车轮型面演变对重载固定辙叉磨耗的影响

doi:10.3901/JME.2020.10.208

机械工程学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (10): 208-215.doi: 10.3901/JME.2020.10.208

扫码分享

车轮型面演变对重载固定辙叉磨耗的影响

朱黄石^1,2, 邹小春¹, 马贺¹, 张军¹

1. 北京建筑大学城市轨道交通车辆服役性能保障北京市重点实验室北京 102616;
2. 南京地铁运营有限责任公司南京 210000

收稿日期:2019-08-08 修回日期:2019-12-30 出版日期:2020-05-20 发布日期:2020-06-11
通讯作者: 马贺(通信作者),女,1988年出生,博士,讲师。主要研究方向为轮轨关系。E-mail:13120171199@163.com
作者简介:朱黄石,男,1995年出生。主要研究方向为轮轨关系。E-mail:530434429@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（51775031）和北京建筑大学市属高校基本科研业务费专项资金（X18177）资助项目。

Influence of Wheel Profiles Evolution on Wear of Fixed Frog in Heavy Haul Railway

ZHU Huangshi^1,2, ZOU Xiaochun¹, MA He¹, ZHANG Jun¹

1. Beijing Key Laboratory of Performance Guarantee on Urban Rail Transit Vehicles, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 102616;
2. Nanjing Metro Operation Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210000

Received:2019-08-08 Revised:2019-12-30 Online:2020-05-20 Published:2020-06-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究大秦线路上列车车轮型面演变对固定辙叉动力学性能的影响，建立重载列车-辙叉动力学模型，分析重载列车通过固定辙叉的动力学性能和磨耗规律。结果表明，车轮通过理论尖端后，滚动圆半径不断变化使得轮叉接触点线速度发生改变，轮叉间滚动与滑动摩擦并存，对翼轨磨损较大；不同车轮对心轨冲击位置相对集中，心轨该区段伤损严重；车轮演变使轮叉接触状态发生变化，磨耗初期车轮的列车动力学性能优于标准车轮，列车平顺性更好，磨耗初期机车与货车轮叉垂向力较标准车轮分别降低了39%和56%，该磨耗阶段车轮与辙叉匹配时，辙叉的磨损最轻微。随着车轮型面演变，车轮磨耗加深，列车动力学性能逐渐恶化，磨耗后期车轮对辙叉磨耗掉块伤损的影响最剧烈。

关键词: 重载列车, 固定辙叉, 车轮磨耗, 动力学性能, 辙叉伤损

Abstract: For Datong-qinhuangdao Line, in order to study the influence of the evolution of the wheel profile on the fixed frog, the dynamic model of heavy haul train and the fixed frog is established to analyze the dynamic performance and wear law of the frog. The results show that after passing the theoretical tip, the radius of the wheel rolling circle changes, causing the linear velocity of the contact point of wheel and frog to change. Besides, for the coexistence of rolling and sliding friction between wheels and frogs, the wing rail wears more seriously. When wheels impact the nose rail, the contact position is relatively concentrated, causing a badly damaged zone on the nose rail. The evolution of the wheel profile changes the contact state between wheels and frogs. Comparing with the standard wheel, the dynamic performance of the worn wheel at the initial stage is better. The ride comfort becomes better and the vertical force becomes lower so that the frog worn slightly. The vertical force of the locomotive wheel and the freight car wheel reduced by 39% and 56% respectively. However, with the evolution of the wheel profile, the wear volume increases and the dynamic performance of the wheel becomes worse. At the later stage of wear, the contact friction between the worn wheel and the frog would cause the severe wear and spalling.

Key words: heavy haul train, fixed frog, wheel wear, dynamic performance, frog damage

中图分类号:

U260

朱黄石, 邹小春, 马贺, 张军. 车轮型面演变对重载固定辙叉磨耗的影响[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(10): 208-215.

ZHU Huangshi, ZOU Xiaochun, MA He, ZHANG Jun. Influence of Wheel Profiles Evolution on Wear of Fixed Frog in Heavy Haul Railway[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 56(10): 208-215.

参考文献

[1] 罗赟,吴安伟. 动车组与单节车侧向通过道岔动力学性能比较[J]. 机车电传动,2007(1):5-7. LUO Yun,WU Anwei. Comparison between dynamic performances of EMUs and single locomotive when passing a turnout[J]. Electric Drive for Locomotives,2007(1):5-7.
[2] 翟婉明,王开云. 机车车辆侧向通过道岔时的运行安全性评估[J]. 同济大学学报,2004,32(3):382-386. ZHAI Wanming,Wang Kaiyun. Safety assessment of trains passing through branch lines of turnouts[J]. Journal of Tongji University,2004,32(3):382-386.
[3] 任尊松,孙守光. 道岔区轮轨接触几何关系研究[J]. 工程力学,2008(11):223-230. REN Zunsong,SUN Shouguang. Study on the wheel/rail,contact geometry relation of the turnout zone[J]. Engineering Mechanics,2008,25(11):223-230.
[4] 任尊松,翟婉明,王其昌. 轮轨接触几何关系在道岔系统动力学中的应用[J]. 铁道学报,2001(5):11-15. REN Zhunsong,ZHAI Wanming,WANG Qichang. The use of spatial wheel/rail contact geometric relationship in the turnout system dynamics[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society,2001(5):11-15.
[5] 孙宏友,王平,张东风,等. 动车组与货车侧向通过整体道床12号交叉渡线道岔动力学特性分析[J]. 铁道标准设计,2015,59(5):70-73. SUN Hongyou,WANG Ping,ZHANG Dongfeng,et al. Dynamics analysis of EMUS and freight car passing through No.12 crossover turnout with solid bed[J]. Railway Standard Design,2015,59(5):70-73.
[6] BLANCO-SAURA A E,VELARTE-GONZALEZ J L,RIBES-LLARIO F,et al. Study of the dynamic vehicle-track interaction in a railway turnout[J]. Multibody System Dynamics,2017(1):1-16.
[7] KOC W,PALIKOWAKA K. Dynamic analysis of the turnout diverging track for HSR with variable curvature sections[J]. World Journal of Engineering & Technology,2017,5(1):42-57.
[8] 曹洋,王平,杨生. 道岔平面选型的动力学研究[J]. 华中科技大学学报,2017,45(11):35-40. CAO Yang,WANG Ping,YANG Sheng. Dynamic study on turnout plane alignment selection[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology,2017,45(11):35-40.
[9] 陈漫,王平. 钢轨廓形优化对转辙器动力特性的影响研究[J]. 铁道标准设计,2017,61(10):37-42,60. CHEN Man,WANG Ping. Research on impact of rail profile optimization on dynamic characteristics of switch[J]. Railway Standard Design,2017,61(10):37-42,60.
[10] 王树国,司道林,杨东升,等. 我国高速铁路道岔尖轨廓形研究[J]. 中国铁路,2018(1):15-19. WANG Shuguo,SI Daolin,YANG Dongsheng,et al. Switch rail profiles of HSR in China[J]. China Railway,2018(1):15-19.
[11] 赵卫华. 固定辙叉轮轨关系优化及动力学仿真分析研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学,2014. ZHAO Weihua. Study on wheel/rail contact geometry optimization and dynamic simulation for rigid frog[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Jiaotong University,2014.
[12] 李俊楠. 机车通过重载固定辙叉系统动力学研究[D].大连:大连交通大学,2015. LI Junnan. Dynamic study on the locomotive wheel and rigid frog of heavy rail[D]. Dalian:Dalian Jiaotong University,2015.
[13] 陆文教,陶功权,王鹏,等. 地铁车轮磨耗对轮轨接触特性及动力学性能的影响[J]. 工程力学,2017,34(8):222-231. LU Wenjiao,TAO Gongquan,WANG Peng,et al. Influence of wheel wear on wheel-rail contact behavior and dynamic performance of metro vehicle[J] Engineering Mechanics,2017,34(8):222-231.
[14] 朱黄石. 重载列车对固定辙叉的磨耗及动力学性能研究[D]. 北京:北京建筑大学,2019. ZHU Huangshi. Study on wear and dynamics performance of heavy-duty trains on fixed frogs[D]. Beijing:Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture,2019.

[1]	王佳诺, 王奇, 韩健, 肖新标, 金学松. 考虑弹性轮对的车辆-轨道耦合动力学建模及减振特性研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(8): 235-244.
[2]	张峻瑞, 张军, 马贺, 窦蕴平. 轮对通过磨耗后固定辙叉的试验研究及接触分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(18): 304-311.
[3]	韩健, 肖新标, 温泽峰, 金学松. 地铁列车-嵌入式轨道系统动力学性能研究III:嵌入式轨道与普通轨道动态响应对比分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(6): 169-176.
[4]	侯茂锐, 陈秉智, 成棣, 胡晓依, 孙丽霞. 两种典型动车组车轮磨耗演变规律及其动力学影响研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(4): 191-201.
[5]	祁亚运, 戴焕云, 干锋. 高速列车车轮型面多目标优化研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(24): 188-197.
[6]	陈志贤, 李忠继, 杨吉忠, 吴兴文, 周永礼. 常导高速电磁悬浮车辆二系悬挂结构对比优化[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(10): 160-168,179.
[7]	张惠普, 汪满新. 4-RṞ(SS)₂高速并联机器人动力尺度综合[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(1): 29-40.
[8]	罗天祺, 陈再刚, 蒋建政, 王家鑫, 王开云. 货物非均匀装载对高速货运动车组动力学性能的影响[J]. 机械工程学报, 2021, 57(2): 139-146.
[9]	许世杰, 关庆华, 张雄飞, 赵长雨, 温泽峰, 陆文教. 地铁车辆车轮踏面双光带形成机理分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2021, 57(18): 240-251.
[10]	宫岛, 刘广宇, 周劲松, 孙煜, 尤泰文. 动车组车体异常振动问题分析及治理研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2021, 57(10): 95-105,117.
[11]	韩健, 肖新标, 杨刚, 温泽峰, 金学松. 地铁列车-嵌入式轨道系统动力学性能II：轨道参数对动力学性能影响[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(24): 173-180.
[12]	丁军君, 杨九河, 胡静涛, 李芾. 高速列车车轮多边形磨耗演变行为[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(22): 184-189.
[13]	肖国放, 陶功权, 刘孟奇, 任德祥, 温泽峰, 周小江, 陆文教. 地铁车辆车轮偏磨原因分析与对策研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(22): 247-255.
[14]	陶功权, 周小江, 周业明, 温泽峰. B型地铁车轮失圆问题分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(14): 152-160.
[15]	柴馨雪, 杨泳, 徐灵敏, 李秦川. 2-UPR-RPU并联机器人的动力学建模与性能分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(13): 110-119.

车轮型面演变对重载固定辙叉磨耗的影响

Influence of Wheel Profiles Evolution on Wear of Fixed Frog in Heavy Haul Railway

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价