基于解析有限元的齿根裂纹时变啮合刚度计算方法

doi:10.3901/JME.2018.23.056

机械工程学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (23): 56-62.doi: 10.3901/JME.2018.23.056

基于解析有限元的齿根裂纹时变啮合刚度计算方法

吴家腾, 杨宇, 程军圣

湖南大学汽车车身先进设计制造国家重点实验室长沙 410082

收稿日期:2017-10-27 修回日期:2018-06-01 出版日期:2018-12-05 发布日期:2018-12-05
通讯作者: 杨宇(通信作者),女,1971年生,博士,教授。主要研究方向为机械设备状态监测及故障诊断。E-mail:yangyu@hnu.edu.cn
作者简介:吴家腾,男,1990年生,博士研究生。主要研究方向为设备状态监测及故障诊断。E-mail:Jiat_wu@126.com;程军圣,男,1968年生,博士,教授。主要研究方向为机械设备状态监测及故障诊断。E-mail:signalp@tom.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划（2016YFF0203400）、国家自然科学基金（51575168，51375152）、智能型新能源汽车国家2011协同创新中心和湖南省绿色汽车2011协同创新中心资助项目。

The Time-varying Mesh Stiffness Calculation for Gear Tooth Crack based on Analytical-finite Element Method

WU Jiateng, YANG Yu, CHENG Junsheng

State key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacture for Vehicle Body, Hunan University, Changsha 410082

Received:2017-10-27 Revised:2018-06-01 Online:2018-12-05 Published:2018-12-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 当齿轮发生故障时，时变啮合刚度的变化能够反映齿轮故障特征大小。因此，时变啮合刚度在齿轮传动过程中是一个重要的动力学参数。提出一种新的齿根裂纹啮合刚度计算方法，即解析有限元法（Analytical-finite element method，A-FM）。考虑到齿轮发生故障时，啮合刚度解析模型计算精度较低，将应力强度因子引入裂纹齿轮的啮合刚度计算过程。首先定义应力强度因子与啮合刚度之间的关系，通过建立齿轮接触模型计算裂纹尖端附近的应力强度因子，然后将计算结果替代解析模型中故障刚度部分。由于应力强度因子能够敏感地识别齿根裂纹的局部微小变化，故该方法相比于解析法具有更高的计算精度，相比于有限元法具备更快的计算效率。同时，建立6自由度动力学模型，通过对其振动响应进行分析，仿真结果验证了所提方法的可行性。

关键词: 动力学建模, 解析有限元法, 时变啮合刚度, 应力强度因子

Abstract: The time-varying meshing stiffness variation can reflect the size of gear fault feature when the gear fault occurs. Therefore, the time-varying meshing stiffness is an important dynamic parameter in the process of gear transmission. A novel tooth crack meshing stiffness calculation method namely analytical-finite element method (A-FM) is presented. Considering the calculation accuracy of the analytical model of the meshing stiffness is low when the gear fault occurs, the stress intensity factor is introduced into the calculation of the meshing stiffness of the cracked gear in this paper. First of all, define the relationship between the stress intensity factors and the meshing stiffness, calculate the stress intensity factor near the crack tip by means of establish the gear contact model, then replace the part of fault stiffness in the analytical model with calculation result. This method is more accurate compare with analytical method and more effective compare with finite element method due to the stress intensity factor is sensitive to small local changes in the tooth root crack. Simultaneously, the six-degree of freedom dynamic model is established. Through the analysis of vibration response, the simulation results verify the feasibility of the proposed method.

Key words: analytical-finite element method, dynamical modeling, stress intensity factor, time-varying mesh stiffness

中图分类号:

TN911
TH113

吴家腾, 杨宇, 程军圣. 基于解析有限元的齿根裂纹时变啮合刚度计算方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(23): 56-62.

WU Jiateng, YANG Yu, CHENG Junsheng. The Time-varying Mesh Stiffness Calculation for Gear Tooth Crack based on Analytical-finite Element Method[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 54(23): 56-62.

参考文献

[1] WU S Y,ZUO M J. Simulation of spur gear dynamics and estimation of fault growth[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration,2008,317(3):608-624.
[2] 万志国,訾艳阳,曹宏瑞,等. 时变啮合刚度算法修正与齿根裂纹动力学建模[J]. 机械工程学报,2013,49(11):153-160. WAN Zhiguo,ZI Yanyang,CAO Hongrui,et al. Time-varying mesh stiffness algorithm correction and tooth crack dynamic modeling[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2013,49(11):153-160.
[3] PANDYA Y,PAREY A. Experimental investigation of spur gear tooth mesh stiffness in the presence of crack using photoelasticity technique[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis,2013,34:488-500.
[4] SONG X,HOWARD I. Dynamic modelling of flexibly supported gears using iterative convergence of tooth mesh stiffness[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing,2016,80:460-481.
[5] CHEN Z G,ZHAI W M,SHAO Y M,et al. Analytical model for mesh stiffness calculation of spur gear pair with non-uniformly distributed tooth root crack[J].Engineering Failure Analysis,2016,66:502-514.
[6] LIANG X H,ZUO M J,LIU L B. A windowing and mapping strategy for gear tooth fault detection of a planetary gearbox[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing,2016,80:445-459.
[7] MA H,PANG X,FENG R J,et al. Fault features analysis of cracked gear considering the effects of the extended tooth contact[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis,2015,48:105-120.
[8] MOHAMMED O D,RANTATALO M,AIDANPÄÄ J-O. Dynamic modelling of a one-stage spur gear system and vibration-based tooth crack detection analysis[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing,2015,54-55:293-305.
[9] WANG Z G,CAO H R,ZI Y Y,et al. An improved time-varying mesh stiffness algorithm and dynamic modeling of gear-rotor system with tooth root crack[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis,2014,42:155-177.
[10] MA H,SONG R Z,PANG X,et al. Time-varying mesh stiffness calculation of cracked spur gears[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis,2014,44:179-194.
[11] CHAARI F,FAKHFAKH T,HADDAR M. Analytical modeling of spur gear tooth crack and influence on gearmesh stiffness[J]. European Journal of Mechanics-A/Solids,2009,28:461-468.
[12] PAMAS L,ÖMER G,BILIR E T. Strain gage methods for measurement of opening mode stress intensity factor[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics,1996,55(3):485-492.

[1]	蒋建东, 章恩光, 赵颖娣, 李聪聪, 乔欣. 盾构刀盘振动掘削动力学建模与仿真研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(5): 113-120.
[2]	张建华, 许晓林, 刘璇, 张明路. 双臂协调机器人相对动力学建模[J]. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(3): 34-42.
[3]	刘静, 吴昊, 邵毅敏, 师志峰. 考虑内圈挡边表面波纹度的圆锥滚子轴承振动特征研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(8): 26-34.
[4]	周素霞, 赵兴晗, 孙晨龙, 孙锐. 动车组铸钢制动盘裂纹扩展寿命预测[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(24): 154-159.
[5]	钟斌, 李雪伍, 于正洋, 张传伟. 304不锈钢棒气动式可控旋弯下料工艺及试验[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(22): 47-54.
[6]	贺屹, 蔡力勋, 陈辉. 基于能量等效原理的K因子、柔度统一模型[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(14): 98-106.
[7]	刘凯, 龚建伟, 陈舒平, 张玉, 陈慧岩. 高速无人驾驶车辆最优运动规划与控制的动力学建模分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(14): 141-151.
[8]	訾斌, 周斌, 钱森. 双台汽车起重机柔索并联装备变幅运动下的动力学建模与分析^*[J]. 机械工程学报, 2017, 53(7): 55-61.
[9]	陈新, 姜永军, 谭宇韬, 高健, 杨志军, 刘冠峰, 贺云波, 王晗, 李泽湘. 面向电子封装装备制造的若干关键技术研究及应用^*[J]. 机械工程学报, 2017, 53(5): 181-189.
[10]	张明, 江志农, 朱俊, 高金吉. 整体齿轮压缩机复杂系统临界负荷故障现象及机理研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2017, 53(23): 20-25.
[11]	张慧博, 田健, 周峻, 赵阳, 游斌弟. 多间隙耦合齿轮转子系统动力学与试验研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2017, 53(11): 29-37.
[12]	山显雷, 程刚. 考虑关节摩擦的3SPS+1PS并联机构显式动力学建模研究^*[J]. 机械工程学报, 2017, 53(1): 28-35.
[13]	李永泉, 宋肇经, 郭, 菲, 单张兵, 张立杰. 多能域过约束并联机器人系统动力学建模方法^*[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(21): 17-25.
[14]	石晓玲, 李强, 宋占勋, 杨广雪. 高速列车锻钢制动盘热疲劳裂纹耦合扩展特性研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(10): 126-132.
[15]	卢超, 杨雪娟, 戴翔, 常俊杰. 钢轨中导波传播模式的半解析有限元分析与实验测量[J]. 机械工程学报, 2015, 51(6): 79-86.

基于解析有限元的齿根裂纹时变啮合刚度计算方法

The Time-varying Mesh Stiffness Calculation for Gear Tooth Crack based on Analytical-finite Element Method

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价