Reverse Identification of John-Cook Constitutive Parameters of Superalloy Based on Orthogonal Cutting

doi:10.3901/JME.2019.07.217

Abstract

Abstract: With the development of computer technology, finite element simulation is increasingly used in the fields of parameter optimization, cutting mechanism research etc. John-Cook (J-C) constitutive model, the foundation of superalloy cutting simulation, is immediately related to the accuracy and reliability of simulation results. Centring on the problem that the material flow characteristics obtained by traditional Split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) test cannot accurately describe the thermoplastic deformation of materials in cutting process and the results of parameter identification are quite different from the actual cutting conditions, a reverse identification method for J-C constitutive parameters of superalloy based on OXLEY cutting theory and orthogonal cutting test is put forward. Firstly, considering the model of unequal shear zone, the distribution regularity of strain, strain rate and shear temperature in cutting process is brought out; secondly, in view of the impossibility about directly comparing traditional turning with its two-dimensional simulation model, an orthogonal cutting experimental platform is designed and built; thirdly, based on the unequal shear zone model and the orthogonal cutting test, the theoretical and experimental values of the flow stress on the main shear plane are calculated respectively, and the least square identification of the five J-C constitutive parameters (initial yield stress A, strain strengthening coefficient B, strain rate strengthening coefficient C, thermal softening coefficient m, work hardening index n) is realized by searching the optimal combination of constitutive parameters with genetic algorithm by setting the minimum gap between the theoretical value and the experimental value as the objective function under the constraint condition of the constitutive parameters to search for its optimal combination. Eventually, the comparison between the simulation results of J-C constitutive parameters and the experimental ones is made to verify the feasibility of the reverse identification method and the accuracy of the constitutive model.

Key words: constitutive model, orthogonal cutting, reverse identification, superalloy

CLC Number:

TH142
TG54

CHEN Bing, LIU Wei, LUO Ming, ZHANG Xiaoteng. Reverse Identification of John-Cook Constitutive Parameters of Superalloy Based on Orthogonal Cutting[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 55(7): 217-224.

References

[1] 吴明阳,赵旭,计伟,等. PCBN刀具切削高温合金锯齿形切屑形成机理[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(3):179-186. WU Mingyang, ZHAO XU, JI Wei, et al. Generation mechanism of saw-tooth chip in turning of GH4169 with PCBN tool[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 52(3):179-186.
[2] OXLEY P L B. The mechanics of machining:An analytical approach to assessing machinability[M]. Chichester:Ellis Horwood Publisher, 1989
[3] 彭鸿博,张宏建. 金属材料本构模型的研究进展[J]. 机械工程材料, 2012, 36(3):5-11. PENG Hongbo, ZHANG Hongjian. Research development of the constitutive models of metal materials[J]. Materials for Mechanical Engineering,2012, 36(3):5-11.
[4] 孔金星,陈辉,何宁,等. 纯铁材料动态力学性能测试及本构模型[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(7):2063-2071. KONG Jinxing, CHEN Hui, HE Ning, et al. Dynamic mechanical property tests and constitutive model of pure iron material[J]. Acta Aeronautica Et Astronautica Sinica, 2014, 35(7):2063-2071.
[5] SHROT A., BÄKER M. Determination of Johnson-Cook parameters from machining simulations[J]. Computational Materials Science, 2012, 52(1):298-304.
[6] PUJANA J, ARRAZOLA P J, M'SAOUBI R, et al. Analysis of the inverse identification of constitutive equations applied in orthogonal cutting process[J]. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2007, 47(14):2153-2161.
[7] GRAZKA M, JANISZEWSKI J, KRUSZKA L, et al. Identification methods of parameters for Johnson-Cook constitutive equation-comparison[J]. Applied Mechanics & Materials, 2014, 566:97-103.
[8] DAOUD M, JOMAA W, CHATELAIN J F, et al. A machining-based methodology to identify material constitutive law for finite element simulation[J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2015, 77(9-12):2019-2033.
[9] KLOCKE F, LUNG D, BUCHKREMER S. Inverse identification of the constitutive equation of inconel 718 and AISI 1045 from FE machining simulations[C]//14th CIRP Conference on Modeling of Machining Operations, 2013:212-217.
[10] SHI B, ATTIA H, TOUNSI N. Identification of material constitutive laws for machining-Part Ⅱ:Generation of the constitutive data and validation of the constitutive law[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Science & Engineering, 2010, 132(5):1009-1017.
[11] MOUFKI A, DUDZINSKI D, MOLINARI A, et al. Thermoviscoplastic modelling of oblique cutting:Forces and chip flow predictions[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2000, 42(6):1205-1232.
[12] SHI B, ATTIA H, TOUNSI N. Identification of material constitutive laws for machining-part I:An analytical model describing the stress, strain, strain rate, and temperature fields in the primary shear zone in orthogonal metal cutting[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Science & Engineering, 2010, 132(5):998-1008.
[13] TOUNSI N, VINCENTI J, OTHO A, et al. From the basic mechanics of orthogonal metal cutting toward the identification of the constitutive equation[J]. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2002, 42(12):1373-1383.
[14] DEMANGE J J, PRAKASH V, PEREIRA J M. Effects of material microstructure on blunt projectile penetration of a nickel-based super alloy[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2009, 36(8):1027-1043.
[15] WANG X,HUANG C,ZOU B,et al. Dynamic behavior and a modified Johnson-Cook constitutive model of Inconel 718 at high strain rate and elevated temperature[J]. Materials Science & Engineering A, 2013, 580(37):385-390.
[16] LORENTZON J, JÄRVSTRÅT N, JOSEFSON B L. Modelling chip formation of alloy 718[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2009, 209(10):4645-4653.
[17] OZEL T, LLANOS I, SORIANO J, et al. 3D finite element modelling of chip formation process for machining inconel 718:Comparison of FE software predictions[J]. Machining Science & Technology, 2011, 15(1):21-46.
[18] MALAKIZADI A, CEDERGREN S, SURREDDI K B, et al. A methodology to evaluate the machinability of Alloy 718 by means of FE simulation[C]//International Conference on Advanced Manufacturing Engineering and Technologies, 2013, 95-106.
[19] PRETE A D, FILICE L, UMBRELLO D. Numerical simulation of machining nickel-based alloys[J]. Procedia CIRP, 2013, 8:540-545.
[20] HE X, CHEN G, WANG T. Analysis of the temperature and residual stress field in the turning cutting of superalloy GH4169[J]. Mechanical Science & Technology for Aerospace Engineering, 2011, 30(12):2116-2115.