基于非线性岩石模型的凿岩机钻进动力学分析和实验

doi:10.3901/JME.260095

机械工程学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (3): 420-434.doi: 10.3901/JME.260095

• 机械动力学 • 上一篇

扫码分享

基于非线性岩石模型的凿岩机钻进动力学分析和实验

马威^1,2, 王阔³, 张健³, 姜鑫⁴, 吴文章²

1. 北京科技大学资源与安全工程学院北京 100083;
2. 南京宝地梅山产城发展有限公司矿业分公司南京 210041;
3. 北京科技大学机械工程学院北京 100083;
4. 徐州徐工基础工程机械有限公司徐州 221004

修回日期:2025-03-02 接受日期:2025-10-10 发布日期:2026-03-25
作者简介:马威,男,1987年出生,博士,讲师。主要研究方向为液压凿岩机的钻进非线性动力学。E-mail:maweiustb@163.com

Dynamic Analysis and Experimental Study of Drifter Drilling Based on Nonlinear Rock Model

MA Wei^1,2, WANG Kuo³, ZHANG Jian³, JIANG Xin⁴, WU Wenzhang²

1. School of Resources and Safety Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083;
2. Nanjing Baodi Meishan Industrial City Development Co., Ltd. Mining Branch, Nanjing 210041;
3. School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083;
4. XCMG Construction Machinery Co., Ltd., Xuzhou 221004

Revised:2025-03-02 Accepted:2025-10-10 Published:2026-03-25
Supported by:
2022年度江苏省工业和信息产业转型升级专项资金资助项目(2022C22)。

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 介绍了液压凿岩机的结构。结合非线性岩石模型，将凿岩机钻进岩石的过程，建立四自由度力学和数学模型。研究了粘滞和非粘滞模式，解释了这两种运动类型之间的差异。将液压作用力的角频率、振幅和垂直偏移量作为控制参数，进行了单参数延拓分析，发现了倍周期分岔、鞍结分岔和环面分岔。介绍了液压凿岩机钻凿岩石的数据采集系统，比较了模型和实验测得的液压作用力、活塞位移和活塞速度。结果表明，为了使凿岩机工作在周期-1轨迹，应该选择角频率的范围为2.09 < ω < 5.327，振幅的范围为0.012 < a < 0.746和0.005 < a < 1，垂直偏移量的范围为0.093 < b < 0.25。实验和模型的液压作用力具有相同的运行趋势，模型的活塞位移和速度大致位于“实验均值±标准差”的范围内，模型较好地模拟了实验结果。

关键词: 液压凿岩机, 非线性岩石模型, 延拓, 粘滞, 分岔

Abstract: This paper introduces the structure of a hydraulic drifter. Integrated with a nonlinear rock model, the process of drilling the rock is established as a four-degree-of-freedom mechanical model and a mathematical model. Both stick and non-stick modes are studied, explaining the differences between these two types of motion. Taking the angular frequency, amplitude and vertical offset of the hydraulic force as control parameters, the single-parameter continuation analysis is carried out, and the period-doubling bifurcation, saddle-node bifurcation and torus bifurcation are found. A comparison is made between the piston displacement and velocity data obtained from the model and experimental results. The results indicate that to make the drifter work on the period-1 trajectory, the range of angular frequency should be 2.09 < ω < 5.327. The range of amplitude should be 0.012 < a < 0.746, 0.005 < a < 1. The range of vertical offset should be 0.093 < b < 0.25. The hydraulic forces of the experiment and the model have the same performance trend, and the piston displacement and velocity of the model are roughly within the range of "experimental mean ±standard deviation", which indicates that the model well simulates the experimental results.

Key words: hydraulic drifter, nonlinear rock model, continuation, stick, bifurcation

中图分类号:

TU63
O322

马威, 王阔, 张健, 姜鑫, 吴文章. 基于非线性岩石模型的凿岩机钻进动力学分析和实验[J]. 机械工程学报, 2026, 62(3): 420-434.

MA Wei, WANG Kuo, ZHANG Jian, JIANG Xin, WU Wenzhang. Dynamic Analysis and Experimental Study of Drifter Drilling Based on Nonlinear Rock Model[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2026, 62(3): 420-434.

参考文献

[1] OH J，SONG C，KIM D J，et al. Numerical investigation of performance of hydraulic percussion drifter[J]. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing，2016，17(7)：879-885.
[2] SONG C，CHUNG J，KIM J H，et al. Design optimization of a drifter using the Taguchi method for efficient percussion drilling[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology，2017，31(4)：1797-1803.
[3] SEO J，NOH D K，LEE G H，et al. A percussion performance analysis for rock-drill drifter through simulation modeling and experimental validation[J]. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing，2016，17(2)：163-170.
[4] GENG Xiaoguang，MA Wei，MA Fei，et al. Design on key parameters of double damper system for hydraulic rock drill[J]. International Applied Mechanics，2019，55(6)：700-705.
[5] YANG Zhenyi，JI Hong，LI Yangeng. Existence scope of only primary vibration within one impact period of a hydraulic drifter piston via point transformation[J]. Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design，Systems，and Manufacturing，2018，12(7)：JAMDSM0123-JAMDSM0123.
[6] YANG Zhenyi，JI Hong，LI Yangeng. Analysis on the main design parameters influencing the impact efficiency of dual-chamber-controlled hydraulic drifter[J]. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing，2018，19(12)：1781-1791.
[7] LI Yelin，TU Yi，ZENG Bin，et al. Research on correction method of inertia factor of starting section of gap flow opening in hydraulic rock drill[J]. Australian Journal of Mechanical Engineering，2022：1-16.
[8] SHAH K H. Electrically controlled hydraulic rock drill[D]. Tampere：Tampere University，2019.
[9] LI Hongsheng，LIU Songyong，CHANG Huanhuan. Experimental research on the influence of working parameters on the drilling efficiency[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology，2020，95：103174.
[10] SHEN Qiang，WANG Yujie，CAO Ruilang，et al. Efficiency evaluation of a percussive drill rig using rate-energy ratio based on rock drilling tests[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering，2022，217：110873.
[11] LING Huixuan，GAO Tian，GONG Tao，et al. Hydraulic rock drill fault classification using x-vectors[J]. Mathematics，2023，11(7)：1724.
[12] HASHIBA K，FUKUI K，LIANG Y，et al. Force-penetration curves of a button bit generated during impact penetration into rock[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering，2015，85：45-56.
[13] LUNDBERG B，COLLET P. Optimal wave shape with respect to efficiency in percussive drilling with detachable drill bit[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering，2015，86：179-187.
[14] PAVLOVSKAIA E，HENDRY D C，WIERCIGROCH M. Modelling of high frequency vibro-impact drilling[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences，2015，91：110-119.
[15] AJIBOSE O K，WIERCIGROCH M，AKISANYA A R. Experimental studies of the resultant contact forces in drillbit-rock interaction[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences，2015，91：3-11.
[16] CHÁVEZ J P，HAMANEH V V，WIERCIGROCH M. Modelling and experimental verification of an asymmetric jeffcott rotor with radial clearance[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration，2015，334：86-97.
[17] 廖茂林. 基于钻头-岩石碰撞的激振冲击系统的非线性动力学研究[J]. 机械工程学报，2020，56(21)：121-130. LIAO Maolin. Nonlinear dynamics of a vibro-impact system for indenter-rock interaction[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering，2020，56(21)：121-130.
[18] LIAO M，WIERCIGROCH M，SAYAH M，et al. Experimental verification of the percussive drilling model[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing，2021，146：107067.
[19] AJIBOSE O K，WIERCIGROCH M，PAVLOVSKAIA E，et al. Global and local dynamics of drifting oscillator for different contact force models[J]. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics，2010，45(9)：850-858.
[20] AJIBOSE O K，WIERCIGROCH M，PAVLOVSKAIA E，et al. Drifting impact oscillator with a new model of the progression phase[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics，2012，79(6)：061007.
[21] 耿晓光. 双缓冲液压凿岩机冲击特性及影响因素研究[D]. 北京：北京科技大学，2019. GENG Xiaoguang. Research on the influence factors of percussion characteristics for hydraulic rock drill with double damper system[D]. Beijing：University of Science and Technology Beijing，2019.
[22] PHANIKRISHNA T. Analytical and computational tools for the study of grazing bifurcations of periodic orbits and invariant tori[D]. Virginia：Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University，2007.
[23] KANG W，THOTA P，WILCOX B，et al. Bifurcation analysis of a microactuator using a new toolbox for continuation of hybrid system trajectories[J]. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics，2009，4(1)：011009.
[24] NAYFEH A H，BALACHANDRAN B. Applied nonlinear dynamics：Analytical，computational，and experimental methods[M]. 1st ed. Marshall：Wiley，1995.
[25] 李莎，吕延军，罗宏博，等. 轴向槽气体轴承-转子非线性系统的动力学行为[J]. 机械工程学报，2022，58(7)：103-116. LI Sha，LÜ Yanjun，LUO Hongbo，et al. Dynamic behaviors of rotor nonlinear system supported in axial-groove gas bearings[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering，2022，58(7)：103-116.
[26] 闫洪波，付鑫，汪建新，等. 基于分数阶阻尼的超磁致伸缩致动器非线性动力学研究[J]. 机械工程学报，2022，58(23)：151-163. YAN Hongbo，FU Xin，WANG Jianxin，et al. Nonlinear dynamics study of giant magnetostrictive actuator systems based on fractional damping[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering，2022，58(23)：151-163.

基于非线性岩石模型的凿岩机钻进动力学分析和实验

Dynamic Analysis and Experimental Study of Drifter Drilling Based on Nonlinear Rock Model

PDF (Mobile)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘世伟, 李龙, 吕胜男, 丁希仑. 基于面对称Bricard单元的弹性空间过约束机构运动分岔与输出特性分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2025, 61(21): 48-59.
[2]	王展, 陈思阳, 王子男, 张珂. 考虑动态波纹的陶瓷轴承-转子系统非线性振动特性研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(23): 189-204.
[3]	崔宇朋, 余杨, 韦明秀, 李振眠, 余建星. 改进博弈论四重组合赋权法下的开口甲板多目标拓扑优化设计[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(9): 263-273.
[4]	王鹏, 杨绍普, 刘永强, 刘鹏飞, 赵义伟, 张兴. 轮对非线性随机动力学模型稳定性及分岔研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(10): 210-225.
[5]	李永泉, 郑天宇, 江洪生, 张舵, 张立杰. 基于图谱法的新型运动分岔并联机构型综合[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(23): 1-17.
[6]	郑友成, 朱强国, 赵泽翔, 鞠洋, 李颖, 刘周龙, 周铄, 王光庆, 张贝奇. 基于线性放大与非线性磁力复合增强的三稳态压电振动能量俘获机理与动力学特性研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(23): 138-150.
[7]	闫洪波, 付鑫, 汪建新, 于均成. 基于分数阶阻尼的超磁致伸缩致动器非线性动力学研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(23): 151-163.
[8]	和东平, 王涛, 解加全, 任忠凯, 刘元铭, 马晓宝. 波纹辊轧机辊系主共振分岔控制研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(7): 109-118.
[9]	廖茂林. 基于钻头-岩石碰撞的激振冲击系统的非线性动力学研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(21): 121-130.
[10]	冯慧娟, 马家耀, 陈焱. 广义Waterbomb折纸管的刚性折叠运动特性[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(19): 143-159.
[11]	赵武, 霍博义, 黄丹. BTA深孔精密扩孔系统流体扰动的非线性横振[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(17): 155-164.
[12]	何仁, 韩清振. 基于非线性Drive-shaft模型的车辆传动系扭振稳定性分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(18): 125-131.
[13]	胡东海, 严炎智. 考虑PMSM转子偏心作用的EV动力传动系统非线性扭振特性分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(22): 128-136.
[14]	刘浪, 刘崇光, 吴双胜, 巩玲君. 价格随机条件下供应商风险厌恶的应急回购契约[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(12): 207-215.
[15]	王舒娅,苏建徽,杨向真,杜燕. 微电网小扰动稳定性研究综述[J]. 电气工程学报, 2016, 11(7): 39-45.