大变形海底管道工程临界评估研究进展

doi:10.3901/JME.2019.02.082

机械工程学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (2): 82-90.doi: 10.3901/JME.2019.02.082

大变形海底管道工程临界评估研究进展

赵晓鑫^1,2, 徐连勇^1,2, 荆洪阳^1,2, 贾鹏宇³, 黄江中⁴

1. 天津大学材料科学与工程学院天津 300072;
2. 天津大学天津市现代连接技术重点实验室天津 300072;
3. 天津市特种设备监督检验技术研究院天津 300192;
4. 海洋石油工程股份有限公司天津 300452

收稿日期:2017-07-19 修回日期:2018-04-17 出版日期:2019-01-20 发布日期:2019-01-20
通讯作者: 徐连勇(通信作者),男,1975年出生,博士,教授,博士研究生导师。主要研究方向为焊接接头ECA评估及疲劳、蠕变,发表论文80余篇。E-mai:xulianyong@tju.edu.cn
作者简介:赵晓鑫,男,1987年出生,博士研究生,工程师。主要研究方向为焊接结构工程临界评估。E-mail:zxx8743@163.com;荆洪阳,男,1966年出生,博士,教授,博士研究生导师。主要从事焊接结构可靠性评价方面的研究,发表论文200余篇。E-mail:hjing@tju.edu.cn;贾鹏宇,男,1987年出生,博士。主要从事焊接结构可靠性分析研究。E-mail:jiapengyu@163.com;黄江中,男,1983年出生,硕士,工程师。主要从事海洋工程焊接装备及工艺研究。E-mail:huangjz@mail.cooec.com.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（51575382）

Research Progress of Engineering Critical Assessment of Submarine Pipelines with Large Deformation

ZHAO Xiaoxin^1,2, XU Lianyong^1,2, JING Hongyang^1,2, JIA Pengyu³, HUANG Jiangzhong⁴

1. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072;
2. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Advanced Joining Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072;
3. Tianjin Special Equipment Supervision and Inspection Technology Research Institute, Tianjin 300192;
4. Offshore Oil Engineering Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300452

Received:2017-07-19 Revised:2018-04-17 Online:2019-01-20 Published:2019-01-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 大变形海底管道作为长距离深海油气运输的主要载体，其性能非常重要。Reel-lay卷管铺设方法是在传统的S型和J型铺管技术发展而来的可以陆上焊接的铺管技术，在卷管和铺设过程中管道会受到超过屈服强度的较大塑性变形，超出了常规意义上金属材料的力学应用范围，因此需要对管道的安全性进行工程临界评估（ECA）。含缺陷金属材料在塑性阶段的力学评估研究对于大变形海底管道的应用至关重要。工程临界评估常用方法包括EPRI法、参考应力法和参考应变法。介绍EPRI法，包括弯曲条件下管道环向裂纹的J积分解和高、低匹配V型坡口焊缝的极限载荷解，以及通过滑移线理论对冶金复合管V型坡口焊缝的等效转化方法。介绍参考应力法，包括管道极限载荷解的优化以及其在管道双轴应力条件下的修正。介绍修正的参考应变法，使之能够应用于大尺寸裂纹评估。最后将各种方法的优缺点和适用范围予以总结，并提出目前工程临界评估尚未解决的问题。

关键词: GE-EPRI, 参考应变法, 参考应力法, 工程临界评估, 滑移线模型

Abstract: As a major carrier of long distance oil and gas transportation, the performance of large-scale deformation submarine pipelines is crucial. Reel-lay progress of submarine pipelines with large deformation develops from traditional s-lay and j-lay, which is an onshore welding and laying technique. During the process of reeling and laying, pipelines subjects to large plastic deformation which is over yield strength. The deformation is beyond the common mechanical application range of metal. Therefore, it is necessary to give an engineering critical assessment (ECA) of the pipelines for security. The mechanical evaluation of metal with defect on the plastic stage is crucial for the application of large-scale plastic submarine pipelines. The common method of ECA includes EPRI approach, reference stress approach and reference strain approach. EPRI approach is introduced, including the J-integral solution of pipeline with circumferential cracks under bending condition, the limit load solution of high and low mismatch V grove weld, and equivalent method of metallurgical clad pipe with V grove weld by slip-line theory. Reference stress approach is introduced, including the optimization of pipeline limit load solution and its modification under biaxial stress condition. The modification of reference strain approach is introduced, and it can be used in the evaluation of severe cracks. At last, advantages, disadvantages and application range of different approaches are summarized. Issues of ECA are proposed.

Key words: engineering critical assessment(ECA), GE-EPRI, reference strain approach, reference stress approach, slip-line pattern

中图分类号:

TG111

赵晓鑫, 徐连勇, 荆洪阳, 贾鹏宇, 黄江中. 大变形海底管道工程临界评估研究进展[J]. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(2): 82-90.

ZHAO Xiaoxin, XU Lianyong, JING Hongyang, JIA Pengyu, HUANG Jiangzhong. Research Progress of Engineering Critical Assessment of Submarine Pipelines with Large Deformation[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 55(2): 82-90.

参考文献

[1] ZHU H,LIN P,PAN Q. A CFD (computational fluid dynamic) simulation for oil leakage from damaged submarine pipeline[J]. Energy,2014,64(1):887-899.
[2] HONG Z,LIU R,LIU W,et al. A lateral global buckling failure envelope for a high temperature and high pressure (HT/HP) submarine pipeline[J]. Applied Ocean Research,2015,51:117-128.
[3] XU L,LIN M. On the critical axial forces of upheaval buckling for imperfect submarine pipelines[J]. Engineering Structures,2017,147:692-704.
[4] CARLSON L C,ROGERS T T,KAMARA T B,et al. Petroleum pipeline explosions in sub-Saharan Africa:A comprehensive systematic review of the academic and lay literature[J]. Burns,2015,41(3):497-501.
[5] LI X,CHEN G,ZHU H. Quantitative risk analysis on leakage failure of submarine oil and gas pipelines using Bayesian network[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection,2016,103:163-173.
[6] LI X,CHEN G,ZHU H,et al. Quantitative risk assessment of submarine pipeline instability[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2017,45:108-115.
[7] ZHU H,YOU J,ZHAO H. Underwater spreading and surface drifting of oil spilled from a submarine pipeline under the combined action of wave and current[J]. Applied Ocean Research,2017,64:217-235.
[8] KANG Z,ZHANG L,ZHANG X. Analysis on J lay of SCR based on catenary and large deflection beam theory[J]. Ocean Engineering,2015,104:276-282.
[9] YUAN F,WANG L,GUO Z,et al. Analytical analysis of pipeline-soil interaction during J-lay on a plastic seabed with bearing resistance proportional to depth[J]. Applied Ocean Research,2012,36(3):60-68.
[10] SENTHIL B,SELVAM R P. Dynamic analysis of a J-lay pipeline[J]. Procedia Engineering,2015,116(1):730-737.
[11] XIE P,ZHAO Y,YUE Q,et al. Dynamic loading history and collapse analysis of the pipe during deepwater S-lay operation[J]. Marine Structures,2015,40:183-192.
[12] HVAL M,LAMVIK T,HOFF R. Engineering critical assessment of clad pipeline installed by S-lay for the operation phase[J]. Procedia Materials Science,2014,3:1216-1225.
[13] GONG S,XU P,BAO S,et al. Numerical modelling on dynamic behaviour of deepwater S-lay pipeline[J]. Ocean Engineering,2014,88(4):393-408.
[14] HVAL M,LAMVIK T. Parameters affecting the weld defect acceptance criteria of clad submarine pipelines installed by S-lay or reel-lay[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis,2015,58:394-406.
[15] ZAN Y,YUAN L,HAN D,et al. Real-time dynamic analysis of J-laying[J]. Chaos,Solitons & Fractals,2016,89:381-390.
[16] ZHANG X,YUE Q,ZHANG W,et al. Study on the design of a model experiment for deep-sea S-laying[J]. Ocean Engineering,2014,84:194-200.
[17] GONG S,XU P. The influence of sea state on dynamic behaviour of offshore pipelines for deepwater S-lay[J]. Ocean Engineering,2016,111:398-413.
[18] SZCZOTKA M. Pipe laying simulation with an active reel drive[J]. Ocean Engineering,2010,37(7):539-548.
[19] ZHAO T,TIAN Z. New tool for internal pressure during fabrication and installation of mechanically lined pipelines using reel-lay method[J]. Applied Ocean Research,2016,58:232-240.
[20] BAYRAKTAR D,AHMAD J,LARSEN B E,et al. Experimental and numerical study of wave-induced backfilling beneath submarine pipelines[J]. Coastal Engineering,2016,118:63-75.
[21] 沈功田. 承压设备无损检测与评价技术发展现状[J]. 机械工程学报,2017,53(12):1-12. SHEN Gongtian,Development status of nondestructive testing and evaluation technique for pressure equipment[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2017,53(12):1-12.
[22] 包陈,蔡力勋,石凯凯,等. 金属材料准静态断裂性能标准测试技术研究进展[J]. 机械工程学报,2016(8):76-89. BAO Chen,CAI Lixun,SHI Kaikai,et al. Progress on the standard test technology of quasistatic fracture toughness for metallic materials[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2016(8):76-89.
[23] KUMAR V,GERMAN M D,SHIH C F. An engineering approach for elastic-plastic fracture analysis[R]. EPRI Report NP-1931,1981.
[24] KUMAR V,GERMAN M D. Elastic-plastic fracture analysis of through-wall and surface flaws in cylinders[R]. EPRI Report NP-5596,1988.
[25] ZAHOOR A. Ductile fracture handbook,Volume 1:Circumferential throughwall cracks.[R]. EPRI Report NP-6301-D,1989.
[26] ZAHOOR A. Evaluation of J-integral estimation scheme for flawed throughwall pipes[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design,1987,10(1):1-9.
[27] RAYNUND M,PALUSAMY S S. J-integral for 3-D with center-cracked plate tests[J]. Computers & Structures,1981,13(5):691-697.
[28] STEENKAMP P A J M,LATZKO D G H,BAKKER A,et al. Engineering application of elastic-plastic fracture assessment methods:an exploratory study[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design,1985,87(7):51-65.
[29] WANG W,ZHANG K D. A fracture behaviour investigation of lower carbon seamless tube with longitudinal crack[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping,1988,31(1):3-14.
[30] ZAHOOR A. Ductile fracture mechanics methodology for complex cracks in nuclear piping[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design,1988,106(2):243-256.
[31] CHEN B,MA W. Elastoplastic fracture parameters for a joint containing a transverse crack in the longitudinal overmatched weld[C]//Proceedings of The 7th International Conference On Fracture (ICF7),March 20-24,1989,Houston,Texas,USA.
[32] ZAHOOR A. Evaluation of throughwall crack pipes under displacement controlled loading[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design,1987,100(1):11-19.
[33] CHIODO M S G,RUGGIERI C. J and CTOD estimation procedure for circumferential surface cracks in pipes under bending[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics,2010,77(3):415-436.
[34] American Petroleum Institute. Fitness-for-Service. API RP-579-1/ASME FFS-1[S]. Washington,D.C:API Publishing Services,2007.
[35] SONG T,KIM Y,KIM J,et al. Mismatch limit loads and approximate J estimates for tensile plates with constant-depth surface cracks in the center of welds[J]. International Journal of Fracture,2007,148(4):343-360.
[36] LEI Y,TAO J,LI P N. Limit load and J estimates of a centre cracked plate with an asymmetric crack in a mismatched weld[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping,1999,76(11):747-757.
[37] BURSTOW M C,HOWARD I C,AINSWORTH R A. The effect of material strength mismatching on constraint at the limit load of welded three-point bend specimens[J]. International Journal of Fracture,1998,89(2):117-142.
[38] KIM J S,SONG T K,KIM Y J,et al. Strength mis-match effect on limit loads for circumferential surface cracked pipes[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics,2009,76(8):1074-1086.
[39] KIM S,HAN J,KIM Y. Limit load solutions of v-groove welded pipes with a circumferential crack at the centre of weld[J]. Procedia Materials Science,2014,3:706-713.
[40] HERTEL S,WAELE W D,VERSTRAETE M,et al. J-integral analysis of heterogeneous mismatched girth welds in clamped single-edge notched tension specimens[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping,2014,119(4):95-107.
[41] HERTEL S,GERVEN F V,NAIB S,et al. Experimental and numerical slip line analysis of welded single-edge notched tension specimens[J]. Procedia Structural Integrity,2016,2:1763-1770.
[42] HAO S,SCHWALBE K H,CORNEC A. The effect of yield strength mis-match on the fracture analysis of welded joints:slip-line field solutions for pure bending[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures,2000,37(39):5385-5411.
[43] SOUZA R F,RUGGIERI C,ZHANG Z. A framework for fracture assessments of dissimilar girth welds in offshore pipelines under bending[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics,2016,163:6-88.
[44] AINSWORTH R A. The assessment of defects in structures of strain hardening material[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics,1984,19(4):633-642.
[45] MARAIS A,MAZIERE M,FOREST S,et al. Influence of static strain aging on the cleavage fracture of a C-Mn steel[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics,2015,141:95-110.
[46] Limited B E G. Assessment of the integrity of structures containing defects. R6 Procedure[S]. 2009.
[47] Technical Committee WEE/37. Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures. BS 7910[S]. British Standard Institution,2005.
[48] Det Norske Veritas H N. Offshore Standard-Submarine Pipeline Systems. DNV-OS-F101[S]. 2013.
[49] KIM Y,BUDDEN P J. Reference stress approximations for J and COD of circumferential through-wall cracked pipes[J]. International Journal of Fracture,2002,116(3):195-218.
[50] KASTNER W,ROHRICH E,SCHMITT W,et al. Critical crack sizes in ductile piping[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping,1981,9(3):197-219.
[51] JIA P,JING H,XU L. A modified fracture assessment method for pipelines under combined inner pressure and large-scale axial plastic strain[J]. Theoretical and applied fracture mechanics,2017,87:91-98.
[52] LINKENS D,FORMBY C,AINSWORTH R. A strain-based approach to fracture assessment-example applications[C]//Proceedings of the International Conference of the Engineering Integrity Assessment,April 10-12,2000,Cambridge,UK.
[53] NOURPANAH N,TAHERI F. Development of a reference strain approach for assessment of fracture response of reeled pipelines[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics,2010,77(12):2337-2353.
[54] BUDDEN P J. Failure assessment diagram methods for strain-based fracture[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics,2006,73(5):537-552.
[55] BUDDEN P J,SMITH M C. Numerical validation of a strain-based failure assessment diagram approach to fracture[C]//ASME 2009 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference,January,2009,American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
[56] BUDDEN P J,AINSWORTH R A. The shape of a strain-based failure assessment diagram[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping,2012,89(1):59-66.
[57] AINSWORTH R A,BUDDEN P J,OH C Y,et al. The treatment of secondary strains within a strain-based failure assessment diagram[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping,2013,104(4):14-20.
[58] JIA P,JING H,XU L,et al. A modified reference strain method for engineering critical assessment of reeled pipelines[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences,2016,105:23-31.

大变形海底管道工程临界评估研究进展

Research Progress of Engineering Critical Assessment of Submarine Pipelines with Large Deformation

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	高卡, 郭晓琴, 张锐. Co-Cu-Pb三元合金的快速凝固组织及电学性能研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2017, 53(18): 99-105.
[2]	雍青松, 王海斗, 徐滨士, 马国政. 类金刚石薄膜摩擦机理及其摩擦学性能影响因素的研究现状[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(11): 95-107.
[3]	郭晓光, 翟昌恒, 金洙吉, 郭东明. 铁基作用下的金刚石石墨化研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2015, 51(17): 162-168.
[4]	刘金娜;徐滨士;王海斗;金国;朱丽娜. 薄膜疲劳失效预测方法与损伤机制的研究进展[J]. , 2014, 50(20): 26-34.
[5]	方刚;雷丽萍;曾攀. 金属塑性成形过程延性断裂的准则及其数值模拟[J]. , 2002, 38(增刊): 21-25.
[6]	龙日升;刘伟军;卞宏友;邢飞. 扫描方式对激光金属沉积成形过程热应力的影响[J]. , 2007, 43(11): 74-81.
[7]	任淮辉;李旭东;李俊琛. 颗粒增强复合材料微结构的数值模拟与虚拟失效[J]. , 2010, 46(4): 35-41.
[8]	许晓静;张雪峰;刘桂玲;程晓农. 等通道转角挤压下变形体长度对应力的影响及开裂判据分析[J]. , 2008, 44(1): 222-226.
[9]	李朝锋;邸洪双;张晓明;王国栋;刘相华. 双辊铸轧薄带钢侧封板材料评价及热应力有限元模拟[J]. , 2002, 38(11): 96-99.
[10]	史春元;杨德新;陈字刚;田锡唐. 异种耐热钢焊接接头低塑性蠕变失效力学因素的研究[J]. , 2000, 36(9): 29-32.
[11]	赵阳;陈礼清;王贵桥;刘相华. Nb+V和V微合金非调质钢疲劳性能[J]. , 2010, 46(16): 131-135.
[12]	张亚;强洪夫;杨月诚. 复合型裂纹小范围屈服下裂尖塑性区统一解[J]. , 2007, 43(2): 50-54.
[13]	王伟民;边秀房;秦敬玉;鲁典照;Silusaranko S I. Al-Si16%合金的过热温度与结晶行为[J]. , 1999, 35(3): 16-19.
[14]	黎常浩　陈振华　陈鼎　李微. 喷射沉积SiCp/Al-20Si复合材料高周疲劳行为研究[J]. , 2012, 48(10): 40-44.
[15]	郭学锋;杨根仓;邢建东. Cu50Ni50过冷熔体在玻璃涂层壳型中的凝固组织[J]. , 2000, 36(10): 46-49.