Application of Lightweight Convolutional Neural Network Method Based on SERepVGG-A2 in Melt Pool State Recognition

doi:10.3901/JME.2025.03.440

Abstract

Abstract: A Quasi-Aiming at the problem that the traditional convolutional neural network is applied to the state recognition of the molten pool, the shallow convolutional neural network cannot effectively extract the characteristics of the molten pool, and the deep convolutional neural network has the problems of large number of parameters and high redundancy. A lightweight convolutional neural network (SERepVGG-A2) method is quantified. Firstly, in order to solve the problem of a large number of useless background areas in the original melt pool image, the region of interest (ROI) extraction of the melt pool image is performed to optimize the data set; then, in order to ensure the model feature extraction ability and reduce the complexity of the model, a lightweight convolutional neural network model combining residual structure, attention mechanism and structural parameter reorganization is proposed to identify the molten pool state. The proposed method is verified and illustrated with the online molten pool data of Ti-10Mo titanium alloy in the directed energy deposition process. The results show that the proposed lightweight network model can not only effectively identify the molten pool characteristics according to the molten pool signal, but also it has higher melting pool identification efficiency than traditional CNN methods.

Key words: melting pool state recognition, convolutional neural network, deep learning, attention mechanism, structural parameter reorganization

CLC Number:

TG156

LIU Hanru, CHEN Guiying, XU Zelin, PENG Shitong, GUO Jianan, LIU Weiwei, WANG Fengtao. Application of Lightweight Convolutional Neural Network Method Based on SERepVGG-A2 in Melt Pool State Recognition[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2025, 61(3): 440-448.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: http://www.cjmenet.com.cn/EN/10.3901/JME.2025.03.440

http://www.cjmenet.com.cn/EN/Y2025/V61/I3/440

References

[1] BI Guijun，SUN Chennan，CHEN Huichi，et al. Microstructure and tensile properties of superalloy in100 fabricated by micro-laser aided additive manufacturing[J]. Materials & Design，2014，60:401-408.
[2] ZHAO Tong，DAHMEN M，CAI W，et al. Laser metal deposition for additive manufacturing of aa5024 and nanoparticulate tic modified aa5024 alloy composites prepared with balling milling process[J]. Optics & Laser Technology，2020，131:106438.
[3] WANG Lu，ZHANG Yaoming，CHIA H Y，et al. Mechanism of keyhole pore formation in metal additive manufacturing[J]. NPJ Computational Materials，2022，8(1):22.
[4] MENG Lingbin，MCWILLIAMS B，JAROSINSKI W，et al. Machine learning in additive manufacturing:A review[J]. JOM，2020，72(6):2363-2377.
[5] ZHANG Ziyang，LIU Zhichao，WU Dazhong. Prediction of melt pool temperature in directed energy deposition using machine learning[J]. Additive Manufacturing，2021，37:101692.
[6] MOZAFFAR M，PAUL A，AL-BAHRANI R，et al. Data-driven prediction of the high-dimensional thermal history in directed energy deposition processes via recurrent neural networks[J]. Manufacturing Letters，2018，18:35-39.
[7] KHANZADEH M，CHOWDHURY S，TSCHOPP M A，et al. In-situ monitoring of melt pool images for porosity prediction in directed energy deposition processes[J]. IISE Transactions，2019，51(5):437-455.
[8] SHEVCHIK S A，KENEL C，LEINENBACH C，et al. Acoustic emission for in situ quality monitoring in additive manufacturing using spectral convolutional neural networks[J]. Additive Manufacturing，2018，21:598-604.
[9] YE Dongsen，HSI FUH J Y，ZHANG Yingjie，et al. In situ monitoring of selective laser melting using plume and spatter signatures by deep belief networks[J]. ISA Transactions，2018，81:96-104.
[10] ZHANG Bin，LIU Shunyu，SHIN Y C. In-process monitoring of porosity during laser additive manufacturing process[J]. Additive Manufacturing，2019，28:497-505.
[11] MI Jiqian，ZHANG Yikai，LI Hui，et al. In-situ monitoring laser based directed energy deposition process with deep convolutional neural network[J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing，2021.
[12] SEMAK V V，HOPKINS J A，MCCAY M H，et al. Melt pool dynamics during laser welding[J]. Journal of Physics D:Applied Physics，1995，28(12):2443-2450.
[13] GUAN Yong，MENG Zong，SUN Dengyun，et al. Rolling bearing fault diagnosis based on information fusion and parallel lightweight convolutional network[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Systems，2022，65:811-821.
[14] LÓPEZ DE LA ROSA F，GÓMEZ-SIRVENT J L，MORALES R，et al. Defect detection and classification on semiconductor wafers using two-stage geometric transformation-based data augmentation and SqueezeNet lightweight convolutional neural network[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering，2023，183:109549.
[15] DING Xiaohan，ZHANG Xiangyu，MA Ningning，et al. RepVGG:making vgg-style convnets great again[EB/OL]. arXiv，2021.
[16] HU Jie，SHEN Li，SUN Gang. Squeeze-and-excitation networks:arXiv:1709.01507[EB/OL]. arXiv，2019.
[17] 田娟，李英祥，李彤岩. 激活函数在卷积神经网络中的对比研究[J]. 计算机系统应用，2018，27(7):43-49. TIAN Juan，LI Yingxiang，LI Tongyan. Comparative study of activation functions in convolutional neural networks [J]. Application of Computer Systems，2018，27(7):43-49.
[18] IOFFE S，SZEGEDY C. Batch normalization:Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift[C]//International conference on machine learning. pmlr，2015:448-456.
[19] LIU Hanhu，YUAN Junlin，PENG Shitong，et al. In-suit monitoring melt pool states in direct energy deposition using resnet[J]. Measurement Science and Technology，2022，33(12):124007.
[20] OTSU N. A tlreshold selection method from gray-level histograms[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systrems，Man，and Cybernetics，1979，9(1):5.
[21] ZHOU Bolei，KHOSLA A，LAPEDRIZA A，et al. Learning deep features for discriminative localization[C]// 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Las Vegas，NV，USA:IEEE，2016:2921-2929.