• CN:11-2187/TH
  • ISSN:0577-6686

›› 2013, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (10): 20-27.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

扫码分享

不同形式声屏障动态特性研究

韩珈琪;肖新标;何宾;周信;金学松   

  1. 西南交通大学牵引动力国家重点实验室
  • 发布日期:2013-05-20

Study on Dynamic Characteristics of Sound Barriers

HAN Jiaqi;XIAO Xinbiao;HE Bin;ZHOU Xin;JIN Xuesong   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Traction Power, Southwest Jiaotong University
  • Published:2013-05-20

摘要: 利用FLUENT软件,模拟高速列车通过高架桥上不同结构形式声屏障的过程,研究声屏障上作用的脉动风压特性。声屏障结构形式主要考虑两种高度和四种不同头部结构对声屏障脉动风压的影响,高速列车采用两种不同车外型(称A车和B车),列车速度为每小时350 km,声屏障头部结构考虑了直型、Y型、内折型(内倒L型)和外折型(外倒L型)。 利用ANSYS软件建立声屏障有限元模型,对声屏障的模态和高速列车的气流脉动激励的响应进行计算分析。计算结果表明,不同头部结构形式的声屏障所受脉动风压随时间变化趋势基本相似,列车高速通过声屏障时脉动风压呈现出明显的头波和尾波效应;不同头部结构的声屏障表面的脉动风压的峰值大小有差异,Y型声屏障最大,内折型次之,外折型最小;两种高度的声屏障立柱底部支座反力差异较大;目前分析的声屏障结构基频远大于脉动风的频率,列车的脉动风压作用不会导致声屏障发生共振。

关键词: 高速列车, 脉动风压, 模态分析, 声屏障, 有限元模型

Abstract: Using the commercial code FLUENT analyzes the characteristics of aerodynamic impulse force on sound barriers when high-speed trains pass by the sound barriers. The analysis considers effect of the different heads of sound barrier with different heights on the characteristics of aerodynamic impulse force on the sound barrier. The different heads of sound barrier include the up-right wall, the type Y, the interior inverse L type and the external inverse L type. Two different heights of sound barrier are used in the calculation. Two kinds of aerodynamic exteriors of high-speed train (A and B) are considered. The operation speed of the train is 350 km/h. Also using the commercial code ANSYS develops the finite element models of the sound barriers to calculate the natural frequencies and modes of the sound barriers, and calculate the transient response to the aerodynamic impulse force caused by the high-speed train. The numerical results show that the variation tendencies of the aerodynamic impulse pressure on the sound barriers with different head structures are close, the impulse airflow on the sound barriers has the remarkable effect of bow wave and trailing wave when the train pass by at high-speed. There are some differences at the peaks of the aerodynamic impulse pressure. The peak value of the aerodynamic impulse pressure on the Y type sound barrier is the maximum, it is the less maximum on the interior inverse “L” sound barrier and the peak value of the aerodynamic impulse pressure on the external inverse L type sound barrier is the minimum. There is a big difference between the reaction forces at the bottoms of stand columns of the sound barriers with heights of 2.15 m and 3.15 m. The analyzed sound barriers have the fundamental resonant frequency higher than the frequencies of the aerodynamic impulse force. Therefore, the resonance does not occurs on the sound barriers when the train passes by at 350 km/h.

Key words: Aerodynamic impulse pressure, Finite element model, High-speed train, Model analysis, Sound barrier

中图分类号: