代理模型技术及其应用：现状与展望

doi:10.3901/JME.2024.03.254

机械工程学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (3): 254-281.doi: 10.3901/JME.2024.03.254

扫码分享

代理模型技术及其应用：现状与展望

吕利叶¹, 鲁玉军¹, 王硕², 刘印², 李昆鹏², 宋学官²

1. 浙江理工大学机械工程学院杭州 310018;
2. 大连理工大学机械工程学院大连 116024

收稿日期:2023-03-01 修回日期:2023-09-04 出版日期:2024-02-05 发布日期:2024-04-28
通讯作者: 宋学官,男,1982年出生,博士,教授,博士研究生导师。主要研究方向为多学科建模分析与优化设计、工业大数据与人工智能技术、装备智能化和数字孪生等。E-mail:sxg@dlut.edu.cn
作者简介:吕利叶,女, 1988 年出生,博士,讲师。主要研究方向为代理模型、多保真度代理模型、试验设计、优化设计、数字孪生等。E-mail:lvliye@zstu.edu.cn;鲁玉军,男, 1976 年出生,博士,教授,硕士研究生导师。主要研究方向为数字化设计与制造、智能制造、工业工程、TRIZ 创新方法等。E-mail:luet_lyj@zstu.edu.cn;王硕,男, 1993 年出生,博士。主要研究方向为基于代理模型的优化设计和数字孪生。E-mail:wangshuo17@foxmail.com;刘印,女, 1992 年出生,博士。主要研究方向为多学科建模分析与结构优化,基于代理模型的数据预测与采样方法。Email:liuyin 8580@163.com;李昆鹏,男, 1992 年出生,博士。主要研究方向为基于代理模型的优化设计、装备智能化和数字孪生。E-mail:785282118@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2018YFB1700704)和国家自然科学基金(52075068)资助项目。

Survey and Prospect of Surrogate Model Technique and Application

LÜ Liye¹, LU Yujun¹, WANG Shuo², LIU Yin², LI Kunpeng², SONG Xueguan²

1. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018;
2. School of Mechanical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024

Received:2023-03-01 Revised:2023-09-04 Online:2024-02-05 Published:2024-04-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 代理模型是计算复杂且费时的数值分析模型的替代模型,在一定程度上弥补了传统工程优化设计和数值仿真分析设计周期长、计算成本高、维数灾难等短板。近年来,代理模型技术蓬勃发展,成果丰硕,被逐渐应用在航空航天、船舶、汽车、发电等领域。首先对代理模型进行总体概述,调查了近三十年代理模型相关论文发表总量与年发表量,总体分析了国内外学者在此领域的投入与产出。其次从试验设计、单保真度代理模型、多保真度代理模型这三方面较为详细地介绍了代理模型研究现状。接着围绕代理模型在优化设计中的应用展开调查,分析与概述了代理模型辅助的多学科优化设计、多目标优化设计和不确定性优化设计。最后归纳总结了代理模型技术目前存在的问题,并对未来的研究方向提出了一些建议。

关键词: 代理模型, 试验设计, 多保真度, 序列取样, 多目标优化设计, 多学科优化设计

Abstract: Surrogate model is a substitute of the numerical analysis model with complex and time-consuming calculation, which can make up for the shortcomings of traditional engineering optimization design and numerical simulation analysis, such as long design cycle, high computing costs, and curse of dimensionality. Surrogate model technique has developed rapidly and achieved abundant outcomes in recent years. It has been gradually applied in aerospace, ship industry, vehicle, power generation and other fields. First, this paper gives a general overview of the surrogate model technique, and investigates the total and increment number of papers published on the surrogate model in the past thirty years. Second, the research status of surrogate model and related typical methods and theories are introduced in detail from three aspects, namely design of experiments, single-fidelity surrogate model and multi-fidelity surrogate model. Then applications of surrogate model in optimization design are investigated. The overall investigation of the surrogate-assisted multidisciplinary, surrogate-assisted multi-objective, and surrogate-assisted uncertainty optimization design techniques are analysed and summarized. Finally, the underlying problems existing in the surrogate model technique are summarized, and some suggestions are proposed for the future research.

Key words: surrogate model, design of experiments, multi-fidelity, sequential sampling, multi-objective optimization design, multidisciplinary optimization design

中图分类号:

TG11

吕利叶, 鲁玉军, 王硕, 刘印, 李昆鹏, 宋学官. 代理模型技术及其应用：现状与展望[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(3): 254-281.

LÜ Liye, LU Yujun, WANG Shuo, LIU Yin, LI Kunpeng, SONG Xueguan. Survey and Prospect of Surrogate Model Technique and Application[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 60(3): 254-281.

参考文献

[1] QUEIPO N V, HAFTKA R T, WEI S, et al. Surrogate-based analysis and optimization[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2005, 41(1):1-28.
[2] CAI X, QIU H, GAO L, et al. An enhanced RBF-HDMR integrated with an adaptive sampling method for approximating high dimensional problems in engineering design[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2016, 53:1209-1229.
[3] GORISSEN D, COUCKUYT I, DEMEESTER P, et al. A surrogate modeling and adaptive sampling toolbox for computer based design[J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2010, 11(1):2051-2055.
[4] VENKATARAMAN S, HAFTKA R T. Structural optimization complexity:What has Moore's law done for us?[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2004, 28:375-387.
[5] FORRESTER A I J, SÓBESTER A, KEANE A J. Multi-fidelity optimization via surrogate modelling[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society A:Mathematical, 2007, 463(2088):3251-3269.
[6] PERI D, CAMPANA E F. High-fidelity models and multiobjective global optimization algorithms in simulation-based design[J]. Journal of Ship Research, 2005, 49(3):159-175.
[7] YANG J, ZHAN Z, ZHENG K, et al. Enhanced similarity-based metamodel updating strategy for reliability-based design optimization[J]. Engineering Optimization, 2016, 48(12):2026-2045.
[8] JIN R, CHEN W, SIMPSON T W. Comparative studies of metamodeling techniques under multiple modeling criteria[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2001, 23:1-13.
[9] SIMPSON T W, POPLINSKI J D, KOCH P N, et al. Metamodels for computer-based engineering design:Survey and recommendations[J]. Engineering With Computers, 2001, 17(2):129-150.
[10] KLEIJNEN J P C. Regression metamodels for generalizing simulation results[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1979, 9(2):93-96.
[11] BLANNING R W. The construction and implementation of metamodels[J]. Simulation, 1975, 24(6):177-184.
[12] O'HAGAN A. Bayesian analysis of computer code outputs:A tutorial[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2006, 91(10-11):1290-1300.
[13] BIEKER H P, SLUPPHAUG O, JOHANSEN T A. Real-time production optimization of oil and gas production systems:A technology survey[J]. SPE Production and Operations, 2007, 22(04):382-391.
[14] KLEIJNEN J P C. Kriging metamodeling in simulation:A review[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 192(3):707-716.
[15] 毛凤山,陈昌富,朱世民.代理模型方法及其在岩土工程中的应用综述[J].地基处理, 2020, 2(4):295-306. MAO Fengshan, CHEN Changfu, ZHU Shimin. Surrogate model method and its application in geotechnical engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Ground Improvement, 2020, 2(4):295-306.
[16] 韩忠华,许晨舟,乔建领,等.基于代理模型的高效全局气动优化设计方法研究进展[J].航空学报, 2020, 41(5):25-65. HAN Zhonghua, XU Chenzhou, QIAO Jianling, et al. Recent progress of efficient global aerodynamic shape optimization using surrogate-based approach[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(5):25-65.
[17] WALZER R. Galen, on medical experience[J]. Philosophy, 1946, 21(78):93-94.
[18] KOTZ S, JOHNSON N L. Breakthroughs in statistics:methodology and distribution[M]. New York:Springer Science & Business Media, 1992.
[19] METROPOLIS N, ULAM S. The Monte Carlo method[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1949, 44(247):335-341.
[20] 梁红霞."田口方法"的集大成者——田口玄一[J].中国质量, 2003(10):40. LIANG Hongxia. The master of "Taguchi Method" -Genichi Taguchi[J]. China Quality, 2003(10):40.
[21] 方开泰.均匀试验设计的理论、方法和应用——历史回顾[J].数理统计与管理, 2004, 23(3):69-80. FANG Kaitai. The theory, method and application of uniform test design——Historical review[J]. Application of Statistics and Management, 2004, 23(3):69-80.
[22] MCKAY M D, BECKMAN R J, CONOVER W J. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code[J]. Technometrics, 2000, 42(1):55-61.
[23] WANG G G, SHAN S Q. Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2007, 129(4):370-380.
[24] GARUD S S, KARIMI I A, KRAFT M. Design of computer experiments:A review[J]. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2017, 106(2):71-95.
[25] LIU H, ONG Y S, CAI J. A survey of adaptive sampling for global metamodeling in support of simulation-based complex engineering design[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2018, 57:393-416.
[26] OWEN A B. Orthogonal arrays for computer experiments, integration and visualization[J]. Statistica Sinica, 1992, 2(2):439-452.
[27] SACKS J, SCHILLER S B, WELCH W J. Designs for computer experiments[J]. Technometrics, 1989, 31(1):41-47.
[28] VIANA F A C. A tutorial on Latin hypercube design of experiments[J]. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2016, 32(5):1975-1985.
[29] KENNY Q Y, LI W, SUDJIANTO A. Algorithmic construction of optimal symmetric Latin hypercube designs[J]. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 2000, 90(1):145-159.
[30] WANG S, LV L, DU L, et al. An improved LHS approach for constrained design space based on successive local enumeration algorithm[C]//2019 IEEE 9th Annual International Conference on CYBER Technology in Automation, Control, and Intelligent Systems (CYBER). Suzhou, IEEE, 2019:896-899.
[31] VIANA F A C, VENTER G, BALABANOV V. An algorithm for fast optimal Latin hypercube design of experiments[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2010, 82(2):135-156.
[32] JIN R, CHEN W, SUDJIANTO A. On sequential sampling for global metamodeling in engineering design[C]//ASME 2002 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Montreal:International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 2002, 539-548.
[33] KUSHNER H J. A new method of locating the maximum point of an arbitrary multipeak curve in the presence of noise[J]. Journal of Basic Engineering, 1964, 86(1):97-106.
[34] STUCKMAN B E. A global search method for optimizing nonlinear systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1988, 18(6):965-977.
[35] SCHONLAU M, WELCH W J, JONES D R. Global versus local search in constrained optimization of computer models[R]//IMS Lecture Notes-Monograph Series. Hayward:Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 1998, 34:11-25.
[36] SÓBESTER A, LEARY S J, KEANE A J. On the design of optimization strategies based on global response surface approximation models[J]. Journal of Global Optimization, 2005, 33(1):31-59.
[37] LAM C Q. Sequential adaptive designs in computer experiments for response surface model fit[D]. Columbus:The Ohio State University, 2008.
[38] DESCHRIJVER D, CROMBECQ K, NGUYEN H M, et al. Adaptive sampling algorithm for macromodeling of parameterized S-Parameter responses[J]. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 2010, 59(1):39-45.
[39] XU S, LIU H, WANG X, et al. A robust error-pursuing sequential sampling approach for global metamodeling based on Voronoi diagram and cross validation[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2014, 136(7):69-74.
[40] HERTEN J V D, COUCKUYT I, DESCHRIJVER D, et al. A fuzzy hybrid sequential design strategy for global surrogate modeling of high-dimensional computer experiments[J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 2015, 37(2):A1020-A1039.
[41] ZHANG Y, KIM N H, HAFTKA R T. General-surrogate adaptive sampling using interquartile range for design space exploration[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2020, 142(5):051402.
[42] HUANG J,GAO Z,ZHOU Z,et al. An improved adaptive sampling and experiment design method for aerodynamic optimization[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2015, 28(5):1391-1399.
[43] XIAO N C, ZUO M J, ZHOU C. A new adaptive sequential sampling method to construct surrogate models for efficient reliability analysis[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2018, 169:330-338.
[44] ZHOU Q, WANG Y, CHOI S K, et al. A sequential multi-fidelity metamodeling approach for data regression[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2017, 134(15):199-212.
[45] WU J, LUO Z, ZHANG N, et al. A new sequential sampling method for constructing the high-order polynomial surrogate models[J]. Engineering Computations, 2018, 35(2):529-564.
[46] GUNST R F. Response surface methodology:process and product optimization using designed experiments[J]. Technometrics, 1996, 38(3):284-286.
[47] SACKS J, WELCH W J, MITCHELL T J, et al. Design and analysis of computer experiments[J]. Statistical Science, 1989, 4(4):409-423.
[48] PARK J, SANDBERG I W. Approximation and radial-basis-function networks[J]. Neural Computation, 1993, 5(2):305-316.
[49] BRERETON R G, LLOYD G R. Support vector machines for classification and regression[J]. Analyst, 2010, 135(2):230-267.
[50] LI H, XU B, LU G, et al. Multi-objective optimization of PEM fuel cell by coupled significant variables recognition, surrogate models and a multi-objective genetic algorithm[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2021, 236:114063.
[51] LANGLEY P, SIMON H A. Applications of machine learning and rule induction[J]. Communications of the ACM, 1995, 38(11):54-64.
[52] MATHERON G. Principles of geostatistics[J]. Economic Geology, 1963, 58(8):1246-1266.
[53] 刘海涛.基于近似模型的工程优化方法中相关问题研究及应用[D].大连:大连理工大学, 2016. LIU Haitao. The research and application of metamodel-based engineering optimization[D]. Dalian:Dalian University of Technology, 2016.
[54] HARDY R L. Multiquadric equations of topography and other irregular surfaces[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1971, 76(8):1905-1915.
[55] VAPNIK V N. An overview of statistical learning theory[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 1999, 10(5):988-999.
[56] 曹鸿钧,段宝岩.基于Kriging模型的后优化近似研究[J].机械设计与研究, 2004, 20(5):10-13. CAO Hongjun, DUAN Baoyan. Approximation research of post-optimization based on Kriging model[J]. Chinese Machine Design and Research, 2004, 20(5):10-13.
[57] 汤龙,王琥,李光耀. Kriging-HDMR非线性近似模型方法[J].力学学报, 2011, 43(4):780-784. TANG Long, WANG Hu, LI Guangyao. Kriging-HDMR nonlinear surrogate model method[J]. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2011, 43(4):780-784.
[58] 舒乐时,周奇,蒋平,等.基于序列Kriging模型的潜器型线优化设计[J].船舶工程, 2016, 38(9):43-46. SHU Leshi, ZHOU Qi, JIANG Ping, et al. Design optimization of submerged vehicle profile based on sequential Kriging model[J]. Ship Engineering, 2016, 38(9):43-46.
[59] 彭磊,刘莉,龙腾.基于径向基函数的卫星平台桁架结构优化设计[J].南京航空航天大学学报, 2014, 46(3):475-480. PENG Lei, LIU Li, LONG Teng. Satellite bus truss structure optimization using radial basis function[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2014, 46(3):475-480.
[60] WANG B, HAO P, LI G, et al. Determination of realistic worst imperfection for cylindrical shells using surrogate model[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2013, 48:777-794.
[61] 郝鹏,王博,李刚,等.基于代理模型和等效刚度模型的加筋柱壳混合优化设计[J].计算力学学报, 2012, 29(4):481-486. HAO Peng, WANG Bo, LI Gang, et al. Hybrid optimization of grid-stiffened cylinder based on surrogate model and smeared stiffener model[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2012, 29(4):481-486.
[62] 刘海涛,徐胜利,王晓放,等. 1种基于Kriging近似模型的叶片罩量优化设计方法[J].航空发动机, 2015, 41(5):24-27. LIU Haitao, XU Shengli, WANG Xiaofang, et al. Optimization design method of gravity center eccentricity for blade based on Kriging surrogate model[J]. Aeroengine, 2015, 41(5):24-27.
[63] 刘俊,宋文萍,韩忠华.基于代理模型的飞翼多目标气动优化设计[J].航空计算技术, 2015, 45(2):1-5. LIU Jun, SONG Wenping, HAN Zhonghua. Multi-objective aerodynamic design optimization of a flying wing using surrogate model[J]. Aeronautical Computing Technique, 2015, 45(2):1-5.
[64] 韩旭.基于数值模拟的设计理论与方法[M].北京:科学出版社, 2015. HAN Xu. Numerical simulation based-design:theory and methods[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2015.
[65] 聂文超,蔡卫军.基于气动代理模型的雷箭分离快速仿真[J].水下无人系统学报, 2019, 27(6):688-694. NIE Wenchao, CAI Weijun. Rapid simulation on torpedo-rocket separation based on the aerodynamic surrogate model[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2019, 27(6):688-694.
[66] 苏杭朋.基于单点力反馈的虚拟装配系统的研究与开发[D].广州:华南理工大学, 2015. SU Hangpeng. Research and development on a virtual assembly system based on one point force feedback[D]. Guangzhou:South China University of Technology, 2015.
[67] ZHANG C, SUN Q, SUN W, et al. A construction method of digital twin model for contact characteristics of assembly interface[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2021, 113:2685-2699.
[68] 韩少强,宋文萍,韩忠华,等.基于梯度增强型Kriging模型的气动反设计方法[J].航空学报, 2017, 38(7):138-152. HAN Shaoqiang, SONG Wenping, HAN Zhonghua, et al. Aerodynamic inverse design method based on gradient-enhanced Kriging model[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(7):138-152.
[69] KRISHNAMURTHY T, ROMERO V. Construction of response surfaces with higher order continuity and its application to reliability engineering[C]//43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. Denver:AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 2002, 1466.
[70] KRISHNAMURTHY T. Response surface approximation with augmented and compactly supported radial basis functions[C]//44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. Norfolk:AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 2003, 1748.
[71] LIAO C C. Enhanced RBF network for recognizing noise-riding power quality events[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2009, 59(6):1550-1561.
[72] 郭丰.产品方案设计中的近似建模与知识处理方法研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2017. GUO Feng. Research on approximation modeling and knowledge processing methods for product scheme design[D]. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology, 2017.
[73] 冯青青. CAD/CAE/MDO过程集成与流程自动化关键技术研究[D].上海:上海交通大学, 2019. FENG Qingqing. The research on technical problems in the integration of CAD/CAE/MDO[D]. Shanghai:Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2019.
[74] XIANG H, LI Y, LIAO H, et al. An adaptive surrogate model based on support vector regression and its application to the optimization of railway wind barriers[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2017, 55:701-713.
[75] HWANG J T, MARTINS J R R A. A fast-prediction surrogate model for large datasets[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2018, 75:74-87.
[76] SHAN S, WANG G G. Metamodeling for high dimensional simulation-based design problems[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2010. 132(5):051009.
[77] CHUNG H S, ALONSO J. Using gradients to construct cokriging approximation models for high-dimensional design optimization problems[C]//40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit. Reno:AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, 2002,0317.
[78] HAN Z H, ZHANG Y, SONG C X, et al. Weighted gradient-enhanced kriging for high-dimensional surrogate modeling and design optimization[J]. AIAA Journal, 2017, 55(12):4330-4346.
[79] GUO Y, GONG D, WANG H. Adaptive evaluation strategy based on surrogate model[C]//12th International Conference. Beijing:Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Design and Usability, 2007, 472-481.
[80] 王晗希.基于交互式遗传算法的服装几何花卉图案的设计[D].杭州:浙江理工大学, 2017. WANG Hanxi. Design of geometric flower cluster based on interactive genetic algorithm[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, 2017.
[81] 张浩然,汪晓东.回归最小二乘支持向量机的增量和在线式学习算法[J].计算机学报, 2006, 29(3):400-406. ZHANG Haoran, WANG Xiaodong. Incremental and online learning algorithm for regression least squares support vector machine[J]. Chinese Journal of Computers, 2006, 29(3):400-406.
[82] 周晓剑,侯蓉.面向大数据的增量式RBF学习算法[J].统计与决策, 2019(18):68-71. ZHOU Xiaojian, HOU Rong. RBF incremental learning algorithm for big data[J]. Statistics and Decision, 2019(18):68-71.
[83] 周晓剑,王乐研.面向大数据流的增量式Kriging学习算法研究[J].统计与信息论坛, 2020, 35(10):21-26. ZHOU Xiaojian, WANG Leyan. A study on incremental kriging learning algorithm for big data flow[J]. Statistics and Information Forum, 2020, 35(10):21-26.
[84] 陈烯烯.面向大数据基于DEA和RBF/SVM的预测方法研究[D].南京:南京邮电大学, 2020. CHEN Xixi. Prediction methods based on DEA and RBF/SVM for big data[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2020.
[85] GROLINGER K, CAPRETZ M A M, SEEWALD L. Energy consumption prediction with big data:Balancing prediction accuracy and computational resources[C]//2016 IEEE International Congress on Big Data. San Francisco:IEEE International Congress on Big Data, 2016:157-164.
[86] VIANA F A C, SIMPSON T W, BALABANOV V, et al. Special section on multidisciplinary design optimization:metamodeling in multidisciplinary design optimization:how far have we really come?[J]. AIAA Journal, 2014, 52(4):670-690.
[87] ZHOU X, JIANG T. Metamodel selection based on stepwise regression[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2016, 54:641-657.
[88] SOBIESZCZANSKI-SOBIESKI J, HAFTKA R T. Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization:survey of recent developments[J]. Structural Optimization, 1997, 14:1-23.
[89] 张科施,韩忠华,李为吉,等.基于近似技术的高亚声速运输机机翼气动/结构优化设计[J].航空学报, 2006, 27(5):810-815. ZHANG Keshi, HAN Zhonghua, LI Weiji, et al. Multidisciplinary aerodynamic/structural design optimization for high subsonic transport wing using approximation technique[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2006, 27(5):810-815.
[90] SONG X, SUN G, LI G, et al. Crashworthiness optimization of foam-filled tapered thin-walled structure using multiple surrogate models[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2013, 47:221-231.
[91] 郑少平,陈静,程远胜,等.代理模型技术及其在船舶板架强度和稳定性计算中的应用[J].中国造船, 2013, 54(1):40-51. ZHENG Shaoping, CHEN Jing, CHENG Yuansheng, et al. Surrogate models and their application in calculation of strength and stability of ship grillage[J]. Ship Building of China, 2013, 54(1):40-51.
[92] GOEL T, HAFTKA R T, SHYY W, et al. Ensemble of surrogates[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2007, 33:199-216.
[93] PERRONE M P, COOPER L N. When networks disagree:Ensemble methods for hybrid neural networks[C]//20th Century Physics|How We Learn; How We Remember:Toward an Understanding of Brain and Neural Systems Neural Networks for Speech and Image Processing. London:Century Physics, 1995, 342-358.
[94] BISHOP C M. Neural networks for pattern recognition[M]. New York:Oxford University Press, 1995.
[95] 顾纪超,李光耀,干年妃,等.基于混合元模型的准最优策略在汽车轻量化中的应用[J].中国机械工程, 2011, 22(16):1997-2000. GU Jichao, LI Guangyao, GAN Nianfei, et al. Application of new optimization method based on quasi-optimization strategy in vehicle lightweight[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2011, 22(16):1997-2000.
[96] FERREIRA W G, SERPA A L. Ensemble of metamodels:The augmented least squares approach[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2016, 53:1019-1046.
[97] ACAR E, RAIS-ROHANI M. Ensemble of metamodels with optimized weight factors[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2009, 37:279-294.
[98] ACAR E. Various approaches for constructing an ensemble of metamodels using local measures[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2010, 42:879-896.
[99] LIU H, XU S, WANG X, et al. Optimal weighted pointwise ensemble of radial basis functions with different basis functions[J]. AIAA Journal, 2016, 54(10):3117-3133.
[100] SANCHEZ E, PINTOS S, QUEIPO N V. Toward an optimal ensemble of kernel-based approximations with engineering applications[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2008, 36:247-261.
[101] VIANA F A C, HAFTKA R T, STEFFEN V. Multiple surrogates:How cross-validation errors can help us to obtain the best predictor[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2009, 39:439-457.
[102] ZERPA L E, QUEIPO N V, PINTOS S, et al. An optimization methodology of alkaline-surfactantpolymer flooding processes using field scale numerical simulation and multiple surrogates[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2005, 47(3-4):197-208.
[103] LEE Y, CHOI D H. Pointwise ensemble of meta-models using V nearest points cross-validation[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2014, 50:383-394.
[104] QIU H, CHEN L, JIANG C, et al. Ensemble of surrogate models using sign based cross validation error[C]//2017 IEEE 21st International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD). Wellington:International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD), 2017, 526-531.
[105] ZHANG J, YUE X, QIU J, et al. A unified ensemble of surrogates with global and local measures for global metamodelling[J]. Engineering Optimization, 2021, 53(3):474-495.
[106] FERNÁNDEZ-GODINO M G, PARK C, KIM N H, et al. Review of multi-fidelity models[EB/OL]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.07196, 2016.
[107] CHANG K J, HAFTKA R T, GILES G L, et al. Sensitivity-based scaling for approximating structural response[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1993, 30(2):283-288.
[108] VITALI R, HAFTKA R T, SANKAR B V. Multi-fidelity design of stiffened composite panel with a crack[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2002, 23:347-356.
[109] SUN G, LI G, STONE M, et al. A two-stage multi-fidelity optimization procedure for honeycomb-type cellular materials[J]. Computational Materials Science, 2010, 49(3):500-511.
[110] ZHANG Y, KIM N H, PARK C, et al. Multifidelity surrogate based on single linear regression[J]. AIAA Journal, 2018, 56(12):4944-4952.
[111] HAN Z H, GÖRTZ S. Hierarchical kriging model for variable-fidelity surrogate modeling[J]. AIAA Journal, 2012, 50(9):1885-1896.
[112] HAN Z H, GÖRTZ S, ZIMMERMANN R. Improving variable-fidelity surrogate modeling via gradient-enhanced kriging and a generalized hybrid bridge function[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2013, 25(1):177-189.
[113] CAI X, QIU H, GAO L, et al. Metamodeling for high dimensional design problems by multi-fidelity simulations[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2017, 56:151-166.
[114] KENNEDY M C, O'HAGAN A. Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available[J]. Biometrika, 2000, 87(1):1-13.
[115] HUANG L, GAO Z, ZHANG D. Research on multi-fidelity aerodynamic optimization methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2013, 26(2):279-286.
[116] TOAL D J J, KEANE A J. Efficient multipoint aerodynamic design optimization via cokriging[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2011, 48(5):1685-1695.
[117] THENON A, GERVAIS V, LE RAVALEC M. Multi-fidelity meta-modeling for reservoir engineering-application to history matching[J]. Computational Geosciences, 2016, 20(6):1231-1250.
[118] TYAN M, NGUYEN N V, LEE J W. Improving variable-fidelity modelling by exploring global design space and radial basis function networks for aerofoil design[J]. Engineering Optimization, 2015, 47(7):885-908.
[119] PELLEGRINI R, IEMMA U, LEOTARDI C, et al. Multi-fidelity adaptive global metamodel of expensive computer simulations[C]//2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC). Vancouver:IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), 2016, 4444-4451.
[120] CAI X, QIU H, GAO L, et al. Adaptive radial-basis-function-based multifidelity metamodeling for expensive black-box problems[J]. AIAA Journal, 2017, 55(7):2424-2436.
[121] DURANTIN C, ROUXEL J, DÉSIDÉRI J A, et al. Multifidelity surrogate modeling based on radial basis functions[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2017, 56:1061-1075.
[122] SONG X, LV L, SUN W, et al. A radial basis function-based multi-fidelity surrogate model:Exploring correlation between high-fidelity and low-fidelity models[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2019, 60:965-981.
[123] LI K, LIU Y, WANG S, et al. Multi-fidelity data fusion based on gradient-enhanced surrogate modelling method[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2021, 143(12):121704.
[124] JACOBS J P, KOZIEL S, OGURTSOV S. Computationally efficient multi-fidelity Bayesian support vector regression modeling of planar antenna input characteristics[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2012, 61(2):980-984.
[125] JACOBS J P, KOZIEL S. Cost-effective global surrogate modeling of planar microwave filters using multi-fidelity bayesian support vector regression[J]. International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering, 2014, 24(1):11-17.
[126] SHI M, LV L, WANG S, et al. A support vector regression-based multi-fidelity surrogate model[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2020, 61:2363-2375.
[127] ZADEH P M, TOROPOV V V, WOOD A S. Metamodel-based collaborative optimization framework[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2009, 38:103-115.
[128] KOZIEL S, BANDLER J W. Multi-fidelity space mapping modeling of microwave devices with double coarse model processing and functional approximation[C]//2009 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest. Boston:IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, 2009, 969-972.
[129] ZHOU Q, JIANG P, SHAO X, et al. A variable fidelity information fusion method based on radial basis function[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2017, 32(C):26-39.
[130] WANG S, LIU Y, ZHOU Q, et al. A multi-fidelity surrogate model based on moving least squares:Fusing different fidelity data for engineering design[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2021, 61:2363-2375.
[131] 黎旭.代理模型技术及其在飞行器可靠性优化中的应用研究[D].西安:西北工业大学, 2018. LI Xu. Surrogate model technology and its application to aircraft reliability-based optimization[D]. Xi'an:Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2018.
[132] BHOSEKAR A, IERAPETRITOU M. Advances in surrogate based modeling, feasibility analysis, and optimization:A review[J]. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2018, 108:250-267.
[133] YAMAZAKI W, RUMPFKEIL M, MAVRIPLIS D. Design optimization utilizing gradient/hessian enhanced surrogate model[C]//28th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Chicago:AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2010, 4363.
[134] NEFTCI E O, MOSTAFA H, ZENKE F. Surrogate gradient learning in spiking neural networks:Bringing the power of gradient-based optimization to spiking neural networks[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2019, 36(6):51-63.
[135] ZHANG Z, CHEN H C, CHENG Q S. Surrogate-assisted quasi-Newton enhanced global optimization of antennas based on a heuristic hypersphere sampling[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2020, 69(5):2993-2998.
[136] 韩忠华. Kriging模型及代理优化算法研究进展[J].航空学报, 2016, 37(11):3197-3225. HAN Zhonghua. Kriging surrogate model and its application to design optimization:A review of recent progress[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(11):3197-3225
[137] SUN C, JIN Y, CHENG R, et al. Surrogate-assisted cooperative swarm optimization of high-dimensional expensive problems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2017, 21(4):644-660.
[138] WANG G G, SHAN S. Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization[C]//ASME 2006 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Philadelphia:IDETC/CIE, 2006, 4255.
[139] ZHU P, FENG F, CHEN W, et al. Lightweight design of vehicle parameters under crashworthiness using conservative surrogates[J]. Computers in Industry,2013, 64(3):280-289.
[140] SIMPSON T W, BOOKER A J, GHOSH D, et al. Approximation methods in multidisciplinary analysis and optimization:A panel discussion[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2004, 27:302-313.
[141] LI J, CAI J, QU K. Surrogate-based aerodynamic shape optimization with the active subspace method[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2019, 59:403-419.
[142] 公茂果,焦李成,杨咚咚,等.进化多目标优化算法研究[J].软件学报, 2009, 20(2):271-289. GONG Maoguo, JIAO Licheng, YANG Dongdong, et al. Research on evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms[J]. Journal of Software, 2009, 20(2):271-289.
[143] MARLER R T, ARORA J S. Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2004, 26:369-395.
[144] DÉSIDÉRI J A. Multiple-gradient descent algorithm for pareto-front identification[M]//Modeling, Simulation and Optimization for Science and Technology. Dordrecht:Springer, 2014.
[145] DEB K, PRATAP A, AGARWAL S, et al. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm:NSGA-II[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2):182-197.
[146] GASPAR-CUNHA A, VIEIRA A. A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm using neural networks to approximate fitness evaluations[J]. International Journal of Computers, Systems and Signals, 2005, 6(1):18-36.
[147] EMMERICH M T M, GIANNAKOGLOU K C, NAUJOKS B. Single-and multiobjective evolutionary optimization assisted by Gaussian random field metamodels[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2006, 10(4):421-439.
[148] KNOWLES J. ParEGO:A hybrid algorithm with on-line landscape approximation for expensive multiobjective optimization problems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2006, 10(1):50-66.
[149] PONWEISER W, WAGNER T, BIERMANN D, et al. Multiobjective optimization on a limited budget of evaluations using model-assisted S-metric selection[C]//International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature. Berlin:Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008, 784-794.
[150] COUCKUYT I, DESCHRIJVER D, DHAENE T. Fast calculation of multiobjective probability of improvement and expected improvement criteria for Pareto optimization[J]. Journal of Global Optimization, 2014, 60(3):575-594.
[151] FENG Z, ZHANG Q, ZHANG Q, et al. A multiobjective optimization based framework to balance the global exploration and local exploitation in expensive optimization[J]. Journal of Global Optimization, 2015, 61(4):677-694.
[152] MARTÍNEZ-FRUTOS J, HERRERO-PÉREZ D. Kriging-based infill sampling criterion for constraint handling in multi-objective optimization[J]. Journal of Global Optimization, 2016, 64(1):97-115.
[153] JEONG S,MINEMURA Y,OBAYASHI S. Optimization of combustion chamber for diesel engine using kriging model[J]. Journal of Fluid Science and Technology, 2006, 1(2):138-146.
[154] SYBERFELDT A, GRIMM H, NG A, et al. A parallel surrogate-assisted multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for computationally expensive optimization problems[C]//2008 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation. Hong Kong, IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, 2008, 3177-3184.
[155] ZHANG Q, LIU W, TSANG E, et al. Expensive multiobjective optimization by MOEA/D with Gaussian process model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2009, 14(3):456-474.
[156] ZHANG Q, LI H. MOEA/D:A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2007, 11(6):712-731.
[157] AKHTAR T, SHOEMAKER C A. Efficient multi-objective optimization through population-based parallel surrogate search[EB/OL]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.02167, 2019.
[158] SRINIVAS N, DEB K. Muiltiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms[J]. Evolutionary Computation, 1994, 2(3):221-248.
[159] PEI J, WANG W, YUAN S. Multi-point optimization on meridional shape of a centrifugal pump impeller for performance improvement[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2016, 30(11):4949-4960.
[160] SHIM H S, KIM K Y, CHOI Y S. Three-objective optimization of a centrifugal pump to reduce flow recirculation and cavitation[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2018, 140(9):091202.
[161] CHOI S, ALONSO J J, CHUNG H S. Design of a low-boom supersonic business jet using evolutionary algorithms and an adaptive unstructured mesh method[C]//45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. Palm Springs:AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 2004, 1758.
[162] NAIN P K S, DEB K. A multi-objective optimization procedure with successive approximate models[J]. KanGAL Report Number 2005002, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, 2005. http://www.iitk.ac.in/kangal/papers/k2005002.pdf.
[163] HUSAIN A, KIM K Y. Enhanced multi-objective optimization of a microchannel heat sink through evolutionary algorithm coupled with multiple surrogate models[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2010, 30(13):1683-1691.
[164] CHEN S, ZHANG J. Multi-objective optimization of interior noise of an automotive body based on different surrogate models and NSGA-II[J]. SAE Technical Paper, 2018, 1:0146.

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

337

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	0	0	0	337

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	265	72
比例	79%	21%

摘要

444

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	444

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	150	294
比例	34%	66%

代理模型技术及其应用：现状与展望

Survey and Prospect of Surrogate Model Technique and Application

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	程洪鑫, 李璐祎, 周长聪. 基于Kriging模型和代理抽样的分布参数不确定性灵敏度分析方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(8): 370-383.
[2]	孟原, 史宝军, 张德权. Kriging-高维代理模型建模方法研究与改进[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(5): 249-263.
[3]	俞水, 吴晓, 郭鹏, 王志华. 基于首次穿越PDF自适应估计的时变可靠性分析方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(5): 264-275.
[4]	王旭, 姜兴宇, 杨国哲, 孙猛, 于沈弘, 毕凯航, 赵日铮, 刘伟军. 基于PSO-SSA的激光清洗装备人机界面布局优化研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(20): 372-387.
[5]	赵峰, 胡伟飞, 李光, 邓晓豫, 刘振宇, 郭云飞, 谭建荣. 基于混合指标自适应采样代理模型的多目标优化设计方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(13): 81-91.
[6]	胡伟飞, 廖家乐, 郭云飞, 鄢继铨, 李光, 岳海峰, 谭建荣. 基于物理信息神经网络的时变可靠性分析方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(13): 141-153.
[7]	范小宁, 王凯, 余畅. 基于约束边界抽样的起重机金属结构可靠性优化[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(8): 288-298.
[8]	李春明, 孙晓霞, 张涛, 舒成龙, 张帅, 宋学官. 基于组合代理模型的变海拔工况车辆动力总成流动性能优化[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(4): 135-144.
[9]	孔雪峰, 潘骏, 钱萍, 魏义敏, 陈文华. 机械产品多变量相依退化建模方法研究综述[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(20): 470-488.
[10]	何庆, 利璐, 李晨钟, 王平, 谢斯. 基于Kriging模型的在役高速列车悬挂参数近似贝叶斯估计[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(12): 139-148.
[11]	张文鑫, 吕震宙. 一种新的自适应Kriging法停止准则及其在涡轮盘疲劳寿命可靠性中的应用[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(6): 263-273.
[12]	朱林, 王鹏, 贾民平, 许飞云. 基于响应面修正敏度模型的结构可靠性影响因素分析方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(22): 160-167.
[13]	杨超, 叶伟, 陈巧红. 并联机构敏感性分析和多目标优化设计方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(19): 229-241.
[14]	陈炜镒, 胡伟飞, 方健豪, 姜宏伟, 刘振宇, 谭建荣. 考虑雨滴侵蚀的风力发电机叶片涂层疲劳寿命优化设计方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(17): 2-15.
[15]	何西旺, 杨亮亮, 冉仁杰, 朱发文, 宋学官. 基于多评价标准的代理模型综合比较研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(16): 403-419.