喷丸、微粒喷丸、滚磨光整、喷丸光整等加工工艺对AISI 9310渗碳淬火航空齿轮钢表面完整性参数及服役性能的影响，并给出齿轮抗疲劳设计方法。针对获得的表面完整性与疲劳性能数据，开展疲劳性能预测与表面完整性设计研究。采用随机森林算法确定了表面完整性参数对滚动接触疲劳寿命的重要度；以接触应力、表面粗糙度、表面残余应力、表面硬度、有效残余应力深度、疲劳寿命可靠度为输入，滚动接触疲劳寿命为输出，采用GA-BP神经网络和SVM机器学习方法建立了滚动接触疲劳寿命预测模型，探究了表面完整性参数对滚动接触疲劳寿命的影响规律；提出了基于多元回归的滚动接触疲劳寿命预测公式，疲劳寿命预测值在1.5倍分散带以内；并在给定设计寿命下采用遗传算法对表面完整性参数进行优化，服务于传动构件抗疲劳设计。

关键词: 滚动接触疲劳, 表面完整性, 疲劳性能, 数据驱动, 寿命预测

Abstract: Rolling contact fatigue of gear is an important bottleneck for high-end equipment such as aviation, aerospace, new energy vehicles and ships. High surface integrity is an vital guarantee to determine the service performance of gears, and the quantitative correlation between surface integrity and gear contact fatigue performance has become a research focus in engineering and academia. In this work, the effects of conventional shot peening, double shot peening, fine particle peening, barrel finishing, barrel finishing after shot peening, etc., on the surface integrity and service properties of AISI 9310 carburized and quenched aviation gear steel are discussed, and it is expected to give an anti-fatigue design method. It is the third part of this series of research. Based on the obtained surface integrity and fatigue performance data, the research on fatigue property prediction and surface integrity design are carried out. The importance of surface integrity parameters to rolling contact fatigue life is determined by random forest algorithm. Taking the contact stress, surface roughness, surface residual stress, surface hardness, effective residual stress depth and fatigue life reliability as input and rolling contact fatigue life as output, the rolling contact fatigue life prediction model is established using GA-BP neural network and SVM machine learning methods. The influence of surface integrity parameters on rolling contact fatigue life is explored. The prediction formula of rolling contact fatigue life based on multiple regression is proposed. The predicted fatigue life is within 1.5 times dispersion band. Genetic algorithm is used to optimize the surface integrity parameters under a given design life, which serves the anti-fatigue design of transmission components.

Key words: rolling contact fatigue, surface integrity, fatigue performance, data-driven, life prediction

中图分类号:

TG156

吴吉展, 魏沛堂, 吴少杰, 刘怀举, 朱才朝. 航空齿轮钢滚动接触疲劳性能预测与表面完整性优化[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(8): 81-93.

WU Jizhan, WEI Peitang, WU Shaojie, LIU Huaiju, ZHU Caichao. Rolling Contact Fatigue Performance Prediction and Surface Integrity Optimization of Aviation Gear Steel[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 60(8): 81-93.

参考文献

[1] 刘怀举，张博宇，朱才朝，等. 齿轮接触疲劳理论研究进展[J]. 机械工程学报，2022，58(3)：95-120. LIU Huaiju，ZHANG Boyu，ZHU Caichao，et al. State of art of gear contact fatigue theories[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering，2022，58(3)：95-120.
[2] LUNDBERG G，PALMGREN A. Dynamic capacity of rolling bearings[J]. J. Applied Mech. Trans. ASME，1949，16(2)：165-172.
[3] CHOI Y，LIU C R. Rolling contact fatigue life of finish hard machined surfaces：Part 2. Experimental verification[J]. Wear，2006，261(5-6)：492-499.
[4] TOENSEND D P，ZARETSKY E V. Effect of shot peening on surface fatigue life of carburized and hardened AISI 9310 spur gears[J]. SAE Transactions，1988，97：807-818.
[5] LIU H，LIU H，ZHU C，et al. Evaluation of contact fatigue life of a wind turbine gear pair considering residual stress[J]. Journal of Tribology，2018，140(4)：041102.
[6] JIA P，LIU H，ZHU C，et al. Contact fatigue life prediction of a bevel gear under spectrum loading[J]. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering，2020，15(1)：123-132.
[7] WANG W，LIU H，ZHU C，et al. Effect of the residual stress on contact fatigue of a wind turbine carburized gear with multiaxial fatigue criteria[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences，2019，151：263-273.
[8] 马润波，董丽虹，王海斗. 基于支持向量机的热喷涂层接触疲劳寿命预测[J]. 兵工学报，2021，42(12)：2743-2752. MA Runbo，DONG Lihong，WANG Haidou. Prediction of contact fatigue life of thermal sprayed coating based on support vector machine[J]. Acta Armamentarii，2021，42(12)：2743-2752.
[9] DURODOLA J F，RAMACHANDRA S，GERGURI S，et al. Artificial neural network for random fatigue loading analysis including the effect of mean stress[J]. International Journal of Fatigue，2018，111：321-332.
[10] AGRAWAL A，CHOUDHARY A. An online tool for predicting fatigue strength of steel alloys based on ensemble data mining[J]. International Journal of Fatigue，2018，113：389-400.
[11] MALEKI E，UNAL O. Fatigue limit prediction and analysis of nano-structured AISI 304 steel by severe shot peening via ANN[J]. Engineering with Computers，2021，37(4)：2663-2678.
[12] ZHOU R，XING Z，WANG H，et al. Prediction of contact fatigue life of AT40 ceramic coating based on neural network[J]. Anti-Corrosion Methods and Materials，2020，67(1)：83-100.
[13] ZHAN Z，HU W，MENG Q. Data-driven fatigue life prediction in additive manufactured titanium alloy: A damage mechanics based machine learning framework[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics，2021，252：107850.
[14] 吴少杰，刘怀举，张仁华，等. 基于正交实验和数据驱动的喷丸表面完整性参数预测[J]. 表面技术，2021，50(4)：86-95. WU Shaojie，LIU Huaiju，ZHANG Renhua，et al. Prediction of surface integrity parameters of shot peening based on orthogonal experiment and data-driven[J]. Surface Technology，2021，50(4)：86-95.
[15] CHEN Z，JIANG Y，TONG Z，et al. Residual stress distribution design for gear surfaces based on genetic algorithm optimization[J]. Materials，2021，14(2)：366.
[16] MATHEW J，KSHIRSAGAR R，ZABEEN S，et al. Machine learning-based prediction and optimisation system for laser shock peening[J]. Applied Sciences，2021，11(7)：2888.
[17] UNAL O. Optimization of shot peening parameters by response surface methodology[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology，2016，305：99-109.
[18] ZHANG X，GAO E，LIU C，et al. Optimization of process parameter of residual stresses for hard turned surfaces[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology，2009，209(9)：4286-4291.
[19] SEDDIK R，BAHLOUL A，ATIG A，et al. A simple methodology to optimize shot-peening process parameters using finite element simulations[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology，2017，90(5-8)：2345-2361.
[20] MYLONAS G，LABEAS G. Numerical modelling of shot peening process and corresponding products: residual stress，surface roughness and cold work prediction[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology，2011，205(19)：4480-4494.
[21] YU L，LIU H. Efficient feature selection via analysis of relevance and redundancy[J]. The Journal of Machine Learning Research，2004，5：1205-1224.
[22] JEBLI I，BELOUADHA F Z，KABBAJ M I，et al. Prediction of solar energy guided by pearson correlation using machine learning[J]. Energy，2021，224：120109.
[23] 闫政旭，秦超，宋刚. 基于Pearson特征选择的随机森林模型股票价格预测[J]. 计算机工程与应用，2021，57(15)：286-296. YAN Zhengxu，QIN Chao，SONG Gang. Random forest model stock price prediction based on pearson feature Selection[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications，2021，57(15)：286-296.
[24] 黄梅，朱焱. 基于随机森林特征重要性的K-匿名特征优选[J]. 计算机应用与软件，2020，37(3)：266-270. HUANG Mei，ZHU Yan. K-Anonymitu feature optimization based on the importance of random forest features[J]. Computer Applications and Software，2020，37(3)：266-270.
[25] NOWELL D，NOWELL P W. A machine learning approach to the prediction of fretting fatigue life[J]. Tribology International，2020，141：105913.
[26] 周志华. 机器学习[M]. 北京：清华大学出版社，2016. ZHOU Zhihua. Machine learning[M]. Beijing：Tsinghua University Press，2016.
[27] 茹一帆，张乐乐，刘文，等. 基于缺口试件应力状态试验的Johnson-Cook模型参数反演标定方法[J]. 机械工程学报，2021，57(22)：60-70. RU Yifan，ZHANG Lele，LIU Wen，et al. Inverse determination method of Johnson–Cook model parameters based on the stress state test of notched specimens[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering，2021，57(22)：60-70.
[28] WU C，HO J，LEE D. Travel-time prediction with support vector regression[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems，2004，5(4)：276-281.
[29] ZHANG Y，SUN H，GUO Y. Wind power prediction based on PSO-SVR and grey combination model[J]. IEEE Access，2019，7：136254-136267.
[30] NAGELKERKE N J D. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination[J]. Biometrika，1991，78(3)：691-692.
[31] LIU H，LIU H，ZHU C，et al. Study on contact fatigue of a wind turbine gear pair considering surface roughness[J]. Friction，2020，8(3)：553-567.
[32] WU J，LIU H，WEI P，et al. Effect of shot peening coverage on residual stress and surface roughness of 18CrNiMo7-6 steel[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences，2020，183：105785.
[33] ZHANG X，WEI P，PARKER R G，et al. Study on the relation between surface integrity and contact fatigue of carburized gears[J]. International Journal of Fatigue，2022，165：107203.
[34] HOLMBERG J，WRETLAND A，HAMMERSBERG P，et al. Surface integrity investigations for prediction of fatigue properties after machining of alloy 718[J]. International Journal of Fatigue，2021，144：106059.