高速受电弓开闭口运行气动特性及对比研究

doi:10.3901/JME.2020.04.177

机械工程学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (4): 177-184.doi: 10.3901/JME.2020.04.177

扫码分享

高速受电弓开闭口运行气动特性及对比研究

李田, 秦登, 邹栋, 张继业, 张卫华

西南交通大学牵引动力国家重点实验室成都 610031

收稿日期:2019-03-04 修回日期:2019-10-20 出版日期:2020-02-20 发布日期:2020-04-23
作者简介:李田,男,1984年出生,博士,副研究员,硕士研究生导师。主要研究方向为列车空气动力学,流动控制与应用。E-mail:litian2008@home.swjtu.edu.cn;秦登,男,1996年出生,硕士研究生。主要研究方向为列车空气动力学。E-mail:1213845116@qq.com;邹栋,男,1985年出生,博士,助理研究员。主要研究方向为受电弓动力学。E-mail:zdong_hn@163.com;张继业,男,1965年出生,博士,教授,博士研究生导师。主要研究方向为列车空气动力学,稳定性理论与应用。E-mail:jyzhang@home.swjtu.edu.cn;张卫华,男,1961年出生,博士,教授,博士研究生导师,国家杰出青年科学基金获得者,国务院"政府津贴"获得者,国家973计划项目首席科学家。主要研究方向为高速列车耦合大系统动力学。E-mail:tpl@home.swjtu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（51605397）、四川省科技计划（2019YJ0227）和牵引动力国家重点实验室自主课题（2019TPL_T02）资助项目。

Study on Aerodynamic Characteristics and Comparisons of High-speed Pantograph in Knuckle-downstream or Knuckle-upstream Direction

LI Tian, QIN Deng, ZOU Dong, ZHANG Jiye, ZHANG Weihua

State Key Laboratory of Traction Power, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031

Received:2019-03-04 Revised:2019-10-20 Online:2020-02-20 Published:2020-04-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 受电弓的气动性能严重影响其受流质量，是高速列车安全运行的关键要素之一。基于计算流体动力学理论，建立高速受电弓空气动力学模型，对比分析了高速受电弓在开口和闭口两种运行状态下的流场结构和气动力特性。数值模拟得到的受电弓气动阻力与风洞试验误差为4.07%，弓头气动升力的误差为7.95%。研究结果表明：在研究的速度等级范围内，高速受电弓开口运行气动阻力比闭口运行大2.24%～3.33%，弓头升力较闭口运行大5.45%～7.98%；不同开闭口运行状态对弓头滑板升力的影响较小。在同一开闭状态下，当高速受电弓运行速度大于等于400 km/h时，气体压缩效应对受电弓气动阻力的影响较大，且随速度的增加而增大，然而，气体压缩性对弓头气动升力的影响较小。

关键词: 高速受电弓, 气动特性, 开闭口状态, 列车空气动力学, 压缩效应

Abstract: The aerodynamic performance of the pantograph seriously affects pantograph-catenary current collection quality and is one of the key factors for the running safety of high-speed trains. Based on the computational fluid dynamics, a high-speed pantograph aerodynamic model is established. The flow field around and aerodynamic characteristics of the high-speed pantograph in both knuckle-downstream and knuckle-upstream direction are compared and analyzed. The error in the aerodynamic drag of the pantograph between numerical simulation and wind tunnel test is 4.07%, and that of the aerodynamic lift of the panhead is 7.95%. Results show that the aerodynamic drag of the high-speed pantograph in the knuckle-downstream direction is larger by 2.24%-3.33% than that in the knuckle-upstream direction, and the panhead lifting force is larger by 5.45%-7.98%. The impact of running state on the lift force of the panhead strip is small. In the knuckle-downstream or knuckle-upstream direction, when the high speed pantograph running speed is no less than 400 km/h, the air compression effect has a greater influence on the aerodynamic drag of the pantograph, and increases with the increase of the speed. However, air compressibility has less effect on the aerodynamic lift force of the panhead.

Key words: high-speed pantograph, aerodynamic characteristics, knuckle-downstream and knuckle-upstream, train aerodynamics, compression effect

中图分类号:

U270

李田, 秦登, 邹栋, 张继业, 张卫华. 高速受电弓开闭口运行气动特性及对比研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(4): 177-184.

LI Tian, QIN Deng, ZOU Dong, ZHANG Jiye, ZHANG Weihua. Study on Aerodynamic Characteristics and Comparisons of High-speed Pantograph in Knuckle-downstream or Knuckle-upstream Direction[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 56(4): 177-184.

参考文献

[1] BAKER C J,JONES J,LOPEZ-CALLEJA F,et al. Measurements of the cross wind forces on trains[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,2004,92(7-8):547-563.
[2] 刘加利,张继业,张卫华. 高速列车车头的气动噪声数值分析[J]. 铁道学报,2011,33(9):19-26. LIU Jiali,ZHANG Jiye,ZHANG Weihua. Numerical analysis on aerodynamic noise of the high-speed train head[J]. Journal of the China Railway Socienty,2011,33(9):19-26.
[3] 张静,刘志刚,鲁小兵,等.高速弓网空气动力学研究进展[J]. 铁道学报,2015,31(1):7-15. ZHANG Jing,LIU Zhigang,LU Xiaobing,et al. Study onaerodynamic development of high-speed pantograph and catenary[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society,2015,31(1):7-15.
[4] 何航. 高速受电弓气动特性仿真研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学,2018. HE Hang. Simulation study on aerodynamic characteristics of high speed pantograph[D]. Chengdu:southwest jiaotong university,2018
[5] 刘星,邓见,郑耀,等. 高速列车受电弓空气动力学对弓网受流的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报,2013,47(3):558-564. LIU Xing,DENG Jian,ZHENG Yao,et al. Impact of aerodynamic of pantograph of a high-speed train on pantograph-catenary current collection[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University,2013,47(3):558-564.
[6] 张亚东,张继业,李田. 高速列车气动噪声贡献量分析[J]. 交通运输工程学报,2017,17(4):78-88. ZHANG Yadong,ZHANG Jiye,LI Tian. Contribution analysis of aerodynamic noise of high-speed train[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering,2017,17(4):78-88.
[7] 张亚东,张继业,张卫华. 高速受电弓气动噪声特性分析[J]. 铁道学报,2017,39(5):47-56. ZHANG Yadong,ZHANG Jiye,ZHANG Weihua. Analysis of aerodynamic noise characteristic of high-speed pantograph[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society,2017,39(5):47-56.
[8] 李瑞平,周宁,张卫华,等. 受电弓气动抬升力计算方法与分析[J]. 铁道学报,2012,34(8):26-32. LI Ruiping,ZHOU Ning,ZHANG Weihua,et al. Calculation and analysis of pantograph aerodynamic uplift force[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society,2012,34(8):26-32.
[9] 郭迪龙,姚拴宝,刘晨辉,等. 高速列车受电弓非定常气动特性研究[J]. 铁道学报,2012,33(11):16-21. GUO Dilong,YAO Shuanbao,LIU Chenhui,et al. Unsteady aerodynamic characteristic of high-speed pantograph[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society,2012,33(11):16-21.
[10] 张亮,张继业,李田,等. 高速列车不同位置受电弓非定常气动特性研究[J]. 机械工程学报,2017,53(12):147-155. ZHANG Liang,ZHANG Jiye,LI Tian,et al. Research on unsteady aerodynamic characteristic of pantograph in different positions of high-speed trains[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2017,53(12):147-155.
[11] 肖友刚,时彧. 高速列车受电弓绝缘子的气动噪声计算及外形优化[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报,2012,9(6):72-76. XIAO Yougang,SHI Yu. Aerodynamic noise calculation and shape optimization of high-speed train pantograph insulators[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering,2012,9(6):72-76.
[12] 牛纪强,周丹,梁习锋,等. 导流装置对受电弓非定常气动特性的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报,2017,54(4):752-760. NIU Jiqiang,ZHOU Dan,LIANG Xifeng,et al. influence of diversion device on unsteady aerodynamic performance of pantograph[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University,2017,54(4):752-760.
[13] YAO S B,GUO D L,YANG G W. The influence of pantograph aerodynamic characteristics caused by its chroud[C]//1st International Workshop on High-Speed and Intercity Railway,IWHIR 2011,Shen zhen,Hong Kong,China,2012:19-22.
[14] IKEDA M,YOSHIDA K,SUZUKI M. A flow control technique utilizing air blowing to modify the aerodynamic characteristics of pantograph for high-speed train[J]. Journal of Mechanical Systems for Transportation and Logistics,2008,1(3):264-271.
[15] LEE Y,RHO J,KIM K H,et al. Experimental studies on the aerodynamic characteristics of a pantograph suitable for a high-speed train[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2015,229(2):136-149.
[16] BOCCIOLONE M,CHELI F,CORRADI R,et al. Crosswind action on rail vehicles:Wind tunnel experimental analyses[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamic,2008,96(5):584-610.
[17] KIM H,HU Z W,THOMPSON D J. Unsteady aerodynamics of high speed train pantograph cavity flow control for noise reduction[C]//22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference,Lyon,France,2016:1-10.
[18] LI T,HEMIDA H,ZHANG J,et al. Comparisons of SST and DES simulations of the flow around trains[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering,2018,140(11):111108.
[19] MENTER F R,KUNTZ M,LANGTRY R. Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model[J]. Turbulence,Heat and Mass Transfer,2003,5:625-632.

高速受电弓开闭口运行气动特性及对比研究

Study on Aerodynamic Characteristics and Comparisons of High-speed Pantograph in Knuckle-downstream or Knuckle-upstream Direction

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	戴志远, 李田, 张卫华, 张继业. 不同海拔高度环境下高速列车气动特性研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(16): 291-305.
[2]	侯自豪, 朱雨建, 薄靖龙, 杨基明. 真空管道列车准一维气动特性[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(6): 119-129.
[3]	黄尊地, 常宁. 基于非定常气动特性的高架动车组振动特性试验研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(24): 233-242.
[4]	朱建勇, 刘沛清. 180°螺旋式Savonius风力机气动特性试验研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(8): 155-161.
[5]	朱剑月, 吕苏, 陈力, 沈哲. 高速列车底部流动特性分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(12): 133-143.
[6]	王政, 李田, 张继业. 不同类型横风下高速列车气动性能研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(4): 203-211.
[7]	邱雅柔, 唐迪, 包士毅, 高增梁. 风诱导塔振动对塔气动特性影响研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(20): 106-114.
[8]	蔡华闽, 张继业, 李田. 高速列车转向架区域气动特性及流场规律研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(12): 49-57.
[9]	杨易, 黄剑锋, 范光辉, 蔡圣康, 刘政. 非光滑表面对汽车尾涡结构的控制分析研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(8): 133-140.
[10]	赵振宙, 陈景茹, 王同光, 李涛, 郑源. 干扰气流对Φ型风力机气动特性影响研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(6): 181-187.
[11]	王企鲲;陈康民. 基于样条函数的弯叶片生成技术及其在微型风扇中的应用[J]. , 2009, 45(5): 256-263.