轨道连接处缺陷对起重机运行冲击系数及疲劳剩余寿命的影响

doi:10.3901/JME.2020.14.254

机械工程学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (14): 254-264.doi: 10.3901/JME.2020.14.254

• 交叉与前沿 • 上一篇

扫码分享

轨道连接处缺陷对起重机运行冲击系数及疲劳剩余寿命的影响

辛运胜, 董青, 徐格宁

太原科技大学机械工程学院太原 030024

收稿日期:2019-11-05 修回日期:2020-03-30 出版日期:2020-07-20 发布日期:2020-08-12
通讯作者: 辛运胜(通信作者),男,1987年出生,博士,讲师。主要研究方向为起重机动力学及振动控制。E-mail:120181624@qq.com
基金资助:
“十三五”国家重点研发计划（2017YFC0805703）、山西省高等教育科技创新（2019L0649）、山西省应用基础研究计划（201901D211288）、山西省“1331工程”重点学科建设计划经费、山西省科技重大专项（20181102002）、太原科技大学博士科研基金（20182037）和山西省优秀博士奖励资助基金（20192018）资助项目。

Influence of Rail Joint Defects on the Running Impact Coefficient and Fatigue Residual Life of Crane

XIN Yunsheng, DONG Qing, XU Gening

School of Mechanical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024

Received:2019-11-05 Revised:2020-03-30 Online:2020-07-20 Published:2020-08-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了分析起重机运行过程中轨道连接处缺陷对金属结构冲击系数的影响，通过正、余弦函数分别模拟高低缺陷和间隙缺陷所引起的不平度，并提出起重机越过轨道缺陷过程的动力学模型。理论推导起重机通过轨道连接处高低缺陷和间隙缺陷时的运行冲击系数方程，并将其与GB/T 3811：2008和ISO 8686—1：2012中方法进行形式和结果的比较，从而证明理论推导结果的正确性。基于起重机车轮尺寸及两种轨道缺陷不平度函数，分析轨道连接处高低缺陷和间隙缺陷发生耦合作用的临界条件，结果表明高低缺陷在冲击过程中起主要作用，二者同时存在时可忽略间隙缺陷影响。通过试验测试满载工况下无轨道缺陷和7 mm高低缺陷时主梁最危险点的应变时间历程，并计算危险点的最大应力；将理论推导的运行冲击系数应用到有限元模型中，计算在无轨道缺陷和7 mm轨道高低缺陷时对应测点的最大应力值，有限元分析结果与试验测试相对误差为2.63%，从而通过工程试验验证运行冲击系数理论推导的正确性。分析轨道缺陷对起重机剩余寿命的影响发现，起重机的临界裂纹长度、疲劳剩余寿命均随着轨道高低缺陷增大而减小，而影响度随着轨道缺陷增大而增大，轨道高低缺陷增大会使运行冲击系数增大且导致起重机主梁剩余寿命降低。

关键词: 起重机, 运行冲击系数, 轨道连接处缺陷, 试验验证, 剩余寿命

Abstract: In order to study the influence of impact coefficient of rail defects on crane operation, the unevenness function caused by step defects and gap defects is simulated by sine and cosine functions respectively, and the crane dynamics model of the running process under the rail defects is proposed. The expression of the impact coefficient of crane operation under step defects and gap defects is derived. The feasibility of the calculation results is verified by comparison with GB/T 3811:2008 and ISO 8686—1:2012. Based on the structural parameters and the characteristics of the rail defects, the critical conditions for the coupling of step defects and gap defects are analyzed. The results show that step defects play a major role in the impact process, and the gap defects can be ignored when both of them exist at the same time. The strain time history of the most dangerous point of the main beam without rail defect and 7 mm step defect under full load is tested respectively, and the maximum stress of the dangerous point is calculated. The theoretical calculation of running impact coefficient is applied to the finite element model to calculate the maximum stress value of corresponding measuring point under two different situations. The error between the finite element model and the experimental results is 2.63%, which verifies the correctness of the theoretical calculation. Analysis of the influence of rail defects on the remaining life of the crane can be found as follows: the critical crack length and fatigue residual life of the crane decrease with the increase of rail step defect, and the influence degree increases with the increase of rail defect. The increase of the step defects of the rail will increase the impact coefficient and reduce the remaining life of the main girder of the crane.

Key words: crane, running impact coefficient, rail joint defects, experimental verification, fatigue residual life

中图分类号:

TH21

辛运胜, 董青, 徐格宁. 轨道连接处缺陷对起重机运行冲击系数及疲劳剩余寿命的影响[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(14): 254-264.

XIN Yunsheng, DONG Qing, XU Gening. Influence of Rail Joint Defects on the Running Impact Coefficient and Fatigue Residual Life of Crane[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 56(14): 254-264.

参考文献

[1] 王爱红, 徐格宁, 高有山. 桥式起重机随机应力谱获取及疲劳剩余寿命估算[J]. 机械工程学报, 2012, 48(18):192-198. WANG Aihong, XU Gening, GAO Youshan. Random stress spectrum acquisition and fatigue residual life estimate for overhead travelling crane[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2012, 48(18):192-198.
[2] EULER M, KUHLMANN U. Crane runways-Fatigue evaluation of crane rail welds using local concepts[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2011, 33(8):1118-1126.
[3] CAGLAYAN O, OZAKGUL K, TEZER O, et al. Fatigue life prediction of existing crane runway girders[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2010, 66(10):1164-1173.
[4] RETTENMEIER P, ROOS E, WEIHE S. Fatigue analysis of multiaxially loaded crane runway structures including welding residual stress effects[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2016, 82:179-187.
[5] 张迎新, 王新华, 吴增彬, 等. 防爆起重机车轮在钢轨上全滑动摩擦温升分析[J]. 润滑与密封, 2013, 38(10):10-14. ZHANG Yingxin, WANG Xinhua, WU Zengbin, et al. Temperature rise analysis of explosion-proof crane wheel sliding on the rail by friction[J]. Lubrication Engineering, 2013, 38(10):10-14.
[6] 刘绍武. 港口机械轮轨接触分析及车轮小型化研究[D]. 上海:同济大学, 2007. LIU Shaowu. Analysis on wheel-rail contact and study for downsizing of the wheel of the port machinery[D]. Shanghai:Tongji University, 2007.
[7] 董杰, 程文明, 邵建兵. 基于LS-DYNA的起重机车轮动态接触研究[J]. 煤矿机械, 2013, 34(10):65-67. DONG Jie, CHENG Wenming, SHAO Jianbing. Research on dynamic contact of wheels of crane based on LS-DYNA[J]. Coal Mine Machinery, 2013, 34(10):65-67.
[8] 耿广辉, 康永飞, 魏波. 桥式起重机轨道故障实例分析与处理[J]. 甘肃冶金, 2014, 36(4):122-123. GENG Guanghui, KANG Yongfei, WEI Bo. Case analysis and treatment for failure of bridge crane rail[J]. Gansu Metallurgy, 2014, 36(4):122-123.
[9] 解春华. 论桥门式起重机啃轨原因分析[J]. 煤炭技术, 2003, 22(10):23-25. XIE Chunhua. Analysis on the cause of rail gnawing of gantry crane[J]. Coal Technology, 2003, 22(10):23-25.
[10] 陈春俊, 翟婉明. 轨道接头压陷激励下轮轨垂向振动分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2002, 21(3):70-71. CHEN Chunjun, ZHAI Wanming. Vertical wheel/track vibration analysis under excitation due to depressed track joint[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2002, 21(3):70-71.
[11] 全顺喜, 王平, 赵才友. 车辆多体系统振动方程建立探讨[J]. 振动与冲击, 2013, 32(11):173-178. QUAN Shunxi, WANG Ping, ZHAO Caiyou. Establishing vibration equations of a vehicle multi-body system with a new method[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2013, 32(11):173-178.
[12] 韩亮斌, 徐格宁. 轨道接头缺陷对整机运行的影响分析[J]. 起重运输机械, 2017(10):57-64. HAN Liangbin, XU Gening. Analysis on the influence of rail joint defect on the operation of crane[J]. Hoisting and Conveying Machinery, 2017(10):57-64.
[13] 张氢, 陈淼, 孙峰, 等. 新型三轮大车机构轮轨动力学响应分析[J]. 中国工程机械学报, 2017(4):329-337. ZHANG Qing, CHEN Miao, SUN Feng, et al. Wheel-rail dynamic analysis of a new rail mounted three-wheeled gantry[J]. Chinese Journal of Construction Machinery, 2017(4):329-337.
[14] ISO 12488-1. Cranes-Tolerances for wheels and travel and traversing tracks-Part 1:General[S]. ISO:Geneva, Switzerland, 2012.
[15] ISO 8686-1. Cranes-Design principles for loads and load combinations-Part 1:General first ed[S]. ISO:Geneva, Switzerland, 2012.
[16] GB/T 3811-2008.《起重机设计规范》释义与应用[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2008. GB/T 3811-2008. Design rules for cranes[S]. Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2008.
[17] GB/T 10183.1-2010. 《起重机车轮及大车和小车轨道公差》[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2010. GB/T 10183.1-2010. Cranes-Tolerances for wheels and travel and traversing track-Part 1:General[S]. Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2010.
[18] 辛运胜. 司机-起重机-轨道/温度系统动力学建模方法与应用研究[D]. 太原:太原科技大学, 2018. XIN Yunsheng. Research on system dynamics modeling method and application of hoistman-crane-rail/temperature system[D]. Taiyuan:Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, 2018.

轨道连接处缺陷对起重机运行冲击系数及疲劳剩余寿命的影响

Influence of Rail Joint Defects on the Running Impact Coefficient and Fatigue Residual Life of Crane

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	朱挺, 陈兆祥, 周笛, 陈震, 胡兵, 潘尔顺. 基于Bayesian-LSTM神经网络的热轧轧辊剩余寿命预测及不确定性评估[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(11): 181-190.
[2]	范小宁, 王凯, 余畅. 基于约束边界抽样的起重机金属结构可靠性优化[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(8): 288-298.
[3]	张树新, 于亦奇, 曹政, 李拓, 罗康. 可重复展收单折伞状天线机构创新设计与实验验证[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(3): 13-21.
[4]	王宇, 刘秋发, 彭一真. 非均匀监测条件下滚动轴承剩余寿命预测方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(23): 96-104.
[5]	庞哲楠, 裴洪, 李天梅, 胡昌华, 司小胜. 考虑不完美维修的随机退化设备剩余寿命自适应预测方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(2): 14-29.
[6]	王超, 杨冰, 朱涛, 肖守讷, 阳光武, 范晓达. 表面强化车轴裂纹扩展及剩余寿命预测方法研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(14): 43-53.
[7]	沈天浩, 丁康, 黎杰, 黄如意, 李巍华. 图结构联合时序数据驱动的装备剩余使用寿命预测方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(12): 183-194.
[8]	杨超颖, 刘颉, 周凯波. 基于路图注意力网络的轴承剩余寿命预测方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(12): 195-201.
[9]	郑锐, 周一帆. 针对比例风险退化系统健康评估的迭代算法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(10): 366-373.
[10]	张旭飞, 邵焱, 付玉琴, 权龙. 起重机变幅系统Simcenter 3D机液联合仿真分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(24): 334-341.
[11]	孟凡振, 丁晓红, 李昊, 熊敏. 层次脉状结构液冷均温板优化设计研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(22): 426-437.
[12]	马硕, 姜兴宇, 杨国哲, 刘伟军, 乔赫廷, 王子生. 废旧机床主轴剩余寿命评估模型[J]. 机械工程学报, 2021, 57(4): 219-226.
[13]	褚学宁, 陈汉斯, 马红占. 性能数据驱动的机械产品关键设计参数识别方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2021, 57(3): 185-196.
[14]	付洋, 曹宏瑞, 郜伟强, 高文辉. 数字孪生驱动的航空发动机涡轮盘剩余寿命预测[J]. 机械工程学报, 2021, 57(22): 106-113.
[15]	王久健, 杨绍普, 刘永强, 文桂林. 一种基于空间卷积长短时记忆神经网络的轴承剩余寿命预测方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2021, 57(21): 88-95.