• CN:11-2187/TH
  • ISSN:0577-6686

机械工程学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (4): 164-173.doi: 10.3901/JME.2021.04.164

• 运载工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

扫码分享

旋转对阻尼车轮降噪效果的影响分析

葛帅1, 成功1, 圣小珍1,2, 史佳伟1   

  1. 1. 西南交通大学牵引动力国家重点实验室 成都 610031;
    2. 上海工程技术大学城市轨道交通学院 上海 201620
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-15 修回日期:2020-06-20 出版日期:2021-02-20 发布日期:2021-04-28
  • 通讯作者: 圣小珍(通信作者),男,1962年出生,博士,"千人计划"特聘教授,博士研究生导师。主要研究方向为铁路振动噪声,环境振动。E-mail:shengxiaozhen@hotmail.com
  • 作者简介:葛帅,男,1996年出生。主要研究方向为铁路振动噪声。E-mail:1151033256@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划战略性国际科技创新合作重点专项(2016YFE0205200)、国家自然科学基金委员会-中国国家铁路集团有限公司高速铁路基础研究联合基金(U1834201)和西南交通大学牵引动力国家重点实验室自主课题(2017TPL_T01)资助项目。

Analysis of the Influence of Rotation on the Noise Reduction Effect of Damped Wheels

GE Shuai1, CHENG Gong1, SHENG Xiaozhen1,2, SHI Jiawei1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Traction Power, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031;
    2. School of Urban Railway Transportation, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620
  • Received:2020-01-15 Revised:2020-06-20 Online:2021-02-20 Published:2021-04-28

摘要: 轮轨噪声是铁路噪声的主要组成部分,而车轮辐射噪声是轮轨噪声的重要来源。因此,开发低噪声车轮是降低铁路噪声的重点之一。以我国某直辐板高速列车车轮为基体,设计9种阻尼车轮,利用2.5维有限元法和2.5维声学边界元法考虑车轮旋转对包括标准车轮在内的共10种车轮进行振动声辐射计算。研究结果表明,在径向轮轨力激励下,考虑车轮旋转得到的车轮辐射声功率级总是大于未考虑旋转时的结果,最大相差3.55 dBA,并且是否考虑车轮旋转甚至会得到相反的降噪结论;约束阻尼车轮的最佳降噪效果要优于自由阻尼车轮的最佳降噪效果;对于相同形式的约束阻尼车轮,采用钢质约束层的降噪效果要优于铝质约束层;在车轮辐板单侧粘贴3 mm厚的钢质约束层和3 mm厚的阻尼层时降噪效果最好,且在辐板内、外侧粘贴效果相当,总的降噪效果达4.3 dBA;约束阻尼层主要是通过抑制单位轮轨力下车轮的1节圆模态振动在发挥降噪作用,而所引起的轮轨力变化发挥的作用有限。

关键词: 阻尼车轮, 旋转, 2.5维有限元法, 2.5维声学边界元法, 振动声辐射, 降噪机理

Abstract: Wheel/rail noise is a dominant component of railway noise, and sound radiation from the wheel is one of the main contributors to wheel/rail noise. Therefore, developing low-noise wheels is the key to reduce railway noise. Based on a straight web wheel used on high-speed trains in China, nine damped wheels are generated using 9 different damping layer designs. Vibrations and sound radiations of 10 wheels (9 damped wheels plus 1 standard wheel) subject to the radial wheel/rail force are calculated by using the 2.5-dimensional finite element method (2.5D FEM) and the 2.5-dimensional acoustic boundary element method (2.5D BEM). For comparison, results are produced for the wheels in rotation as well as not in rotation. Results show that the sound power level of a wheel with rotation considered is always higher than that if the rotation is omitted, and the maximum difference is 3.55 dBA for the cases considered. It is found that results predicted without considering wheel rotation may be misleading. The best noise reduction achieved by the constrained layer damped wheels is better than that by the free layer damped wheels. For a given design of constrained layer damped wheel, using steel as the constrained layer is much better than using aluminum. Among the 9 designs, the one with a damping layer of 3 mm thickness and a steel constrained layer of the same thickness pasted on one side of wheel web performs the best, achieving 4.3 dBA in terms of noise reduction; placing the constrained damping layer on the other side of the wheel web does not make much difference. The noise reduction is achieved mainly by suppressing the vibration of the 1-circle number mode of the wheel under unit wheel/rail force, and the effect caused by the change in wheel-rail force is insignificant.

Key words: damped wheel, rotation, 2.5D FEM, 2.5D BEM, vibration and sound radiation, noise reduction mechanism

中图分类号: