深度调峰工况下汽轮机低压缸最小流量的确定

doi:10.3901/JME.2020.16.098

机械工程学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (16): 98-108.doi: 10.3901/JME.2020.16.098

• 可再生能源与工程热物理 • 上一篇下一篇

扫码分享

深度调峰工况下汽轮机低压缸最小流量的确定

曹丽华¹, 王文龙¹, 罗桓桓², 胡鹏飞¹, 王勇², 孙亮²

1. 东北电力大学能源与动力工程学院吉林 132012;
2. 国网辽宁省电力有限公司沈阳 110004

收稿日期:2019-10-10 修回日期:2020-03-12 出版日期:2020-08-20 发布日期:2020-10-19
作者简介:曹丽华,女,1973年出生,博士,教授,博士研究生导师。主要研究方向为火电厂节能减排、灵活性改造及汽轮机经济运行与优化等。E-mail:clh320@126.com;王文龙,男,1993年出生。主要研究方向为火电厂节能减排、灵活性改造及汽轮机经济运行与优化等。E-mail:wwl862169@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划资助项目（2017YFB0902100）。

Determination of Minimum Flow Rate of Low Pressure Cylinder of Steam Turbine under Deep Peak Load Regulation Conditions

CAO Lihua¹, WANG Wenlong¹, LUO Huanhuan², HU Pengfei¹, WANG Yong², SUN Liang²

1. School of Energy and Power Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin 132012;
2. State Grid Liaoning Electric Power Supply Co., Ltd., Shenyang 110004

Received:2019-10-10 Revised:2020-03-12 Online:2020-08-20 Published:2020-10-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在火电机组深度调峰工况下，汽轮机进汽量明显减少，低压缸甚至处于小流量工况下，严重威胁叶片的安全稳定运行。为了研究深度调峰工况下，叶片强度极限内最小流量确定的问题，利用ANSYS-Workbench软件对末级叶片进行流固耦合运算和模态分析。结果表明，最大等效应力与最大变形量所处位置不一致，最大等效应力出现在叶顶，最大变形量出现在叶片中部。随着流量的减小，最大等效应力和最大变形量呈先减小后增大的趋势。G₁/G₀=0.1时，最大等效应力为451.52 MPa，较额定工况时增加了18.94%，最大变形量为0.725 74 mm，较额定工况时降低了7.8%。G₁/G₀<0.1时，最大等效应力超出强度极限，不满足强度要求。随着流量的减小，叶片固有频率均能避开激振力频率，叶片不会发生共振。综合考虑应力、应变、频率、振型等强度因素，低压缸最小流量不得低于额定流量的10%。

关键词: 汽轮机, 最小流量, 流固耦合, 模态分析, 应力分析

Abstract: The inlet flow rate of steam turbine obviously is reduced when the thermal power unit is involved in peak load operation, even under the small volume flow condition, which has the great influence on the safety of steam turbine. The fluid-structure coupling and modal analysis of the last stage blade is calculated by ANSYS-Workbench to determine the minimum flow rate within the stress limit of blade under deep peak regulation conditions. The results show that the position of blade maximum equivalent stress is different from that of blade maximum deformation. The maximum equivalent stress is located at the tip of the blade and the maximum deformation is at the middle of the blade. The maximum equivalent stress and maximum deformation decrease first and then increase with the decrease of flow rate. Under G₁/G₀=0.1 conditions,the maximum equivalent stress is 451.52 MPa, 18.94% higher than that at rated working condition. The maximum deformation is 0.725 74 mm, 7.8% lower than that at rated working condition. The maximum equivalent stress exceeds the stress limit and does not meet the stress requirements under G₁/G₀<0.1 condition. There is a big difference between the natural frequency and the exciting force frequency of blade, so the blade will not resonate. Therefore, the minimum flow rate of the low pressure cylinder should not be less than 10% of the rated flow rate when the influences of stress, strain, mode of vibration, frequency and other intensity factors are comprehensively considered.

Key words: steam turbine, minimum flow rate, fluid-structure coupling, modal analysis, stress analysis

中图分类号:

TK263

曹丽华, 王文龙, 罗桓桓, 胡鹏飞, 王勇, 孙亮. 深度调峰工况下汽轮机低压缸最小流量的确定[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(16): 98-108.

CAO Lihua, WANG Wenlong, LUO Huanhuan, HU Pengfei, WANG Yong, SUN Liang. Determination of Minimum Flow Rate of Low Pressure Cylinder of Steam Turbine under Deep Peak Load Regulation Conditions[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 56(16): 98-108.

参考文献

[1] MATTHIAS B,JOERG R S. Flow patterns in high pressure steam turbines during low-load operation[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery,2014,136(6):1-12.
[2] SEGAWA K,SENOO S,HAMATAKE H,et al. Steady and unsteady flow measurements under low load conditions in a low pressure model steam turbine[C]//International Conference on Nuclear Engineering,2012,833-839.
[3] SENOO S,SEGAWA K,HAMATAKE H,et al. Computations for unsteady compressible flows in a multistage steam turbine with steam properties at low load operations[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power,2011,133(10):1-10.
[4] 陆颂元,肖振德. 国产200 MW汽轮机发电机组非定常工况转子动应力计算及分析[J].中国电机工程学报,1990,10(4):26-34. LU Songyuan,XIAO Zhende. Dynamic stress calculation and analysis for 200 MW turbogenerator at extreme operating condition[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE,1990,10(4):26-34.
[5] RAO A R,DUTTA B K. Blade vibration triggered by low load and high back pressure[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis,2014,46(23):40-48.
[6] BEEVERS A,HAVAKECHIAN S,MEGERLE B. On the prediction and theory of the temperature increase of low pressure last stage moving blades during low volume flow conditions and limiting it through steam extraction-methods[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery,2015,137(10):1-11.
[7] 蔡小舒,宁廷保,牛凤仙,等. 300 MW直接空冷汽轮机低压末级鼓风态流场及湿度测量[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2008,29(2):7-13. CAI Xiaoshu,NING Tingbao,NIU Fengxian,et al. Measurement of flow and wetness in windage condition in a 300 MW direct air-cooling low pressure steam turbine[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE,2008,29(2):7-13.
[8] MEGERLE B,STEPHEN R T,WILLIAM M I,et al. Numerical and experimental investigation of the aerody-namic excitation of a model low-pressure steam turbine stage operating under low volume flow[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power,2013,135(1):1-7.
[9] SIGG R,HEINZ C,CASEY M V,et al. Numerical and experimental investigation of a low-pressure steam turbine during windage[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part A:Journal of Power and Energy,2009,223(6):697-708.
[10] HUANG Kezhen,CAI Lin,GAO Jianshu,et al. Numerical investigation of condensing flow of low pressure steam turbine at different flow rate conditions[J]. Thermal Science,2017,21(1):161-167.
[11] 谢永慧,汪勇,张荻. 水滴高速撞击下汽轮机叶片的动力响应[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2008,28(17):76-81. XIE Yonghui,WANG Yong,ZHANG Di. Study on dynamic response of steam turbine blade with high speed water droplet impact[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE,2008,28(17):76-81.
[12] KATSUTOSHI K,SHIGEYOSHI O,et al. Numerical analysis of stress on pump blade by one-way coupled fluid-structure simulation[J]. Journal of Fluid Science and Technology,2010,5(2):219-234.
[13] 胡丹梅,张志超,孙凯,等. 风力机叶片流固耦合计算分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2013,33(17):98-104. HU Danmei,ZHANG Zhichao,SUN Kai,et al. Computational analysis of wind turbine blades based on fluid-structure interaction[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE,2013,33(17):98-104.
[14] BRAHIMI F,OUIBRAHIM A. Blade dynamical response based on aeroelastic analysis of fluid structure interaction in turbomachinery[J]. Energy,2016,115(1):986-995.
[15] 朱宝田,吴厚钰. 汽轮机叶片动应力计算方法的研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报,2000,34(1):26-30. ZHU Baotian,WU Houyu. Dynamic stress calculation of steam turbine blade[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University,2000,34(1):26-30.
[16] 肖俊峰,朱宝田. 基于模态综合方法的汽轮机叶片组振动特性研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报,1999,19(6):77-79. XIAO Junfeng,ZHU Baotian. Study of the vibration characteristics for steam turbine bladed group based on modal synthesis method[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE,1999,19(6):77-79.
[17] 王仲博. 小容积流量下汽轮机末级长叶片可靠性的试验研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报,1987,4(7):45-51. WANG Zhongbo. Research and experiment of reliability of last blades of steam turbine at small flow[J]. Procee-dings of the CSEE,1987,4(7):45-51.
[18] 刘东远,孟庆集. 汽轮机叶片动应力计算及其优化[J]. 中国电机工程学报,1999,19(2):15-19. LIU Dongyuan,MENG Qingji. Dynamic stress calcu-lation and optimization of steam turbine blade[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE,1999,19(2):15-19.
[19] 谢永慧,张荻. 汽轮机阻尼围带长叶片振动特性研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2005,25(18):86-90. XIE Yonghui,ZHANG Di. Numerical model for vibration characteristic of steam turbine blade with damped shroud[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE,2005,25(18):86-90.
[20] 宋学官,蔡林,张华. ANSYS流固耦合分析与工程实例[M]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社,2012. SONG Xueguan,CAI Lin,ZHANG Hua. ANSYS fluid-structure coupling analysis and engineering example[M]. Beijing:China Water and Power Press,2012.
[21] 李春旺,李海云,王澈,等. 航空发动机涡轮叶片振动模态影响因素研究[J]. 空军工程大学学报,2014,15(1):5-9. LI Chunwang,LI Haiyun,WANG Che,et al. A study of influencing factors on frequencies and mode shapes of aeroengine turbine blades[J]. Journal of Air Force EngineeringUniversity,2014,15(1):5-9.
[22] 丁平,黄燕晓. 基于ANSYS的飞机发动机压气机叶片模态分析[J]. 中国民航飞行学院学报,2010,21(4):23-26. DING Ping,HUANG Yanxiao. Modal analysis of aircraft engine compressor blade based on ANSYS[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation Flight University of China,2010,21(4):23-26.
[23] 谢永慧,张荻. 大功率汽轮机末级长叶片三维动态应力及服役寿命的研究[J]. 动力工程,2007,27(1):11-16. XIE Yonghui,ZHANG Di. Study on 3-dimensional dynamic stress and service life of large steam turbines last stage blades[J]. Journal of Power Engineering,2007,27(1):11-16.
[24] 欧阳德,付小平,宋兆泓. 某发动机二级涡轮叶片共振断裂可靠性分析[J]. 燃气涡轮试验与研究,1997(4):39-41. OUYANG De,FU Xiaoping,SONG Zhaohong. Reliability analysis of resonant fracture of secondary turbine blade of an engine[J]. Gas Turbine Test and Research,1997(4):39-41.

深度调峰工况下汽轮机低压缸最小流量的确定

Determination of Minimum Flow Rate of Low Pressure Cylinder of Steam Turbine under Deep Peak Load Regulation Conditions

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张行, 富宽, 陈铭浩, 李睿, 石新娜. 压差式多节串联管道机器人越障时动力学演化规律及减振分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(8): 348-359.
[2]	赵峻林, 乔百杰, 罗现强, 符顺国, 程昊, 王亚南, 陈雪峰. 基于单传感器测量的多模态叶片动应力场预测[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(16): 19-33.
[3]	刘跃, 黄民, 李永健, 安琪, 蒋杰. 大压差下热塑性迷宫密封泄漏特性研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(15): 194-204.
[4]	王胜一, 胡少雄, 董楠, 刘华坪, 王凯. 喷水推进两栖车水上自航性能CFD模拟研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(14): 387-395.
[5]	陈宗平, 成功, 圣小珍. 高速铁路扣件系统高频动态特性研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(16): 147-156.
[6]	康杰, 王寅, 罗杰, 孙嘉宝, 曾舒洪. 自主工作模态分析方法研究综述[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(13): 89-109.
[7]	曹雪梅, 何宏图, 魏冰阳, 许浩. 螺旋锥齿轮数字孪生体模态参数的提取与分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(13): 260-267.
[8]	高帅, 韩勤锴, 褚福磊. 考虑热流固耦合的角接触滚动轴承动力学特性及打滑状态分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(9): 87-97.
[9]	吴海利, 张长春, 孙林根, 徐倩虹. 617镍基合金蠕变-疲劳交互力学行为与微观组织演变[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(8): 170-180.
[10]	欧阳智海, 康辉民, 刘厚才, 段良辉, 曹正, 周岳, 蒋冠, 李旺. 磁悬浮铣削电主轴转子-刀具变质量不平衡系统动态特性研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(23): 306-320.
[11]	武洪凯, 吴承伟. 嵌入弹性波纹环的轴承挤压油膜特性分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(13): 185-193.
[12]	蔡建国, 钟一涵, 王立武, 陈旭, 汪子哲, 张骞, 冯健. 圆柱形可展柔性结构高收纳比折叠展开方案[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(1): 19-28.
[13]	关庆华, 温泽峰, 池茂儒, 梁树林. 轮对蛇行运动的相位同步模态分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2021, 57(24): 279-288.
[14]	廖茂林, 宋文, 王晓勇, 辛岩莉, 郜志英. 直动型溢流阀的流固耦合建模与动态特性研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2021, 57(23): 137-148.
[15]	黄珏皓, 娄军强, 杨依领, 陈特欢, 陈海荣, 魏燕定. 黏性流体环境中压电宏纤维致动柔性结构的流固耦合振动特性及试验[J]. 机械工程学报, 2021, 57(22): 376-385.