基于轮廓法的金刚石线锯整周三维表面形貌测量和评价

doi:10.3901/JME.2019.20.107

机械工程学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (20): 107-115.doi: 10.3901/JME.2019.20.107

• 仪器科学与技术 • 上一篇

基于轮廓法的金刚石线锯整周三维表面形貌测量和评价

李振宇^1,2, 崔长彩^1,3, 黄辉^1,3, 徐西鹏^1,3

1. 华侨大学制造工程研究院厦门 361021;
2. 集美大学轮机工程学院厦门 361021;
3. 福建省脆性材料智能制造技术工程研究中心厦门 361201

收稿日期:2018-12-20 修回日期:2019-06-05 发布日期:2020-01-07
通讯作者: 崔长彩(通信作者),女,1972年出生,博士,教授,博士研究生导师。主要研究方向为几何量精密测量技术,优化算法理论与应用。E-mail:cuichc@hqu.edu.cn
作者简介:李振宇,男,1977年出生,博士研究生。主要研究方向为精密仪器测量技术。E-mail:lzy_2002cn@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金"促进海峡两岸科技合作联合基金"资助项目（U1805251）。

Measurement and Evaluation of Full Circumferential Three-dimensional Surface Topography of Diamond Wire Saw Based on Contour Method

LI Zhenyu^1,2, CUI Changcai^1,3, HUANG Hui^1,3, XU Xipeng^1,3

1. Institute of Manufacturing Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021;
2. School of Marine Engineering, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021;
3. Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Brittle Materials Intelligent Manufacturing, Xiamen 361021

Received:2018-12-20 Revised:2019-06-05 Published:2020-01-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对毫米级尺度线径和微米级尺度磨粒的金刚石线锯整周三维表面形貌测量难以实现与定量评价问题，提出一种基于轮廓法的圆周扫描表面磨粒形貌测量与分析方法。通过显微测量系统沿周向扫描采集金刚石线锯对应的边缘轮廓图像序列，经图像处理后获得金刚石线锯整个圆周表面形貌的坐标点云，采用三次样条插值法对数据进行平滑处理，经圆柱坐标变换处理，可重构金刚石线锯三维表面形貌。在金刚石线锯常用评价参数基础上，提出基于扫描过程二维投影轮廓和三维重构形貌的综合评价参数。采用自行研制的测量系统，对两个规格的线锯（线径外径分别为0.250 mm、0.320 mm；磨粒粒径范围30~40 μm）进行测量和评价。试验结果表明：该方法无需多次拼接，就可完成金刚石线锯整周三维微观形貌测量，并能实现对线锯特征参数的全面评价，可为线锯本身制造及使用过程中的工艺优化提供更加客观的基础数据。

关键词: 金刚石线锯, 表面形貌, 轮廓法, 测量评价

Abstract: Aiming at measuring and quantitatively evaluating the full circumferential three-dimensional surface topography of millimetric scale diamond wire saw and micro scale abrasive, a surface circumferential scanning method based on microscopic images contours is proposed. First, Point cloud data is obtained by processing sequential scanning microscopic contour images of diamond wire saw. Then the spatial coordinates of point cloud data are obtained, and three-dimensional surface topography are reconstructed by using cubic spline interpolation and coordinate transformation. Besides the common evaluation parameters of diamond wire saw, more evaluation parameters are defined on the basis of the 2D projection contours and 3Dreconstructed surface topography. Based on the self-developed measurement system, two wire saws (diameters 0.250 mm and 0.320 mm; grains diameter in the range of 30-40 μm) are measured and evaluated. Experimental results indicate that the proposed method can be used to measure the full circumferential three-dimensional surface topography of diamond wire saw without multiple stitching, and comprehensively evaluate wire saws using the characteristic parameters, which provide useful objective basic data for the manufacturing and the process optimization of wire saws.

Key words: diamond wire saw, surface topography, contour measurement method, evaluation

中图分类号:

TG156

李振宇, 崔长彩, 黄辉, 徐西鹏. 基于轮廓法的金刚石线锯整周三维表面形貌测量和评价[J]. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(20): 107-115.

LI Zhenyu, CUI Changcai, HUANG Hui, XU Xipeng. Measurement and Evaluation of Full Circumferential Three-dimensional Surface Topography of Diamond Wire Saw Based on Contour Method[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 55(20): 107-115.

参考文献

[1] WU H. Wire sawing technology:A state-of-the-art review[J]. Precision Engineering,2016,43:1-9.
[2] 李伦,李淑娟,汤奥斐,等. 金刚石线锯横向超声振动切割SiC单晶表面粗糙度预测[J]. 机械工程学报,2016,52(19):204-212. LI Lun,LI Shujuan,TANG Aofei,et al. Surface roughness prediction of SiC monocrystalline cut by diamond wire-saw excited by transverse ultrasonic vibration[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2016,52(19):204-212.
[3] 高玉飞,葛培琪,毕文波,等. KDP晶体金刚石线锯切割表面缺陷分析[J].人工晶体学报,2013,42(7):1278-1282. GAO Yufei,GE Peiqi,BI Wenbo. Study on surface of KDP crystal sawed by diamond wire saw[J]. Journal of Synthetic Crystals,2013,42(7):1278-1282.
[4] WANG P,GE P,GAO Y,et al. Prediction of sawing force for single-crystal silicon carbide with fixed abrasive diamond wire saw[J]. Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing,2017,63:25-32.
[5] TEOMETE E. Wire saw process-induced surface damage characterization[J]. Arabian Journal Forence & Engineering,2013,38(5):1209-1215.
[6] SCHWINDER S,BERG M,KUNERT M. New potential for reduction of kerf loss and wire consumption in multi-wire sawing[J]. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells,2015,136:44-47.
[7] KUMAR A,KAMINSKI S,MELKOTE S N,et al. Effect of wear of diamond wire on surface morphology,roughness and subsurface damage of silicon wafers[J]. Wear,2016,364-365:163-168.
[8] 万容兵,赵涛,刘伟. 金刚线磨粒密度及分布的检测方法及装置:中国,CN102890039A[P]. 2013-01-23. WAN Rongbing,ZHAO Tao,LIU Wei. Defects detection on surface of diamond wire saw:China,CN102890039A[P]. 2013-01-23.
[9] 金刚石线锯表面缺陷质量图像视觉检测系统[EB/OL].[2017-06-03]. http://cn.trustexporter.com/cp-a975061684/o4068251.htm. Defects detection on surface of diamond wire saw based on image and vision detection system[EB/OL].[2017-06-03]. http://cn.trustexporter.com/cp-a975061684/o4068251.htm.
[10] EINAR L. Production monitoring and quality control of thin diamond wire[EB/OL].[2015-04-25]. http://www.anglosterling.com/presentation/diamond_wire/01diamond_wire.shtml.
[11] LEE S,KIM H,KIM D,et al. Investigation on diamond wire break-in and its effects on cutting performance in multi-wire sawing[J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2016,87(1-4):1-8.
[12] 霍凤伟,郭东明,金洙吉,等. 细粒度金刚石砂轮形貌测量与评价[J]. 机械工程学报,2007,43(10):108-113. HOU Fengwei,GUO Dongming,JIN Zhuji,et al. Measurement and evaluation of the surface topography of fine diamond grinding wheel[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2007,43(10):108-113.
[13] 崔长彩,余卿,张遨,等. 金刚石砂轮表面形貌测量系统[J]. 光学精密工程,2014,22(12):3167-3174. CUI Changcai,YU Qing,ZHANG Ao,et al. Measurement system of surface topography for diamond grinding wheel[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering,2014,22(12):3167-3174.
[14] 沈金华. 激光共聚焦信号处理及控制技术的研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2010. SHEN Jinhua. Research on laser confocal signal acquisition and control technology[D]. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology,2010.
[15] 杨维. 基于聚焦形貌恢复的3D表面粗糙度测量[D]. 绵阳:西南科技大学,2015. YANG Wei. 3D surface roughness measurement using shape from focus[D]. Mianyang:Southwest University of Science and Technology,2015.
[16] 周朗明,张小虎,关棒磊. 基于序列轮廓线的凸面目标全自动重构方法[J]. 自动化学报,2015,41(4):725-734. ZHOU Langming,ZHANG Xiaohu,GUAN Banglei. An automatic reconstruction method of convex object on sequence contours[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica,2015,41(4):725-734.
[17] 黎培培. 轮廓法三维形貌测量研究[D]. 济南:山东大学,2015. LI Peipei. The study of 3-D measurement by profile method[D]. Jinan:Shandong University,2015.
[18] 周波,毛剑波. 金刚石线锯质量检验[J]. 金刚石与磨料磨具工程,2017(2):73-77. ZHOU Bo,MAO Jianbo. Quality inspection method for diamond saw[J]. Diamond & Abrasives Engineering,2017(2):73-77.

基于轮廓法的金刚石线锯整周三维表面形貌测量和评价

Measurement and Evaluation of Full Circumferential Three-dimensional Surface Topography of Diamond Wire Saw Based on Contour Method

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	梁志强, 黄迪青, 周天丰, 李宏伟, 刘心藜, 王西彬, 张国振, 王洪臣. 螺旋伞齿轮磨削表面形貌仿真与试验研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(3): 191-198.
[2]	严益, 晏嘉陵, 刘明星, 李丹, 刘川, 褚巧玲. 多次切割轮廓法测试局部补焊厚板内部残余应力分布[J]. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(18): 28-35.
[3]	胡松涛, 黄伟峰, 史熙, 彭志科, 刘向锋. 基于双高斯分层表面理论的机械密封研究综述[J]. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(1): 91-105.
[4]	李直, 陈剑, 沈锦龙, 刘焜. 线接触滚/滑状态下表面形貌的弹性变形研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(5): 142-148.
[5]	商维, 张沭玥, 郭俊, 刘启跃, 王文健. 基于虚拟砂轮建模的钢轨打磨材料去除仿真研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(4): 30-36.
[6]	陈旭斌, 葛翔, 祝毅, 杨华勇. 选择性激光熔化零件微观结构及摩擦学性能研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(3): 63-72.
[7]	李直, 陈剑, 沈锦龙, 刘焜. 基于双盘试验的齿面时变摩擦特性研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(3): 73-81.
[8]	王艳, 李德蔺, 刘建国, 宋红林, 彭水平, 汪锐. 基于动态轮廓采样法的轴向超声振动辅助磨削工件表面形貌预测与试验验证[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(21): 221-230.
[9]	董永亨, 李淑娟, 李言, 李鹏阳, 杨振朝, 辛彬. 球头铣刀余摆线加工表面形貌的建模与仿真研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(19): 212-223.
[10]	尤媛, 李洪波, 夏春雨, 孔宁, 张杰, 贾生晖. 冷轧毛化工作辊表面粗糙度衰减过程的试验与数学模型研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(12): 173-183.
[11]	董永亨, 李淑娟, 李言, 李鹏阳, 杨振朝. 基于改进Z-MAP算法的球头铣刀加工表面形貌仿真与试验研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2017, 53(23): 197-208.
[12]	李磊涛, 郑晓亚. 一种瞬态接触热导数值模拟方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(6): 174-180.
[13]	胡兆稳, 刘焜, 刘小君, 王伟. 静态接触中表面纹理对塑性变形界面微凸体平坦化的影响[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(3): 93-100.
[14]	李伦, 李淑娟, 汤奥斐, 李言. 横向超声振动对金刚石线锯切割硬脆材料锯切力及临界切削深度的影响[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(3): 187-196.
[15]	李伦, 李淑娟, 汤奥斐, 李言, 杨明顺. 金刚石线锯横向超声振动切割SiC单晶表面粗糙度预测^*[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(19): 204-212.