韧性产品交互式概念设计与知识推理方法研究

doi:10.3901/JME.2023.11.074

机械工程学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (11): 74-83.doi: 10.3901/JME.2023.11.074

• 特邀专栏:智能产品交互设计 • 上一篇下一篇

扫码分享

韧性产品交互式概念设计与知识推理方法研究

郭鑫^1,2, 王海涵^1,2, 王杰^1,2, 张凯^1,2, 赵武^1,2

1. 四川大学机械工程学院成都 610065;
2. 四川大学创新方法与创新设计四川省重点实验室成都 610065

收稿日期:2021-10-31 修回日期:2022-09-15 出版日期:2023-06-05 发布日期:2023-07-19
通讯作者: 赵武(通信作者),男,1968年出生,博士,教授,博士研究生导师。主要研究方向为创新设计与智能设计、智能装备。E-mail:zhaowu@scu.edu.cn
作者简介:郭鑫,男,1989年出生,博士,副研究员,硕士研究生导师。主要研究方向为人工智能技术辅助产品设计、知识辅助设计与系统。E-mail:guoxin@scu.edu.cn;王海涵,男,1997年出生,硕士研究生。主要研究方向为产品概念设计。E-mail:541200537@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2018YFB1700702)、国家自然科学基金(52175241)和四川省科技计划资助(2022YFG0065)资助项目

Research on Interactive Conceptual Design and Knowledge Reasoning Method of Resilient Products

GUO Xin^1,2, WANG Haihan^1,2, WANG Jie^1,2, ZHANG Kai^1,2, ZHAO Wu^1,2

1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065;
2. The Innovation Method and Creative Design Key Laboratory, Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610065

Received:2021-10-31 Revised:2022-09-15 Online:2023-06-05 Published:2023-07-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 设计具有更好的容错性和修正空间的韧性产品，有效应对复杂环境带来的扰动，是未来智能产品创新的关键因素之一。传统概念设计研究着重强调需求转化与功构映射，忽略了环境扰动对设计目标的影响，导致概念设计过程知识推理模糊、产品韧性水平不稳定等问题。论文以设计出具有抵御扰动、并能从破坏或冲击中恢复自身功能的韧性产品为目标，提出一种韧性产品交互式概念求解过程模型。基于“用户需求”正向收敛与“复杂环境”逆向扰动，构建韧性产品“需求-扰动”下设计目标理解及功能分解、基于功构配置的知识推理扩展方法(Requirement function knowledge deployment，RFKD)以及基于多阶段、交互式遗传算法的概念方案求解机制(Multi-stage interactive genetic algorithm for resilient conceptual design，MIGA-RCD)，并以核环境下某型号智能吊装平台概念设计过程为例验证了方法的可行性与有效性。相关成果在扰动-意图-方案交互驱动的韧性概念设计理论研究中实现了创新，有助于实现设计方案的智能求解与推理。

关键词: 韧性产品, 概念设计, 交互式遗传算法, 知识推理

Abstract: Designing resilient products with better fault tolerance and correction space, and effectively responding to disturbances caused by complex environments, is one of the key factors for future smart product innovation. Traditional conceptual design research emphasizes demand transformation and function-structure mapping, ignoring the impact of environmental disturbances on design goals, leading to problems such as fuzzy knowledge reasoning in the conceptual design process and unstable product resilience levels. The manuscript aims to design resilient products that are resistant to disturbances and can recover themselves from damage or impact, an interactive concept-solving process model for resilient products is proposed. Based on the forward convergence of “customer requirement” and the reverse disturbance of “complex environment”, the design goal understanding and function decomposition under “requirement-disturbance” of resilient products are constructed, and the knowledge reasoning extension method based on requirement function knowledge deployment (RFKD) and multi-stage interactive genetic algorithm for resilient conceptual design (MIGA-RCD). Taking the conceptual design process of a certain type of intelligent hoisting platform in a nuclear environment as an example to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the method.The results are innovative in the theoretical study of resilient conceptual design under the influence of interference-intention-solution interactions and help to achieve intelligent solution and reasoning for design schemes.

Key words: resilience products, conceptual design, interactive genetic algorithm, knowledge reasoning

中图分类号:

TG156

郭鑫, 王海涵, 王杰, 张凯, 赵武. 韧性产品交互式概念设计与知识推理方法研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(11): 74-83.

GUO Xin, WANG Haihan, WANG Jie, ZHANG Kai, ZHAO Wu. Research on Interactive Conceptual Design and Knowledge Reasoning Method of Resilient Products[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 59(11): 74-83.

参考文献

[1] FENG Q，ZHAO X，FAN D，et al. Resilience design method based on meta-structure:a case study of offshore wind farm[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety，2019，186:232-244.
[2] VACHTSEVANOS G，LEE B，OH S，et al. Resilient design and operation of cyber physical systems with emphasis on unmanned autonomous systems[J]. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems，2018，91(1):59-83.
[3] TIEN I. Resilient by design:the case for increasing resilience of buildings and their linked food- energy-water systems[J]. Elementa (Washington，D.C.)，2018，6(1):18.
[4] ABDULKAREEM M，ELKADI H. From engineering to evolutionary，an overarching approach in identifying the resilience of urban design to flood[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction，2018，28:176-190.
[5] KUNZLER A M，GILAN D A，KALISCH R，et al. Current concepts of resilience research[J]. Nervenarzt，2018，89(7):747-753.
[6] THOMKE S H. The role of flexibility in the development of new products:an empirical study[J]. Research Policy，1997，26(1):105-119.
[7] 李彦，刘红围，李梦蝶，等. 设计思维研究综述[J]. 机械工程学报，2017，53(15):1-20. LI Yan，LIU Hongwei，LI Mengdie，et al. Review on research of design thinking[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering，2017，53(15):1-20.
[8] GUO X，LIU Y，ZHAO W，et al. Supporting resilient conceptual design using functional decomposition and conflict resolution[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics，2021，48:101262.
[9] CHEN Y，LIU Z，XIE Y. A multi-agent-based approach for conceptual design synthesis of multi-disciplinary systems[J]. International Journal of Production Research，2014，52(6):1681-1694.
[10] 刘晓敏，李娇蓉，陈亮，等. 融合可拓学与多层次知识建模的仿生原型获取[J]. 机械工程学报，2019，55(21):150-160. LIU Xiaomin，LI Jiaorong，CHEN Liang，et al. Bionic prototype acquisition incorporating extension and multi-level knowledge modeling[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering，2019，55(21):150-160.
[11] FENG C，HUANG S，BAI Z. A group decision making method for sustainable design using intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations in the conceptual design stage[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production，2020，243:118640.
[12] GUO X，WANG J，ZHAO W，et al. Study of medical device innovation design strategy based on demand analysis and process case base[J]. Multimedia Tools and Applications，2016，75(22):14351-14365.
[13] ZHANG W J，LIN Y. On the principle of design of resilient systems - application to enterprise information systems[J]. Enterprise Information Systems，2010，4(2):99-110.
[14] NEUBERT J，LIPSON H. Soldercubes:a self-soldering self-reconfiguring modular robot system[J]. Autonomous Robots，2016，40(1):139-158.
[15] MOOSAVIAN A，XI F J. Modular design of parallel robots with static redundancy[J]. Mechanism and Machine Theory，2016，96:26-37.
[16] 谢友柏. 设计科学与设计竞争力[M]. 北京:科学出版社，2018. XIE Youbai. Design science and design competitiveness[M]. Beijing:China Science Press，2018.
[17] 谭建荣. 制造业与互联网融合的趋势和实践[J]. 物联网学报，2018，2(4):1-4. TAN Jianrong. Trends and practices in the integration of manufacturing and the Internet[J]. Chinese Journal on Internet of Things，2018，2(4):1-4.
[18] CHEN L，DUAN G，WANG S，et al. A choquet integral based fuzzy logic approach to solve uncertain multi-criteria decision making problem[J]. Expert Systems with Applications，2020，149:113303.
[19] 郭鑫，赵武，王杰，等. 面向创新设计的工艺设计知识模型及检索方法研究[J]. 机械工程学报，2017，53(15):66-72. GUO Xin，ZHAO Wu，WANG Jie，et al. A study of knowledge modeling and retrieval methods oriented towards innovative design of manufacturing planning[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering，2017，53(15):66-72.
[20] HUI Q，LI Y，TAO Y，et al. Triple-helix structured model based on problem-knowledge-solution co-evolution for innovative product design process[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering，2020，33(1):1-15.
[21] SHI Y，PENG Q. Enhanced customer requirement classification for product design using big data and improved kano model[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics，2021，49:101340.
[22] 李洪杰，肖人彬. 基于约束网络的机械产品设计方法原理[J]. 机械工程学报，2004，40(1):121-126. LI Hongjie，XIAO Renbin. Principle of mechanical product design methodology based on constraint network[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering，2004，40(1):121-126.
[23] HATCHUEL A，WEIL B. C-K design theory:an advanced formulation[J]. Research in Engineering Design，2009，19(4):181-192.
[24] GUO X，ZHAO W，HU H，et al. A smart knowledge deployment method for the conceptual design of low-carbon products[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production，2021，321.
[25] ZHU S，WU J，XIONG H，et al. Scaling up top- K cosine similarity search[J]. Data & Knowledge Engineering，2011，70(1):60-83.
[26] CAO C，LI C，YANG Q，et al. Multi-objective optimization model of emergency organization allocation for sustainable disaster supply chain[J]. Sustainability，2017，9(11):2103.
[27] DOU R，ZONG C，NAN G. Multi-stage interactive genetic algorithm for collaborative product customization[J]. Knowledge-based Systems，2016，92:43-54.

韧性产品交互式概念设计与知识推理方法研究

Research on Interactive Conceptual Design and Knowledge Reasoning Method of Resilient Products

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	娄山河, 冯毅雄, 胡炳涛, 洪兆溪, 谭建荣. 人机认知协同的复杂装备概念设计：挑战、进展和展望[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(11): 2-19.
[2]	景立挺, 陈盈臣, 谢静, 谭博文, 姜少飞. 考虑用户权重不一致性和复杂交互影响的产品可持续设计需求评估研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(3): 218-231.
[3]	娄山河, 冯毅雄, 郑浩, 胡炳涛, 洪兆溪, 谭建荣. 模拟人脑工作机制的机械产品概念设计行为原理启发求解方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(24): 344-358.
[4]	龙辉, 郝佳, 牛红伟, 王国新, 张非凡. 基于情境的CAD模型手势操控技术[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(10): 374-382.
[5]	李雨桐, 王玉新, 张旭光. 机械系统功能行为合成与创新[J]. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(19): 128-137.
[6]	郑浩, 冯毅雄, 高一聪, 谭建荣. 基于性能演化的复杂产品概念设计求解过程研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(9): 214-223.
[7]	侯文彬, 单春来, 于野, 张红哲. 模块化平台的模块划分及共享模块筛选方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(1): 188-196.
[8]	张建辉, 檀润华, 张争艳, 代金玲, 杨欣霖. 计算机辅助创新技术驱动的产品概念设计与详细设计集成研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(5): 47-57.
[9]	刘晓敏, 黄水平, 王建辉, 林贵杰. 基于TRIZ及功能类比的产品概念设计创新^*[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(23): 34-42.
[10]	康与云, 唐敦兵. 基于矩阵算式和蚁群算法的元功能链设计方案优化方法^*[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(23): 25-33.
[11]	姜少飞, 周升铭, 李吉泉, 卞耀威. 基于物-场可供性模型提升产品设计质量的研究^*[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(15): 128-138.
[12]	徐锋;纪杨建;祁国宁;顾新建. 基于低碳与成本约束的机电产品包装概念设计[J]. , 2014, 50(10): 199-205.
[13]	徐锋;顾新建;纪杨建;祁国宁. 基于低碳约束的产品概念设计方法研究[J]. , 2013, 49(7): 58-65.
[14]	杨波;高常青;尹晓玲;王兴组;姚孔. 面向概念设计的扩展功能建模方法[J]. , 2013, 49(15): 153-162.
[15]	刘征;鲁娜;孙凌云. 面向概念设计过程的隐性知识获取方法[J]. , 2011, 47(14): 184-191.