Cognition Philosophy Logic and Design Evaluation of Intelligent Interaction

doi:10.3901/JME.2023.11.031

Abstract

Abstract: Intelligent technology, products and system are becoming increasingly important in industry and life, which reshapes the way people perceive and reform the world. Based on the perspective of cognition philosophy and technology phenomenology, the complex interaction between human beings and intelligent objects is analyzed. The philosophy logic approach from paradigm of computer and representation to embodied cognition is explored. Combing with the technological mediation theory which describes the embodiment, hermeneutic, background and alterity relationship of “Human-Technology-World”, the intelligent field structure and interaction model which describes “Human-Intelligent Artifacts-Context” is established, and the embodied, embedded, extended and generative cognitive theories contained in typical human-intelligent artifacts interaction situation are analyzed. Intelligent interaction design elements are extracted to build a multidimensional index system from the philosophical perspectives of “embodied cognition, function realization and situation value”. Wearable intelligent artifacts are taken as an example, and the importance of design index is evaluated based on fuzzy comprehensive analysis. The construction of interaction field model with the body as the core, intelligent objects as the intermediary, and gradually extended to the environment, provides internal cognitive philosophical logic support for the development of new intelligent interaction design and evaluation methods in the era of artificial intelligence.

Key words: intelligent interaction, philosophy of cognition, technical design, field model, design evaluation

CLC Number:

TB472

XU Jiang, SUN Gang, XU Jingyu, SU Pujie, MIAO Qiyang. Cognition Philosophy Logic and Design Evaluation of Intelligent Interaction[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 59(11): 31-42.

References

[1] AARTS E，MARZANO S. The new everyday:views on ambient intelligence[M]. Rotterdam:010 Publishers，2003.
[2] ZHOU J， ZHOU Y，WANG B，et al. Human-cyber-phy- sical systems in the context of new-generation intelligent manufacturing[J]. Engineering，2019，5(4):624-636.
[3] 路甬祥，陈鹰. 人机一体化系统科学体系和关键技术[J]. 机械工程学报，1995，31(1):1-7.LU Yongxiang，CHEN Ying. Academic architecture and key techniques of the humachine system[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering，1995，31(1):1-7.
[4] SABOU M，KANTOROVITCH J，NIKOLOV A，et al. Position paper on realizing smart products:challenges for semantic Web technologies[C]// SSN'09 Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Semantic Sensor Networks-Volume 522，CEUR-WS.org，2009.
[5] MÜHLHÄUSER M. Smart products:an introduction[J]. Communications in Computer & Information Science，2007(11):158-164.
[6] ALTER S. Making sense of smartness in the context of smart devices and smart systems[J]. Information Systems Frontiers，2020，22:381-393.
[7] DOURISH P. What we talk about when we talk about context[J]. Personal & Ubiquitous Computing，2004，8(1):19-30.
[8] CARROLL J. Becoming social:expanding scenario-based approaches in HCI[J]. Behaviour & Information Technology，1996，15(4):266-275.
[9] VERBEEK P P . Materializing morality:design ethics and technological mediation[J]. Science，Technology and Human Values，2006，31(3):361-380.
[10] VERBEEK P P. What things do:philosophical reflections on technology，agency，and design[M]. State College:Penn State University Press，2005.
[11] LATOUR B. On technical mediation:philosophy，sociology，genealogy[J]. Common Knowledge，1994(3):29-64.
[12] HARRISON S，SENGERS P，TATAR D. Making epistemological trouble:third-paradigm HCI as successor science[J]. Interacting with Computers，2011，23(5):385-392.
[13] DOURISH P. Where the action is:the foundations of embodied interaction[M]. Cambridge:MIT Press，2001.
[14] VARELA F J，THOMPSON E，ROSCH E. The embodied mind[M]. Cambridge:The MIT Press，1991.
[15] 魏屹东. 认知哲学手册[M]. 北京:科学出版社，2020.WEI Yidong. Handbook of philosophy of cognition[M]. Beijing:Science Press，2020.
[16] GALLAGHER S. Enactivist interventions:rethinking the mind[M]. New York:Oxford University Press，2017.
[17] HEIDEGGER M. Being and time[M]. New York:State University of New York Press，1996.
[18] MERLEAU-PONTY M. Phenomenology of perception [M]. London:Routledge，2002.
[19] PUTNAM H. Mind，language，and reality[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press，1975.
[20] DENNETT D C. The intentional stance[M]. Cambridge:The MIT Press，1987.
[21] JACKENDOFF R. Consciousness and the computational mind[M]. Cambridge:The MIT Press，1987.
[22] THAGART P. Mind-introduction to cognitive science[M]. London:Psychology Press，2005.
[23] 李建会. 心灵的形式化及其挑战:认知科学的哲学[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社，2017.LI Jianhui. Formalization of mind and its challenges:the philosophy of cognitive science [M]. Beijing:China Social Sciences Press，2017.
[24] WALTER S. Situated cognition:a field guide to some open conceptual and ontological issues[J]. Review of Philosophy & Psychology，2014，5(2):241-263.
[25] FOGLIA L ，WILSON R A . Embodied cognition[J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science，2013，4(3):319-325.
[26] LAKOFF G，JOHNSON M. Metaphors we live by[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press，1980.
[27] BROOKS R．Intelligence without reason[C]// Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1，1991:568-595.
[28] WILSON M. Six views of embodied cognition[J]. Psychological Bulletin and Review，2002，9(4):625-636.
[29] CLANCEY W. Situated cognition:on human knowledge and computer representations[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press，1997.
[30] BROWN J S，COLLINS A，DUGUID P. Situated cognition and the culture of learning[J]. Educational Researcher，1989，18(1):32-42.
[31] NORMAN D A . Cognition in the head and in the world:introduction to a debate on situated cognition[J]. Cognitive Science，1993，17(1):1-6.
[32] 李建会. 论布鲁克斯的无表征智能理论[J]. 自然辩证法研究，2007(7):9-13.LI Jianhui. On Rodney Brooks' theory of intelligence without representation[J]. Studies in Dialectics of Nature，2007(7):9-13.
[33] CLARK A，CHALMERS D J. The extended mind[J]. Analysis，1998，58(1):7-19.
[34] ROWLANDS M. The new science of the mind:From extended mind to embodied phenomenology[M]. Cambridge:The MIT Press，2010.
[35] NOÉ A. Action in perception[M]. Cambridge:The MIT Press，2004.
[36] SHAPIRO L. Embodied cognition[M]. London:Routledge，2010.
[37] MITCHAM C. Thinking through technology:the path between engineering and philosophy [M]. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press，1994.
[38] 杨又，吴国林. 智能人工物的意向性分析[J]. 科学技术哲学研究，2019，36(2):65-71.YANG You，WU Guolin. The analysis of the intention of intelligent artifact[J]. Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology，2019，36(2):65-71.
[39] IHDE D. Technology and the lifeworld:from garden to earth[M]. Bloomington:Indiana University Press，1990.
[40] VERBEEK P P. Cyborg intentionality:rethinking the phenomenology of human-technology relations[J]. Phenomenology & the Cognitive Sciences，2008，7(3):387-395.
[41] 徐江. 知识图谱视角下的设计元研究管窥[J]. 装饰，2019(10):48-53.XU Jiang. Restricted view on design meta- research from the perspective of knowledge graph[J]. Zhuang-shi，2019(10):48-53.
[42] 蒋中港. 设计研究的技术哲学进路——基于文献计量分析视角[D]. 上海:同济大学，2022.JIANG Zhonggang. The approach of philosophy of technology in design research—based on the perspective of bibliometric analysis[D]. Shanghai:Tongji University，2022.
[43] FRANCÉS ML，MORER P ，RODRÍGUEZ M I，et al. Wearable design requirements identification and evaluation[J]. Sensors，2020，20(9):2599.