复杂技术系统隐性冲突求解路径规划方法

doi:10.3901/JME.2024.01.309

机械工程学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (1): 309-328.doi: 10.3901/JME.2024.01.309

扫码分享

复杂技术系统隐性冲突求解路径规划方法

普雪洁^1,2, 张建辉^1,2, 李建勇^1,2, 张健楠¹

1. 河北工业大学机械工程学院天津 300401;
2. 河北工业大学国家技术创新方法与实施工具工程技术研究中心天津 300401

收稿日期:2023-04-18 修回日期:2023-07-16 发布日期:2024-03-15
作者简介:普雪洁，男，1996年出生。主要研究方向为复杂产品创新设计。E-mail：pu16602638154@163.com
张建辉(通信作者)，男，1974年出生，博士研究生，教授，硕士研究生导师。主要研究方向为复杂产品创新设计、计算机辅助设计/制造。E-mail：zjh2031@126.com
李建勇，男，1991年出生，硕士研究生。主要研究方向为复杂产品创新设计。E-mail：lijianyong5285@163.com
张健楠，男，1976年生出生，硕士，讲师，硕士研究生导师。主要研究方向为智能信息处理、计算机辅助工业设计理论与技术、产品创新设计。E-mail：jiannanz@hebut.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家创新方法工作专项(2018IM040300)和河北省自然科学基金(E2021202097)资助项目。

Path Planning Method for Solving Implicit Contradiction for Complex Technical System

PU Xuejie^1,2, ZHANG Jianhui^1,2, LI Jianyong^1,2, ZHANG Jiannan¹

1. School of Mechanical and Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401;
2. National Engineering Research Center for Technological Innovation Method and Tool, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401

Received:2023-04-18 Revised:2023-07-16 Published:2024-03-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对复杂技术系统中隐性冲突数量多、隐性冲突参数间存在复杂关联性，导致求解过程繁琐的问题，提出了一种复杂技术系统隐性冲突求解路径规划方法。首先，基于需求分析和功能失效分析方法进行隐性冲突的系统化识别，并将识别出的隐性冲突应用元素-名称-量值模型(Element-name-value，ENV)进行标准化表达。其次，将隐性冲突分为两类，针对第一类隐性冲突，基于层次分析法(Analytic hierarchy process, AHP)计算隐性冲突的权重，从而确定其求解路径；针对第二类隐性冲突，通过建立复杂技术系统的功能-行为-结构网络，应用PageRank算法计算网络节点重要度并排序，确定该类隐性冲突的求解路径。最后，综合两类隐性冲突的求解路径，规划获取隐性冲突的最优求解路径，并应用发明问题解决理论(Theory of inventive problem solving, TRIZ)工具快速解决。以TZG 9 3/4-140S铁钻工为工程案例，验证所提方法的可行性和有效性。

关键词: 复杂技术系统, 隐性冲突识别, 求解路径规划, TRIZ, 隐性冲突求解

Abstract: Aiming at the problem that the number of implicit contradictions in complex technical systems is large and the complex correlation between implicit contradiction parameters leads to the cumbersome solution process, an implicit contradiction solution path planning method for complex technical systems is proposed. Firstly, implicit contradictions are systematically identified based on need analysis and functional failure analysis, and apply ENV (Element-name-value) model to standardize the identified implicit contradictions. Secondly, the implicit contradiction is divided into two types. For the first type of implicit contradiction, the weight of implicit contradictions is calculated based on AHP (Analytic hierarchy process) to determine the solution path; For the second type of implicit contradiction, a function-behavior-structure network of complex technical systems is established, and the PageRank algorithm is used to calculate and rank the importance of network nodes, and the solution path for this type of implicit contradiction is determined. Finally, by synthesizing the solution paths of the two types of implicit contradictions, the optimal solution path is planned to obtain the implicit contradictions, and the TRIZ tool is applied to solve it quickly. Taking TZG 9 3/4-140S iron roughneck as an engineering case, the feasibility and effectiveness of the method are verified.

Key words: complex technical system, implicit contradiction identification, solving path planning, TRIZ, implicit contradiction resolution

中图分类号:

TB472

普雪洁, 张建辉, 李建勇, 张健楠. 复杂技术系统隐性冲突求解路径规划方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(1): 309-328.

PU Xuejie, ZHANG Jianhui, LI Jianyong, ZHANG Jiannan. Path Planning Method for Solving Implicit Contradiction for Complex Technical System[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 60(1): 309-328.

参考文献

[1] TERNINKO J. Systematic innovation:An introduction to TRIZ (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving)[M]. Florida:CRC Press,1998.
[2] ALTSHULLER G. And suddenly the inventor appeared:TRIZ,the theory of inventive problem solving[M]. Worcester:Technical Innovation Center,1996.
[3] KHOMENKO N,GUIO R D. OTSM network of problems for representing and analysing problem situations with computer support[C]. IFIP Working Conference on Computer Aided Innovation,2007:77-88.
[4] CAVALLUCCI D,ROUSSELOT F,ZANNI C. Initial situation analysis through problem graph[J]. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology,2010,2(4):310-317.
[5] CAVALLUCCI D,ELTZER T. Parameter network as a means for driving problem solving process[J]. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology,2007,30(1/2):125-136.
[6] BALDUSSU A,BECATTINI N,CASCINI G. Network of contradictions analysis and structured identification of critical control parameters[J]. Procedia Engineering,2011,9:3-17.
[7] HMINA K,AMINE M E,LASRI L,et al. Preferences-based approach for TRIZ contradiction matrix exploitation in preliminary design[J]. FME Transactions,2020,48(3):588-599.
[8] 赵芮凯, 张建辉, 王学瑞,等. 基于Petri网和TRIZ的复杂技术系统多冲突问题求解[J]. 机械设计,2020,37(6):29-37. ZHAO Ruikai,ZHANG Jianhui,WANG Xuerui,et al. Solving multiple conflicts of systems with complex technologies based on Petri net and TRIZ[J]. Journal of Machine Design,2020,37(6):29-37.
[9] 韦子辉,檀润华. 产品设计中多冲突问题解决过程研究[J]. 中国机械工程,2010,21(3):263-267. WEI Zihui, TAN Runhua. Research on the multi-contradictions problems solving in product design[J]. China Mechanical Engineering,2010,21(3):263-267.
[10] WANG J,ZHANG J,RUI L. Multi-flow problem mining of complex electromechanical system based on flow analysis[C]//International Conference on Mechanical Design,2017:433-454.
[11] 梁瑞,檀润华,张建辉. 技术进化引导的多冲突混合信息求解过程模型[J]. 机械工程学报,2020,56(21):219-230. LIANG Rui,TAN Runhua,ZHANG Jianhui. Multi-contradiction mixed information solving process model guided by the technological evolution[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2020,56(21):219-230.
[12] 杨洪超,张建辉,梁金豹,等. 面向多冲突网络求解的产品创新设计过程模型[J]. 机械设计,2014,31(4):11-17. YANG Hongchao,ZHANG Jianhui,LIANG Jinbao,et al. Product innovation design process model oriented multi-contradiction network solving[J]. Journal of Machine Design,2014,31(4):11-17.
[13] 马力辉. 面向多冲突问题的TRIZ关键技术研究[D]. 天津:河北工业大学,2007. MA Lihui. Research on TRIZ key technology for multi-contradictions[D]. Tianjin:Hebei University of Technology,2007.
[14] 孙建广,李浩宇,王康,等. 面向跨学科的问题流网络转化过程模型[J]. 计算机集成制造系统,2022,28(2):584-600. SUN Jianguang,LI Haoyu,WANG Kang,et al. Problem flow network transformation process model oriented to inter-discipline[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems,2022,28(2):584-600.
[15] 张建辉,梁瑞,韩波,等. 面向复杂产品的问题流网络构建及求解过程模型[J]. 机械工程学报,2018,54(23):160-173. ZHANG Jianhui,LIANG Rui,HAN Bo,et al. The problem flow network building and solving process model for complex product[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2018,54(23):160-173.
[16] FIORINESCHI L,FRILLICI F S,RISSONE P. A comparison of classical TRIZ and OTSM-TRIZ in dealing with complex problems[J]. Procedia Engineering,2015,131:86-94.
[17] 佐藤允一. 问题解决术[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010. SATO Y. Problem solving[M]. Beijing:China Renmin University Press,2010.
[18] SUH N P. Designing-in of quality through axiomatic design[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability,1995,44(2):256-264.
[19] LOK A. Combination of hidden customer needs tools and MPV to generate product concept[C]. Proceedings of the MATRIZ,2016:93-107.
[20] 张付英,姜向敏,王宏浩. 基于模糊理论的QFD用户需求分析方法研究[J]. 天津科技大学学报,2017,32(1):56-61. ZHANG Fuying,JIANG Xiangmin,WANG Honghao. Analysis method of customer requirements for QFD based on fuzzy theory[J]. Journal of Tianjin University of Science & Technology,2017,32(1):56-61.
[21] 罗保峰,王清贤,朱俊虎,等. 一种基于三角模糊数及层次分析法的评估指标权重确定方法[J]. 电信技术研究,2013(6):9-16. LUO Baofeng,WANG Qingxian,ZHU Junhu,et al. A method for determining weight of evaluation index based on triangular fuzzy number and analytic hierarchy process[J]. Research on Telecommunication Technology,2013(6):9-16.
[22] 檀润华. TRIZ及应用技术创新过程与方法[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2010. TAN Runhua. TRIZ and application:the technological innovation process and the method[M]. Beijing:Higher Education Press,2010.
[23] 冯雁霞,杨伯军,高雨,等. 面向性能需求的系统问题分析及确定方法研究[J]. 机械设计与研究,2020,36(1):11-16+21. FENG Yanxia,YANG Bojun,GAO Yu,et al. Research on system problem analysis and determination method oriented to performance requirements[J]. Machine Design & Research,2020,36(1):11-16+21.
[24] 牛晓伟. 困难功能元的发现与求解方法研究及其在勒紧打结器设计中的应用[D]. 天津:河北工业大学,2018. NIU Xiaowei. Research on the discovery and solution method of difficult functional elements and its application in the design of knotter[D]. Tianjin:Hebei University of Technology,2018.
[25] 覃孟黎. 5why分析法在质量管理中的应用及实例研究[J]. 现代工业经济和信息化,2018,8(8):92-93+97. QIN Mengli. Application of 5why analysis method in quality management and case study[J]. Modern Industrial Economy and Informationization,2018,8(8):92-93+97.
[26] 檀润华,苑彩云,曹国忠,等. 反向鱼骨图下的现有产品功能模型建立[J]. 工程设计学报,2003,10(4):197-201. TAN Runhua,YUAN Caiyun,CAO Guozhong,et al. Function model for products existed using reverse fishbone[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design,2003,10(4):197-201.
[27] 吴凡超. 机电产品需求获取和概念设计研究[D]. 杭州:杭州电子科技大学,2016. WU Fanchao. Research on requirements acquisition and conceptual design of mechanical and electrical products[D]. Hangzhou:Hangzhou Dianzi University,2016.
[28] PAHL G,BEITZ W. Engineering design[M]. Berlin:Spinger-Verlag,1996.
[29] KAPLAN S,VISNEPOLSCHI S,ZLOTIN B. New tools for failure and risk analysis:Anticipatory Failure Determination (AFD) and theory of scenario structuring[M]. Southfield:Ideation International Inc,2005.
[30] 韦子辉,檀润华,孙建广,等. 基于TRIZ的AFD失效分析方法[J]. 工程设计学报,2007,14(5):354-358. WEI Zihui,TAN Runhua,SUN Jianguang,et al. Research on AFD failure analysis method based on TRIZ[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design,2007,14(5):354-358.
[31] LI Y,CHU X,CHU D,et al. An integrated module partition approach for complex products and systems based on weighted complex networks[J]. International Journal of Production Research,2014,52(15):4608-4622.

复杂技术系统隐性冲突求解路径规划方法

Path Planning Method for Solving Implicit Contradiction for Complex Technical System

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	白仲航, 邓暄, 于菲, 刘智光, 李晓阳. 面向系统资源挖掘的FBS与发明原理辅助裁剪创新方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(15): 255-266.
[2]	梁瑞, 檀润华, 张建辉. 技术进化引导的多冲突混合信息求解过程模型[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(21): 219-230.
[3]	白仲航, 张珊, 于菲, 檀润华. 标准解辅助多层次系统资源衍生的裁剪方法研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(11): 108-120.
[4]	杨友胜, 唐顺军, 王晓东, 冯辅周. 基于TRIZ理论的深海水液压电磁阀[J]. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(16): 205-212.
[5]	张建辉, 梁瑞, 韩波, 檀润华, 孙建广. 面向复杂产品的问题流网络构建及求解过程模型[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(23): 160-173.
[6]	刘晓敏, 黄水平, 陈智钦, 罗祥. 基于TRIZ与AD的海草夹苗机械手概念创新设计及可靠性研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(5): 40-46.
[7]	鲍宏, 刘志峰, 胡迪, 柯庆镝, 张城. 应用TRIZ的主动再制造绿色创新设计研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(5): 33-39.
[8]	刘龙繁, 李彦, 马金龙, 杜晓娇, 刘红围. 基于知识粒度的TRIZ在创新设计中的应用[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(5): 22-32.
[9]	夏文涵, 王凯, 李彦, 熊艳. 基于TRIZ的管道机器人自适应检测模块创新设计[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(5): 58-67.
[10]	刘江南, 姜光, 卢伟健, 张晓东. TRIZ工具集用于驱动产品创新及生态设计方法研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(5): 12-21.
[11]	张鹏, 董娅凡, 张换高, 张建辉, 檀润华. 设计过程复杂性理论与TRIZ理论集成复杂机电系统功能分解过程模型^*[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(23): 17-24.
[12]	刘晓敏, 黄水平, 王建辉, 林贵杰. 基于TRIZ及功能类比的产品概念设计创新^*[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(23): 34-42.
[13]	罗晨王欣苏春吴泽. 基于案例推理的夹具设计案例表示与检索[J]. 机械工程学报, 2015, 51(7): 136-143.
[14]	王静秋, 王晓雷. 表面织构创新设计的研究回顾及展望[J]. 机械工程学报, 2015, 51(23): 84-95.
[15]	于菲, 刘芳, 檀润华, 刘智光. TRIZ辅助多层次裁剪方法集构建[J]. 机械工程学报, 2015, 51(21): 156-164.