压差式多节串联管道机器人越障时动力学演化规律及减振分析

doi:10.3901/JME.2024.08.348

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 压差式管道内检测机器人作为保障油气管道安全运输的重要装备，逐渐向着集成化、智能化、高精度的方向发展。管内介质的复杂流动状态与管内的随机不平顺激励均会引起管道机器人动力学行为的突变，进而影响其内检测作业精度和服役性能。建立串联管道机器人多体动力学模型和Adams与Matlab/Simulink双向流固耦合联合仿真求解模型，研究受管内环焊缝激励时不同舱体节数下多节串联式管道机器人的动力学响应情况、振动叠加情况和动力演化规律；建立管道内检测机器人振动综合评价指标，结合仿真数据和神经网络算法建立管道内检测机器人的结构优化模型并采用遗传算法进行参数寻优。研究结果表明：多节舱体压差式管道机器人受管内环焊缝激励时，每节舱体的轴向振动趋势类似，轴向加速度极值变化不大，且每节舱体过环焊缝时存在振动传递情况。优化后的管道机器人结构参数将轴向、垂向、俯仰加速度极值分别降低74.7%，38.1%，37.27%。

关键词: 管道机器人, 流固耦合, 动力学响应, 减振优化, 多体动力学模型

Abstract: As an important equipment to ensure the safe transportation of oil and gas pipelines, pipeline inspection robots with pressure difference are gradually evolving toward integration, intelligence and high precision. The complex flow condition of the medium in the pipe and the random non-uniform excitation in the pipe can cause sudden changes in the dynamic behavior of the pipeline robot, affecting the accuracy and performance of its internal inspection work. The dynamic multi-body model of the serial pipeline robot and the joint simulation solution model of Adams and Matlab/Simulink with fluid-solid coupling simulation are established. The dynamic behavior, vibration superposition, and dynamic evolution law of multi-part serial pipeline robot excited by the girth weld in the pipeline under different sections are studied. Established a comprehensive evaluation index for pipeline robot vibration, combined with simulation data and neural network algorithms to build a structural optimization model for pipeline inspection robot, and used genetic algorithms for parameter optimization. The results show that when the pipeline robot is excited with multiple section pressure differences due to the girth weld in the pipe, the axial vibration tendency of each cabin is similar and the extreme value of axial acceleration does not change significantly. Moreover, vibration transmission occurs when each car passes through the girth weld. The optimized structural parameters of the pipeline robot reduce the extreme values of axial, vertical and pitch accelerations by 74.7%, 38.1% and 37.27%, respectively.

Key words: pipe robot, fluid-solid coupling, dynamic response, vibration reduction optimization, multibody dynamics model

中图分类号:

TE973

张行, 富宽, 陈铭浩, 李睿, 石新娜. 压差式多节串联管道机器人越障时动力学演化规律及减振分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(8): 348-359.

ZHANG Hang, FU Kuan, CHEN Minghao, LI Rui, SHI Xinna. Dynamic Evolution and Vibration Reduction Analysis of Multi-section Serial In-pipe Inspection Robot When Crossing Obstacles[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 60(8): 348-359.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: http://www.cjmenet.com.cn/CN/10.3901/JME.2024.08.348

http://www.cjmenet.com.cn/CN/Y2024/V60/I8/348

参考文献

[1] 辛佳兴，陈金忠，李晓龙，等. 油气管道内检测技术研究前沿进展[J]. 石油机械，2022，50(5)：119-126. XIN Jiaxing，CHEN Jinzhong，LI Xiaolong，et al. Advances in oil and gas pipeline internal inspection[J]. China Petroleum Machinery，2022，50(5)：119-126.
[2] 胡铁华，郭静波. 油气管道内检测新技术与装备的开发及应用[J]. 天然气工业，2019，39(1)：118-124. HU Tiehua，GUO Jingbo. Development and application of new technologies and equipments for in-line pipeline inspection[J]. Natural Gas Industry，2019，39(1)：118-124.
[3] 董绍华，田中山，赖少川，等. 新一代超高清亚毫米级管道内检测技术的研发与应用[J]. 油气储运，2022，41(1)：34-41. DONG Shaohua，TIAN Zhongshan，LAI Shaochuan，et al. Research and application of a new generation of ultra-high-deﬁnition inline detection technology with sub-millimeter precision[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation，2022，41(1)：34-41.
[4] 夏文涵，王凯，李彦，等. 基于TRIZ的管道机器人自适应检测模块创新设计[J]. 机械工程学报，2016，52(5)：58-67. XIA Wenhan，WANG Kai，LI Yan，et al. Innovative design for adaptive detection module of in-pipe robot based on TRIZ[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering，2016，52(5)：58-67.
[5] ZHAO J，WANG J，LIU Q，et al. A review of mechanical model，structure，and prospect for long-distance pipeline pig and robot[J]. Robotica，2022，40(12)：1-37.
[6] 崔攀，李跃喜，李法中，等. 海底管道中电子几何检测器运行故障解决及建议[J]. 石化技术，2021，28(1)：42-43. CUI Pan，LI Yuexi，LI Fazhong，et al. Troubleshooting and suggestions for operation failure of electornic geometry detector in submarine pipeline[J]. Petrochemical Industry Technology，2021，28(1)：42-43.
[7] 席海宏. 天然气长输管道清管器运行速度预测[J]. 油气储运，2020，39(11)：1286-1291. XI Haihong. Prediction on pig running speed in long-distance natural gas pipeline[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation，2020，39(11)：1286-1291.
[8] JAMSHIDI B，SARKARI M. Simulation of pigging dynamics in gas-liquid two-phase flow pipelines[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering，2016，32：407-414.
[9] NIECHELE A，BRAGA A，AZEVEDO L. Transient pig motion through gas and liquid pipelines[J]. Journal of Energy Resources Technology，2001，123(4)：260-269.
[10] ESMAEILZADEH F，MOWLA D，ASEMANI M. Mathematical modeling and simulation of pigging operation in gas and liquid pipelines[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering，2009，69(1)：100-183.
[11] AKSENOV D，SHCHERBAKOV V，LESHCHENKO V. Selection of structural parameters of an inspection pig for arterial oil and gas pipelines from conditions of dynamics[J]. Chemical and Petroleum Engineering，2013，49(3)：265-269.
[12] LI W，HUANG Q，DONG X，et al. A theoretical model for predicting the wax breaking force during pipeline pigging[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering，2018，169：654-662.
[13] HENDRIX M，LIANG X，BREUGEM W，et al. Characterization of the pressure loss coefficient using a building block approach with application to by-pass pigs[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering，2017，150：13-21.
[14] LIU C，WEI Y，CAO Y，et al. Traveling ability of pipeline inspection gauge (pig) in elbow under different friction coefficients by 3D fem[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering，2020，75：103134.
[15] ZHU X，LI X，ZHAO C，et al. Dynamic simulation and experimental research on the motion of odometer passing over the weld[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering，2016，30：205-212.
[16] 曹学文，曹恒广，杜翰，等. 海底天然气凝析液管道旁通清管模拟研究[J]. 石油机械，2021，49(9)：132-139. CAO Xuewen，CAO Hengguang，DU Han，et al. Simulation study on bypass pigging of submarine natural gas condensate pipeline[J]. China Petroleum Machinery，2021，49(9)：132-139.
[17] 罗小明，赫松涛，何利民. 天然气凝析液管道中射流清管器的运动特性[J]. 油气储运，2021，40(9)：1033-1044，1062. LUO Xiaoming，HE Songtao，HE Liming. Movement characteristics of bypass pigs in natural gas condensate pipelines[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation，2021，40(9)：1033-1044，1062.
[18] 张行，崔灿，廖宁生，等. 考虑流固耦合的管道机器人冲击环焊缝过程动力学建模与分析[J]. 机械工程学报，2020，56(23)：129-140. ZHANG Hang，CUI Can，LIAO Ningsheng，et al. Dynamic modeling and analysis of pipeline inspection gauge passing girth welds considering fluid-solid coupling[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering，2020，56(23)：129-140.
[19] ZHANG H，ZHANG S，LIU S，et al. Chatter vibration phenomenon of pipeline inspection gauges (pigs) in natural gas pipeline[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering，2015，27：1129-1140.
[20] 李经廷，贾文龙，陈莎，等. 清管载荷作用下输气管道安全落差研究[J]. 应用力学学报，2021，38(1)：318-325. LI Jingting，JIA Wenlong，CHEN Sha，et al. Study on safe elevation difference of gas pipeline under the pigging impact conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics，2021，38(1)：318-325.
[21] 罗强，吴瑕，贾文龙，等. 大落差天然气管道安全清管工艺条件[J]. 油气储运，2019，38(2)：208-213. LUO Qiang，WU Xia，JIA Wenlong，et al. Safe pigging conditions of hilly gas pipelines[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation，2019，38(2)：208-213.
[22] JIANG J，ZHANG H，JI B，et al. Numerical investigation on sealing performance of drainage pipeline inspection gauge crossing pipeline elbows[J]. Energy Science & Engineering，2021，9(10)：1858-1871.
[23] 闵希华，杨理践，王国庆，等. 长输油气管道弱磁应力内检测技术[J]. 机械工程学报，2017，53(12)：19-27. MIN Xihua，YANG Lijian，WANG Guoqing，et al. Weak magnetism stress internal testing technology of the long distance oil-gas pipeline[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering，2017，53(12)：19-27.
[24] 杨理践，耿浩，高松巍，等. 高速漏磁检测饱和场建立过程及影响因素研究[J]. 仪器仪表学报，2019，40(10)：1-9. YANG Lijian，GENG Hao，GAO Songwei，et al. Study on the establishment process and influence factors of high-speed magnetic flux leakage testing[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument，2019，40(10)：1-9.
[25] ZHANG H，ZHANG S，LIU S，et al. Measurement and analysis of friction and dynamic characteristics of PIG’s sealing disc passing through girth weld in oil and gas pipeline[J]. Measurement，2015，64：112-122.
[26] 袁伟，赵杰，杨智荣，等. 往复压缩机管道振动的控制标准分析[J]. 流体机械，2019，47(1)：52-57. YUAN Wei，ZHAO Jie，YANG Zhirong，et al. Discussion on the control standard of reciprocating compressor piping vibration[J]. Fluid Machinery，2019，47(1)：52-57.
[27] 马广轩，郭瑞娟，郝高岩，等. 城市轨道交通环境振动评价方法与指标计算讨论[J]. 噪声与振动控制，2018，38(S2)：469-473. MA Guangxuan，GUO Ruijuan，HAO Gaoyan，et al. Discussion on the evaluation method and index calculation of urban rail transit environment vibration[J]. Noise and Vibration Control，2018，38(S2)：469-473.
[28] 徐中明，马坤，汪先国，等. 发动机振动评价研究[J]. 机械设计，2014，31(3)：90-94. XU Zhongming，MA Kun，WANG Xianguo，et al. Research on vibration evaluation of engine[J]. Journal of Machine Design，2014，31(3)：90-94.
[29] 裴洪，胡昌华，司小胜，等. 基于机器学习的设备剩余寿命预测方法综述[J]. 机械工程学报，2019，55(8)：1-13. PEI Hong，HU Changhua，SI Xiaosheng，et al. Review of machine learning based remaining useful life prediction methods for equipment[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering，2019，55(8)：1-13.
[30] 张德胜，杨港，赵旭涛，等. 基于BP神经网络的立式离心泵导叶与蜗壳优化设计[J]. 农业机械学报，2022，53(4)：130-139. ZHANG Desheng，YANG Gang，ZHAO Xutao，et al. Optimization design of vane diffuser and volute in vertical centrifugal pump based on back propagation neural network[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery，2022，53(4)：130-139.
[31] 李志山，史耀耀. 基于神经网络的高效强力复合铣床立柱优化设计[J]. 航空制造技术，2019，62(17)：58-65. LI Zhishan，SHI Yaoyao. Optimizing disc milling column of efficient and powerful compound milling machine based on neural network[J]. Aerospace Manufacturing Technology，2019，62(17)：58-65.
[32] 王挨荣，陈汉章，郭微，等. 基于BP神经网络和遗传算法的综采面工艺参数优化研究[J]. 煤炭工程，2022，54(4)：62-67. WANG Airong，CHEN Hanzhang，GUO Wei，et al. Process parameters optimization of fully mechanized mining face based on hybrid strategy of BP neural network and genetic algorithm [J]. Coal Engineering，2022，54(4)：62-67.
[33] GHOSH G，MANDAL P，MONDAL S C，et al. Modeling and optimization of surface roughness in keyway milling using ann，genetic algorithm，and particle swarm optimization[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology，2019，100(5)：1223-1242.