动车组车下设备对舒适度的影响分析

doi:10.3901/JME.2020.22.227

机械工程学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (22): 227-236.doi: 10.3901/JME.2020.22.227

扫码分享

动车组车下设备对舒适度的影响分析

郭金莹^1,2, 石怀龙¹, 邬平波¹, 王静²

1. 西南交通大学牵引动力国家重点实验室成都 610031;
2. 成都工业学院汽车与交通学院成都 611730

收稿日期:2019-12-08 修回日期:2020-03-19 出版日期:2020-11-20 发布日期:2020-12-31
通讯作者: 石怀龙(通信作者),男,1986年出生,博士,助理研究员。主要研究方向为车辆系统动力学。E-mail:shi@swjtu.edu.cn
作者简介:郭金莹,女,1987年出生,博士研究生。主要研究方向为车辆系统动力学。E-mail:guojy@my.swjtu.edu.cn;邬平波,男,1968年出生,博士,研究员,博士研究生导师。主要研究方向为车辆系统动力学与结构可靠性。E-mail:wupingbo@163.com;王静,女,1986年出生,讲师。主要研究方向为机械系统设计。E-mail:523750917@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（51805451，11790282）。

Influence of Car Body-suspended Equipment on the Ride Comfort of High-speed Railway Vehicles

GUO Jinying^1,2, SHI Huailong¹, WU Pingbo¹, WANG Jing²

1. State Key Laboratory of Traction Power, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031;
2. School of Automobile and Transportation, Chengdu Technological University, Chengdu 611730

Received:2019-12-08 Revised:2020-03-19 Online:2020-11-20 Published:2020-12-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究车下设备对动车组舒适度的影响，建立考虑车体弹性和多个车下设备的高速动车组垂向动力学模型，实现设备的质量参数、结构参数和悬挂参数等参数化建模，基于频域分析法推导系统加速度频响函数表达式，采用随机轨道不平顺激励功率谱和舒适度滤波函数计算舒适度指标，基于最优同调理论设计设备的最优悬挂频率和阻尼比并进行数值验证。结果表明，车体垂弯频率越高、设备质量越大且越靠近车体中心安装，舒适度指标越小，车辆乘坐舒适性越好，建议将大质量设备（4 t及以上）悬挂在距车体中心5 m以内；设备质心纵向偏心导致其吊挂点的作用力力臂改变和转动惯量增加，造成舒适度指标略有增加；在优化设备悬挂参数时，可以忽略车体结构阻尼的影响；设备质量越大，最优悬挂频率越低、最优悬挂阻尼比越大，且应当基于加速度响应设计最优悬挂阻尼比，最优同调条件为车体和设备的相位差接近π/2；针对所述车辆，设备最优悬挂频率和阻尼比分别为7 Hz和0.2~0.3，车体加速度功率谱中的弹性振动主频得到充分抑制。

关键词: 高速列车, 车下设备, 柔性车体, 耦合振动, 悬挂参数, 舒适度

Abstract: A parametric vertical dynamic model of a high-speed railway vehicle with a flexible car body and car body-suspended equipment is built to study the influence of suspension parameters of equipment on the ride comfort, in which the equipment mass, geometry and suspension parameters are represented by variable quantities. The frequency response function of car body acceleration is derived through frequency domain analysis method, and the ride comfort index is calculated using random track irregularity spectrum and ride comfort filtering function, and numerical simulation verifies the proposed optimal suspension frequency and damping ratio of the equipment obtained from the optimal homology theory. It shows that the comfort index gets smaller with a higher first bending frequency of car body, a larger mass of the equipment or a closer equipment installation position to the center of the car body. Thus, the equipment which has a mass more than 4 t should be suspended no further than 5 m away from the car body center for good ride comfort. The longitude eccentricity of the equipment changes the force arms of the suspension points, and increases its inertia as well, resulting in a small increment of the ride comfort index. The structural damping of the car body has almost no effect on the optimal suspension parameters. The larger the mass of equipment, the lower the optimal suspension frequency and the larger the optimal suspension ratio. In addition, the optimal suspension parameters relies on the acceleration response rather than the displacement response. The optimal homology requires that the phase difference between the car body and equipment accelerations is close to π/2. For the specific vehicle in this work, the optimal suspension frequency of the equipment is 7 Hz with an optimized ratio of 0.2-0.3, which significantly restrains the power spectrum peak of acceleration on the car body.

Key words: high-speed train, car body-suspended equipment, flexible car body, coupling vibration, suspension parameters, ride comfort

中图分类号:

U270

郭金莹, 石怀龙, 邬平波, 王静. 动车组车下设备对舒适度的影响分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(22): 227-236.

GUO Jinying, SHI Huailong, WU Pingbo, WANG Jing. Influence of Car Body-suspended Equipment on the Ride Comfort of High-speed Railway Vehicles[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 56(22): 227-236.

参考文献

[1] SHI H,WU P. Flexible vibration analysis for car body of high-speed EMU[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology,2016,30(1):55-66.
[2] WEI L,ZENG J,CHI M,et al. Carbody elastic vibrations of high-speed vehicles caused by bogie hunting instability[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2017,55(9):1321-1342.
[3] SCHANDL G,LUGNER P,BENATZKY C,et al. Comfort enhancement by an active vibration reduction system for a flexible railway car body[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2007,45(9):835-847.
[4] HOLST C. Active damping of carbody vibrations[D]. Stockholm:Royal Institute of Technology,1998.
[5] TAKIGAMI T,TOMIOKA T. Bending vibration suppression of railway vehicle carbody with piezoelectric elements[J]. Journal of Mechanical Systems for Transpor-tation and Logistics,2008,1(1):111-121.
[6] 黄彩虹,曾京. 基于约束阻尼层的高速客车车体弯曲振动的抑[J]. 交通运输工程学报,2010,10(1):36-42. HUANG Caihong,ZENG Jing. Flexural vibration suppression of car body for high-speed passenger car based on constrained damping layers[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering,2010,10(1):36-42.
[7] 曾京,罗仁. 考虑车体弹性效应的铁道客车系统振动分析[J]. 铁道学报,2007,29(6):19-25. ZENG Jing,LUO Ren. Vibration analysis of railway passenger car systems by considering flexible carbody effect[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society,2007,29(6):19-25.
[8] 周劲松,张伟,孙文静,等. 铁道车辆弹性车体动力吸振器减振分析[J]. 中国铁道科学,2009,30(3):86-90. ZHOU Jinsong,ZHANG Wei,SUN Wenjing,et al. Vibration reduction analysis of the dynamic vibration absorber on the flexible carbody of railway vehicles[J]. China Railway Science,2009,30(3):86-90.
[9] 吴会超,邬平波,曾京,等. 车下设备对车体振动的影响[J]. 交通运输工程学报,2012,12(5):50-56. WU Huichao,WU Pingbo,ZENG Jing,et al. Influence of equipment under car on carbody vibration[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering,2012,12(5):50-56.
[10] 石怀龙,罗仁,邬平波,等. 基于动力吸振原理的动车组车下设备悬挂参数设计[J]. 机械工程学报,2014,50(14):155-161. SHI Huailong,LUO Ren,WU Pingbo,et al. Suspension parameters designing of equipment for electric multiple units based on dynamic vibration absorber theory[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2014,50(14):155-161.
[11] SHI H,LUO R,WU P,et al. Application of DVA theory in vibration reduction of carbody with suspended equipment for high-speed EMU[J]. Science China Techno-logical Sciences,2014,57(7):1425-1438.
[12] 宫岛,周劲松,孙文静,等. 高速列车车下设备模态匹配及试验研究[J]. 铁道学报,2014,36(10):13-20. GONG Dao,ZHOU Jinsong,SUN Wenjing,et al. Modal matching between suspended equipment and car body of a high-speed railway vehicle and in-situ experiment[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society,2014,36(10):13-20.
[13] WANG J,SONG C,WU P,et al. Wheel reprofiling interval optimization based on dynamic behavior evolution for high speed trains[J]. Wear,2016,366-367:316-324.
[14] 汪群生,曾京,罗光兵,等. 车轮磨耗下车下悬吊系统振动特性研究[J]. 机械工程学报,2016,52(10):113-118. WANG Qunsheng,ZENG Jing,LUO Guangbing,et al. Study on vibration behavior of carbody underneath suspended systems under wheel profile wear[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2016,52(10):113-118.
[15] 李凡松,王建斌,石怀龙,等. 动车组车体异常弹性振动原因及抑制措施研究[J]. 机械工程学报,2019,55(12):178-188. LI Fansong,WANG Jianbin,SHI Huailong,et al. Research on causes and countermeasures of abnormal flexible vibration of car body for electric multiple units[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2019,55(12):178-188.
[16] 翟婉明. 车辆-轨道耦合动力学[M]. 4版. 北京:科学出版社,2015. ZHAI Wanming. Vehicle-track coupled dynamics[M]. 4th ed. Beijing:Science Press,2015.
[17] European committee for standardization. EN 12299. Railway applications ride comfort for passengers measurement and evaluation[S]. Brussel:European committee for standardization CEN,2009.
[18] Traction and rolling stock committee,International Union of Railways. UIC 513. Guidelines for evaluating passenger comfort in relation to vibration in railway vehicle[S]. Paris:Traction and Rolling Stock Committee of International Union of Railways,1994.
[19] DUMITRIU M. A new passive approach to reducing the carbody vertical bending vibration of railway vehicles[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2017,55(11):1787-1806.
[20] 丁文镜. 减振理论[M]. 2版. 北京:清华大学出版社,2014. DING Wenjing. Vibration reduction[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press,2014.
[21] 背户一登. 动力吸振器及其应用[M]. 北京:机械工业出版社,2013. KAZUTO Seto.Dynamic vibration absorber and its applition[M].Beijing:China Machine Press,2013.
[22] GUO J,SHI H,LUO R,et al. Parametric analysis of the car-body suspended equipment for railway vehicles vibration reduction[J]. IEEE Access,2019,7:88116-88125.

动车组车下设备对舒适度的影响分析

Influence of Car Body-suspended Equipment on the Ride Comfort of High-speed Railway Vehicles

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	柳明, 张捷, 高阳, 蒋文杰, 肖新标. 隧道内高速列车车内噪声特性及声源识别试验分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(8): 207-215.
[2]	蔡路, 张继业, 李田. 高速列车设备舱格栅通风性能仿真分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(4): 143-150.
[3]	汪群生, 曾京, 朱彬, 吴一, 王勇. 基于最优控制理论的高速列车车下悬吊系统半主动悬挂[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(4): 160-167.
[4]	于梦阁, 李海庆, 刘加利, 李田. 强风雨环境下高速列车空气动力学性能研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(4): 185-192.
[5]	贾永兴, 景璟, 梅元贵. 单列高速列车通过隧道空气阻力数值模拟研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(4): 193-200.
[6]	贺小龙, 罗天洪, 王盛学, 伍国果, 唐帮备, 汪群生. 高速列车牵引电机冷却风机悬挂参数选择[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(4): 201-208.
[7]	丁军君, 杨九河, 胡静涛, 李芾. 高速列车车轮多边形磨耗演变行为[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(22): 184-189.
[8]	杨晟, 李凡松, 石怀龙, 邬平波. 车体垂弯振型节点位置对其弹性振动的影响[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(22): 210-218.
[9]	窦伟元, 张乐乐, 张海峰, 刘长青. 基于刚柔耦合动力学模型的高速列车铸铝横梁应力状态分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(2): 138-144.
[10]	吴越, 韩健, 左齐宇, 金学松, 肖新标, 梁树林. 钢轨波磨对高速列车车轮多边形磨耗产生与发展的影响[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(17): 198-208.
[11]	金学松, 吴越, 梁树林, 温泽峰, 吴兴文, 王平. 高速列车车轮多边形磨耗、机理、影响和对策分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(16): 118-136.
[12]	朱剑月, 吕苏, 陈力, 沈哲. 高速列车底部流动特性分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(12): 133-143.
[13]	梅元贵, 马瑶, 王雷. 山区高速列车车体动态气密性阈值特征的数值模拟研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(12): 196-206.
[14]	张乐, 李田, 蔡路, 张继业, 安超. 雪粒参数对高速列车转向架区域雪粒堆积的影响[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(10): 216-224.
[15]	张骞, 孟宪洪, 凌烈鹏, 高芒芒, 于梦阁. 重载铁路大跨度钢桁梁桥复合材料轨枕适应性[J]. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(8): 145-153.