硬质聚氨酯泡沫塑料的应变率效应研究

doi:10.3901/JME.2023.16.192

机械工程学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (16): 192-203.doi: 10.3901/JME.2023.16.192

扫码分享

硬质聚氨酯泡沫塑料的应变率效应研究

刘欢¹, 黄瑞源², 蒋东³, 秦健⁴, 文彦博¹, 张延泽¹

1. 南京理工大学瞬态物理国家重点实验室南京 210094;
2. 福州大学土木工程学院福州 350116;
3. 北京航天长征飞行器研究所北京 100076;
4. 海军研究院北京 100161

收稿日期:2022-08-25 修回日期:2022-12-11 出版日期:2023-08-20 发布日期:2023-11-15
通讯作者: 黄瑞源(通信作者),男,1984年出生,博士,研究员。主要研究方向为爆炸与冲击动力学。E-mail:huangruiyuan1984@163.com
作者简介:刘欢,男,1996年出生。主要研究方向为硬质聚氨酯泡沫塑料的动态本构关系。E-mail:18805156720@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(12172178);装备预研基金(614260404021801);中国空气动力研究与发展中心超高速碰撞研究中心开放基金(20200203)资助项目。

Research on the Strain Rate Effect of Rigid Polyurethane Foam

LIU Huan¹, HUANG Ruiyuan², JIANG Dong³, QIN Jian⁴, WEN Yanbo¹, ZHANG Yanze¹

1. National Key Laboratory of Transient Physics, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094;
2. School of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116;
3. Beijing Aerospace Long March Aircraft Research Institute, Beijing 100076;
4. Naval Research Institute, Beijing 100161

Received:2022-08-25 Revised:2022-12-11 Online:2023-08-20 Published:2023-11-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用直径37 mm口径分离式霍普金森压杆（Split Hopkinson pressure bar,SHPB）对硬质聚氨酯泡沫塑料（Rigid polyurethane foam,RPUF）开展了应变率范围为1000～2300s^-1的动态压缩试验，试验结果表明RPUF材料具有明显的应变率效应。将RPUF材料视为不含应变率效应的理想弹塑性模型，并利用有限元软件ABAQUS开展RPUF材料SHPB试验的数值模拟，仿真结果表明RPUF材料的动态屈服强度随着应变率的增加而明显增大，横向惯性效应对试验结果的影响不可忽略。接着开展了RPUF材料的三轴围压（1 MPa、2 MPa、5 MPa和10 MPa）试验，试验结果表明，RPUF材料的屈服强度和静水压呈线性关系，因此研究RPUF材料应变率效应时需要考虑材料本身静水压效应对其的影响。为了获取RPUF材料的实际应变率效应，基于SHPB和三轴围压的试验数据提出一种含静水压效应和应变率效应的本构模型，并将其应用于RPUF材料的SHPB数值模拟中，该方法虽然消除了材料静水压效应对试验结果的影响，但仿真结果仍比试验值偏大，这是因为横向惯性效应对试验的影响并未在数值模拟中消除。最后通过引入横向惯性效应的修正系数对材料参数进行修正，仿真结果与试验数据一致，说明所提本构模型及修正后的材料参数能够真实反映RPUF材料本身的力学性能，从而得到RPUF材料的实际应变率效应。

关键词: 硬质聚氨酯泡沫塑料, 应变率, 横向惯性效应, 静水压效应, 本构关系

Abstract: The dynamic compression experiments with a strain rate ranging from 1 000 s^-1 to 2 300 s^-1 were carried out on rigid polyurethane foam（RPUF） using a split Hopkinson pressure bar（SHPB） with a diameter of 37 mm. The experimental results show that the RPUF material has obvious strain rate effect. The RPUF material is regarded as an ideal elastoplastic model without strain rate effect, and the finite element software ABAQUS is used to carry out the numerical simulation of the SHPB experiment of the RPUF material. The simulation results show that the dynamic yield stress of the RPUF material increases significantly with the increase of the strain rate. Therefore, the influence of the transverse inertia effect on the experimental results cannot be ignored. Then, the triaxial confining pressure（1 MPa, 2 MPa, 5 MPa and 10 MPa） tests of RPUF material were carried out. The experimental results show that the yield stress of RPUF material is linear with the hydrostatic pressure. Therefore, the hydrostatic effect of the material itself needs to be considered when studying the strain rate effect of RPUF material. In order to obtain the actual strain rate effect of RPUF material,based on the experimental data of SHPB and triaxial confining pressure, a constitutive model including hydrostatic pressure effect and strain rate effect was proposed and applied to the SHPB numerical simulation of RPUF material. Although this method eliminates the effect of material hydrostatic pressure on the experimental results, the simulation result is still larger than the experimental value. This is because the influence of the transverse inertia effect on the experiment is not eliminated in the numerical simulation. The material parameters were corrected by introducing the correction coefficient of the transverse inertia effect, and the simulation results are in good agreement with the experimental data, indicating that the proposed constitutive model and the corrected material parameters can truly reflect the mechanical properties of the RPUF material itself, thus obtaining the actual strain rate effect of RPUF material.

Key words: rigid polyurethane foam, strain rate, transverse inertia effect, hydrostatic effect, constitutive relationship

中图分类号:

TB324

刘欢, 黄瑞源, 蒋东, 秦健, 文彦博, 张延泽. 硬质聚氨酯泡沫塑料的应变率效应研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(16): 192-203.

LIU Huan, HUANG Ruiyuan, JIANG Dong, QIN Jian, WEN Yanbo, ZHANG Yanze. Research on the Strain Rate Effect of Rigid Polyurethane Foam[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 59(16): 192-203.

参考文献

[1] ACUA P, ZHANG J, YIN G Z, et al. Bio-based rigid polyurethane foam from castor oil with excellent flame retardancy and high insulation capacity via cooperation with carbon-based materials[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2021, 56(3):2684-2701.
[2] 韦青,郭彦峰,付云岗,等. 聚乙烯泡沫单填充纸蜂窝夹层管的轴向缓冲吸能特性[J]. 机械工程学报, 2021, 57(2):112-120. WEI Qing, GUO Yanfeng, FU Yungang, et al. Axial buffer energy absorption characteristics of polyethylene foam single-filled paper honeycomb sandwich pipe[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 57(2):112-120.
[3] XU J S, WU Y Q, ZHANG B L, et al. Synthesis and synergistic flame-retardant effects of rigid polyurethane foams used reactive DOPO-based polyols combination with expandable graphite[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2020, 138(16):50223.
[4] SZCZOTOK A M, DAN M, SERRANO A, et al. Flame retardancy of rigid polyurethane foams containing thermoregulating microcapsules with phosphazene-based monomers[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2021, 56(2):1-17.
[5] 曲杰,胡焱松,岳凯,等. 硬质聚氨酯泡沫在多轴压缩试验下的力学特性研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2017, 53(20):89-97. QU Jie, HU Yansong, YUE Kai, et al. Research on mechanical properties of rigid polyurethane foam under multiaxial compression test[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 53(20):89-97.
[6] KAO Y T, RAVINDRA A A, PAYNE N, et al. Low-velocity impact response of 3D-printed lattice structure with foam reinforcement[J]. Composite Structures, 2018, 192:93-100.
[7] KOOHBOR B, KIDANE A, LU W Y. Effect of specimen size, compressibility and inertia on the response of rigid polymer foams subjected to high velocity direct impact loading[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2016, 98:62-74.
[8] HWANG B K, KIM S K, KIM J H, et al. Dynamic compressive behavior of rigid polyurethane foam with various densities under different temperatures[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2020, 180:105657.
[9] KUMAR B B, ZELTMANN S E, DODDAMANI M, et al. Effect of cenosphere surface treatment and blending method on the tensile properties of thermoplastic matrix syntactic foams[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2016, 133(35):43881.
[10] YANG C, XING Z, ZHANG M, et al. Supercritical CO₂ foaming of radiation crosslinked polypropylene/high-density polyethylene blend:Cell structure and tensile property[J]. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 2017, 141:276-283.
[11] 姜锡权,陶洁,王玉志. 改进的霍普金森压杆技术在聚氨脂泡沫塑料动态力学性能研究中的应用[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2007, 27(4):358-363. JIANG Xiquan, TAO Jie, WANG Yuzhi. The application of improved Hopkinson pressure bar technology in the study of dynamic mechanical properties of polyurethane foams[J]. Explosion and Shock, 2007, 27(4):358-363.
[12] KOOHBOR B, KIDANE A, LU W Y, et al. Investigation of the dynamic stress-strain response of compressible polymeric foam using a nonparametric analysis[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2016, 91:170-182.
[13] 谢若泽,卢子兴,田常津,等. 聚氨酯泡沫塑料动态剪切力学行为的研究[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 1999, 19(4):315-321. XIE Ruoze, LU Zixing, TIAN Changjin, et al. Studies of the dynamic shear mechanical properties of compression on polyurethane foamedplastics[J]. Explosion and Shock, 1999, 19(4):315-321.
[14] FAN Zhiqiang, ZHANG Bingbing, LIU Yingbin, et al. Interpenetrating phase composite foam based on porous aluminum skeleton for high energy absorption[J]. Polymer Testing, 2021, 93:106917.
[15] BRACE W F, JONES A H. Comparison of uniaxial deformation in shock and static loading of three rocks[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1971, 76(20):4913-4921.
[16] BERTHOLF L D, KARNES C H. Two-dimensional analysis of the split Hopkinson pressure bar system[J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1975, 23(1):1-19.
[17] FORRESTAL M J, WRIGHT T W, CHEN W. The effect of radial inertia on brittle samples during the split Hopkinson pressure bar test[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2007, 34(3):405-411.
[18] 路德春,穆嵩,周鑫,等. 混凝土材料的动态承载力与惯性效应[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2019, 45(4):345-352. LU Dechun, MU Song, ZHOU Xin, et al. Dynamic bearing capacity and inertial effect of concrete materials[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2019, 45(4):345-352.
[19] 张书,卢玉斌. 混凝土SHPB实验中惯性效应的机理及其影响因素研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2014(S2):281-287. ZHANG Shu, LU Yubin. Research on the mechanism and influencing factors of inertia effect in concrete SHPB experiment[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014(S2):281-287.
[20] 陈滔,李庆斌,管俊峰. 混凝土压缩性对SHPB试验中惯性效应的影响[J]. 固体力学学报, 2013(5):515-520. CHEN Tao, LI Qingbin, GUAN Junfeng. The influence of concrete compressibility on the inertial effect in SHPB test[J]. Chinese Journal of Solid Mechanics, 2013(5):515-520.
[21] 王永刚,王礼立. 大直径SHPB几何弥散效应及其表现的数值分析研究[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2003(23):131-132. WANG Yonggang, WANG Lili. Numerical analysis of large-diameter SHPB geometric dispersion effect and its performance[J]. Explosion and Shock, 2003(23):131-132.
[22] 吕晓聪,许金余,赵德辉,等. 冲击荷载循环作用下砂岩动态力学性能的围压效应研究[J]. 工程力学, 2011, 28(1):138-144. LÜ Xiaocong, XU Jinyu, ZHAO Dehui, et al. Research on the confining pressure effect of sandstone dynamic mechanical properties under impact load cycles[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2011, 28(1):138-144.
[23] 俞缙,穆康,李宏,等. 砂岩渗透性演化特性的孔隙率分布细观模拟分析[J]. 工程力学, 2014, 31(11):124-131. YU Jin, MU Kang, LI Hong, et al. Micro-simulation analysis of porosity distribution of sandstone permeability evolution characteristics[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 31(11):124-131.
[24] 刘军忠,许金余,吕晓聪,等. 围压下岩石的冲击力学行为及动态统计损伤本构模型研究[J]. 工程力学, 2012, 29(1):55-63. LIU Junzhong, XU Jinyu, LÜ Xiaocong, et al. Research on impact mechanics behavior and dynamic statistical damage constitutive model of rock under confining pressure[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2012, 29(1):55-63.
[25] VINAY V C, CHANDAN M R, VARMA M, et al. Study of castor oil-based auxetic polyurethane foams for cushioning applications[J]. Polymer International, 2021, 70(11):1631-1639.
[26] AABID H S, RAJAN J. Reinstating structural stability of castor oil based flexible polyurethane foam using glycerol[J]. Chemistry Select, 2020, 5(13):3959-3964.
[27] RAFTOPOULOS K N, PAGACZ J, OZIMEK J, et al. Molecular dynamics in polyurethane foams chemically reinforced with POSS[J]. Polymer Bulletin, 2019, 76(6):2887-2898.
[28] 陈网桦,彭金华,葛桂兰,等. 聚氨酯泡沫塑料抗冲击性能的实验研究[J]. 弹道学报, 1997, 9(4):84-88. CHEN Wanghua, PENG Jinhua, GE Guilan, et al. The experimental investigation of shock-resistant of polyurethane foams plastics[J]. Journal of Ballistics, 1997, 9(4):84-88.
[29] GOEL M D, MONDAL D P, YADAV M S, et al. Effect of strain rate and relative density on compressive deformation behavior of aluminum cenosphere syntactic foam[J]. Materials Science and Engineering, 2014, 590(1):406-415.
[30] SONG B, CHEN W W, LU W Y. Mechanical characterization at intermedite strain rates for rate effects on an epoxy syntactic foam[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2007, 49(12):1336-1343.
[31] GUPTA N, SHUNMUGASAMY V C. High strain rate compressive response of syntactic foams:Trends in mechanical properties and failure mechanisms[J]. Materials Science & Engineering A, 2011, 528(25-26):7596-7605.
[32] 陈网桦,刘建飞,彭金华,等. 硬质聚氨酯泡沫塑料的SHPB实验研究[J]. 实验力学, 1997, 12(2):192-197. CHEN Wanghua, LIU Jianfei, PENG Jinhua, et al. Investigation for mechanical properties of rigid polyurethane foam plastics by SHPB tests[J]. Journal of Experimental Mechanics, 1997, 12(2):192-197.
[33] CHEN W W, WU Q, KANG J H, et al. Compressive superelastic behavior of a NiTi shape memory alloy at strain rates of 0.001-750 s-1[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2001, 38:8989-8998.
[34] NASSER S N, CHOI J Y, GUO W G, et al. Very high strain-rate response of a NiTi shape-memory alloy[J]. Mechanics of Materials, 2005, 37:287-298.
[35] 李潇,方秦,孔祥振,等. 砂浆材料SHPB实验及惯性效应的数值模拟研究[J]. 工程力学, 2018, 35(7):187-193. LI Xiao, FANG Qin, KONG Xiangzhen, et al. SHPB experiment of mortar material and numerical simulation of inertial effect[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2018, 35(7):187-193.
[36] KONG X, FANG Q, WU H, et al. Numerical predictions of cratering and scabbing in concrete slabs subjected to projectile impact using a modified version of HJC material model[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2016, 95:61-71.
[37] 郭伟国,李玉龙,索涛. 应力波基础简明教程[M]. 西安:西北工业大学出版社, 2007. GUO Weiguo, LI Yulong, SUO Tao. A brief course on stress wave basics[M]. Xi'an:Northwestern Polytechnical University Press, 2007.
[38] 方秦,洪建,张锦华,等. 混凝土类材料SHPB实验若干问题探讨[J]. 工程力学, 2014, 31(5):1-14. FANG Qin, HONG Jian, ZHANG Jinhua, et al. Issues of SHPB test on concrete-like material[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 31(5):1-14.
[39] DAI X, SABUWALA T, GIOIA G. Experiments on elastic polyether polyurethane foams under multiaxial loading:Mechanical response and strain fields[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2011, 78(3):2388-2399.
[40] 陈诚. 车用硬质聚氨酯泡沫力学实验及有限元仿真[D]. 广州:华南理工大学, 2015. CHEN Cheng. Mechanical experiment and finite element simulation of rigid polyurethane foam for vehicles[D]. Guangzhou:South China University of Technology, 2015.
[41] 滕军,李祚华,王孝锋,等. 基于ABAQUS的混凝土材料子程序开发与应用[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2009, 30(S1):218-223. TENG Jun, LI Zuohua, WANG Xiaofeng, et al. Development and application of concrete material subprogram based on ABAQUS[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2009, 30(S1):218-223.

硬质聚氨酯泡沫塑料的应变率效应研究

Research on the Strain Rate Effect of Rigid Polyurethane Foam

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	徐腾, 邓春阳, 冉家琪, 龚峰, 唐恒. 金属的应变率效应及其动态本构研究进展[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(2): 81-98.
[2]	范佳宾, 马鸣龙, 张奎, 李永军, 李兴刚, 石国梁, 袁家伟. 退火态VW84M镁合金热变形行为研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(8): 111-120.
[3]	陈鑫, 王佳宁, 杨立飞, 张冠宸. 6061-T6铝合金薄板剪切试件设计及动态剪切力学特性分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(4): 62-70.
[4]	周迅, 张振涛, 高云, 尉朋, 潘骏, 陈文华. 铝合金冲压件疲劳损伤规律的试验研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(10): 117-123.
[5]	方进秀, 张兴权, 王会廷, 谢玲玲. 5052铝合金的动态拉伸性能及其本构模型[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(8): 160-169.
[6]	樊译璘, 阚前华, 赵吉中, 徐祥, 康国政. 不同钢轨材料棘轮行为试验研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(2): 35-42.
[7]	杨萍, 崔金磊, 刘晓玲, 杨沛然. 关于润滑油流变特性研究中一个常用假设的深入探讨[J]. 机械工程学报, 2017, 53(19): 195-200.
[8]	焦敬品, 吴超, 孟祥吉, 吴斌, 何存富. 非线性超声谐振方法及在结垢检测中的应用研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(8): 43-50.
[9]	曹建国, 王天聪, 李洪波, 温盾, 周云松. 基于Arrhenius改进模型的无取向电工钢高温变形本构关系[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(4): 90-96.
[10]	李桂琴, 陈阳, 阮斌, 郭庆, 周俊龙. 一种高聚物的高低温本构模型[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(12): 67-73.
[11]	李微, 梁慧, 陈荐, 杨嘉伟, 李贤泽. 多孔Cu-Ni-Al合金的高温压缩变形行为及本构关系[J]. 机械工程学报, 2015, 51(2): 58-64.
[12]	兰凤崇;曾繁波;周云郊;陈吉清. 闭孔泡沫铝力学特性及其在汽车碰撞吸能中的应用研究进展[J]. , 2014, 50(22): 97-112.
[13]	郑战光;谢昌吉;孙腾;袁帅. 一种超细晶材料的混合硬化模型及其数值模拟[J]. , 2014, 50(20): 77-83.
[14]	唐炳涛;鹿晓阳. 基于塑性流动本构关系的多步反向模拟法[J]. , 2011, 47(4): 47-52.
[15]	于忠奇;侯波;李淑慧;林忠钦. 耦合温度和应变率的铝合金板成形极限预测方法[J]. , 2010, 46(8): 37-41.