• CN:11-2187/TH
  • ISSN:0577-6686

›› 1959, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (2): 11-21.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

扫码分享

国产陶瓷刀车削过程中摩擦磨损特性的研究

胡传锦;熊大章;杨观廉;何惟诚;熊仪淑   

  1. 中国科学院机械研究所
  • 发布日期:1955-06-01

A RESEARCH ON THE FRICTIONAL AND WEAR PROPERTIES OF THE CHINESE MADE CERAMICS DURING TURNING OPERATION

Hu Chuan-chin;Hsiung Da-chang;Yang Kwan-lien;Ho Wee-chan;Hsiung Yee-su   

  1. Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Academia Sinica
  • Published:1955-06-01

摘要: 采用Г.И.ГрановскИЙ所创立的摹拟切削过程的试验方法,进行了国产陶瓷刀车削过程中摩擦损特性的研究。井与苏产硬质合金T15K6在同样试验条件下摩擦磨损特性,作了全面的对照比较。当摩擦速度较小时,陶瓷对45号钢的摩擦系数大于T15K6对45号钢的摩擦系数,陶瓷的累计磨损重量大于T15K6的累计磨损重量;当摩擦速度较大时,则得到相反的结果。当接触比压较小时,陶瓷对45号钢的摩擦系数大于T15K6对45号钢的摩擦系数,这时陶瓷的累计磨损重量也显著地较大;但当接触比压较大时,两种情况下的摩擦系数相差不多,然而累计磨损重量则仍以陶瓷的为较大。摩擦速度或接触比压小时所产生的振动,会显著地促使陶瓷的累计摩损重量增加。陶瓷使45号钢表面层所受硬化深度和程度,均较T15K6使其所受者为大;惟当摩擦速度很大,以致在用陶瓷进行的试验中能产生明显的热影响和软化作用时为例外。

Abstract: It is well-known that the frictional and wear properties actually govern the cutting ability of a tool material. But these properties of ceramics, as a new kind of non-metallic tool material, have not yet been thoroughly studied.In this report, a research on the frictional and wear properties of the Chinese made ceramics during turning operation is described. Following the "analogous method", established by professor r. N. rpauoacaaH, we use a ceramic test bar, instead of the usual turning tool, to perform the experiments. Simultaneously, a Soviet made cemented carbide TISK6 test bar is used to perform the same experiments under the same conditions. Then, the results obtained in the two cases are well compared with each other. The research indicates that the coefficient of friction μ between ceramics and steel (medium carbon steel No.45 is used to perform all the experiments) is larger than that between carbide and steel when the sliding speed v is lower than 250m/min, but the values of μ in the two cases become vice versa when the sliding speed v is higher than 250m/min (fig.5). The authors believe, this is probably due to the more intensive heat influence of ceramics upon the steel surface during higher sliding speed, so that the plasticity of the steel surface is increased and the frictional resistance is decreased. The coefficient μ between ceramics and steel is larger than that between carbide and steel when the contact pressure P is low, but such difference in the two cases deminishes away when the contact pressure P is high (fig.8). Along the same length of sliding path L, the accumulative wear w of ceramics is quite larger than that of carbide when the sliding speed v is low, but such difference becomes vice versa when the sliding speed v is high (fig 4). It is believed that the ceramics is worse than the carbide as to withstand the chatter vibration generated during low sliding. speed. But the former is better than the latter as to withstand the high temperature generated during high sliding speed. The accumulative wear w of either ceramics or carbide decreases as the contact pressure P decreases, although the wear of the former is quite larger than that of the latter (fig.7). But when the contact pressure P is sufficient low to generate a chatter vibration, the accumulative wear of the ceramics rapidly increases again, while that of the carbide continuously decreases (fig.7, left). The result of strain hardening test on steel surface indicates that either the depth of hardening or the surface microhardness produced by ceramics is larger than that produced by carbide (fig. 9 and 6), except that produced when sliding speed is sufficient high for the ceramics to induce a significant heat influence and "softening effect" (fig.6, right).