基于用户大数据的电动汽车驱动系统可靠性试验循环工况构建方法

doi:10.3901/JME.2021.14.129

机械工程学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (14): 129-140.doi: 10.3901/JME.2021.14.129

• 特邀专栏：电源系统设计、管理与大数据 • 上一篇下一篇

扫码分享

基于用户大数据的电动汽车驱动系统可靠性试验循环工况构建方法

赵礼辉^1,2,3, 王震¹, 冯金芝^1,2,3, 郑松林^1,2,3, 宁欣⁴

1. 上海理工大学机械工程学院上海 200093;
2. 机械工业汽车机械零部件强度与可靠性评价重点实验室上海 200093;
3. 上海市新能源汽车可靠性评价公共技术平台上海 200093;
4. 河南科技学院机电学院新乡 453003

收稿日期:2020-06-06 修回日期:2021-05-06 出版日期:2021-07-20 发布日期:2021-09-15
通讯作者: 赵礼辉(通信作者),男,1985年出生,博士,副教授。主要研究方向为车辆可靠性评价与轻量化设计。E-mail:Pheigoe@126.com
作者简介:王震,男,1997年出生。主要研究方向为电驱动系统可靠性分析与测试。E-mail:wangzhenares@yeah.net
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划（2018YFB0104802）和国家自然科学基金（51705322）资助项目

Construction Method for Reliability Test Driving Cycle of Electric Vehicle Drive System Based on Users' Big Data

ZHAO Lihui^1,2,3, WANG Zhen¹, FENG Jinzhi^1,2,3, ZHENG Songlin^1,2,3, NING Xin⁴

1. School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science & Technology, Shanghai 200093;
2. CMIF Key Laboratory for Strength and Reliability Evaluation of Automotive Structures, Shanghai 200093;
3. Public Technology Platform for Reliability Evaluation of New Energy Vehicles in Shanghai, Shanghai 200093;
4. School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 453003

Received:2020-06-06 Revised:2021-05-06 Online:2021-07-20 Published:2021-09-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为构建与用户载荷关联的电动汽车驱动系统可靠性试验循环工况，基于300个实际用户累计3 540 000 km载荷数据，提取工况片段并关联电驱动系统失效主导载荷构造工况特征参数，运用主成分分析与K-Means聚类分析法将用户使用条件下电驱动系统运行片段分成五种典型工况；基于损伤累积模型，分析不同工况载荷对电驱动系统部件造成的损伤，并确定各工况最优单位损伤强度分布模型，并以损伤分布连续性转折点，筛选单位损伤强度较高的片段作为可靠性试验循环工况；基于马尔科夫状态转移概率矩阵，采用马尔科夫链蒙特卡洛法产生伪随机数对工况拼接，构建电动汽车驱动系统可靠性试验加载谱。通过构造的可靠性试验载荷谱与标准循环工况及用户损伤对比，表明构建的电驱动系统可靠性试验加载谱具有较高的损伤强度，能够有效涵盖90%以上的用户使用强度，从而为电动汽车驱/传动系可靠性设计与验证提供参考和依据。

关键词: 用户大数据, 电驱动系统, 可靠性试验, 工况构建, 马尔科夫过程

Abstract: To construct the reliability test driving cycle of the electric vehicle drive system correlated with users' load, based on 300 actual users load data with 3.54 million kilometers, fragment of conditions are extracted and characteristic parameters are constructed with the failure dominant load of the electric drive system. Using principal component analysis and K-Means clustering analysis methods, the operating segments of the electric drive system under user conditions are divided into five typical conditions. Based on the damage accumulation model, the damage caused to the components of the electric drive system under different conditions are analyzed, and the optimal unit damage intensity distribution models are determined for each condition. Based on the continuity turning point of the damage distribution, the segments with higher unit damage strength are selected as reliability test driving cycle. Based on Markov state transition probability matrix, using Markov chain Monte Carlo method to generate pseudo-random numbers for stitching of conditions, then the reliability test load spectrum of the electric vehicle drive system is constructed. The comparison of the constructed reliability test load spectrum with the standard cyclic conditions and customers damage shows that the reliability test loading spectrum of the electric drive system is constructed with higher damage strength, which can effectively cover more than 90% of the strength under user conditions, so as to provide reference and basis for the reliability design and verification of electric vehicle drive or transmission system.

Key words: users' big data, electric vehicle drive system, reliability test, construction of conditions, Markov process

中图分类号:

U461

赵礼辉, 王震, 冯金芝, 郑松林, 宁欣. 基于用户大数据的电动汽车驱动系统可靠性试验循环工况构建方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2021, 57(14): 129-140.

ZHAO Lihui, WANG Zhen, FENG Jinzhi, ZHENG Songlin, NING Xin. Construction Method for Reliability Test Driving Cycle of Electric Vehicle Drive System Based on Users' Big Data[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 57(14): 129-140.

参考文献

[1] 王志福. 电动汽车电驱动理论与设计[M]. 北京:机械工业出版社,2016. WANG Zhifu. Theory and design of electric drive for electric vehicles[M]. Beijing:China Machine Press,2016.
[2] SASIDHARAN S,ISHA T B. Reliability analysis in an electrical drive system[J]. Indian Journal of Science and Technology,2016,48(9):1-4.
[3] 李文礼,石晓辉,柯坚,等. 关联用户的汽车传动系载荷谱室内台架试验编制方法[J]. 机械工程学报,2014,50(20):143-150. LI Wenli,SHI Xiaohui,KE Jian,et al. Weave method study of customer correlated load spectrum for driveline durability indoor test[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2014,50(20):143-150.
[4] 赵礼辉,刘斌,井清,等. 轻型商用车全寿命周期目标里程与运行工况研究[J]. 汽车工程,2018,40(3):342-348. ZHAO Lihui,LIU Bin,JING Qing,et al. A research on target mileage and operation conditions in total life cycle for light commercial vehicles[J]. Automotive Engineering,2018,40(3):342-348.
[5] ZHANG J,WANG Z P,LIU P,et al. Driving cycles construction for electric vehicles considering road environment:A case study in Beijing[J]. Applied Energy,2019,253:11-35.
[6] JOHANNESSON P,SPECKERT M. Guide to load analysis for durability in vehicle engineering[M]. New Jersey:John Wiley & Sons Inc,2013.
[7] 赵礼辉,李佳欣,井清,等. 关联用户的汽车试验场耐久性评价路况循环确定方法研究[J]. 汽车工程,2020,42(1):127-133. ZHAO Lihui,LI Jiaxin,JING Qing,et al. Research on the method of determining road condition cycles of durability test of correlated user automobile test field[J]. Automotive Engineering,2020,42(1):127-133.
[8] BRADY J,MAHONY M O. Development of a driving cycle to evaluate the energy economy of electric vehicles in urban areas[J]. Applied Energy,2016,177:165-178.
[9] ZAHID T,XU K,LI W M,et al. State of charge estimation for electric vehicle power battery using advanced machine learning algorithm under diversified drive cycles[J]. Energy,2018,162:871-882.
[10] ZHAO X,YU Q,MA J,et al. Development of a representative EV urban driving cycle based on a K-Means and SVM hybrid clustering algorithm[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation,2018:1-18.
[11] HELMBRECHT M,OLAVERRI-MONREAL C,BENGLER K,et al. How electric vehicles affect driving behavioral patterns[J]. Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine,IEEE,2014,6(3):22-32.
[12] LEE C H,WU C H. A data driven approach to create an extensible EV driving data model[C]//Association for Computing Machinery. Data Science. Proceedings of the 3rd Multidisciplinary International Social Networks Conference on Social Informatics 2016. Union,NJ,USA:ACM,2016(36):1-6.
[13] ZHAO X,ZHAO X M,YU Q,et al. Development of a representative urban driving cycle construction methodology for electric vehicles:A case study in Xi'an[J]. Transportation Research Part D,2020,81:1-22.
[14] CALINSKI T,HARABASZ J. A dendrite method for cluster analysis[J]. Communications in Statistics,1974,3(1):1-27.
[15] LEE Y L,PAN J,HATHAWAY R,et al. Fatigue testing and analysis[M]. New York:Butterworth Heinemann,2005.
[16] SHI S,LIN N,ZHANG Y,et al. Research on Markov property analysis of driving cycles and its application[J]. Transportation Research Part D,2016,47:171-181.
[17] 姜平,石琴,陈无畏. 聚类和马尔科夫方法结合的城市汽车行驶工况构建[J]. 中国机械工程,2010,21(23):2893-2897. JIANG Ping,SHI Qin,CHEN Wuwei. Driving cycle construction method of city motors based on clustering method and Markov process[J]. China Mechanical Engineering,2010,21(23):2893-2897.
[18] LIN J. A Markov progress approach to driving cycle development[D]. Davis： University of California， 2002.

基于用户大数据的电动汽车驱动系统可靠性试验循环工况构建方法

Construction Method for Reliability Test Driving Cycle of Electric Vehicle Drive System Based on Users' Big Data

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王文林, 张子波, 李英子, 吴永明, 王起新, 梁若霜. 液压缸可靠性试验与数据分析研究平台[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(18): 385-393.
[2]	高锋阳, 张浩然. 氢燃料电池混合动力有轨电车的自适应瞬时等效能耗优化[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(6): 226-238.
[3]	陈爽, 胡明辉, 赵佳伟. 系统损耗最小的双电机纯电动汽车实时转矩分配策略[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(22): 411-423.
[4]	韩建斌, 张卓然, 黄健, 王晨, 杜亚辉. 分布式电驱动系统永磁同步电机改进型反馈式弱磁控制策略研究^*[J]. 电气工程学报, 2021, 16(4): 85-92.
[5]	印明昂, 田刚, 孙志礼, 孙尧. 多优先级与离开机制并存的M/M/c/N排队系统[J]. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(14): 197-205.
[6]	段福斌, 潘骏, 陈文华, 徐瀚辉, 杨礼康. 双筒式液压减振器阻尼力退化建模与可靠性评估[J]. 机械工程学报, 2017, 53(24): 201-210.
[7]	陈文华;吴友义;高亮;陈泽宗;潘骏. 电连接器真空环境试验电压加载方式研究[J]. , 2009, 45(7): 1-6.
[8]	崔卫民;薛红军;喻天翔;宋笔锋. 试验数据服从Weibull分布时可靠性试验最少试件数的确定[J]. , 2008, 44(1): 51-55.
[9]	郭虎;陈文华;樊晓燕;邓耀文;吴慧敏. 汽车试验场可靠性试验强化系数的研究[J]. , 2004, 40(10): 73-76,8.