智能交互的认知哲学逻辑及设计评价研究

doi:10.3901/JME.2023.11.031

机械工程学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (11): 31-42.doi: 10.3901/JME.2023.11.031

• 特邀专栏:智能产品交互设计 • 上一篇下一篇

扫码分享

智能交互的认知哲学逻辑及设计评价研究

徐江, 孙刚, 徐静妤, 苏浦捷, 缪绮阳

同济大学设计创意学院上海 200092

收稿日期:2022-08-22 修回日期:2022-12-30 出版日期:2023-06-05 发布日期:2023-07-19
通讯作者: 孙刚(通信作者),男,1995年生,博士研究生。主要研究方向为设计认知与计算。E-mail:1810839768@qq.com
作者简介:徐江,男,1978年生,博士,教授,博士研究生导师。主要研究方向为设计现象学,设计战略与管理,智能穿戴设计,设计教育。E-mail:xuj@tongji.edu.cn;徐静妤,女,1996年生,博士研究生。主要研究方向为设计现象学。E-mail:976098110@qq.com;苏浦捷,男,1995年生,博士研究生。主要研究方向为工业设计工程。E-mail:290237620@qq.com;缪绮阳,女,1998年生,硕士研究生。主要研究方向为工业设计工程。E-mail:mqy0436@126.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2021YFF0900602)、国家自然科学基金(51675382)、中国工程院重大咨询项目(2015-ZD-15，2017-XZ-02)和中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(22120210243)资助项目

Cognition Philosophy Logic and Design Evaluation of Intelligent Interaction

XU Jiang, SUN Gang, XU Jingyu, SU Pujie, MIAO Qiyang

College of Design and Innovation, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092

Received:2022-08-22 Revised:2022-12-30 Online:2023-06-05 Published:2023-07-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 智能技术、产品和系统在生产和生活中日益重要，重塑了人类认识和改造世界的方式。基于认知哲学和技术现象学视角剖析人与智能物的复杂交互关系：探究由计算表征到具身认知的哲学逻辑进路；结合描述“人-技术-世界”具身、诠释、背景和它异四重关系的技术中介论，建立“人-智能物-环境”的智能场域结构与互动模型，分析典型人-智能物互动情境中的体化、嵌入、延展和生成认知理论；抽取智能交互设计要素，构建集成“具身认知、功能效用、情境价值”的多维设计指标体系；以可穿戴智能物为例，基于模糊综合分析实现对设计指标的重要性评估。以身体为核心、以智能物为中介、逐步延展于环境的智能交互场域模型的构建，为在人工智能时代发展新的智能交互设计理论及评价方法提供内在认知哲学逻辑支撑。

关键词: 智能交互, 认知哲学, 技术设计, 场域模型, 设计评价

Abstract: Intelligent technology, products and system are becoming increasingly important in industry and life, which reshapes the way people perceive and reform the world. Based on the perspective of cognition philosophy and technology phenomenology, the complex interaction between human beings and intelligent objects is analyzed. The philosophy logic approach from paradigm of computer and representation to embodied cognition is explored. Combing with the technological mediation theory which describes the embodiment, hermeneutic, background and alterity relationship of “Human-Technology-World”, the intelligent field structure and interaction model which describes “Human-Intelligent Artifacts-Context” is established, and the embodied, embedded, extended and generative cognitive theories contained in typical human-intelligent artifacts interaction situation are analyzed. Intelligent interaction design elements are extracted to build a multidimensional index system from the philosophical perspectives of “embodied cognition, function realization and situation value”. Wearable intelligent artifacts are taken as an example, and the importance of design index is evaluated based on fuzzy comprehensive analysis. The construction of interaction field model with the body as the core, intelligent objects as the intermediary, and gradually extended to the environment, provides internal cognitive philosophical logic support for the development of new intelligent interaction design and evaluation methods in the era of artificial intelligence.

Key words: intelligent interaction, philosophy of cognition, technical design, field model, design evaluation

中图分类号:

TB472

徐江, 孙刚, 徐静妤, 苏浦捷, 缪绮阳. 智能交互的认知哲学逻辑及设计评价研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(11): 31-42.

XU Jiang, SUN Gang, XU Jingyu, SU Pujie, MIAO Qiyang. Cognition Philosophy Logic and Design Evaluation of Intelligent Interaction[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 59(11): 31-42.

参考文献

[1] AARTS E，MARZANO S. The new everyday:views on ambient intelligence[M]. Rotterdam:010 Publishers，2003.
[2] ZHOU J， ZHOU Y，WANG B，et al. Human-cyber-phy- sical systems in the context of new-generation intelligent manufacturing[J]. Engineering，2019，5(4):624-636.
[3] 路甬祥，陈鹰. 人机一体化系统科学体系和关键技术[J]. 机械工程学报，1995，31(1):1-7.LU Yongxiang，CHEN Ying. Academic architecture and key techniques of the humachine system[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering，1995，31(1):1-7.
[4] SABOU M，KANTOROVITCH J，NIKOLOV A，et al. Position paper on realizing smart products:challenges for semantic Web technologies[C]// SSN'09 Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Semantic Sensor Networks-Volume 522，CEUR-WS.org，2009.
[5] MÜHLHÄUSER M. Smart products:an introduction[J]. Communications in Computer & Information Science，2007(11):158-164.
[6] ALTER S. Making sense of smartness in the context of smart devices and smart systems[J]. Information Systems Frontiers，2020，22:381-393.
[7] DOURISH P. What we talk about when we talk about context[J]. Personal & Ubiquitous Computing，2004，8(1):19-30.
[8] CARROLL J. Becoming social:expanding scenario-based approaches in HCI[J]. Behaviour & Information Technology，1996，15(4):266-275.
[9] VERBEEK P P . Materializing morality:design ethics and technological mediation[J]. Science，Technology and Human Values，2006，31(3):361-380.
[10] VERBEEK P P. What things do:philosophical reflections on technology，agency，and design[M]. State College:Penn State University Press，2005.
[11] LATOUR B. On technical mediation:philosophy，sociology，genealogy[J]. Common Knowledge，1994(3):29-64.
[12] HARRISON S，SENGERS P，TATAR D. Making epistemological trouble:third-paradigm HCI as successor science[J]. Interacting with Computers，2011，23(5):385-392.
[13] DOURISH P. Where the action is:the foundations of embodied interaction[M]. Cambridge:MIT Press，2001.
[14] VARELA F J，THOMPSON E，ROSCH E. The embodied mind[M]. Cambridge:The MIT Press，1991.
[15] 魏屹东. 认知哲学手册[M]. 北京:科学出版社，2020.WEI Yidong. Handbook of philosophy of cognition[M]. Beijing:Science Press，2020.
[16] GALLAGHER S. Enactivist interventions:rethinking the mind[M]. New York:Oxford University Press，2017.
[17] HEIDEGGER M. Being and time[M]. New York:State University of New York Press，1996.
[18] MERLEAU-PONTY M. Phenomenology of perception [M]. London:Routledge，2002.
[19] PUTNAM H. Mind，language，and reality[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press，1975.
[20] DENNETT D C. The intentional stance[M]. Cambridge:The MIT Press，1987.
[21] JACKENDOFF R. Consciousness and the computational mind[M]. Cambridge:The MIT Press，1987.
[22] THAGART P. Mind-introduction to cognitive science[M]. London:Psychology Press，2005.
[23] 李建会. 心灵的形式化及其挑战:认知科学的哲学[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社，2017.LI Jianhui. Formalization of mind and its challenges:the philosophy of cognitive science [M]. Beijing:China Social Sciences Press，2017.
[24] WALTER S. Situated cognition:a field guide to some open conceptual and ontological issues[J]. Review of Philosophy & Psychology，2014，5(2):241-263.
[25] FOGLIA L ，WILSON R A . Embodied cognition[J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science，2013，4(3):319-325.
[26] LAKOFF G，JOHNSON M. Metaphors we live by[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press，1980.
[27] BROOKS R．Intelligence without reason[C]// Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1，1991:568-595.
[28] WILSON M. Six views of embodied cognition[J]. Psychological Bulletin and Review，2002，9(4):625-636.
[29] CLANCEY W. Situated cognition:on human knowledge and computer representations[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press，1997.
[30] BROWN J S，COLLINS A，DUGUID P. Situated cognition and the culture of learning[J]. Educational Researcher，1989，18(1):32-42.
[31] NORMAN D A . Cognition in the head and in the world:introduction to a debate on situated cognition[J]. Cognitive Science，1993，17(1):1-6.
[32] 李建会. 论布鲁克斯的无表征智能理论[J]. 自然辩证法研究，2007(7):9-13.LI Jianhui. On Rodney Brooks' theory of intelligence without representation[J]. Studies in Dialectics of Nature，2007(7):9-13.
[33] CLARK A，CHALMERS D J. The extended mind[J]. Analysis，1998，58(1):7-19.
[34] ROWLANDS M. The new science of the mind:From extended mind to embodied phenomenology[M]. Cambridge:The MIT Press，2010.
[35] NOÉ A. Action in perception[M]. Cambridge:The MIT Press，2004.
[36] SHAPIRO L. Embodied cognition[M]. London:Routledge，2010.
[37] MITCHAM C. Thinking through technology:the path between engineering and philosophy [M]. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press，1994.
[38] 杨又，吴国林. 智能人工物的意向性分析[J]. 科学技术哲学研究，2019，36(2):65-71.YANG You，WU Guolin. The analysis of the intention of intelligent artifact[J]. Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology，2019，36(2):65-71.
[39] IHDE D. Technology and the lifeworld:from garden to earth[M]. Bloomington:Indiana University Press，1990.
[40] VERBEEK P P. Cyborg intentionality:rethinking the phenomenology of human-technology relations[J]. Phenomenology & the Cognitive Sciences，2008，7(3):387-395.
[41] 徐江. 知识图谱视角下的设计元研究管窥[J]. 装饰，2019(10):48-53.XU Jiang. Restricted view on design meta- research from the perspective of knowledge graph[J]. Zhuang-shi，2019(10):48-53.
[42] 蒋中港. 设计研究的技术哲学进路——基于文献计量分析视角[D]. 上海:同济大学，2022.JIANG Zhonggang. The approach of philosophy of technology in design research—based on the perspective of bibliometric analysis[D]. Shanghai:Tongji University，2022.
[43] FRANCÉS ML，MORER P ，RODRÍGUEZ M I，et al. Wearable design requirements identification and evaluation[J]. Sensors，2020，20(9):2599.

智能交互的认知哲学逻辑及设计评价研究

Cognition Philosophy Logic and Design Evaluation of Intelligent Interaction

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张健, 宋昕贤, 顾佩华. 复杂竞争产品的演化状态空间与可适应能力评价[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(13): 33-47.
[2]	曹恩国, 徐祺, 沈峰岑, 胡伟峰. 多运动复合型被动式下肢外骨骼设计及其智能交互评估[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(11): 43-53.
[3]	龙辉, 郝佳, 牛红伟, 王国新, 张非凡. 基于情境的CAD模型手势操控技术[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(10): 374-382.
[4]	贾长治;杜秀菊;刘广生;康海英. 火炮冲击缓冲装置动态特性影响仿真分析与改进方法[J]. , 2012, 48(19): 156-162.