工况参数对悬索桥主缆索股与鞍座动态接触与微滑移行为的影响研究

doi:10.3901/JME.2024.19.144

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 悬索桥主缆索股与鞍座间的动态接触与微滑移行为严重影响桥梁的服役安全性，而工况参数(交变载荷幅值、交变载荷频率、预紧力、摩擦因数等)对主缆索股与鞍座间动态接触与微滑移行为影响显著。因此，运用有限元软件ABAQUS和试验平台开展了主缆索股与鞍座间的接触分析和动态接触与微滑移试验，探究了不同工况参数下主缆索股与鞍座间的动态接触与微滑移特征(接触应力、接触压力、接触状态、微滑移幅值、摩擦因数等)。结果表明随着交变载荷幅值的增大，索股与鞍座间的接触状态呈黏着-部分滑动-完全滑动的变化趋势，微滑移幅值逐渐增大；随着交变载荷频率的增大，接触状态趋于向完全滑动状态转变，微滑移幅值逐渐增大；随着预紧力、摩擦因数的增大，接触状态趋于向黏着状态转变，微滑移幅值逐渐减小；鞍座固定端与加载端的接触压力在不同条件参数的影响下呈不同的变化趋势。基于仿真和试验结果的各条件参数对微滑移幅值影响程度排序分别为：交变载荷幅值>预紧力>摩擦因数和交变载荷幅值>预紧力>交变载荷频率。

关键词: 主缆索股, 鞍座, 动态接触与微滑移, 关联关系模型

Abstract: The dynamic contact and microslip behavior between main cable strand and saddle of suspension bridge seriously affects the service safety of the bridge, and the working condition parameters (alternating load amplitude, alternating load frequency, preload force, friction coefficient, etc.) have a significant impact on the dynamic contact and microslip behavior between main cable strand and saddle.Therefore, the contact analysis and dynamic contact and microslip experiments between main cable strand and saddle are carried out by using finite element software ABAQUS and test apparatus, and the dynamic contact and microslip characteristic (contact stress, contact pressure, contact state, microslip amplitude, friction coefficient, etc.) between main cable strand and saddle under different conditions are explored.The results show that with the increase of the amplitude of alternating load, the contact state between cable strand and saddle shows a trend of adhesion -partial slip-complete slip, and the microslip amplitude increases gradually.With the increase of alternating load frequency, the contact state tends to change to the complete slip state, and the microslip amplitude increases gradually.With the increase of preload force and friction coefficient, the contact state tends to change to the adhesive state, and the microslip amplitude decreases gradually.Under the influence of different conditions, the contact pressure between the fixed end and the loading end of saddle shows different trends.Based on the simulation and experimental results, the order of the influence degree of each condition parameter on the microslip amplitude is: alternating load amplitude > preload force > friction coefficient and alternating load amplitude > preload force > alternating load frequency.

Key words: main cable strand, saddle, dynamic contact and microslip, correlation model

中图分类号:

TH117

王大刚, 徐伟, 李陈晨, 孙跃威. 工况参数对悬索桥主缆索股与鞍座动态接触与微滑移行为的影响研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(19): 144-158.

WANG Dagang, XU Wei, LI Chenchen, SUN Yuewei. Study on the Influence of Working Condition Parameters on the Dynamic Contact and Microslip Behavior between Main Cable Strand and Saddle of Suspension Bridge[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 60(19): 144-158.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: http://www.cjmenet.com.cn/CN/10.3901/JME.2024.19.144

http://www.cjmenet.com.cn/CN/Y2024/V60/I19/144

参考文献

[1] 薛光雄. 公路桥梁施工系列手册：悬索桥[M]. 北京：人民交通出版社，2014. XUE Guangxiong. Serial handbooks of highway-bridge construction：Suspension bridge[M]. Beijing：China Communications Press，2014.
[2] 孟凡超，王仁贵，徐国平. 悬索桥[M]. 北京：人民交通出版社，2016. MENG Fanchao，WANG Rengui，XU Guoping. Suspension bridge[M]. Beijing：China Communications Press，2016.
[3] 付春晓，雷俊卿. 既有悬索桥主缆现状的检测与研究[J]. 世界桥梁，2002(4)：70-74. FU Chunxiao，LEI Junqing. Detection and research on current status of main cable of existing suspension bridge[J]. World Bridges，2002(4)：70-74.
[4] 严琨，沈锐利，王涛，等. 基于初弯曲梁单元的大跨度悬索桥主缆弯曲刚度分析[J]. 公路交通科技，2015，32(3)：89-95. YAN Kun，SHEN Ruili，WANG Tao，et al. Study on bending stiffness of main cable of long-span suspension bridge based on original curvature beam element[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development，2015，32(3)：89-95.
[5] YAU J D. Dynamic response analysis of suspended beams subjected to moving vehicles and multiple support excitations[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration，2009，325(4-5)：907-922.
[6] CHENG Z，ZHANG Q，BAO Y，et al. Analytical models of frictional resistance between cable and saddle equipped with friction plates for multispan suspension bridges[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering，2018，23(1)：1-13.
[7] 齐东春，沈锐利，刘章军，等. 悬索桥有限元计算的三节点空间鞍座单元[J]. 西南交通大学学报，2014，49(6)：942-947. QI Dongchun，SHEN Ruili，LIU Zhangjun，et al. 3-node sptial saddle element for finite element calculation of suspension bridge[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University，2014，49(6)：942-947.
[8] ZHANG N，XIA H. Vehicle-bridge interaction analysis under high-speed trains[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration，2008，309(3-5)：407-425.
[9] XIA H，GUO W. Lateral dynamic interaction analysis of a train-girder-pier system[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration，2008，318(4)：927-942.
[10] 田继科. 大跨悬索桥缆索系统耐久性的分析研究[D]. 北京：北京交通大学，2010. TIAN Jike. Study and analysis on durability of cable system of long-span suspension bridge[D]. Beijing：Beijing Jiaotong University，2010.
[11] 李国豪. 桥梁结构稳定与振动[M]. 北京：中国铁道出版社，2002. LI Guohao. Stability and vibration of bridge structures[M]. Beijing：China Railway Publishing House，2002.
[12] HONG K J，YI C，LEE Y K. Geometry and friction of helically wrapped wires in a cable subjected to tension and bending[J]. International Journal of Steel Structures，2012，12(2)：233-242.
[13] TAKENA K，SASAKI M，HATA K，et al. Slip behavior of cable against saddle in suspension bridges[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering，1992，118(2)：377-391.
[14] 吉林，陈策，冯兆祥. 三塔悬索桥中塔主缆与鞍座间抗滑移试验研究[J]. 公路，2007(6)：1-6. JI Lin，CHEN Ce，FENG Zhaoxiang. A study on slip resistance between main cabie and saddle on middle tower of three-tower suspension bridge[J]. Highway，2007(6)：1-6.
[15] 陈策，吉林，冯兆祥. 悬索桥主缆与鞍座间摩擦因数的测定[J]. 中外公路，2008(1)：120-123. CHEN Ce，JI Lin，FENG Zhaoxiang. Determination of friction coefficient between main cable and saddle of suspension bridge[J]. Journal of China & Foreign Highway，2008(1)：120-123.
[16] 周凌远，李乔. 缆索与鞍座间的摩擦特性[J]. 兰州理工大学学报，2011，37(2)：117-121. ZHOU Lingyuan，LI Qiao. Characteristics of friction between cable and saddle[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University of Technology，2011，37(2)：117-121.
[17] 张清华，李乔. 悬索桥主缆与鞍座间摩擦特性试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报，2013，46(4)：85-92. ZHANG Qinghua，LI Qiao. Study on cable-saddle frictional characteristics of long-span suspension bridges[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal，2013，46(4)：85-92.
[18] 苏洋. 悬索桥AS法主缆索鞍抗滑移试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报，2022，41(5)：66-73. SU Yang. Cable-saddle anti-slipping test of AS method suspension bridges[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University，2022，41(5)：66-73.
[19] 高文丽. 悬索桥主缆钢丝动态接触与滑移行为研究[D]. 徐州：中国矿业大学，2020. GAO Wenli. Study on dynamic contact and slipping behavior of main cable steel wire of suspension bridge[D]. Xuzhou：China University of Mining and Technology，2020.
[20] 王大刚，朱辉龙，高文丽. 悬索桥主缆平行钢丝动态接触与滑移机理研究[J]. 机械工程学报，2021，57(11)：228-242. WANG Dagang，ZHU Huilong，GAO Wenli. Research on dynamic contact and slip mechanisms of parallel steel wires in the main cable of suspension bridge[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering，2021，57(11)：228-242.
[21] WANG D G，WANG B，GAO W L，et al. Dynamic contact behaviors of saddle materials for suspension bridge[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis，2022，134：106031.
[22] 朱辉龙. 大跨度悬索桥主缆力学行为及滑移特性研究[D]. 徐州：中国矿业大学，2021. ZHU Huilong. Research on mechanical behavior and slip characteristic of main cable of long-span suspension bridge[D]. Xuzhou：China University of Mining and Technology，2021.
[23] WANG D G，ZHU H L，XU W，et al. Contact and slip behaviors of main cable of the long-span suspension bridge[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis，2022，136：106232.
[24] 季申增. 悬索桥主缆与索鞍间侧向力及摩擦滑移特性分析[D]. 成都：西南交通大学，2017. JI Shenzeng. Character analysis of lateral force and slip friction between main cable and saddle in suspension bridge[D]. Chengdu：Southwest Jiaotong University，2017.
[25] 肖刚. 三塔悬索桥主缆与鞍座抗滑移设计研究[D]. 成都：西南交通大学，2015. XIAO Gang. Research on the design of anti slide between main cable and saddle of three-pylon suspension bridges[D]. Chengdu：Southwest Jiaotong University，2015.
[26] 肖纬，王志强，魏红一. 考虑缆索滑移的精细化索鞍模型[J]. 石家庄铁道大学学报，2016，29(2)：22-27. XIAO Wei，WANG Zhiqiang，WEI Hongyi. Detailed saddle model considering stick-slip of the cable[J]. Journal of Shijiazhuang Tiedao University，2016，29(2)：22-27.
[27] 王祥如. 钢丝多轴微动腐蚀疲劳损伤机理研究[D]. 徐州：中国矿业大学，2018. WANG Xiangru. Study on multiaxial fretting corrosion fatigue damage mechanism of steel wires[D]. Xuzhou：China University of Mining and Technology，2018.
[28] 王大刚. 钢丝的微动损伤行为及其微动疲劳寿命预测研究[D]. 徐州：中国矿业大学，2012. WANG Dagang. Study on fretting damage behaviors and fretting fatigue life estimation of steel wires[D]. Xuzhou：China University of Mining and Technology，2012.
[29] 李博，吴煌，李腾. 基于加权的综采导水裂隙带高度多元非线性回归预测方法研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报，2022，39(3)：536-545. LI Bo，WU Huang，LI Teng. Height prediction of water-conducting fractured zone under fully mechanized mining based on weighted multivariate nonlinear regression[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering，2022，39(3)：536-545.
[30] 陈贵坤，曾凯，邢保英，等. 铝合金自冲铆工艺参数的多元非线性回归模型[J]. 机械工程学报，2022，58(22)：227-234. CHEN Guikun，ZENG Kai，XING Baoying，et al. Multiple nonlinear regression model of process parameters for aluminum alloy self-piercing riveting[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering，2022，58(22)：227-234.
[31] 冯存傲，张德坤，郭永波，等. 基于弧面法的摩擦式提升机衬垫摩擦性能测定[J]. 煤炭学报，2017，42(7)：1899-1905. FENG Cunao，ZHANG Dekun，GUO Yongbo，et al. A measurement to study on the frictional properties of friction hoist’s liner based on arc method[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2017，42(7)：1899-1905.
[32] 王路，沈锐利，白伦华，等. 悬索桥主缆与索鞍间滑移行为及力学特征试验[J]. 中国公路学报，2018，31(9)：79-87，107. WANG Lu，SHEN Ruili，BAI Lunhua，et al. Test for slip behavior and mechanical characteristics between main cable and saddle in suspension bridges[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport，2018，31(9)：79-87，107.