胶层厚度对胶接波纹板三点弯曲力学性能影响研究

doi:10.3901/JME.2023.02.104

机械工程学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (2): 104-112.doi: 10.3901/JME.2023.02.104

扫码分享

胶层厚度对胶接波纹板三点弯曲力学性能影响研究

韩啸¹, 孙亮亮², 刘博³, 刘哲远², 吴承伟¹

1. 大连理工大学工程力学系大连 116024;
2. 大连理工大学汽车工程学院大连 116024;
3. 上海航天精密机械研究所上海 201600

收稿日期:2021-09-04 修回日期:2022-05-23 发布日期:2023-03-30
通讯作者: 吴承伟(通信作者),男,1957年出生,博士,教授,博士研究生导师。主要研究方向为工程力学、生物力学、封装力学和制造工艺力学等。E-mail:cwwu@dlut.edu.cn
作者简介:韩啸,男,1987年出生,博士,副教授,硕士研究生导师。主要研究方向为结构连接性能试验表征、多场耦合建模和数值预测。E-mail:hanxiao@dlut.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（U1908233，12172083）和上海航天科技创新基金（SAST2021-060）资助项目。

Effect of Adhesive Thickness on the Mechanical Property of Adhesively Bonded Corrugated Structure under Three-point Bending Load

HAN Xiao¹, SUN Liangliang², LIU Bo³, LIU Zheyuan², WU Chengwei¹

1. Department of Engineering Mechanics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024;
2. School of Automotive Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024;
3. Shanghai Spaceflight Precision Machinery Institute, Shanghai 201600

Received:2021-09-04 Revised:2022-05-23 Published:2023-03-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 三明治波纹板采用轻质化和薄壁化的结构设计方法，可以作为承载和吸能结构应用于汽车底盘前纵梁、车身Y字梁等，而现有文献缺少针对胶层厚度对波纹板性能影响的研究。通过制备胶接波纹板并开展三点弯曲工况准静态加载失效试验，分析了不同胶层厚度对三明治波纹板整体承载和吸能特性的影响规律。试验发现，不同胶层厚度下铝合金胶接波纹板结构承载能力和破坏样貌存在差异，相比于0.5 mm和1.0 mm，0.2 mm胶层厚度的三明治结构的各项力学性能和稳定性较好。随后建立胶接波纹板三点弯曲加载有限元模型，实现了对波纹板整体加载变形过程和胶层损伤的模拟，通过与试验结果对比验证了有限元建模方法的有效性，为轻质金属胶接波纹板结构设计和性能评价提供可靠方法。

关键词: 三明治夹芯, 内聚力模型, 有限元建模, 断裂力学, 裂纹扩展

Abstract: The corrugated-cored sandwich structure adopts a lightweight and thin-walled structural design method, and can thus be used as a load-bearing and energy-absorbing structure to be applied to the front longitudinal beam of the automobile chassis and the Y-shaped beam of vehicle body, while study on the effect of bondline thickness on the mechanical performance is absent in currently published literatures. Sandwich corrugated structures were manufactured through structural adhesive bonding and then loaded under quasi-static three-point bending up to failure, to analyse the effect of adhesive thickness on the overall load-bearing capacity and energy absorption behaviour. It was found that the structural load-bearing capacity and fracture behaviour varied with different adhesive thicknesses. Comparing to adhesive thickness of 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm, the sandwich structure with 0.2 mm adhesive thickness showed better mechanical performance and stability. Finite element model was established considering Cohesive Zone Model in adhesive layer, realising the simulation on the three-point bending loading process on the bonded corrugated structure. The experimental and numerical results were compared and proved the validity of the FE modelling approach. The presented methodology can reliably aid the structural design and performance evaluation of adhesively bonded light-metal corrugated structure.

Key words: corrugated-core sandwich, cohesive zone model, finite element modelling, fracture mechanics, crack propagation

中图分类号:

TH114

韩啸, 孙亮亮, 刘博, 刘哲远, 吴承伟. 胶层厚度对胶接波纹板三点弯曲力学性能影响研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(2): 104-112.

HAN Xiao, SUN Liangliang, LIU Bo, LIU Zheyuan, WU Chengwei. Effect of Adhesive Thickness on the Mechanical Property of Adhesively Bonded Corrugated Structure under Three-point Bending Load[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 59(2): 104-112.

参考文献

[1] 李永兵, 马运五, 楼铭, 等. 轻量化材料汽车车身连接技术进展[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(24):1-23. LI Yongbing, MA Yunwu, LOU Ming, et al. Advances in welding and joining processes of multi-material lightweight car body[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 52(24):1-23.
[2] CHANG W S, VENTSEL E, KRAUTHAMMERA T, et al. Bending behavior of corrugated-core sandwich plates[J]. Composite Structures, 2005, 70:81-89.
[3] 韩啸, 金勇, 杨鹏, 等. 胶层厚度对胶粘剂Ⅰ型断裂韧性影响试验和仿真研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(10):43-52. HAN Xiao, JING Yong, YANG Peng, et al. Experimental and simulation study on the effect of adhesive thickness model I fracture toughness[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 54(10):43-52.
[4] ESNAOLA A, ELGUEZABAL B, AURREKOETXEA J, et al. Optimization of the semi-hexagonal geometry of a composite crush structure by finite element analysis[J]. Composites Part B:Engineering, 2016, 93:56-66.
[5] 张钱城, 杨立博, 韩宾, 等. 非对称结构铝合金波纹夹层板的三点弯曲力学性能研究[J]. 应用力学学报, 2014, 31(6):836-842. ZHANG Qiancheng, YANG Libo, HAN Bin, et al. Bending of nano-arrays with surface effects and Casimir forces[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2014, 31(6):836-842.
[6] FARLEY G L. Effect of specimen geometry on the energy absorption capability of composite materials[J]. Journal of Composite Materials, 1986, 20(4):390-400.
[7] 于野, 盈亮, 胡平, 等. 高强钢波纹夹芯结构的力学性能研究[J]. 固体力学学报, 2014, 35(3):302-307. YU Ye, YING Liang, HU Ping, et al. Research on the mechanical property of high strength steel corrugated core sandwich structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Solid Mechanics, 2014, 35(3):302-307.
[8] HAN X, JIN Y, DA SILVA L F M, et al. On the effect of adhesive thickness on mode I fracture energy an experimental and modelling study using a trapezoidal cohesive zone model[J]. The Journal of Adhesion, 2020, 96(5):490-514.
[9] LINDSTRÖM A, HALLSTRÖM S. In-plane compression of sandwich panels with debonds[J]. Composite Structures, 2010, 92(2):532-540.
[10] LU T J, HUTCHINSON J W, EVANS A G. Optimal design of a flexural actuator[J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2001, 49(9):2071-2093.
[11] HRON R, MARTAUS F, KADLEC M. Peel resistance of geopolymer sandwich with foam and honeycomb cores[C/CD]//57th International Scientific Conference on Experimental Stress Analysis, 2019.
[12] HAN X, AKHMET G, ZHANG W, et al. The effect of adhesive fillet on mechanical performance of adhesively bonded corrugated sandwich structures:An experimental-numerical study[J]. The Journal of Adhesion, 2020, 96(5):515-537.
[13] LEAL A J S, CAMPILHO R D S G. Numerical evaluation of the ENF and 4ENF tests for the shear toughness estimation of adhesive joints[J]. Composite Structures, 2018, 202:333-343.
[14] CAMPILHO R D S G, BANEA M D, CHAVES F J P, et al. Extended finite element method for fracture characterization of adhesive joints in pure mode I[J]. Computational Materials Science, 2011, 50:1543-1549.
[15] 金勇. 结构胶粘剂Ⅰ型断裂性能湿热老化行为研究[D]. 大连:大连理工大学, 2018. JIN Yong. Study on hygrothermal behavior on the model I fracture characteristics of structural adhesives[D]. Dalian:Dalian University of Technology, 2018.
[16] ASTM D7766-16. Standard practice for damage resistance testing of sandwich constructions[S]. American Society of Testing Materials, 2013.
[17] 唐文献, 李胜秋, 张建, 等. 纵向波纹柱形耐压壳屈曲数值分析与试验研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2009, 26(7):164-170. TANG Wenxian, LI Shengqiu, ZHANG Jian, et al. Numerical and experimental study on buckling of longitudinal corrugated cylindrical pressure shell[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2009, 26(7):164-170.
[18] HAN X, AKHMET G, HU P, et al. Numerical prediction on the mechanical degradation of adhesively bonded corrugated sandwich beam after hygrothermal ageing[J]. Composite Structures, 2020, 241:112131.
[19] ZIELECKI W, KUBIT A, KLUZ R, et al. Investigating the influence of the chamfer and fillet on the high-cyclic fatigue strength of adhesive joints of steel parts[J]. Journal of Adhesive Science and Technology, 2017, 31:627-644.
[20] STEVENS R. Modeling of sylgard adhesive strength[R]. United States:LA-UR-15-20757, 2015.
[21] 解江, 张雪晗, 宋山山, 等. CFRP薄壁C型柱轴向压缩破坏机制及吸能特性[J]. 复合材料学报, 2018, 35(12):33-42. XIE Jiang, ZHANG Xuehan, SONG Shanshan, et al. Failure mechanism and energy-absorbing characteristics of CFRP thin-walled C-channels subject to axial compression[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2018, 35(12):33-42.

胶层厚度对胶接波纹板三点弯曲力学性能影响研究

Effect of Adhesive Thickness on the Mechanical Property of Adhesively Bonded Corrugated Structure under Three-point Bending Load

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王博士, 陈楠楠, 蔡艳, 王敏. 低合金贝氏体高强钢模拟焊接粗晶热影响区低温疲劳韧脆转变行为及机制[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(6): 271-278.
[2]	孙士勇, 朱殿立, 李佳琦, 樊俊铃, 杨睿, 赵延广. 基于图像对比的疲劳裂纹扩展动态检测方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(18): 24-31.
[3]	高冲, 董丽虹, 王海斗, 刘彬, 吕晓仁. 整体加筋结构疲劳损伤研究进展[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(18): 116-127.
[4]	陈健, 孟义兴, 袁慎芳, 徐秋慧, 王卉. 融合导波监测的搭接结构裂纹扩展寿命孪生预测[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(16): 34-42.
[5]	李怡然, 尧军平, 梁超群, 肖鹏, 陈国鑫, 李步炜. 基于三维微观结构的SiC/AZ91D复合材料单轴拉伸过程中裂纹萌生扩展机制[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(16): 160-170.
[6]	赵雷, 武言, 徐连勇, 韩永典, 熊昱. 纳入拘束效应的焊接接头蠕变裂纹扩展速率预测方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(14): 126-138.
[7]	邓智铭, 黄土地, 黄洪钟, 尉询楷, 王浩. 变工况条件下角接触球轴承疲劳剥落故障演化加速试验载荷谱研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(13): 193-204.
[8]	喻健, 缑百勇, 陈桂勇, 张腾, 马斌麟, 樊祥洪, 陈鑫, 王逸韬. 胶铆混合修理结构疲劳裂纹扩展性能分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(22): 352-368.
[9]	李鹤飞, 张鹏, 张哲峰. 高强钢断裂韧性与疲劳裂纹扩展评价方法研究进展[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(16): 18-31.
[10]	王超, 杨冰, 朱涛, 肖守讷, 阳光武, 范晓达. 表面强化车轴裂纹扩展及剩余寿命预测方法研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(14): 43-53.
[11]	赵文滔, 杨颜志, 王长焕, 鞠雪梅, 严刚. 基于贝叶斯推断的复合材料层间内聚力模型参数反演[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(6): 110-118.
[12]	周长江, 王豪野, 靳广虎, 艾永生. 考虑残余应力的螺旋锥齿轮接触疲劳裂纹萌生-扩展寿命计算方法研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(23): 28-38.
[13]	陈林, 戴宇恒, 崔健伟, 周庆飞, 岑耀东. 微合金化钢轨淬火工艺的优化及其疲劳裂纹扩展行为研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(14): 233-240.
[14]	马硕, 姜兴宇, 杨国哲, 刘伟军, 乔赫廷, 王子生. 废旧机床主轴剩余寿命评估模型[J]. 机械工程学报, 2021, 57(4): 219-226.
[15]	王权岱, 杨新宇, 惠振文, 赵仁峰, 杨振朝, 郭美玲, 李言. 约束面投影成型基底表面微织构特征对固化层分离力的影响[J]. 机械工程学报, 2021, 57(17): 196-206.