面向微创手术器械臂的可变刚度机理综述

doi:10.3901/JME.2022.21.001

机械工程学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (21): 1-15.doi: 10.3901/JME.2022.21.001

扫码分享

面向微创手术器械臂的可变刚度机理综述

尚祖峰¹, 马家耀^2,3, 王树新^2,3

1. 浙江理工大学机械工程学院杭州 310018;
2. 天津大学机构理论与装备设计教育部重点实验室天津 300350;
3. 天津大学机械工程学院天津 300350

收稿日期:2021-11-18 修回日期:2022-05-07 出版日期:2022-11-05 发布日期:2022-12-23
通讯作者: 尚祖峰(通信作者),男,1992年出生,博士,副教授,硕士研究生导师。主要研究方向为基于编织结构的柔性机器人。E-mail:zufeng_shang@zstu.edu.cn
作者简介:马家耀,男,1986年出生,博士,副教授,博士研究生导师。主要研究方向为折纸结构,折展结构,薄壁吸能结构,微创手术医疗器械等。E-mail:jiayao.ma@tju.edu.cn;王树新,男,1966年出生,博士,教授,博士研究生导师,中国工程院院士。主要研究方向为机械系统动力学、水下机器人与医疗手术机器人等。E-mail:shuxinw@tju.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（51721003）和浙江理工大学科研启动基金（21022312-Y）资助项目。

Review of Variable Stiffness Mechanisms in Minimally Invasive Surgical Manipulators

SHANG Zufeng¹, MA Jiayao^2,3, WANG Shuxin^2,3

1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018;
2. Key Laboratory of Mechanism Theory and Equipment Design of the Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350;
3. School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350

Received:2021-11-18 Revised:2022-05-07 Online:2022-11-05 Published:2022-12-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 微创手术以体表小切口或人体腔道为入路，造成的组织创伤更小，代表着外科手术的最前沿。对于位置深远的病灶，需采用细长柔性器械来适应复杂的体腔环境。具有变刚度特性的手术器械臂，可实现柔性器械的刚柔并济，是保障术中人机交互安全、兼顾操作精度和力输出的关键。聚焦于微创手术器械臂领域，对变刚度机理进行综述，将其分类为：阻塞法、热响应材料法、形状锁合法、力对抗法、梁特征重构法以及混合法。根据对器械臂的性能要求，首先讨论、比较了各变刚度机理在刚化能力、响应时间、空间占用等方面上的性能。然后，综述了潜在的器械臂变刚度设计方法并分析其前景与挑战。最后，总结展望了该研究领域，指出发掘新型变刚度材料及基于仿生理念开展结构/功能一体化设计是本领域寻求突破的重点。

关键词: 微创手术, 器械臂, 刚柔并济, 可变刚度, 弯曲刚度

Abstract: Taking one or several small cuts on skin or a body orifice as the path, minimally invasive surgery can significantly reduce the tissue damage, thus representing the future trend of the surgery. To reach a lesion far away from the path, slender and flexible device should be adopted for its adaptability to the complicated body-cavity condition. A surgical manipulator with variable stiffness can fulfill stiffening-softening function of the flexible device, and it thus becomes the key to ensure a safe human-machine interaction, a good precision, and an enough force output of manipulation during the surgery. Focused on the field of minimally invasive surgical manipulator, the current variable stiffness mechanisms are reviewed and classified as those based on jamming, thermally responsive material, shape-locking, antagonistic actuation force, reconfigurable cantilever, and combinations of them. Under the consideration of the application requirements, performances of manipulators in stiffening capability, response time, and space consumption, are firstly compared and discussed under different variable stiffness mechanisms. Next, potential variable stiffness mechanisms that could be applied in manipulators are reviewed, and the prospects and challenges are also analyzed. Finally, the field is summarized and forecasted. It is pointed out that developing new variable-stiffness material and carrying out integrated design of structures and functions based on biomimetic concepts are the main future directions.

Key words: minimally invasive surgery, manipulator, rigidity and flexibility, variable stiffness, bending stiffness

中图分类号:

TH777

尚祖峰, 马家耀, 王树新. 面向微创手术器械臂的可变刚度机理综述[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(21): 1-15.

SHANG Zufeng, MA Jiayao, WANG Shuxin. Review of Variable Stiffness Mechanisms in Minimally Invasive Surgical Manipulators[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2022, 58(21): 1-15.

参考文献

[1] TSUI C, KLEIN R, GARABRANT M. Minimally invasive surgery:National trends in adoption and future directions for hospital strategy[J]. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 2013, 27(7):2253-2257.
[2] TRACY C R, RAMAN J D, CADEDDU J A, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology:Where have we been and where are we heading?[J]. Nature Reviews Urology, 2008, 5(10):561-568.
[3] STRONG A T, RODRIGUEZ J, KROH M, et al. Intramural surgery:A new vista in minimally invasive therapy[J]. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2017, 225(2):339-342.
[4] MOHIUDDIN K, SWANSON S J. Maximizing the benefit of minimally invasive surgery[J]. Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2013, 108(5):315-319.
[5] MURTTER D, MARESCAUX J. Appendicitis/diverticulitis:Minimally invasive surgery[J]. Digestive Diseases, 2013, 31(1):76-82.
[6] 赵玉沛, 邱江东. 中国腹腔镜胰腺癌根治术:20年回顾与展望[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(3):237-240. ZHAO Yupei, QIU Jiangdong. The laparoscopic radical surgery for pancreatic cancer in China:Review and prospect in 20 years[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(3):237-240.
[7] 孙玉成, 刘晓巍, 片光哲. 两种微创术式治疗重度直肠脱垂46例疗效观察[J]. 中国肛肠病杂志, 2021, 41(6):59-62. SUN Yucheng, LIU Xiaowei, PIAN Guangzhe. Comparison on the effects of two mini-invasive procedure for severe rectocele of 46 cases[J]. Chinese Journal of Coloproctology, 2021, 41(6):59-62.
[8] 黄相威, 单云峰. 微创保胆取石术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆结石的手术分析[J]. 数理医药学杂志, 2020, 33(12):1763-1765. HUANG Xiangwei, SHAN Yunfeng. Surgical analysis of minimally invasive gallstone preservation and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallstones[J]. Journal of Mathematical Medicine, 2020, 33(12):1763-1765.
[9] 朱可安, 陈灵, 李昭, 等. 应用单孔腹腔镜开展常见妇科手术的可行性探讨[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(3):158-162. ZHU Ke'an, CHEN Ling, LI Zhao, et al. Feasibility study of using laparoendoscopic single site surgery to carry out common gynecological[J]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Version), 2021, 14(3):158-162.
[10] MCGEE M F, ROSEN M J, MARKS J, et al. A primer on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery:Building a new paradigm[J]. Surgical Innovation, 2006, 13(2):86-93.
[11] ALHAMYANI S S A, ABDELRAHMAN T M. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery:Uses, advantages, complications and cost[J]. Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science, 2020, 8(4):99-106.
[12] RATTNER D, KALLOO A. ASGE/SAGES working group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery[J]. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2006, 63(2):199-203.
[13] TROCHIMCZUK R. Comparative analysis of RCM mechanisms based on parallelogram used in surgical robots for laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery[J]. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2020, 58(4):911-925.
[14] GIFARI M W, NAGHIBI H, STRAMIGIOLI S, et al. A review on recent advances in soft surgical robots for endoscopic applications[J]. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2019, 15(5):e2010.
[15] SHAIKH S N, THOMPSON C C. Natural orifice translumenal surgery:Flexible platform review[J]. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2010, 2(6):210-216.
[16] National Orifice Surgery Consortium for Assessment and Research. Working group summary on development of a multitasking platform[EB/OL].[2006-10-11]. http://www.noscar.org/presentations-2006/tasking-platform.
[17] LOEVE A, BREEDVELD P, DANKELMAN J. Scopes too flexible and too stiff[J]. IEEE Pulse, 2010, 1(3):26-41.
[18] ZUO S, WANG S. Current and emerging robotic assisted intervention for NOTES[J]. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 2016, 13(12):1095-1105.
[19] 王田苗, 郝雨飞, 杨兴帮, 等. 软体机器人:结构, 驱动, 传感与控制[J]. 机械工程学报, 2017, 53(13):1-13. WANG Tianmiao, HAO Yufei, YANG Xingbang, et al. Soft robotics:structure, actuation, sensing and control[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 53(13):1-13.
[20] DOU W, ZHONG G, CAO J, et al. Soft robotic manipulators:Designs, actuation, stiffness tuning, and sensing[J]. Advanced Materials Technologies, 2021, 6(9):2100018.
[21] MANTI M, CACUCCIOLO V, CIANCHETTI M. Stiffening in soft robotics:A review of the state of the art[J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 2016, 23(3):93-106.
[22] BLANC L, DELCHAMBRE A, LAMBERT P. Flexible medical devices:review of controllable stiffness solutions[J]. Actuators, 2017, 6(3):23.
[23] LIU A J, NAGEL S R. Jamming is not just cool any more[J]. Nature, 1998, 396:21-22.
[24] FITZGERALD S G, DELANEY G W, HOWARD D. A review of jamming actuation in soft robotics[J]. Actuators, 2020, 9(4):104.
[25] AKTAS B, NARANG Y S, VASIOS N, et al. A modeling framework for jamming structures[J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2021, 31(16):2007554.
[26] BROWN E, RODENBERG N, AMEND J, et al. Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107(44):18809-18814.
[27] AMEND J, BROWN E, RODENBERG N, et al. A positive pressure universal gripper based on the jamming of granular material[J]. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2012, 28(2):341-350.
[28] CIANCHETTI M, RANZANI T, GERBONI G, et al. Soft robotics technologies to address shortcomings in today's minimally invasive surgery:the STIFF-FLOP approach[J]. Soft Robotics, 2014, 1(2):122-131.
[29] DE FALCO I, CIANCHETTI M, MENCIASSI A. A soft multi-module manipulator with variable stiffness for minimally invasive surgery[J]. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 2017, 12(5):056008.
[30] RANZANI T, CIANCHETTI M, GERBONI G, et al. A soft modular manipulator for minimally invasive surgery:Design and characterization of a single module[J]. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2016, 32(1):187-200.
[31] WEI Y, CHEN Y, YANG Y, et al. A soft robotic spine with tunable stiffness based on integrated ball joint and particle jamming[J]. Mechatronics, 2016, 33:84-92.
[32] WEI Y, CHEN Y, REN T, et al. A novel, variable stiffness robotic gripper based on integrated soft actuating and particle jamming[J]. Soft Robotics, 2016, 3(3):134-143.
[33] LI Y, CHEN Y, YANG Y, et al. Passive particle jamming and its stiffening of soft robotic grippers[J]. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2017, 33(2):446-455.
[34] CHIO J, LEE D Y, EO J H, et al. Tendon-driven jamming mechanism for configurable variable stiffness[J]. Soft Robotics, 2021, 8(1):109-118.
[35] BRANCADORO M, MANTI M, TOGNARELLI S, et al. Fiber jamming transition as a stiffening mechanism for soft robotics[J]. Soft Robotics, 2020, 7(6):663-674.
[36] VASIOS N, NARANG Y, AKTAS B, et al. Numerical analysis of periodic laminar and fibrous media undergoing a jamming transition[J]. European Journal of Mechanics A-Solids, 2019, 75:322-329.
[37] BRANCADORO M, MANTI M, GRANI F, et al. Toward a variable stiffness surgical manipulator based on fiber jamming transition[J]. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 2019, 6:12.
[38] BRANCADORO M, MANTI M, TOGNARELLI S, et al. Preliminary experimental study on variable stiffness structures based on fiber jamming for soft robots[C]//Proceedings of 1st IEEE-RAS International Conference on Soft Robotics, April 24-28, 2018, Livorno, Italy:IEEE, 2018:258-263.
[39] AKTAS B, HOWE R D. Tunable anisotropic stiffness with square fiber jamming[C]//Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics, July 15, 2020, New Haven, CT, USA:IEEE 2020:879-884.
[40] CHAUHAN S, GUERRA M, DE MEL R. Selective stiffening mechanism for surgical-assist soft robotic applications[C]//Proceedings of SAI Intelligent Systems Conference, September 06-07, 2018, London, UK:Springer, 2018, 868:791-803.
[41] WANG T, ZHANG J, LI Y, et al. Electrostatic layer jamming variable stiffness for soft robotics[J]. IEEE-ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2019, 24(2):424-433.
[42] GAO Y, HUANG X, MANN I S, et al. A novel variable stiffness compliant robotic gripper based on layer jamming[J]. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 2020, 12(5):051013.
[43] KIM Y J, CHENG S, KIM S, et al. A novel layer jamming mechanism with tunable stiffness capability for minimally invasive surgery[J]. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2013, 29(4):1031-1042.
[44] KIM Y J, CHENG S, KIM S, et al. Design of a tubular snake-like manipulator with stiffening capability by layer jamming[C]//IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, October 07-12, 2012, Algarve, Portugal:IEEE, 2012:4251-4256.
[45] SHANG Z, MA J, YOU Z, et al. A foldable manipulator with tunable stiffness based on braided structure[J]. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B-Applied Biomaterials, 2020, 108(2):316-325.
[46] SHANG Z, MA J, YOU Z, et al. Lateral indentation of a reinforced braided tube with tunable stiffness[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2020, 149:106608.
[47] AMANOV E, NGUYEN T D, MARKMANN S, et al. Toward a flexible variable stiffness endoport for single-site partial nephrectomy[J]. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2018, 46(10):1498-1510.
[48] ZHAO Y, SHAN Y, ZHANG J, et al. A soft continuum robot, with a large variable-stiffness range, based on jamming[J]. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 2019, 14(6):066007.
[49] WANG J, WANG S, LI J, et al. Development of a novel robotic platform with controllable stiffness manipulation arms for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS)[J]. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2018, 14(1):e1838.
[50] LI J, LI X, WANG J, et al. Design and evaluation of a variable stiffness manual operating platform for laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS)[J]. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2017, 13(4):e1797.
[51] GE H, LI H, MEI S, et al. Low melting point liquid metal as a new class of phase change material:An emerging frontier in energy area[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 21:331-346.
[52] XING Z, WANG F, JI Y, et al. A structure for fast stiffness-variation and omnidirectional-steering continuum manipulator[J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2020, 6(2):755-762.
[53] ZHAO R, YAO Y, LUO Y. Development of a variable stiffness over tube based on low-melting-point-alloy for endoscopic surgery[J]. Journal of Medical Devices, 2016, 10(2):021002.
[54] WEI X, JU F, CHEN B, et al. Development of a variable-stiffness and shape-detection manipulator based on low-melting-point-alloy for minimally invasive surgery[C]//IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Conference Proceedings, July 20-24, 2020, Montreal, Canada:IEEE, 2020:4895-4898.
[55] ALAMEIGI F, SEIFABADI R, ARMAND M. A continuum manipulator with phase changing alloy[C]//IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation ICRA, May 16-21, 2016, Stockholm, Sweden:IEEE, 2016:758-764.
[56] WANG H, CHEN Z, ZUO S. Flexible manipulator with low-melting-point alloy actuation and variable stiffness[J]. Soft Robotics, 2022, 9(3):577-590.
[57] PETERS J, NOLAN E, WIESE M, et al. Actuation and stiffening in fluid-driven soft robots using low-melting-point material[C]//IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, November 04-08, 2019, Macau, China:IEEE, 2019:4692-4698.
[58] CHENG N, ISHIGAMI G, HAWTHORNE S, et al. Design and analysis of a soft mobile robot composed of multiple thermally activated joints driven by a single actuator[C]//IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation ICRA, May 03-08, 2010, Anchorage, AK, USA:IEEE, 2010:5207-5212.
[59] CHENG N G, GOPINATH A, WANG L, et al. Thermally tunable, self-healing composites for soft robotic applications[J]. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, 2014, 299(11):1279-1284.
[60] LOEVE A J, BOSMA J H, BREEDVELD P, et al. Polymer rigidity control for endoscopic shaft-guide ‘Plastolock’-a feasibility study[J]. Journal of Medical Devices, 2010, 4(4):045001.
[61] GAO Q, SUN Z. A novel design of water-activated variable stiffness endoscopic manipulator with safe thermal insulation[J]. Actuators, 2021, 10(6):130.
[62] YAN J, SHI P, XU Z, et al. A wide-range stiffness-tunable soft actuator inspired by deep-sea glass sponges[J]. Soft Robotics, 2022, 9(3):625-637.
[63] LE H M, PHAN P T, LIN C, et al. A temperature-dependent, variable-stiffness endoscopic robotic manipulator with active heating and cooling[J]. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2020, 48(6):1837-1849.
[64] LE H M, CAO L, DO T N, et al. Design and modelling of a variable stiffness manipulator for surgical robots[J]. Mechatronics, 2018, 53:109-123.
[65] PARK J, LEE H, KEE H, et al. Magnetically steerable manipulator with variable stiffness using graphene polylactic acid for minimally invasive surgery[J]. Sensors and Actuators A-Physical, 2020, 309:112032.
[66] JIANG S, CHEN B, QI F, et al. A variable-stiffness continuum manipulators by an SMA-based sheath in minimally invasive surgery[J]. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2020, 16(2):e2081.
[67] YAGI A, MATSUMIYA K, MASAMUNE K, et al. Rigid-flexible outer sheath model using slider linkage locking mechanism and air pressure for endoscopic surgery[C]//9th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, October 01-06, 2006, Copenhagen, Denmark:Springer, 2006, 9(1):503-510.
[68] YAGI A, MATSUMIYA K, MASAMUNE K, et al. Rigid-flexible outer sheath model using shape lock mechanism by air pressure and wire driven curving mechanism[C]//World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, August 27-September 01, 2006, Seoul, Korea:Springer, 2006, 5(17):3108-3111.
[69] ZUO S, IIJIMA K, TOKUMIYA T, et al. Variable stiffness outer sheath with "Dragon skin" structure and negative pneumatic shape-locking mechanism[J]. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2014, 9(5):857-865.
[70] ZUO S, YAMANAKA N, SATO I, et al. MRI-compatible rigid and flexible outer sheath device with pneumatic locking mechanism for minimally invasive surgery[C]//4th International Workshop on Medical Imaging and Augmented Reality, August 1-2, 2008, Tokyo, Japan:Springer, 2008, 5128:210.
[71] GIANNICCINI M E, XIANG C, ATYABI A, et al. Novel design of a soft lightweight pneumatic continuum robot arm with decoupled variable stiffness and positioning[J]. Soft Robotics, 2018, 5(1):54-70.
[72] HAO L, XIANG C, GIANNACCINI M E, et al. Design and control of a novel variable stiffness soft arm[J]. Advanced Robotics, 2018, 32(11):605-622.
[73] GAO X, LI X, ZHAO C, et al. Variable stiffness structural design of a dual-segment continuum manipulator with independent stiffness and angular position[J]. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2021, 67:102000.
[74] LIU Y, YANG Y, PENG Y, et al. A light soft manipulator with continuously controllable stiffness actuated by a thin McKibben pneumatic artificial muscle[J]. IEEE-ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2020, 25(4):1944-1952.
[75] MANFREDI L, YUE L, ZHANG J, et al. A 4 DOFs variable stiffness soft module[C]//Proceedings of 1st IEEE-RAS International Conference on Soft Robotics, April 24-28, 2018, Livorno, Italy:IEEE, 2018:94-99.
[76] LOEVE A J, PLETTENBURG D H, BREEDVELD P, et al. Endoscope shaft-rigidity control mechanism:"FORGUIDE"[J]. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2011, 59(2):542-551.
[77] KIM Y J, CHENG S, KIM S, et al. A stiffness-adjustable hyperredundant manipulator using a variable neutral-line mechanism for minimally invasive surgery[J]. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2013, 30(2):382-395.
[78] LOSCHAK P M, BURKE S F, ZUMBRO E, et al. A robotic system for actively stiffening flexible manipulators[C]//IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, September 28-October 02, 2015, Hamburg, Germany:IEEE, 2015:216-221.
[79] TAMADON I, HUAN Y, de GROOT A G, et al. Positioning and stiffening of an articulated/continuum manipulator for implant delivery in minimally invasive surgery[J]. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2020, 16(2):e2072.
[80] HUH T M, PARK Y J, CHO K J. Design and analysis of a stiffness adjustable structure using an endoskeleton[J]. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 2012, 13(7):1255-1258.
[81] CAO Y, JU F, ZHANG L, et al. A novel variable-stiffness flexible manipulator actuated by shape memory alloy for minimally invasive surgery[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineering Part H-Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 2018(11), 232:1098-1110.
[82] KAWASE T, SUGINO T, ONOGI S, et al. Improvement of a tunable stiffness organ-grasping device by design of a wavy-shaped beam structure[J]. Applied Sciences-Basel, 2021, 11(10):4581.
[83] KIM J, NAKAJIMA Y, KOBAYASHI K. A suction-fixing, stiffness-tunable liver manipulator for laparoscopic surgeries[J]. IEEE-ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2017, 23(1):262-273.
[84] ZHOU Y, HEADINGS L M, DAPINO M J. Discrete layer jamming for safe co-robots[C]//IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation ICRA, May 20-24, 2019, Montreal, Canada:IEEE, 2019:6124-6129.
[85] ZHAO B, ZHANG W, ZHANG Z, et al. Continuum manipulator with redundant backbones and constrained bending curvature for continuously variable stiffness[C]//IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, October 1-5, 2018, Madrid, Spain:IEEE, 2018:7492-7499.
[86] ZHAO B, ZENG L, WU Z, et al. A continuum manipulator for continuously variable stiffness and its stiffness control formulation[J]. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2020, 149:103746.
[87] KIM J, CHOI W Y, KANG S, et al. Continuously variable stiffness mechanism using nonuniform patterns on coaxial tubes for continuum microsurgical robot[J]. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2019, 35(6):1475-1487.
[88] KIM Y, CHENG S S, DESAI J P. Active stiffness tuning of a spring-based continuum robot for MRI-guided neurosurgery[J]. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2017, 34(1):18-28.
[89] 张国凯, 马家耀, 尚祖峰, 等. 具有折展与变刚度特征的NOTES手术器械臂[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(17):28-35. ZHANG Guokai, MA Jiayao, SHANG Zufeng, et al. Deployable manipulator with tunable stiffness for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 54(17):28-35.
[90] WEHRMEYER J A, BARTHEL J A, ROTH J P, et al. Colonoscope flexural rigidity measurement[J]. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 1998, 36(4):475-479.
[91] 栾吉森, 胡晓燕. 提高Bi-Sn低熔点合金性能的研究[J]. 模具技术, 1985:34-38. LUAN Jisen, HU Xiaoyan. Research on improving the performance of the Bi-Sn based low-melting-point alloy[J]. Die and Mould Technology, 1985:34-38.
[92] SWANSTROM L L, KOZAREK R, PASRICHA P J, et al. Development of a new access device for transgastric surgery[J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2005, 9(8):1129-1137.
[93] THOMPSON C C, RYOU M, SOPER N J, et al. Evaluation of a manually driven, multitasking platform for complex endoluminal and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery applications (with video)[J]. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2009, 70(1):121-125.
[94] EHRLICH D, MUTHUSAMY V R. Device profile of the EXALT Model D single-use duodenoscope for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography:Overview of its safety and efficacy[J]. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 2021, 18(5):421-427.
[95] ZHENG Q, XU C, JIANG Z, et al. Smart actuators based on external stimulus response[J]. Frontiers in Chemistry, 2021, 9:650358.
[96] REN X, ZHANG G, SHANG Z, et al. A variable stiffness spring-sponge composite tube with fast response and shape recovery[J]. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, 2018, 303(10):1800185.
[97] 朱艳青, 史继富, 王雷雷, 等. 3D打印技术发展现状[J]. 制造技术与机床, 2015(12):50-57. ZHU Yanqing, SHI Jifu, WANG Leilei, et al. Current status of the three-dimensional printing technology[J]. Manufacturing Technology and Machine Tool, 2015(12):50-57.
[98] 岳敏, 李红伟, 李海燕. 3D打印在弹性体领域的应用[J]. 橡胶工业, 2019, 66(10):795-798. YUE Min, LI Hongwei, LI Haiyan. Applications of 3D-printing in elastomer[J]. China Rubber Industry, 2019, 66(10):795-798.
[99] ZHANG Y F, ZHANG N, HINGORANI H, et al. Fast-response, stiffness-tunable soft actuator by hybrid multimaterial 3D printing[J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2019, 29(15):1806698.
[100] KORKEES F, ALLENBY J, DORRINGTON P. 3D printing of composites:design parameters and flexural performance[J]. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2020, 26(4):699-706.
[101] LIPTON J I, LIPSON H. 3D printing variable stiffness foams using viscous thread instability[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6:29996.
[102] YANG Y, CHEN Y, WEI Y, et al. Novel design and three-dimensional printing of variable stiffness robotic grippers[J]. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 2016, 8(6):061010.
[103] YANG Y, CHEN Y, LI Y, et al. 3D printing of variable stiffness hyper-redundant robotic arm[C]//IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation ICRA, May 16-21, 2016, Stockholm, Sweden:IEEE, 2016:3871-3877.
[104] TAGHAVI M, HELPS T, HUANG B, et al. 3D-printed ready-to-use variable-stiffness structures[J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2018, 3(3):2402-2407.
[105] JOLLY M R, BENDER J W, CARLSON J D. Properties and applications of commercial magnetorheological fluids[J]. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 1999, 10(1):5-13.
[106] LI J, HU B, GENG P, et al. Variable stiffness mechanism design and analysis for a snake-like robot[C]//Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), December 12-15, 2018, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia:IEEE, 2018:331-336.
[107] ZHANG D, YUAN H, CAO Z. Environmental adaptive control of a snake-like robot with variable stiffness actuators[J]. IEEE-CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2020, 7(3):745-751.
[108] 李鸽鸽, 刘保国, 董亚军. 磁流变体在机械工程中的应用综述[J]. 机械强度, 2015, 37(2):219-225. LI Gege, LIU Baoguo, DONG Yajun. Overview on application of magnetorheological fluids in mechanical engineering[J]. Journal of Mechanical Strength, 2015, 37(2):219-225.
[109] TAKEMURA K, YOKOTA S, EDAMURA K. Development and control of a micro artificial muscle cell using electro-conjugate fluid[J]. Sensors and Actuators A-Physical, 2007, 133(2):493-499.
[110] 涂福泉, 刘小双, 毛阳, 等. 电流变液的研究现状及其应用进展[J]. 材料导报, 2014, 28(11):66-68. TU Fuquan, LIU Xiaoshuang, MAO Yang, et al. Recent progress and application of electrorheological fluids[J]. Materials Reports, 2014, 28(11):66-68.
[111] YANG C, GENG S, WALKER I, et al. Geometric constraint-based modeling and analysis of a novel continuum robot with shape memory alloy initiated variable stiffness[J]. International Journal of Robotics Research, 2020, 39(14):1620-1634.
[112] SUN C, CHEN L, LIU J, et al. A hybrid continuum robot based on pneumatic muscles with embedded elastic rods[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C-Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2020, 234(1):318-328.
[113] SHAH D S, YANG E J, YUEN M C, et al. Jamming skins that control system rigidity from the surface[J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2021, 31(1):2006915.
[114] LIU C, LI B, LI Z, et al. 3D printable and fringe electric field adhesion enabled variable stiffness artificial muscles for semi-active vibration attenuation[J]. Soft Matter, 2021, 17(28):6697-6706.

面向微创手术器械臂的可变刚度机理综述

Review of Variable Stiffness Mechanisms in Minimally Invasive Surgical Manipulators

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张赫, 李海铭, 张佳闪, 任昊, 李浩天, 赵杰. 面向腔镜微创手术的连续体机械手关键技术与研究进展[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(19): 44-64.
[2]	孙广开, 何彦霖, 于洋, 韩静, 赵冠棋, 周康鹏, 祝连庆. 连续体手术机器人光纤导航技术现状和展望[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(1): 1-18.
[3]	金天贺, 张志, 刘志明, 孙帅帅, 尹丽云. 高速列车H∞控制可变刚度悬挂系统应用研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(8): 204-214.
[4]	冯美, 李妍, 赵继, 呼咏, 高奎鸿. 机器人辅助微创手术器械丝传动张力传递研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2021, 57(11): 120-127.
[5]	叶伟, 谢镇涛, 李秦川. 一种可用于微创手术的并联机构运动学分析与性能优化[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(19): 103-112.
[6]	张国凯, 马家耀, 尚祖峰, 陈焱, 由衷, 易波, 王树新. 具有折展与变刚度特征的NOTES手术器械臂[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(17): 28-35.
[7]	刘光, 张鹏飞, 陈华伟, 韩志武, 张德远. 载能电刀仿生防粘表面技术[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(17): 21-27.
[8]	杨名远, 马家耀, 李建民, 陈焱, 王树新. 基于厚板折纸理论的微创手术钳[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(17): 36-45.
[9]	陈煜宇, 刘磊, 李博, 魏超, 王树新, 李涤尘. 柔性驱动与刚度可调结构/功能一体化微创手术操作臂设计制造与性能研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(17): 53-61.
[10]	王田苗, 郝雨飞, 杨兴帮, 文力. 软体机器人：结构、驱动、传感与控制[J]. 机械工程学报, 2017, 53(13): 1-13.
[11]	胡中伟, 林旺源, 徐西鹏. 三种典型生物软组织切割特性的试验研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(11): 186-192.
[12]	潘博;付宜利;王树国;杨宗鹏. 微创条件约束下内窥镜操作机器人运动学[J]. , 2009, 45(3): 162-168.