抗震风力机结构设计载荷需求研究

doi:10.3901/JME.2018.16.204

机械工程学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (16): 204-211.doi: 10.3901/JME.2018.16.204

扫码分享

抗震风力机结构设计载荷需求研究

杨阳, 李春, 张万福, 袁全勇

上海理工大学能源与动力工程学院上海 200093

收稿日期:2017-09-11 修回日期:2018-04-11 出版日期:2018-08-20 发布日期:2018-08-20
通讯作者: 李春(通信作者),男,1963年出生,教授、博导。主要从事计算流体力学、叶轮机械气动力学、能源规划及风能利用等方面的研究工作。E-mail:lichun_usst@163.com
作者简介:杨阳,男,1992年出生,博士研究生。主要研究方向为复杂工况风力机气动弹性响应。E-mail:15216702797@163.com;张万福,男,1986年生,讲师。主要研究方向为叶轮机械减振方法及其控制。E-mail:zhangwanfu_yy_usst@163.com;袁全勇,男,1991年出生,硕士研究生。主要研究方向为风力机气动弹性计算。E-mail:772141949@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（51676131，11402148）和国际（地区）合作与交流项目（5171101976）资助项目。

Research on Loading Demands of Structure Design for Aseismatic Wind Turbines

YANG Yang, LI Chun, ZHANG Wanfu, YUAN Quanyong

School of Energy and Power Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093

Received:2017-09-11 Revised:2018-04-11 Online:2018-08-20 Published:2018-08-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究风力机结构设计载荷需求与抗震强度之间的关系，通过Wolf方法考虑土-构耦合效应，并基于开源软件FAST建立通用的风力机地震工况动力学仿真模型。以AOC 50 kW、WindPACT 1.5 MW和NREL 5 MW三台不同功率的风力机为研究对象，计算101种不同强度地震与湍流风联合作用下，三台风力机在不同运行方式下的结构动力学响应。结果表明：地震载荷加剧了风力机塔顶振动，在加速度峰值为2.14 m/s²的地震作用下，NREL 5 MW风力机机舱加速度波动范围增大4.7倍。由此诱发紧急停机，叶片顺桨过程中使得气动阻尼急剧降低，从而导致结构载荷发生增幅振荡，说明地震发生时，紧急停机操作并不能有效降低塔顶振动。在高强度地震工况下，塔基弯矩最大响应值与设计地震加速度峰值之间为线性关系。提出了一种新的塔基结构强度设计需求预估模型，在不同强度地震范围均有较高的拟合度，可为抗震型风力机结构载荷设计提供较高的参考价值。

关键词: 地震工况, 风力机, 结构强度, 预估模型

Abstract: In order to analyse the relation between structural strength loading demands of wind turbines and design earthquake intensity,a universal seismic analysis framework has been developed based the open source tool FAST with taking into account the soil structural interaction effect using Wolf method.Three distinct wind turbines (AOC 50 kW,WindPACT 1.5 MW and NREL 5 MW) have been selected as the research objects.The structural dynamic responses of the wind turbines operating in different modes under multiple loadings combined by 101 earthquake excitations and turbulent wind are obtained.The results indicate that earthquake excitation increases the vibration amplitude of tower-top significantly.The fluctuation range of nacelle acceleration of NREL 5MW has been widened around 4.7 times under the influence of an earthquake event with a peak of ground acceleration of 2.14 m/s².Emergency shutdown is induced.The aerodynamic damping of the rotor decreases rapidly due to pitching to feather resulting in more severe vibration with a larger amplitude.It indicates that the emergency shutdown cannot mitigate the vibration on tower-top of the wind turbine subjected to an earthquake event.The maximum tower-base moment demand increase linearly with the peak of target earthquake acceleration.A novel model of pseudo-spectral acceleration and tower-base moment demand is developed for better estimations of seismic loading demands.The proposed model can estimate the tower-base moment demands more efficiently for the different wind turbines subjected to different earthquakes compared to present models.The findings can be referred for structural design of aseismatic wind turbines.

Key words: estimation model, seismic events, structural strength, wind turbine

中图分类号:

TK83

杨阳, 李春, 张万福, 袁全勇. 抗震风力机结构设计载荷需求研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(16): 204-211.

YANG Yang, LI Chun, ZHANG Wanfu, YUAN Quanyong. Research on Loading Demands of Structure Design for Aseismatic Wind Turbines[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 54(16): 204-211.

参考文献

[1] 池志强,夏鸿建,李德源,等. 风力机柔性叶片模态气动阻尼分析方法研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(2):176-183. CHI Zhiqiang, XIA Hongjian, LI Deyuan, et al. Study on modal aerodynamic damping analysis method for wind turbine blade[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 54(2):176-183.
[2] 李德源,汪显能,莫文威,等. 动态气动载荷和构件振动对风力机气弹特性的影响分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(14):165-173. LI Deyuan, WANG Xianneng, MO Wenwei, et al. Analysis on the influence of dynamic aerodynamic loads and component vibration of wind turbine on aeroelastic[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 52(14):165-173.
[3] BUTT U A, ISHIHARA T. Seismic load evaluation of wind turbine support structures considering low structural damping and soil structure interaction[C/CD]//European wind energy association annual event,2012,Copenhagen, Denmark.
[4] ISHIHARA T, SARWAR M W. Numerical and theoretical study on seismic response of wind turbines[C/CD]//European wind energy conference and exhibition, 2008, Brussels, Belgium.
[5] DAI Kaoshan, HUANG Yichao, GONG Changqing, et al. Rapid seismic analysis methodology for in-service wind turbine towers[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2015, 14(3):539-548.
[6] WITCHER D. Seismic analysis of wind turbines in the time domain[J]. Wind Energy, 2005, 8(1):81-91.
[7] WANG Xuefei, YANG Xu, ZENG Xiangwu. Seismic centrifuge modelling of suction bucket foundation for offshore wind turbine[J]. Renewable Energy, 2017, 114:1013-1022.
[8] ZHENG X Y, LI H, RONG W, et al. Joint earthquake and wave action on the monopile wind turbine foundation:An experimental study[J]. Marine Structures, 2015, 44:125-141.
[9] 贺广零. 考虑土-结构相互作用的风力发电高塔系统地震动力响应分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2009, 45(7):87-94. HE Guangling. Seismic response analysis of wind turbine tower systems considering soil-structure interaction[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2009, 45(7):87-94.
[10] KEMAL H. Stochastic seismic response analysis of offshore wind turbine including fluid-structure-soil interaction[J]. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2012, 21(12):867-878.
[11] SANTANGELO F, FAILLA G, SANTINI A, et al. Time-domain uncoupled analyses for seismic assessment of land-based wind turbines[J]. Engineering Structures, 2016, 123:275-299.
[12] KATSANOS E I, SANZ A A, GEORGAKIS C T, et al. Multi-hazard response analysis of a 5MW offshore wind turbine[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2017, 199:3206-3211.
[13] 杨阳,李春,袁全勇. 5 MW风力机地震工况塔架动力学响应研究[J]. 动力工程学报, 2017, 37(11):938-944. YANG Yang, LI Chun, YUAN Quanyong. Research on dynamic response of a 5 MW wind turbine tower on seismic conditions[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2017, 37(11):938-944.
[14] YANG Yang, YE Kehua, LI Chun, et al. Dynamic behavior of wind turbines influenced by aerodynamic damping and earthquake intensity[J]. Wind Energy, 2018, 21(3):511-527.
[15] 杨阳,李春,缪维跑,等. 湍流风场与地震激励联合作用下的风力机结构动力学响应[J]. 振动与冲击, 2015, 34(21):136-143. YANG Yang, LI Chun, MIAO Weipao, et al. Response of structural dynamic characteristics of wind turbine operating in turbulent wind combined with seismic motion[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2015, 34(21):136-143.
[16] ASAREH M A, SCHONBERG W, VOLZ J. Effects of seismic and aerodynamic load interaction on structural dynamic response of multi-megawatt utility scale horizontal axis wind turbines[J]. Renewable Energy, 2016, 86:49-58.
[17] JONKMAN J M, BUHL Jr M L. FAST user's guide[J]. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Technical Report No. NREL/EL-500-38230, 2005.
[18] WOLF J P. Spring-dashpot-mass models for foundation vibrations[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1997, 26(9):931-949.
[19] LAINO D J, HANSEN A C. User's guide to the wind turbine aerodynamics computer software AeroDyn[R]. Prepared for NREL Under Subcontract, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Technical Report No. TCX-9-29209-01, 2002.
[20] ATIK L, ABRAHAMSON N. An improved method for nonstationary spectral matching[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2010, 26(3):601-617.
[21] JONKMAN B J, BUHL M L. Turbsim user's guide[J]. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Technical Report No. NREL/EL-500-36970, 2004.
[22] PROWELL I. An experimental and numerical study of wind turbine seismic behavior[D]. San Diego:University of California, 2011.
[23] International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 61400-3 Wind Turbine-Part3:Design requirements for offshore wind turbines.1st editon[S]. Geneva, Switzerland:IEC, 2005.
[24] International Code Council. International Building Code 2006[S]. Illinois, USA:ICCI, 2006.

抗震风力机结构设计载荷需求研究

Research on Loading Demands of Structure Design for Aseismatic Wind Turbines

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	唐新姿, 李可翔, 何文双, 陈睿, 彭锐涛. 多工况风电叶片颤振相关性分析与气弹优化[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(20): 300-314.
[2]	杨欢, 伊鹏辉, 覃锴, 黄典贵. 基于钝尾缘翼型叶片的三维风力机性能分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(6): 123-130.
[3]	胡银龙, 徐进, 程昌俊, 周辉, 蔡旭昊. 基于机电惯容的漂浮式海上风力机无源振动控制[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(5): 202-211.
[4]	龚曙光, 王翔, 谢桂兰, 卢海山, 徐凡业. 配重对拓宽无叶片风力机捕能区间的影响研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(4): 265-273.
[5]	庞可超, 黄典贵. 双层翼叶片几何参数对水平轴风力机气动性能影响研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(2): 259-267.
[6]	杨佳佳, 贺尔铭, 陈鹏翔, 舒俊成. 混合质量阻尼器在海上漂浮式风力机振动响应抑制中的应用[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(8): 250-257.
[7]	陈明, 赵振宙, 孟令玉, 冯俊鑫, 江瑞芳, 玛尔瓦提·黑扎提. 涡流发生器参数化模型风力机叶段表面应用方法研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(8): 258-265.
[8]	孙朱俊, 许斌, 黄典贵. 前缘涡振圆柱对翼型气动性能的影响[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(6): 242-252.
[9]	闫阳天, 李春, 杨阳, 缪维跑, 李志昊. 基于VMD方法的海上风力机结构TMD抗震[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(4): 155-164.
[10]	董新洪, 孙鹏文, 张兰挺, 王宗涛. 风力机叶片铺层参数多目标优化设计[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(4): 165-173.
[11]	郭坤翔, 夏鸿建, 李德源, 黄俊东. 后掠风力机叶片非定常气弹耦合模型与响应分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(4): 174-182.
[12]	王泽栋, 郝俊博, 易文武, 陈严, 黄志鸿. 尾流对串列式风力机性能影响的风洞试验研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(12): 237-249.
[13]	张强, 缪维跑, 李春, 张万福. 喷管式翼缝对垂直轴风力机气动性能影响研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2021, 57(22): 335-343.
[14]	朱建勇, 刘沛清. 180°螺旋式Savonius风力机气动特性试验研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(8): 155-161.
[15]	艾超, 高伟, 陈立娟, 张亚滨, 郭佳伟. 基于风速预测的液压型风力发电机组并网转速控制研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(8): 162-171.