高速列车减振器新型活塞结构研发及仿真试验

doi:10.3901/JME.2018.12.086

机械工程学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (12): 86-92.doi: 10.3901/JME.2018.12.086

• 特邀专栏：大国重器：复兴之路上的轨道交通技术 • 上一篇下一篇

高速列车减振器新型活塞结构研发及仿真试验

周素霞^1,2, 孙晨龙^1,2, 王成国³, 罗金良⁴, 宫涛⁵

1. 北京建筑大学机电与车辆工程学院北京 100044;
2. 北京建筑大学城市轨道交通车辆服役性能保障北京市重点实验室北京 100044;
3. 中国铁道科学研究院铁道科学技术研究发展中心北京 100081;
4. 山东凌博瑞轨道交通科技有限公司菏泽 274000;
5. 北京铁路局车辆处北京 100860

收稿日期:2017-07-20 修回日期:2017-12-25 出版日期:2018-06-20 发布日期:2018-06-20
作者简介:周素霞,女,1971年出生。博士,副教授。主要研究方向为车辆结构的疲劳与断裂、金属材料的微观损伤及车辆动力学。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划资助项目（2016YFB1200402-002）。

Research and Simulation Experiment of New Type Piston Structure for High-speed Train Damper

ZHOU Suxia^1,2, SUN Chenlong^1,2, WANG Chengguo³, LUO Jinliang⁴, GONG Tao⁵

1. Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, School of Mechanical-Electronic and Vehicle Engineering;
2. Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Urban Rail Transit Vehicle Service Performance Guarantee Key Laboratory of Beijing, Beijing 100044;
3. Railway Science & Technology Research & Development Center, China Academy of Railway Science, Beijing 100081;
4. Shandong LingBoRui Railway Transportation Technology Co., Ltd., Heze 274000;
5. Rolling Stock Department of Beijing Railway Bureau, Beijing 100860

Received:2017-07-20 Revised:2017-12-25 Online:2018-06-20 Published:2018-06-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为实现高速列车关键零部件国产化，结合高速列车对减振器的性能要求及运行环境，对高速列车CRH380BL二系横向减振器的活塞结构进行了创新设计。应用三维设计软件SolidWorks完成减振器新型活塞结构设计，新型活塞结构具有更优秀的工作特性和工艺可控性。在MSC.Easy5环境下建立减振器的液压控制模型，通过减振器性能的仿真测试，完成新型活塞结构参数优选。将减振器试验台的测试结果与仿真数据进行对比分析，减振器仿真性能测试与试验结果基本吻合。结果表明：采用新型活塞结构减振器的压缩力值、复原力值以及不对称率等基本参数满足动车组油压减振器技术条件；减振器液压模型具有良好的仿真精确度；创新设计的液压减振器活塞满足设计需要和工作要求。

关键词: 高速列车, 减振器活塞结构, 减振器数字设计, 液压控制模型

Abstract: In order to realize the localization of high speed train key components,combined with the performance requirements that high-speed train on the shock absorber and operating environment, an innovative design is developed for the piston structure of the CRH380BL secondary lateral damper. Three-dimensional design software SolidWorks is used to complete the new piston structure design of damper. The new type piston structure has better working characteristics and process controllability. In the MSC. Easy5 environment, hydraulic control model of shock absorber is established. Through the simulation test of shock absorber performance, the structural parameters preferred of new type piston are completed. The test results and simulation data are compared and analyzed, and the simulation results are consistent with the test results. The results show that using the basic parameters such as the compression force, the restoring force and the asymmetric rate of shock absorber of new type piston structure can satisfy the technical requirements for hydraulic damper of EMU. Hydraulic model of shock absorber has good simulation accuracy. The innovative design of hydraulic shock absorber piston meets design and work requirements.

Key words: damper piston structure, digital design of damper, high speed train, hydraulic control model

中图分类号:

U270

周素霞, 孙晨龙, 王成国, 罗金良, 宫涛. 高速列车减振器新型活塞结构研发及仿真试验[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(12): 86-92.

ZHOU Suxia, SUN Chenlong, WANG Chengguo, LUO Jinliang, GONG Tao. Research and Simulation Experiment of New Type Piston Structure for High-speed Train Damper[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 54(12): 86-92.

参考文献

[1] RICHARD V K,WANG Chengguo,QIAN Lixin,et al. A new shock absorber model for use in vehicle dynamics studies[J]. Vehicle System Dynamic,2005,43(9):613-631.
[2] 周长城. 汽车液压筒式减振器设计及理论[M]. 北京:北京理工大学,2012. ZHOU Changcheng. Design and theory of automotive hydraulic shock absorber[M]. Beijing:Beijing Institute of Technology,2012.
[3] 周长城,顾亮. 筒式减振器叠加节流阀片开度与特性试验[J]. 机械工程学报,2007,43(6):210-215. ZHOU Changcheng,GU Liang. Superposition Throttle-slices opening size and characteristic test of telescope-damper[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2007,43(6):210-215.
[4] 李同杰,王娟,孙启国,等. 高速列车油压减振器动力学特性研究[J]. 铁道机车车辆,1998,26(6):9-12. LI Tongjie,WANG Juan,SUN,Qiguo,et al. Study on dynamic characteristics of absorber[J]. Railway Locomotive & Car,1998,26(6):9-12.
[5] RICHARD van K,QIAN Lixin,WANG Chengguo,et,al. A new shock absorber for using[J]. Vehicle System Dynamic,2005,43(9):613-631.
[6] RICHARD van K,WANG Chengguo,QIAN Lixin,et,al. A new shock absorber model with an application in vehicle dynamics studies[C]//SAE International Truck and Bus Meeting and Exhibition. Fort Worth,TX:Society Automotive Engineers,2003:105-111.
[7] 周素霞,秦震,孙晨龙,等. 抗蛇行减振器常见故障对高速列车动力学性能的影响[J]. 北京交通大学学报,2017,41(1):85-91. ZHOU Suxia,QIN Zhen,SUN Chenlong,et al. Study on anti-yaw damper fault characteristics and its effect on high-speed train vehicle dynamics[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University,2017,41(1):85-91.
[8] 肖乾,李清华,王成国,等. 铁道车辆液压减振器结构参数对其阻尼特性影响研究[J]. 铁道学报,2014,36(10):21-27. XIAO Qian,LI Qinghua,WANG Chengguo,et al. Research on influence of railway vehicle hydraulic shock absorber structure parameters on damping characteristic[J]. Journal of the railway Society,2014,36(10):21-27.
[9] 周长城,顾亮,王丽. 节流阀片弯曲与变形系数[J]. 北京理工大学学报,2006,26(7):581-584. ZHOU Changcheng,GU Liang,WANG Li,Bending deformation and coefficient of throttle-slice[J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology,2006,26(7):581-584
[10] RICHARD van Kasteel,钱立新,王成国,等. 铁道车辆液压减振器的工作原理和数字模型[J]. 铁道学报,2005,27(2):28-34. Richard van Kasteel,QIAN Lixin,WANG Chengguo,etal. Study on working principle and numerical model of shock absorber used in railway vehicles[J]. Journal of the railway Society,2005,27(2):28-34
[11] 山东凌博瑞轨道交通科技有限公司. 液压减振器和活塞组件[P]. 中国:ZL 201620155571.7,2016.3.1. Shandong ling borui rail transit technology co.,ltd. Hydraulic shock absorber and piston assembly[P]. China:ZL 201620155571.7,2016.3.1.
[12] 山东凌博瑞轨道交通科技有限公司. 液压减振器活塞[P]. 中国:ZL 201730145167.1,2017.09.08. Shandong ling borui rail transit technology co.,ltd. Hydraulic shock absorber piston[P]. China:ZL 201730145167.1,2017.09.08.
[13] 周建新,陈北平. 基于easy5和ADAMS的双筒式液压减振器扫频研究[J]. 机床与液压,2009,37(12):186-188. ZHOU Jianxin,CHEN Beiping. Research on frequency sweep of the twin-tube hydraulic absorber using EASY5 and ADMAMS[J]. Machine Tool & Hydraulics,2009,37(12):186-188.
[14] 肖乾,李清华,王成国,等. 铁道车辆液压减振器联合仿真[J]. 机床与液压,2014,42(11):1-4. XIAO Qian,LI Qinghua,WANG Chengguo,etal. Construction of railway vehicle hydraulic damper co-simulation model and experimental verification[J]. Machine Tool & Hydraulics,2014,42(11):1-4.
[15] 中华人民共和国铁道部.动车组油压减振器暂行技术条件:TJ/CL 284-2014[S]. 北京:中国铁道出版社,2014. The ministry of railways of people's republic of China. Temporary technical conditions of hydraulic shock absorbers for EMUs:TJ/CL 284-2014[S]. Beijing:China Railway Press,2014.

高速列车减振器新型活塞结构研发及仿真试验

Research and Simulation Experiment of New Type Piston Structure for High-speed Train Damper

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	朱剑月, 雷震宇, 李莉. 高速列车轮对气动噪声特性分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(14): 69-79.
[2]	彭丹丹, 刘志亮, 靳亚强, 秦勇. 基于软筛分停止准则的改进经验模态分解及其在旋转机械故障诊断中的应用[J]. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(10): 122-132.
[3]	于曰伟, 周长城, 赵雷雷. 高速列车转向架-车体-座椅垂向耦合振动机理及悬挂参数联合优化[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(8): 57-67.
[4]	吴越, 韩健, 刘佳, 梁树林, 金学松. 高速列车车轮多边形磨耗对轮轨力和转向架振动行为的影响[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(4): 37-46.
[5]	金学松, 赵国堂, 梁树林, 陶功权, 崔大宾, 温泽峰. 高速铁路轮轨磨损特征、机理、影响和对策——车轮踏面横向磨耗[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(4): 3-13.
[6]	张业, 孙振旭, 姚永芳, 刘雯, 杨国伟, 郭迪龙. 典型路基结构对高速列车横风气动特性影响分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(4): 186-195.
[7]	于梦阁, 张骞, 刘加利, 张继业. 随机风环境下高速列车运行安全评估研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(4): 245-254.
[8]	肖乾, 方姣, 杨逸航, 昌超. 不同温湿度对高速列车车轮磨耗的影响分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(4): 14-21.
[9]	张玉梅, 王瑞乾, 李晔, 李明, 温泽峰, 肖新标. 高速列车车窗隔声量研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(4): 212-221.
[10]	孙艳红, 张捷, 韩健, 高阳, 肖新标. 高速列车风道传声特性及其优化设计[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(24): 129-137.
[11]	霍卿, 梅元贵. 轨道对高速列车气动阻力特性的影响分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(16): 152-159.
[12]	李晔, 王瑞乾, 徐秋婷, 王加政, 张学飞, 褚玉霞. 基于心理声学的高速列车车内噪声预测及选材方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(12): 78-85.
[13]	张涛, 李强, 王曦, 王斌杰. 高速列车齿轮箱箱体在位模态识别[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(12): 31-41.
[14]	张亚东, 韩璐, 李明, 张继业. 高速列车受电弓气动噪声降噪^*[J]. 机械工程学报, 2017, 53(6): 94-101.
[15]	卢耀辉, 张醒, 张舒翔, 曾京, 党林媛. 高速列车车体加速寿命试验载荷谱编制及分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2017, 53(24): 151-160.