椭圆截面管件充液压制变形与应力分析

doi:10.3901/JME.2017.18.035

机械工程学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (18): 35-41.doi: 10.3901/JME.2017.18.035

椭圆截面管件充液压制变形与应力分析

张鑫龙¹, 贺久强^1,2, 韩聪^1,2, 苑世剑^1,2

1. 哈尔滨工业大学材料科学与工程学院哈尔滨 150001;
2. 哈尔滨工业大学金属精密热加工国防科技重点实验室哈尔滨 150001

收稿日期:2016-07-25 修回日期:2017-03-27 出版日期:2017-09-20 发布日期:2017-09-20
通讯作者: 苑世剑(通信作者),男,1963年出生,博士,教授,博士研究生导师,长江学者特聘教授、国家杰出青年基金获得者.主要研究方向为管件内高压成形和板材液压成形技术与装备.E-mail:syuan@hit.edu.cn
作者简介:张鑫龙,男,1988年出生,博士研究生.主要研究方向为管件充液压制成形.E-mail:zhangxinlong2009@126.com;贺久强,男,1979年出生,硕士,工程师.主要研究方向为管件内高压成形与充液压制成形装备研制.E-mail:hjq@hit.edu.cn;韩聪,男,1973年出生,博士,副教授,博士研究生导师.主要研究方向为管件内高压成形与剪切弯曲成形.E-mail:conghan@hit.edu.cn
基金资助:
教育部长江学者和科技创新团队发展计划资助项目（IRT1229）。

Plastic Deformation and Stress Analysis on Hydro-pressing of Mild Steel Tube with Elliptical Section

ZHANG Xinlong¹, HE Jiuqiang^1,2, HAN Cong^1,2, YUAN Shijian^1,2

1. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001;
2. National Key Laboratory for Precision Hot Processing of Metals, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001

Received:2016-07-25 Revised:2017-03-27 Online:2017-09-20 Published:2017-09-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 预成形是内高压成形的关键工序，预制坯的形状直接影响到后续内高压成形的缺陷与壁厚分布。针对管件无内压支撑压制时因失稳导致的预制坯截面凹陷与尺寸不可控等问题，提出管件充液压制成形方法。对椭圆截面管件充液压制成形过程进行应力分析与试验研究，将充液压制与传统压制进行对比，分析充液压力和下压量对管件截面应力、壁厚及尺寸的影响。结果表明：管内充液可有效改善压制管件等效应力分布情况，充液压力越大，等效应力分布越均匀|相比于传统压制，充液压制过程中椭圆截面的壁厚变化并不明显，最大减薄处位于直壁部分中间区域，当充液压力为15 MPa时，其最大减薄率为2%；随着充液压力的增大，管件直壁部分的凹痕缺陷逐渐平复消失。

关键词: 壁厚分布, 充液压制, 内高压成形, 预成形, 圆管压制

Abstract: Preforming is the key to the hydroforming process. The forming defects and thickness distribution are directly affected by the shape of the preform. A hydro-pressing forming method is proposed to solve the problems in conventional mechanical pressing process without internal pressure, such as dent defects and size uncontrollable. The stress analysis and experimental research are performed for the hydro-pressing process of mild steel tube with elliptical sections. The differences are compared between the hydro-pressing and the conventional mechanical pressing. The effects of supporting pressure and pressing displacement on section stress, wall thickness distribution and section shape are investigated. It is demonstrated that the equivalent stress distribution of pressing tube was improved by hydro-pressing process. The greater the supporting pressure, the more uniform the equivalent stress distribution. Compared with conventional mechanical pressing, the thickness variation of the elliptical section is unobvious during hydro-pressing process. The maximum thinning is located in the middle region of the straight wall. When the supporting pressure is 15 MPa, the maximum thinning is only 2%. Dent defects located in the straight wall of the tube is decreasing with the increasing of supporting pressure.

Key words: hydroforming process, hydro-pressing, preforming, tube mechanical pressing, wall thickness distribution

中图分类号:

TG394

张鑫龙, 贺久强, 韩聪, 苑世剑. 椭圆截面管件充液压制变形与应力分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2017, 53(18): 35-41.

ZHANG Xinlong, HE Jiuqiang, HAN Cong, YUAN Shijian. Plastic Deformation and Stress Analysis on Hydro-pressing of Mild Steel Tube with Elliptical Section[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 53(18): 35-41.

参考文献

[1] 苑世剑, 何祝斌, 刘钢, 等. 内高压成形理论与技术的新进展[J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2011, 21(10):2523-2533. YUAN Shijian, HE Zhubin, LIU Gang, et al. New developments in theory and process of internal high pressure forming[J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2011, 21(10):2523-2533.
[2] KOC M, ALTAN T. An overall review of the tube hydroforming (THF) technology[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2001, 108(3):384-393.
[3] 雷丽萍, 方刚, 曾攀, 等. 汽车副架液压胀形预成形工艺设计的数值模拟[J]. 塑性工程学报, 2002, 9(2):76-78. LEI Liping, FANG Gang, ZENG Pan, et al. Numerical modeling of pre-forming process design in hydroforming automobile subframe[J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2002, 9(2):76-78.
[4] SONG W J, HEO S C, KIM J, et al. Investigation on preformed shape design to improve formability in tube hydroforming process using FEM[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2006, 177(1):658-662.
[5] 谢文才, 苑世剑. 弯曲轴线薄壁焊管内高压成形壁厚与变形规律的研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(22):78-83. XIE Wencai, YUAN Shijian. Thickness and deformation characters of seamed tube hydroforming with twisted axis[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 52(22):78-83.
[6] HWANG Y M, ALTAN T. Finite element analysis of tube hydroforming processes in a rectangular die[J]. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2003, 39(11):1071-1082.
[7] HWANG Y M, ALTAN T. FE simulations of the crushing of circular tubes into triangular cross-sections[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2002, 125:833-838.
[8] KIM J, LEI L P, KANG B S. Preform design in hydroforming of automobile lower arm by FEM[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2003, 138(1):58-62.
[9] TABATABAEI S A, PANAHI M S, MASHHADI M M, et al. Optimum design of preform geometry and forming pressure in tube hydroforming using the equi-potential lines method[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2013, 69(9-12):2787-2792.
[10] LIU Jianwei, LIU Xinyu, YANG Lianfa, et al. Investigation of tube hydroforming along with stamping of thin-walled tubes in square cross-section dies[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B:Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2016, 230(1):111-119.
[11] 韩聪, 张伟玮, 苑世剑, 等. 预制坯形状对扭力梁内高压成形的影响分析[J]. 材料科学与工艺, 2011, 19(4):1-5. HAN Cong, ZHANG Weiwei, YUAN Shijian, et al. The effect of perform shape on hydroforming of a torsion beam[J]. Materials Science and Technology, 2011, 19(4):1-5.
[12] KIM J, KANG B S, HWANG S M. Preform design in hydroforming by the three-dimensional backward tracing scheme of the FEM[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2002, 130:100-106.
[13] KIM J, KANG S J, KANG B S. Computational approach to analysis and design of hydroforming process for an automobile lower arm[J]. Computers & Structures, 2002, 80(14):1295-1304.
[14] 张勇, 刘舒然, 赖雄鸣, 等. 泡沫填充薄壁结构的抗弯性分析及多目标优化设计[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(24):115-122. ZHANG Yong, LIU Shuran, LAI Xiongming, et al. Bending resistance analysis and multi-objective optimization design of foam filled thin-walled structure[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 52(24):115-122.
[15] XIE Wencai, HAN Cong, CHU Guannan, et al. Research on hydro-pressing process of closed section tubular parts[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2015, 80(5):1149-1157.

椭圆截面管件充液压制变形与应力分析

Plastic Deformation and Stress Analysis on Hydro-pressing of Mild Steel Tube with Elliptical Section

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	谢文才, 苑世剑. 弯曲轴线薄壁焊管内高压成形壁厚与变形规律的研究^*[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(22): 78-83.
[2]	刘雨生, 李萍, 王斌, 李贝贝, 薛克敏. Ti2AlNb合金多层板结构超塑成形/扩散连接数值模拟及试验研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2015, 51(12): 43-49.
[3]	王仲仁;苑世剑;汤泽军;张琦. 省力液压成形的原理与途径[J]. , 2013, 49(18): 99-105.
[4]	邵勇;陆彬;陈军;郭平义. 基于渐进优化的锻造预成形优化设计研究[J]. , 2012, 48(22): 65-71.
[5]	初冠南;王小松;刘钢;杨建国;杨帅. 激光焊管内高压成形焊缝有限元建模方式[J]. , 2012, 48(22): 34-39.
[6]	苑世剑;韩聪;王小松. 空心变截面构件内高压成形工艺与装备[J]. , 2012, 48(18): 21-27.
[7]	宋鹏;王小松;韩聪;徐永超;苑世剑. 铝合金矩形截面内高压成形圆角充填行为研究[J]. , 2010, 46(12): 59-64.
[8]	赵新海;李剑峰;黄晓慧;赵国群;王广春. 控制锻件变形均匀性和变形力的锻造预成形多目标优化设计[J]. , 2009, 45(5): 193-197.
[9]	王晓娜;李付国;肖军;李淼泉. 基于类等势场的粉末高温合金盘件预成形设计及有限元模拟[J]. , 2009, 45(5): 237-243.
[10]	刘钢;苑世剑;滕步刚. 内高压成形矩形断面圆角应力分析[J]. , 2006, 42(6): 150-155.
[11]	马新武;赵国群;王广春. 非等温成形过程中的预锻模具形状优化设计[J]. , 2003, 39(5): 145-149.
[12]	刘郁丽;杨合;詹梅. 摩擦对叶片精锻预成形毛坯放置位置影响规律的研究[J]. , 2003, 39(1): 97-100.
[13]	苑世剑;王小松. 内高压成形机理研究及其应用[J]. , 2002, 38(增刊): 12-15.
[14]	赵新海;赵国群;王广春;王同海. 锻造预成形多目标优化设计的研究[J]. , 2002, 38(4): 61-65.
[15]	赵国群;贾玉玺;王广春;赵振铎. 基于有限元逆向模拟技术的预成形模具设计[J]. , 2000, 36(2): 65-68.