不同胶接参数对CFRP层合板单搭胶接结构强度的影响及优化设计

doi:10.3901/JME.2021.08.154

机械工程学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (8): 154-165.doi: 10.3901/JME.2021.08.154

扫码分享

不同胶接参数对CFRP层合板单搭胶接结构强度的影响及优化设计

胡春幸, 侯玉亮, 铁瑛, 李成, 毛振刚

郑州大学机械与动力工程学院郑州 450001

收稿日期:2020-04-10 修回日期:2020-10-14 出版日期:2021-04-20 发布日期:2021-06-15
通讯作者: 李成(通信作者)，男，1962年出生，博士，教授，博士研究生导师。主要研究方向为复合材料力学。E-mail：chengli@zzu.edu.cn
作者简介:胡春幸，男，1993年出生，硕士研究生。主要研究方向为复合材料胶接结构。E-mail：huchunxing2020@163.com;侯玉亮，男，1988年出生，博士，讲师，硕士研究生导师。主要研究方向为复合材料力学与结构优化设计。E-mail：yulianghou@zzu.edu.cn;毛振刚，男，1994年出生，硕士研究生。主要研究方向为复合材料损伤分析。E-mail：1358434420@qq.com;铁瑛，女，1978年出生，博士，副教授，硕士研究生导师。主要研究方向为复合材料机械强度。E-mail：tieying@zzu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（U1833116，52005451）和河南省等学校重点科研（20A460003）资助项目。

Influence of Different Bonding Parameters on the Strength of CFRP Laminates with Single Lap Bonding Structure and Optimization

HU Chunxing, HOU Yuliang, TIE Ying, LI Cheng, MAO Zhengang

School of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001

Received:2020-04-10 Revised:2020-10-14 Online:2021-04-20 Published:2021-06-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对于碳纤维增强基复合材料（Carbon fibre-reinforced polymer， CFRP）层合板单搭胶接结构的优化问题，首先利用连续损伤力学模型、三维Hashin准则和内聚力模型研究不同胶接参数对CFRP层压板单搭胶接结构力学性能的影响，其次采用拉丁超立方试验设计方法和响应面法构建了拉伸强度代理模型，最后基于遗传算法和代理模型进行联合优化。结果表明，仿真与试验吻合较好，数值结果与试验结果的误差均低于10%，验证了有限元模型的精确性。随着搭接长度的增大，拉伸强度和层合板层间分层损伤程度逐渐增大，剪切强度和胶层自身剪切失效程度逐渐减小；胶接结构的力学性能及失效形式随着铺层方式的不同而改变。最佳铺层顺序、胶接长度、胶层厚度和搭接宽度分别为[0₃/90₃]_2s、20 mm、0.060 7 mm和10 mm。与常规单搭胶接结构相比，拉伸强度和剪切强度分别提高了25.92%和25.88%。采用遗传算法对CFRP层合板单搭胶接结构进行优化，对提高单搭接接头的力学性能具有重要意义。

关键词: 单搭胶接结构, 胶接参数, 连接强度, 代理模型, 优化设计

Abstract: To obtain the optimization of single lap joint(SLJ) of CFRP laminates, the effects of different bonding parameters on the mechanical properties of SLJ are firstly studied by using continuum damage mechanics(CDM) model, 3D Hashin damage criterion and cohesion zone model(CZM). Moreover, a surrogate model of tensile strength is constructed using the Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) method and response surface method(RSM). Finally, the optimized design of CFRP SLJ structure is obtained by combination of the surrogate model and genetic algorithm(GA). The results show that, the error is less than 10% between the numerical and experimental results, which proves the validity of the used numerical model. As the lap length increases, the tensile strength and the delamination damage between adjacent layers of the laminates are gradually increased. Additionally, the shear strength and the shear failure level of the adhesive are gradually reduced. The connection performance and failure form of the adhesively bonded structure change with different stacking sequences. The best stacking sequences, lap lengths, adhesive thickness and lap widths are [0₃/90₃]_2s, 20 mm, 0.060 7 mm, and 10 mm, respectively. Compared with the conventional SLJ, the tensile and shear strengths are increased by 25.92% and 25.88%, respectively. Genetic algorithm is used to optimize the SLJ of CFRP laminates, which is of great significance to improve the mechanical properties of SLJ.

Key words: single-lap joints, adhesively bonding parameters, connection strength, surrogate model, optimization

中图分类号:

TB332

胡春幸, 侯玉亮, 铁瑛, 李成, 毛振刚. 不同胶接参数对CFRP层合板单搭胶接结构强度的影响及优化设计[J]. 机械工程学报, 2021, 57(8): 154-165.

HU Chunxing, HOU Yuliang, TIE Ying, LI Cheng, MAO Zhengang. Influence of Different Bonding Parameters on the Strength of CFRP Laminates with Single Lap Bonding Structure and Optimization[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 57(8): 154-165.

参考文献

[1] ABUSREA M，ARAKAWA K. Improvement of an adhesive joint constructed from carbon fiber-reinforced plastic and dry carbon fiber laminates[J]. Composite Part B 2016，97：368-373.
[2] YANG C Q，WANG X L，JIAO Y J，et al. Linear strain sensing performance of continuous high strength carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites[J]. Composite Part B 2016，102：86-93.
[3] CHOWDHURY N，WANG J，CHIU W，et al. Experimental and finite element studies of thin bonded and hybrid carbon fiber double lap joints used in aircraft structures[J]. Composite Part B，2016，85：233-242.
[4] 吕胜利，程起有，姚磊江，等. 损伤复合材料层板胶接修理的优化设计[J]. 机械强度，2007，29(4)：598-600. LÜ Shengli，CHENG Qiyou，YAO Leijiang，et al. Optimization design of adhesive bonding repair of damaged composite laminates[J]. Journal of Mechanical Strength，2007，29(4)：598-600.
[5] 邓雅琼，陈洋，栗娜，等. 三维编织复合材料与金属胶接结构的力学性能与优化[J]. 复合材料学报，2018，35(10)：2760-2767. DENG Yaqiong，CHEN Yang，LI Na，et al. Mechanical properties and optimization adhesive structure of three-dimensional braided composites and metal[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica，2018，35(10)：2760-2767.
[6] KIM M H，HONG H S. An adaptation of mixed-modeⅠ+Ⅱcontinuum damage model for prediction of fracture characteristics in adhesively bonded joint[J]. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives，2018，80：87-103.
[7] HAMIT A. Effect of overlap length and scarf angle on the mechanical properties of different adhesive joints subjected to tensile loads[J]. Materials Testing，2017，59：536-546.
[8] AKPINAR I A，GULTEKIN K，AKPINAR S，et al. Research on strength of nanocomposite adhesively bonded composite joints[J]. Composites Part B，2017，126：143-152.
[9] JIANG Z W，WAN S，KELLER T，et al. Two-dimensional analytical stress distribution model for unbalanced FRP composite single-lap joints[J]. European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids，2017，66：341-355.
[10] KHAN M A，AGLITTI G S，CROCOMBE A D，et al. Development of design allowables for the design of composite bonded double-lap joints in aerospace applications[J]. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives，2018，82：221-232.
[11] ZHAO L B，WANG Y N，QIN T L，et al. A new material model for 2d FE analysis of adhesively bonded composite joints[J]. Materials Science，2014，20(4)：468-473.
[12] RIBEIRO T E A，CAMPILHO R D S G，DA S L F，et al. Damage analysis of composite aluminium adhesively bonded single-lap joints[J]. Composite Structures，2016，13：25-33.
[13] LI J F，YAN Y，ZHANG T T，et al. Experimental study of adhesively bonded CFRP joints subjected to tensile loads[J]. International Journal of Adhesion &; Adhesives，2015，57：95-104.
[14] SULU I Y. Mechanical behavior of single-lap and double-lap adhesive joined composite parts[J]. Mechanical Testing Numerical Simulation，2017，59：11-12.
[15] GUO X，GUAN Z D，NIE H C，et al. Damage tolerance analysis of adhesively bonded composite single lap joints containing a debond flaw[J]. The Journal of Adhesion，2016，93(3)：216-234.
[16] 吴义韬，姚卫星，吴富强. 复合材料层合板面内渐进损伤分析的CDM模型[J]. 力学学报，2014，46(1)：94-104. WU Yitao，YAO Weixing，WU Fuqiang. CDM model for intralaminar progressive damage analysis of composite laminates[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics，2014，46(1)：94-104.
[17] 苗学周，李成，铁瑛，等. 补片形状和尺寸对复合材料胶接修补的影响[J]. 机械工程学报，2014，50(20)：63-69. MIAO Xuezhou，LI Cheng，TIE Ying，et al. Influence of patch shape and size on adhesively bonded composite repair[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering，2014，50(20)：63-69.
[18] 段元欣，张开富，王中强，等. L形碳纤维增强复合材料/铝合金胶接复合构件剥离应力建模与分析[J]. 机械工程学报，2012，48(2)：44-50. DUAN Yuanxin，ZHANG Kaifu，WANG Zhongqiang，et al. Peeling stress model and analysis of single-l carbon fiber reinforced plastic/polymer/Al composite component [J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering，2012，48(2)：44-50.
[19] 侯文彬，刘璟琳，陈广义，等. 胶层缺陷对胶接-拉铆搭接剪切接头力学性能影响研究[J]. 机械工程学报，2019，55(24)：37-44. HOU Wenbin，LIU Jinglin，CHEN Guangyi，et al. Effect of defects in adhesive layer on the mechanical property of hybrid bond-riveted lap shear joint[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering，2019，55(24)：37-44.
[20] 毛振刚，侯玉亮，李成，等. 搭接长度和铺层方式对CFRP层合板胶接结构连接性能和损伤行为的影响[J]. 复合材料学报，2020，37(1)：121-131. MAO Zhengang，HOU Yuliang，LI Cheng，et al. Effect of lap length and stacking sequence on strength and damage behaviors of adhesively bonded CFRP laminates [J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica，2020，37(1)：121-131.
[21] 鲁大伟，李书. 应用免疫遗传算法优化设计层合板铺层顺序[J]．北京航空航天大学学报，2005，31(2)：247-250. LU Dawei，LI Shu. Application of immune genetic algorithm to optimize the design of laminate ply sequence [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics，2005，31(2)：247-250.
[22] SULU I Y. Mechanical behavior of composite parts adhesively jointed with the insert double-lap joint under tensile load[J]. Welding in the World，2018，62：403-413.
[23] CAMPILHO R D S G，BANEA M D，PINTO A M G，et al. Strength prediction of single- and double-lap joints by standard and extended finite element modelling[J]. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives，2011，31(5)：363-372.
[24] SUN L G，LI C，TIE Y，et al. Experimental and numerical investigations of adhesively bonded CFRP single-lap joints subjected to tensile loads[J]. Int. J. Adhesion Adhes.，2019，95：102402.
[25] ERDAL O，SONMEZ F O. Optimum design of composite laminates for maximum buckling load capacity using simulated annealing[J]. Composite Structures，2005，71：45-52.
[26] MAHDI A N，KAZEM F，DAMINO P，et al. Surrogate-based multi-objective optimization of a composite laminate with curvilinear fibers[J]. Composite Structures，2012(94)：2306-2313.
[27] GUO W，XUE P，YANG J. Nonlinear progressive damage model for composite laminates used for low velocity impact[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics，2013，34(9)：1145-1154.
[28] HOU Y L，TIE Y，LI C，et al. Low-velocity impact behaviors of repaired CFRP laminates：Effect of impact location and external patch configurations[J]. Composites Part B，2019，163：669-680.

不同胶接参数对CFRP层合板单搭胶接结构强度的影响及优化设计

Influence of Different Bonding Parameters on the Strength of CFRP Laminates with Single Lap Bonding Structure and Optimization

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	程洪鑫, 李璐祎, 周长聪. 基于Kriging模型和代理抽样的分布参数不确定性灵敏度分析方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(8): 370-383.
[2]	孟原, 史宝军, 张德权. Kriging-高维代理模型建模方法研究与改进[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(5): 249-263.
[3]	俞水, 吴晓, 郭鹏, 王志华. 基于首次穿越PDF自适应估计的时变可靠性分析方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(5): 264-275.
[4]	吕利叶, 鲁玉军, 王硕, 刘印, 李昆鹏, 宋学官. 代理模型技术及其应用：现状与展望[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(3): 254-281.
[5]	王旭, 姜兴宇, 杨国哲, 孙猛, 于沈弘, 毕凯航, 赵日铮, 刘伟军. 基于PSO-SSA的激光清洗装备人机界面布局优化研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(20): 372-387.
[6]	彭翔, 陈轲楠, 王明博, 易兵, 李吉泉, 姜少飞. 基于改进堆叠顺序表法的变厚度复合结构铺层序列优化设计[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(19): 199-211.
[7]	张艳斌, 张世雄, 孙维光, 张继旺, 张立民. 混合动力动车组动力包隔振设计及试验研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(16): 314-323.
[8]	赵峰, 胡伟飞, 李光, 邓晓豫, 刘振宇, 郭云飞, 谭建荣. 基于混合指标自适应采样代理模型的多目标优化设计方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(13): 81-91.
[9]	胡伟飞, 廖家乐, 郭云飞, 鄢继铨, 李光, 岳海峰, 谭建荣. 基于物理信息神经网络的时变可靠性分析方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(13): 141-153.
[10]	刘强, 高晴利, 王伟, 韩邦成, 牛萍娟, 王子羲. 激光巨量转移复合型运动平台用洛伦兹磁轴承[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(1): 198-209.
[11]	谷永振, 段宝岩, 杜敬利, 史伟杰, 张永涛, 武路鹏, 冯树飞. 基于改进力密度法和非线性有限元法的索-膜-桁架天线形态优化设计[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(9): 252-262.
[12]	张广冬, 黄翔. 以制品几何精度为目标的塑料挤出模具优化设计方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(8): 142-150.
[13]	范小宁, 王凯, 余畅. 基于约束边界抽样的起重机金属结构可靠性优化[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(8): 288-298.
[14]	李春明, 孙晓霞, 张涛, 舒成龙, 张帅, 宋学官. 基于组合代理模型的变海拔工况车辆动力总成流动性能优化[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(4): 135-144.
[15]	杨强, 孙本奇, 李树军, 戴建生. 面向构态切换稳定性的约束变胞机构可靠性优化设计方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(3): 22-37.