• CN:11-2187/TH
  • ISSN:0577-6686

机械工程学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (8): 207-215.doi: 10.3901/JME.2020.08.207

• 运载工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

扫码分享

隧道内高速列车车内噪声特性及声源识别试验分析

柳明1, 张捷1, 高阳2, 蒋文杰1, 肖新标1   

  1. 1. 西南交通大学牵引动力国家重点实验室 成都 610031;
    2. 中车长春轨道客车股份有限公司 长春 130062
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-03 修回日期:2019-06-20 出版日期:2020-04-20 发布日期:2020-05-28
  • 通讯作者: 肖新标(通信作者),男,1978年出生,博士,副研究员,硕士研究生导师。主要研究方向为轨道交通振动噪声分析与控制。E-mail:xinbiaoxiao@163.com
  • 作者简介:柳明,男,1994年出生。主要研究方向为高速铁路振动噪声控制。E-mail:15184446574@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划战略性国际科技创新合作重点专项(2016YFE0205200)、国家自然科学基金(U1834201)和国家重点研发计划(2016YFB1200506-08/2016YFB1200503-02)资助项目。

Experimental Analysis on Characteristics and Source Identification of Interior Noise of a High-speed Train Running in a Tunnel

LIU Ming1, ZHANG Jie1, GAO Yang2, JIANG Wenjie1, XIAO Xinbiao1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Traction Power, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031;
    2. CRRC Changchun Railway Vehicles Co., Ltd., Changchun 130062
  • Received:2018-10-03 Revised:2019-06-20 Online:2020-04-20 Published:2020-05-28

摘要: 与明线运行相比,隧道内的高速列车车内噪声将明显增加。通过线路试验,对我国某型高速列车以160~350 km/h速度在明线和隧道运行时的车内振动噪声进行测试分析。掌握两种线路下的车内振动和噪声、车身表面气动噪声、转向架区域振动和噪声特性及其随速度的变化规律;采用50通道球形声阵列,识别两种线路下的车内主要噪声源,并分析噪声源的车内区域贡献率,进而在此基础上研究两种线路下的车内声振传递特性。结果表明,两种线路下车内噪声频谱差异主要体现在315~2 000 Hz,各测点不同线路的声压级差值与运行速度相关性较小,车内噪声受轮轨噪声激励影响相对明显。对于客室中部,列车350 km/h匀速运行时,隧道段列车顶板和客室后方贡献率分别增加4.0%和3.0%,地板贡献率降低8.6%,差异频段主要体现在63~160 Hz。对于侧墙区域,明线段车内低频噪声主要来自侧墙的振动,而在隧道时,车内低频噪声则主要来自于侧墙车身表面的气动激励。客室内噪声总值和频谱分布的差异在隧道运行情况下会减小,现有更关注客室端部噪声控制的传统认识,在列车隧道运行下,需要同样重要地关注和对待客室中部区域。

关键词: 高速列车, 车内噪声, 隧道, 明线, 声源识别

Abstract: The interior noise level of high-speed trains running in a tunnel can be obviously increased compared with that running on the ground surface. The interior noise and vibration characteristics of a high-speed train under two different running cases (on the ground surface or in a tunnel) at speed of 160-350 km/h are analyzed according to the line test. The interior noise and vibration characteristics, the bogie area noise and vibration characteristics, the aerodynamic noise characteristics on vehicle body surface, and their variations with speed under those two running cases are obtained. By using the 50-channel spherical acoustic array, the main noise sources of the interior noise under those two running cases are identified, the contribution rate of the noise sources are analyzed, and on this basis, the interior noise and vibration transmission characteristics are studied. Results show that the difference of interior noise spectrum in the two running cases is mainly reflected in 315-2 000 Hz. The difference of sound pressure level for different lines is relatively independent to the operating speed. The interior noise is significantly affected by the wheel-rail noise excitation. For the middle area of the coach, when the train runs at 350 km/h, the contribution rates of the roof and the rear of the cabin are increased by 4.0% and 3.0%, respectively; the contribution rate of floor is decreased by 8.6%, and the main differences of the noise spectrum between them are located in 63-160 Hz. For the sidewall area, the low frequency noise source on the ground surface mainly comes from the vibration of the sidewall; but for the tunnel, it mainly comes from the aerodynamic excitation of the side wall surface. The variation of the total noise value and the spectrum distribution in the passenger room will be reduced under the tunnel operation. The existing concept of the noise control concern mainly at the end of the passenger compartment, but as this study indicates, it is also crucial to pay attention to the central area of the passenger compartment under the tunnel operation.

Key words: high-speed train, interior noise, tunnel, ground surface, sound source recognition

中图分类号: