考虑客户满意度的带缓冲串行系统维护决策

doi:10.3901/JME.2024.13.173

机械工程学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (13): 173-181.doi: 10.3901/JME.2024.13.173

扫码分享

考虑客户满意度的带缓冲串行系统维护决策

綦法群^1,2, 胡琴^2,3, 张桉铭², 王茜莎², 黄洪钟¹

1. 电子科技大学机械与电气工程学院成都 611731;
2. 温州大学机电工程学院温州 325035;
3. 中国铁塔股份有限公司台州分公司台州 318000

收稿日期:2023-10-10 修回日期:2024-03-02 出版日期:2024-07-05 发布日期:2024-08-24
作者简介:綦法群,男,1982年出生,博士,副教授,硕士研究生导师。主要研究方向为复杂制造系统维护决策。E-mail:qiqizhezhe@126.com;黄洪钟(通信作者),男,1963年出生,博士,教授,博士研究生导师。主要研究方向为可靠性设计、优化设计,状态监测、故障诊断与寿命预测。E-mail:hzhuang@uestc.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(52272376)。

Maintenance Decision of Buffered Serial Systems Considering Customer Satisfaction

QI Faqun^1,2, HU Qin^2,3, ZHANG Anming², WANG Xisha², HUANG Hongzhong¹

1. School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731;
2. College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035;
3. Taizhou Branch, China Tower Corporation Limited, Taizhou 318000

Received:2023-10-10 Revised:2024-03-02 Online:2024-07-05 Published:2024-08-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 串行生产系统的可靠性和维护活动极大地影响系统产能、产品质量、生产成本和服务水平等关键绩效指标。为提高系统可靠性、增加产能、降低运维成本、保证产品质量和服务水平，提出一种考虑客户满意度的带缓冲串行生产系统维护建模方法。引入客户满意度模型量化客户对产品质量和生产时间的要求，考虑设备退化对产品质量的影响，建立基于设备状态的产品质量损失模型。采用质量维护阈值离散质量损失过程，结合机会维护理论制定系统维护策略。以最大化订单利润为目标，求解最优预防性维护阈值和质量维护阈值。最后，以某15工位汽车生产线为例，验证了所提方法的有效性及可行性。

关键词: 串行系统, 客户满意度, 维护决策, 缓冲, 质量损失

Abstract: The reliability and maintenance activities of serial production systems greatly affect key performance indicators such as system capacity, product quality, production costs, and service levels. To improve system reliability, raise production capacity, save operation and maintenance costs, and ensure product quality and service level, a novel maintenance policy considering customer satisfaction for buffered serial production systems is proposed. The customer satisfaction model is presented to quantify the customers' requirements for product quality and production time. The impact of equipment degradation on product quality is analyzed, and the quality loss model for products based on equipment states is established. Based on the threshold of quality for maintenance, the process of quality loss is discretized, and combining the theory of opportunity maintenance, the maintenance policy for the system is provided. By maximizing the order profit, the optimal preventive maintenance threshold and quality maintenance threshold are derived. Finally, an automotive production line consisting of 15 stations is taken as an example to show the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed maintenance strategy.

Key words: serial system, customer satisfaction, maintenance decisions, buffer, quality loss

中图分类号:

TB497

綦法群, 胡琴, 张桉铭, 王茜莎, 黄洪钟. 考虑客户满意度的带缓冲串行系统维护决策[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(13): 173-181.

QI Faqun, HU Qin, ZHANG Anming, WANG Xisha, HUANG Hongzhong. Maintenance Decision of Buffered Serial Systems Considering Customer Satisfaction[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 60(13): 173-181.

参考文献

[1] 周晓军, 沈炜冰, 奚立峰, 等. 一种考虑修复非新的多设备串行系统机会维护动态决策模型[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2007, 41(5)：769-773. ZHOU Xiaojun, SHEN Weibing, XI Lifeng, et al. A dynamic opportunistic preventive maintenance model for a multi-unit series system with consideration of imperfect maintenance effect[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2007, 41(5)：769-773.
[2] DURSUN I, AKCAY A, VAN HOUTUM G. Age-based maintenance under population heterogeneity：Optimal exploration and exploitation[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2022, 301(3)：1007-1020.
[3] SHAFIEE M, FINKELSTEIN M. An optimal age-based group maintenance policy for multi-unit degrading systems[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2015, 134：230-238.
[4] 俞梦琦, 史凯龙, 周晓军. 基于双时间窗的多设备串行系统机会维护策略[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(1)：69-75. YU Mengqi, SHI Kailong, ZHOU Xiaojun. Opportunistic maintenance strategy for multi-unit serial systems based on dual time window[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2020, 54(1)：69-75.
[5] 沈南燕, 武星, 李静, 等. 自动化生产线中关键设备的预维护策略研究[J] 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(21)：231-240. SHEN Nanyan, WU Xing, LI Jing, et al. Research on pre-maintenance strategy of key equipment in automatic production line[J]. Journal of mechanical engineering, 2020, 56(21)：231-240.
[6] FU Yuqiang, ZHU Xiaoyan. A joint age-based system replacement and component reallocation maintenance policy：Optimization, analysis and resilience[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2023, 235：109240.
[7] ZHANG Qin, YAO Wenjing, XU Peng, et al. Optimal age replacement policies of mission-oriented systems with discounting[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2023, 177：109027.
[8] ZHU Qiushi, PENG Hao, VAN HOUTUM G. A condition-based maintenance policy for multi-component systems with a high maintenance setup cost[J]. OR Spectrum, 2015, 37(4)：1007-1035.
[9] POPPE J, BOUTE R, LAMBRECHT M. A hybrid condition-based maintenance policy for continuously monitored components with two degradation thresholds[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, 268(2)：515-532.
[10] ZHANG Nan, DENG Yingjun, LIU Bin, et al. Condition-based maintenance for a multi-component system in a dynamic operating environment[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2023, 231：108988.
[11] ZHENG Rui, MAKIS V. Optimal condition-based maintenance with general repair and two dependent failure modes[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2020, 141：106322.
[12] 张云正. 考虑客户满意度的租赁系统维修与备件订购联合决策研究[D]. 太原：太原科技大学, 2020. ZHANG Yunzheng. Joint decision of optimal maintenance and spare parts ordering for leased system with Lessees’ satisfaction[D]. Taiyuan：Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, 2020.
[13] HAIDER H, SADIQ R, TESFAMARIAM S. Intra-utility performance management model (In-UPM) for the sustainability of small to medium sized water utilities: Conceptualization to development[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 133(10)：777-794.
[14] SALMASNIA A, YAZDEKHASTI A. A bi-objective model to optimize periodic preventive maintenance strategy during warranty period by considering customer satisfaction[J]. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2017, 8(4)：770-781.
[15] BOUSLAH B, GHARBI A, PELLERIN R. Joint economic design of production, continuous sampling inspection and preventive maintenance of a deteriorating production system[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2016, 173：184-198.
[16] 周炳海, 易琦. 能耗与质量约束下的生产系统集成维护决策[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2021, 42(10)：1474-1481. ZHOU Binghai, YI Qi. Integrated preventive maintenance decision model for production systems with energy consumption and quality constraints[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2021, 42(10)：1474-1481.

考虑客户满意度的带缓冲串行系统维护决策

Maintenance Decision of Buffered Serial Systems Considering Customer Satisfaction

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	岳帅, 林轻, 杜忠华, 聂宏, 张明. 运载器准三维着陆动力学与极限工况缓冲性能研究*[J]. 机械工程学报, 2021, 57(21): 22-33.
[2]	韦青, 郭彦峰, 付云岗, 吉美娟, 韩旭香. 聚乙烯泡沫单填充纸蜂窝夹层管的轴向缓冲吸能特性[J]. 机械工程学报, 2021, 57(2): 112-120.
[3]	刘鑫, 尹来容, 胡林. 基于概率-椭球混合模型的缓冲气囊防护特性可靠性分析方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(2): 130-137.
[4]	韩忠华, 张权, 史海波, 张竞元. 带准备时间的柔性流水车间多序列有限缓冲区排产优化问题[J]. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(24): 236-252.
[5]	赵旭宝, 魏伟, 张军, 马永峰. 调车冲击工况下MT-2车辆缓冲器容量需求数值模拟[J]. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(14): 122-131.
[6]	寿梦杰, 廖昌荣, 叶宇浩, 张红辉, 付本元, 谢磊. 冲击载荷下磁流变缓冲器的动力学行为[J]. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(1): 72-80.
[7]	张啟晖, 熊伟, 阮健, 关广丰, 熊庆辉, 王祖温. 车辆换档用2D数字缓冲阀的研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(20): 206-212.
[8]	孙树磊, 丁军君, 周张义, 李芾, 徐力. 重载列车纵向冲动动力学分析及试验研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2017, 53(8): 138-146.
[9]	杨亮亮, 罗世辉, 傅茂海, 周尚书, 曾文昌. 基于调车工况的车辆纵向冲击数值模拟研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(4): 126-132.
[10]	杨阳, 邹佳航, 秦大同, 袁瑷辉. 采煤机高可靠性机电液短程截割传动系统[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(4): 111-119.
[11]	洪煌杰, 王红岩, 李建阳, 芮强, 张芳. 空投装备气囊缓冲系统评价方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2015, 51(4): 148-154.
[12]	张金亚, 蔡淑杰, 朱宏武. 叶片式混输泵入口段气液两相流场可视化试验[J]. 机械工程学报, 2015, 51(18): 184-190.
[13]	文桂林, 肖久如, 尹汉锋, 刘志波, 卿启湘. 全向式多室连通火星着陆缓冲气囊的多目标优化设计[J]. 机械工程学报, 2015, 51(15): 135-141.
[14]	陈殿生, 张自强, 陈科位. 仿生蝗虫机构着陆缓冲过程中的能量分配[J]. 机械工程学报, 2015, 51(13): 196-202.
[15]	董小闵;丁飞耀;管治;陈孝荣. 面向高速的磁流变缓冲器多目标优化设计及性能研究[J]. , 2014, 50(5): 127-134.